Skip to main content
Log in

Psychosocial outcome in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (Janz syndrome) and other genetic generalized epilepsies

Psychosoziales Outcome bei juveniler myoklonischer Epilepsie (Janz-Syndrom) und anderen genetisch generalisierten Epilepsien

  • Leitthema – 100 Jahre Dieter Janz
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Epileptologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Genetic generalized epilepsies (GGE) are often accompanied by neuropsychological deficits, mainly frontal dysfunctions and deficits in executive control but also behavioral abnormalities with high impact on individual social outcome. Systematic investigations were carried out on the social outcome and clinical factors that influence the individual course in different aspects of the patient’s life, especially in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), the most common and best studied GGE syndrome to date.

Objectives

This study aimed to describe the neuropsychological deficit profiles and their effects on the psychosocial outcome in JME in comparison with other GGE syndromes. Clinical predictors of individual psychosocial outcome were identified.

Methods

Discussion of original work and reviews as well as expert opinions.

Results

The psychosocial outcome in GGE has been widely investigated focusing on the quality of life and major domains of social life. Syndrome-specific cognitive and behavioral characteristics in GGE—and in particular in JME—essentially determine the clinical and psychosocial outcome. Two main components impact the clinical and psychosocial outcome in JME: syndrome-specific features based on unalterable structural abnormalities of the brain and seizure-related sequelae.

Conclusion

Evidence-based neuropsychological assessment can contribute significantly to avoid negative and irreversible social consequences and should be part of the diagnostic approach for patients with JME and other GGE syndromes. To keep seizure-related influences to a minimum, an appropriate and effective treatment of the epilepsy is mandatory as well as early recognition, treatment, and management of psychiatric symptoms.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Patienten mit genetisch generalisierten Epilepsien (GGE) weisen oft spezifische neuropsychologische Defizite auf, die das psychosoziale Outcome maßgeblich beeinflussen können. Hierzu gehören insbesondere frontale Dysfunktionen und Defizite der kognitiven Kontrolle sowie Störungen des Verhaltens. In systematischen Studien wurden soziale Aspekte sowie klinische Prädiktoren für das soziale Outcome bei Patienten mit juveniler myoklonischer Epilepsie (JME) untersucht, dem häufigsten und bisher am besten untersuchten GGE-Syndrom.

Fragestellung

Ziel der Arbeit war die Darstellung neuropsychologischer Defizitprofile und ihrer Auswirkungen auf das individuelle psychosoziale Outcome bei Patienten mit JME im Vergleich mit anderen GGE-Syndromen. Klinische Prädiktoren für das individuelle psychosoziale Outcome wurden identifiziert.

Material und Methode

Dazu wurden Original- und Übersichtsarbeiten sowie Expertenempfehlungen diskutiert.

Ergebnisse

Bisherige Untersuchungen zum psychosozialen Outcome bei Patienten mit GGE fokussierten auf wesentliche Aspekte des Soziallebens sowie auf die individuelle Lebensqualität. Syndromspezifische kognitive Charakteristika und Verhaltensmerkmale haben insbesondere bei JME wesentlichen Einfluss auf den klinischen und psychosozialen Verlauf. Hierbei spielen 2 wesentliche Komponenten eine entscheidende Rolle: zum einen syndromspezifische Merkmale, die auf strukturellen Veränderungen des Gehirns beruhen und nicht veränderbar sind, und zum anderen anfallsbedingte Folgeerscheinungen.

Schlussfolgerungen

Durch eine evidenzbasierte neuropsychologische Beurteilung können negative und möglicherweise irreversible soziale Auswirkungen für Patienten mit JME und anderen GGE-Syndromen verhindert werden. Um anfallsbedingte Einflüsse auf ein Minimum zu reduzieren, sollte neben der effektiven und frühzeitigen Behandlung der Epilepsie der Fokus maßgeblich auf psychiatrische Komorbiditäten gelegt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Commission on classification and terminology of the International league against epilepsy (1989) Proposal for revised classification of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes. Epilepsia 30:389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hommet C, Sauerwein HC, De Toffol B, Lassonde M (2006) Idiopathic epileptic syndromes and cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:85–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Motamedi G, Meador K (2003) Epilepsy and cognition. Epilepsy Behav 4(Suppl. 2):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aldenkamp A, Arends J (2004) The relative influence of epileptic EEG discharges, short nonconvulsive seizures, and type of epilepsy on cognitive function. Epilepsia 45:54–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Helmstaedter CA (1999) Prediction of memory reserve capacity. Adv Neurol 81:271–279

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. von Podewils F, Geithner J (2015) Idiopathisch generalisierte Epilepsien. Prädiktoren für eine gute Lebensqualität. Z Epileptol 28(2):129–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eddy CM, Rickards HE, Cavanna AE (2011) The cognitive impact of antiepileptic drugs. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 4(6):385–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Witt JA, Helmstaedter C (2017) How can we overcome neuropsychological adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs? Expert Opin Pharmacother 18:551–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Witt JA, Helmstaedter C (2013) Monitoring the cognitive effects of antiepileptic pharmacotherapy–approaching the individual patient. Epilepsy Behav 26(3):450–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Witt JA, Elger CE, Helmstaedter C (2015) Adverse cognitive effects of antiepileptic pharmacotherapy: each additional drug matters. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 25(11):1954–1959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Giorgi FS, Guida M, Caciagli L, Pagni C, Pizzanelli C, Bonanni E, Tognono G, Bonuccelli U (2016) Social cognition in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 128:61–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmitz B, Yacubian EM, Feucht M, Hermann B, Trimble M (2013) Neuropsychology and behavior in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 28:72–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abarrategui B, Parejo-Carbonell B, García García ME, Di Capua D, García-Morales I (2018) The cognitive phenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 89:99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pascalicchio TF, de Araujo Filho GM, da Silva Noffs MH, Lin K, Caboclo LO, Vidal-Dourado M, Ferreira Guilhoto LM, Yacubian EM (2007) Neuropsychological profile of patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: a controlled study of 50 patients. Epilepsy Behav 10(2):234–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moschetta S, Fiore LA, Fuentes D, Gois J, Valente KD (2011) Personality traits in patient with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 21(4):473–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Syvertsen M, Selmer K, Enger U, Nakken KO, Pal DK, Smith A, Koht J (2019) Psychosocial complications in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 90:122–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pung T, Schmitz B (2006) Circadian rhythm and personality profile in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsia 47(Suppl. 2):111–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schneider-von Podewils F, Gasse C, Geithner J, Wang ZI, Bombach P, Berneiser J, Herzer R, Kessler C, Runge U (2014) Clinical predictors of the long-term social outcome and quality of life in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: 20–65 years of follow-up. Epilepsia 55(2):322–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Janz D, Christian W (1957) Impulsiv-Petit mal. Dtsch Z Nervenheilkd 176:346–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Camfield CS, Camfield PR (2009) Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy 25 years after seizure onset. A population-based study. Neurology 73:1041–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moschetta S, Valente KD (2013) Impulsivity and seizure frequency, but not cognitive deficits, impact social adjustment in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsia 54(5):866–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Holtkamp M, Senf P, Kirschbaum A, Janz D (2014) Psychosocial long-term outcome in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsia 55(11):1732–1738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gabriel D, Ventura M, Samões R, Freitas J, Lopes J, Ramalheira J, da Silva AM, Chaves J (2020) Social impairment and stigma in genetic generalized epilepsies. Epilepsy Behav 104:106886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Camfield P, Camfield C (2010) Idiopathic generalized epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures (IGE-GTC): A population-based cohort with 〉20 year follow up for medical and social outcome. Epilepsy Behav 18:61–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Salgado PC, Souza EA (2002) Impact of epilepsy at work: evaluation of quality of life. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 60:442–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Karachristianou S, Katsarou Z, Bostantjopoulou S, Economou A, Garyfallos G, Delinikopoulou E (2008) Personality profile in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 13:654–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Piazinni A, Turner K, Vignoli A, Canger R, Canevini MP (2008) Frontal cognitive dysfunction in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsia 49:657–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Baker GA, Brooks J, Buck D, Jacoby A (2000) The stigma of epilepsy: a european perspective. Epilepsia 41:98–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cengiz GF, Tanik N (2020) Who is more important in stigmatization, family or friends? Epilepsy Behav 104(Pt A):106880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Camfield C, Camfield P, Smith B (2016) Poor versus rich children with epilepsy have the same clinical course and remission rates but a less favorable social outcome: A population-based study with 25 years of follow-up. Epilepsia 57(11):1826–1833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Boylan LS, Flint LA, Labovitz DL, Jackson SC, Starner K, Devinsky O (2004) Depression but not seizure frequency predicts quality of life in treatment resistant epilepsy. Neurology 62:258–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Baker GA, Gagnon D, McNulty P (1998) The relationship between seizure frequency, seizure type and quality of life: findings from three European countries. Epilepsy Res 30:231–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Loring DW, Meador KJ, Lee GP (2004) Determinants of quality of life in epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 5:976–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kwan P, Yu E, Leung H, Leon T, Mychaskiw MA (2009) Association of subjective anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance with quality-of-life ratings in adults with epilepsy. Epilepsia 50:1059–1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim JH, Suh SI, Park SY, Seo WK, Koh I, Koh SB, Seol HY (2012) Microstructural white matter abnormality and frontal cognitive dysfunctions in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsia 53(8):1371–1378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Carol S. Camfield, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix von Podewils MHBA.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

F. von Podewils received honoraria from UCB Pharma, EISAI, and BIAL Pharma that were, however, not associated with this work.

For this article no studies with human participants or animals were performed by any of the authors. All studies performed were in accordance with the ethical standards indicated in each case.

Additional information

This article was written jointly with Carol S. Camfield, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

von Podewils, F. Psychosocial outcome in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (Janz syndrome) and other genetic generalized epilepsies. Z. Epileptol. 33, 151–156 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10309-020-00318-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10309-020-00318-8

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation