Skip to main content
Log in

Responses of Hazelnut Trees to Organic and Conventional Managements in the Dryland

Wie reagieren Haselnusssträucher im ökologischen und konventionellen Anbau in Trockengebieten

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Erwerbs-Obstbau Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hazelnut trees (Corylus avellana L.) give yields without any more reduction under dryland. However, it is not known how plant water status and gas exchanges response to organic management under the dryland. In an attempt to answer this question, such responses, which are leaf water potential (LWP), stomatal conductance (gs) and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of hazelnut trees, were studied under organic and conventional managements in the dryland conditions. It was also investigated possible effects of those parameters on organic and conventional hazelnut trees vs. SWC and atmospheric stress (i. e., air vapour pressure deficit-VPD). Organic hazelnut trees had slightly higher ET and yield, and lower SWC than conventional hazelnut trees. However, generally, slightly higher LWP and gs values were obtained for conventional hazelnut trees while the value of VPD was higher in organic hazelnut orchards. LWP, PAR, gs response to SWC and VPD and relationships between each others were generally imperceptibly higher in organic hazelnut trees than conventional hazelnut trees but no stronger responses and relationships. Plant canopy measurements were mostly parallel with the results obtained values of ET, yield, SWC and VPD. Precipitation during the year influenced both hazelnut orchards managements to have higher yield and keep life alive. However, it could be emphasized that hazelnut trees under organic and conventional hazelnut managements required supplement irrigation to avoid summer water stress, and for providing fruit fulling and accumulation of reserves for the following year. Finally, it can be conclude that organic farming is a good alternative for hazelnut orchards in dryland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araujo ASF, Santos VB, Monteiro RTR (2008) Responses of soil microbial biomass and activity for practices of organic and conventional farming systems in Piaui state, Brazil. Eur J Soil Biol 44:225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awada T, Josiah S (2007) Physiological responses of four hazelnut hybrids to water availability in Nebraska. Gt Plains Res 17(2):193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Bignami C, Cristofori V, Bertazza G (2011) Effects of Water Availability on Hazelnut Yield and Seed Composition during Fruit Growth. In: Fernández JE, Ferreira MI (eds) XXVIIIth IHC – IS on Water Use in a Changing World. Acta Hort, vol 922. ISHS, Lisbon, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett ES, Van Iersel WM (2008) Morphology and irrigation efficiency of Gaura Lindheimeri grown with capacitance sensor-controlled irrigation. HortScience 43(5):1555–1560

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavero J, Medina ET, Puig M, Martínez-Cob A (2009) Sprinkler irrigation changes maize canopy microclimate and crop water status, transpiration, and temperature. Agron J 101:854–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comstok J, Mencuccini M (1998) Control of stomatal conductance by leaf water potential in Hymenoclea salsola (T and G), a desert subshrub. Plant Cell Environ 21:1029–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristofori V, Muleo R, Bignami C, Rugini E (2014) Long Term Evaluation of Hazelnut Response to Drip Irrigation. In: Grau Beretta P, Ellena M (eds) Proc. VIIIth International Congress on Hazelnut. Acta Hort., vol 1052. ISHS, Temuco City, Chile

    Google Scholar 

  • Dağdelen N, Basal H, Yılmaz E, Gurbuz T, Akcay S (2009) Different drip irrigation treatments affect cotton yield, water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey. Agric Water Manag 96:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalona JM, Flexas J, Medrano H (1999) Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis under water stress in field-grown grapevines. Aust J Plant Physiol 26:421–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanjul L, Jones HG (1982) Rapid stomatal responses to humidity. Planta 154:135–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier E, Berger A (1985) Testing water potential in peach trees as an indicator of water stress. J Hort Sci 60:47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Gispert JR, Ramírez de Cartagena F, Villar JM, Rovira M (2015) Efecto del volumen de suelo húmedo en riego localizado para el cultivo del avellano (Corylus avellana L.). ITEA 111(2):109–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Grantz DA (1990) Plant response to atmospheric humidity. Plant Cell Environ 13:667–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grau P (2009) Manual of European Hazelnut. Bull Inia 195:96 (In Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson CR, Azarenko AN, Potter JR (1996) Photosynthetic rate, flowering, and yield component alteration in hazelnut in response to different light environments. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 121(6):1103–1111

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg EH, Saugier B, Pontailler J‑Y, Black TA, Chen W, Hurdle PA, Wu A (2000) Responses of trembling aspen and hazelnut to vapor pressure deficit in a boreal deciduous forest. Tree Physiol 20:725–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karadeniz T, Bostan SZ, Tuncer C, Tarakçioğlu C (2008) Hazelnut growing. http://www.ezob.org.tr/findik.pdf. Accessed 2 16 (In Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Legates DR, Mahmood R, Levia DF, DeLiberty TD, Quiring S, Houser C, Nelson FE (2011) Soil moisture: A central and unifying theme in physical geography. Prog Phys Geog 35:65–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsal J, Girona J, Mata M (1997) Leaf water relation parameters in almond compared to hazelnut trees during a deficit irrigation period. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 122(4):582–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingeau M, Ameglio T, Pons B, Rousseau P (1994) Effects of water stress on development, growth and yield of hazelnut trees. Acta Horticul Ture 351:305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özmen S (2013) Irrigation water use and water table in Düzce area. Düzce Fre J Sci Technol 1(2013):47–57 (In Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosati A, Metcalf S, Buchner R, Fulton A, Lampinen B (2006) Tree water status and gas exchange in walnut under drought, high temperature and vapor pressure deficit. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 81(3):415–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosati A, Metcalf SG, Buchner RP, Fulton AE, Lampinen BD (2007) Effects of Kaolin application on light absorption and distribution, radiation use efficiency and photosynthesis of almond and walnut canopies. Ann Bot 99:255–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shao HB, Chu LY, Jaleel CA, Zhao CX (2008) Water-deficit stress-induced anatomical changes in higher plants. C R Biol 331(3):215–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale EA, Lampkin NH, Hovi M, Keatinge R, Lennartsson EKM, MacDonald DW, Padel S, Tattersall FH, Wolfe MS, Watson CA (2001) Agronomic and environmental implications of organic farming systems. Adv Agron 70:261–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonello KC, Filho JT (2013) Ecophysiological behavior of Eucalyptus Grandis X Eucalyptus Urophylla, Igarata, Sp – Brazil. Irriga Botucatu 18(1):113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tous J, Girona J, Tasias J (1994) Cultural practices and cost of hazelnut production. Acta Hortic 351:395–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USSL (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. In: Richards LA (ed) Agriculture Hand Book. USDA, Washington, DC., USA, p 60

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Fu BJ, Gao GY, Yao XL, Zhou J (2012) Soil moisture and evapotranspiration of different land cover types in the Loess Plateau. Chinahydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:2883–2892

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks DUBAP (Düzce University Scientific Research Projects: 2013.23.01.131 and 2013.23.01.196) for its financial support of this study. Furthermore, the author thanks Mrs. Yasemin KARSLIOĞLU-who is owner of Karslıoğlu Farm and Mr. Rahmi AYDIN-who is owner of RALILA Gıda Company for opening their farms to search of these studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selçuk Özmen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

S. Özmen declares that he has no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özmen, S. Responses of Hazelnut Trees to Organic and Conventional Managements in the Dryland. Erwerbs-Obstbau 60, 21–30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-017-0334-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-017-0334-x

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation