Skip to main content
Log in

An MRI-Based Deep Transfer Learning Radiomics Nomogram to Predict Ki-67 Proliferation Index of Meningioma

  • Published:
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to predict Ki-67 proliferation index of meningioma by using a nomogram based on clinical, radiomics, and deep transfer learning (DTL) features. A total of 318 cases were enrolled in the study. The clinical, radiomics, and DTL features were selected to construct models. The calculation of radiomics and DTL score was completed by using selected features and correlation coefficient. The deep transfer learning radiomics (DTLR) nomogram was constructed by selected clinical features, radiomics score, and DTL score. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated. The models were compared by Delong test of AUCs and decision curve analysis (DCA). The features of sex, size, and peritumoral edema were selected to construct clinical model. Seven radiomics features and 15 DTL features were selected. The AUCs of clinical, radiomics, DTL model, and DTLR nomogram were 0.746, 0.75, 0.717, and 0.779 respectively. DTLR nomogram had the highest AUC of 0.779 (95% CI 0.6643–0.8943) with an accuracy rate of 0.734, a sensitivity value of 0.719, and a specificity value of 0.75 in test set. There was no significant difference in AUCs among four models in Delong test. The DTLR nomogram had a larger net benefit than other models across all the threshold probability. The DTLR nomogram had a satisfactory performance in Ki-67 prediction and could be a new evaluation method of meningioma which would be useful in the clinical decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADC:

Apparent diffusion coefficient

AUC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

CI:

Confidence interval

CNN:

Convolutional neural networks

DCA:

Decision curve analysis

DL:

Deep learning

DTL:

Deep transfer learning

DTLR:

Deep transfer learning radiomics

ICC:

Intraclass correlation efficient

LASSO:

Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator

LR:

Logistic regression

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

ROI:

Region of interest

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(8):1231-1251. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Truitt G, Boscia A, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2011–2015 [published correction appears in Neuro Oncol. 2018 Nov 17;:null]. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20(suppl_4):iv1-iv86. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy131

  3. Goldbrunner R, Stavrinou P, Jenkinson MD, et al. EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(11):1821-1834. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rogers L, Barani I, Chamberlain M, et al. Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(1):4-23. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.7.JNS131644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li D, Jiang P, Xu S, et al. Survival impacts of extent of resection and adjuvant radiotherapy for the modern management of high-grade meningiomas. J Neurooncol. 2019;145(1):125-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03278-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Black PM, Villavicencio AT, Rhouddou C, Loeffler JS. Aggressive surgery and focal radiation in the management of meningiomas of the skull base: preservation of function with maintenance of local control. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143(6):555-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010170060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin B, Paesmans M, Mascaux C, et al. Ki-67 expression and patients survival in lung cancer: systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2004;91(12):2018-2025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Berlin A, Castro-Mesta JF, Rodriguez-Romo L, et al. Prognostic role of Ki-67 score in localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol.2017; 35(8):499-506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim MS, Kim KH, Lee EH, et al. Results of immunohistochemical staining for cell cycle regulators predict the recurrence of atypical meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2014; 121(5):1189-1200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oya S, Kawai K, Nakatomi H, Saito N. Significance of Simpson grading system in modern meningioma surgery: integration of the grade with MIB-1 labeling index as a key to predict the recurrence of WHO grade I meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2012; 117(1):121-128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu N, Song SY, Jiang JB, Wang TJ, Yan CX. The prognostic role of Ki-67/MIB-1 in meningioma: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Medicine.2020; 99(9):e18644.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mirian C, Skyrman S, Bartek J Jr, et al. The Ki-67 Proliferation Index as a Marker of Time to Recurrence in Intracranial Meningioma. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(6):1289-1298. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu Y, Liu L, Luan S, Xiong J, Geng D, Yin B. The diagnostic value of texture analysis in predicting WHO grades of meningiomas based on ADC maps: an attempt using decision tree and decision forest. Eur Radiol 2019; 29: 1318–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5632-7

  14. Park YW, Oh J, You SC, et al. Radiomics and machine learning may accurately predict the grade and histological subtype in meningiomas using conventional and diffusion tensor imaging. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(8):4068-4076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5830-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ke C, Chen H, Lv X, et al. Differentiation Between Benign and Nonbenign Meningiomas by Using Texture Analysis From Multiparametric MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;51(6):1810-1820. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan PF, Yan L, Hu TT, et al. The Potential Value of Preoperative MRI Texture and Shape Analysis in Grading Meningiomas: A Preliminary Investigation. Transl Oncol. 2017;10(4):570-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2017.04.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Duan C, Zhou X, Wang J, et al. A radiomics nomogram for predicting the meningioma grade based on enhanced T1WI images. Br J Radiol. 2022;95(1137):20220141. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220141

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Duan CF, Li N, Li Y, et al. Comparison of different radiomic models based on enhanced T1-weighted images to predict the meningioma grade. Clin Radiol. 2022;77(4):e302-e307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2022.01.039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 2016; 278: 563–77. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015151169

  20. Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, et al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1234-1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(4):441-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Khanna O, Fathi Kazerooni A, Farrell CJ, et al. Machine Learning Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomic Feature Analysis to Predict Ki-67 in World Health Organization Grade I Meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 2021;89(5):928-936. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyab307

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao Y, Xu J, Chen B, Cao L, Chen C. Efficient Prediction of Ki-67 Proliferation Index in Meningiomas on MRI: From Traditional Radiological Findings to a Machine Learning Approach. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(15):3637. Published 2022 Jul 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153637

  24. Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA et al (2010) N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:1310–1320

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Depeursinge A, Foncubierta-Rodriguez A, Van De Ville D, Muller H (2014) Three-dimensional solid texture analysis in biomedical imaging: review and opportunities. Med Image Anal 18:176–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bozdağ M, Er A, Ekmekçi S. Association of apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67 proliferation index, progesterone-receptor status and various histopathological parameters, and its utility in predicting the high grade in meningiomas. Acta Radiol. 2021;62(3):401-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185120922142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang Y, Dundamadappa SK, Thangasamy S, et al. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67 proliferation index in grading meningioma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(6):1303-1308. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baskan O, Silav G, Bolukbasi FH, Canoz O, Geyik S, Elmaci I. Relation of apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67 proliferation index in meningiomas. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1057):20140842. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(12):749-762. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT, et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach [published correction appears in Nat Commun. 2014;5:4644. Cavalho, Sara [corrected to Carvalho, Sara]]. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4006. Published 2014 Jun 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5006

  31. Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE, et al. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2017;42:60-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Chongfeng Duan, Nan Li, and Xuejun Liu. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Chongfeng Duan, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuejun Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This is an observational study. The institutional review board of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was not necessary to obtain because the study used MRI images which did not include identifying information.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

• The DTLR nomogram had an AUC of 0.779 (95% CI 0.6643–0.8943) with an accuracy rate of 0.734, a sensitivity value of 0.719, and a specificity value of 0.75.

• The DTLR nomogram had a satisfactory performance in Ki-67 prediction and could be a new evaluation method of meningioma which would be useful in the clinical decision-making.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, C., Hao, D., Cui, J. et al. An MRI-Based Deep Transfer Learning Radiomics Nomogram to Predict Ki-67 Proliferation Index of Meningioma. J Digit Imaging. Inform. med. 37, 510–519 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-023-00937-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-023-00937-3

Keywords

Navigation