Abstract
Research has shown that teachers are able to adapt their processing strategy of student information to situational demands, whereby they flexibly use either an automatic and category-based strategy or a controlled and information-integrating strategy. However, the effect of teachers’ accountability for task and the consistency of student information on strategy use is less clear. In two experimental studies, teachers were presented with consistent and inconsistent student profiles, whereby accountability levels were systematically varied. In the first study, the attention to and memory of information were investigated as indicators of changes in information processing strategy. In the second study, resulting changes in judgement accuracy were investigated. Results of study 1 provided support for the theoretical assumption that people apply the category-based strategy when confronted with consistent information under low accountability conditions, while inconsistent information and high accountability conditions led to the use of information-integration strategy. Results of study 2 showed that teachers’ judgement accuracy generally increased in relation to high accountability conditions and to lesser extent profile consistency, whereby inaccuracy reflected both under- and overestimation of student ability. The combined results suggest that the use of differential information processing strategies not only leads to differences in the attention to and processing of information, but also results in differences in the quality of judgements and decision making, especially under high accountability conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In Germany and Luxembourg, as in several other European countries, entry into secondary school is based on a selection process whereby teachers, together with parents, decide which track would be most suitable for the student.
References
Bamberg, M., Barthelemy, M., Bertemes, J., Besch, E., Boehm, B., Brunner, M., et al. (2010). PISA 2009: Nationaler Bericht Luxemburg. Luxembourg: MENFP-SCRIPT et Université du Luxembourg: EMACS.
Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00004-6.
Bodenhausen, G. V., Macrae, C. N., & Sherman, J. W. (1999). On the dialectics of discrimination: Dual processes in social stereotyping. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 271–290). New York: Guildford Press.
Bonefeld, M., & Dickhäuser, O. (2018). (biased) grading of students’ performance: Students’ names, performance level, and implicit attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology, 9/481(May), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00481.
Bos, W., Voss, A., Lankes, E.-M., Schwippert, K., Thiel, O., & Valtin, R. (2004). Schullaufbahnempfehlungen von Lehrkräften für Kinder am Ende der vierten Jahrgangsstufe [Teachers’ schooltransition deciosns for childern at the end of the 4th Grade]. In W. Bos, E.-M. Lankes, M. Prenzel, K. Schwippert, R. Valtin, & G. Walther (Eds.), IGLU- Einige Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im nationalen und internationalen Vergleich (pp. 191–228). Münster: Waxmann.
Brehmer, B. (1994). The psychology of linear judgment models. Acta Psychologica, 87(2-3), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(94)90048-5.
Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Bromme. (2010). Lehrerexpertise [Teacher expertise]. In W. Schneider & M. Hasselhorn (Eds.), Handbuch der Psychologie: Band 10: Handbuch der Pädagogischen Psychologie (pp. 159–167). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. CHaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York: Guildford.
Dawson, V. L., Zeitz, C. M., & Wright, J. C. (1989). Expert—Novice differences in person perception: Evidence of experts’ sensitivities to the organization of behavior. Social Cognition, 7(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1989.7.1.1.
de Boer, H., Bosker, R. J., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2010). Sustainability of teacher expectation bias effects on long-term student performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017289.
Demaray, M. K., & Elliott, S. N. (1998). Teachers’ judgments of students’ academic functioning: A comparison of actual and predicted performances. School Psychology Quarterly, 13(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088969.
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of computer. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Fazio, R. H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latencies in social psychological research. In C. Hendricks & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Research methods in personality and social psychology: Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 74–97). Newbury Park: Sage.
Fiedler, K., Walther, E., Freytag, P., & Plessner, H. (2002). Judgment biases in a simulated classroom—A cognitive-environmental approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(1), 527–561. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2981.
Figlio, D. N., & Lucas, M. E. (2004). Do high grading standards affect student performance? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9-10), 1815–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00039-2.
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 155–194. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.001103.
Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 357–413). New York: Oxford University Press.
Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model. Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 231–254). New York: Guilford Press.
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). New York: Academic Press.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2010). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture (Internatio). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
Geven, S. A. J., Batruch, A. H., & Van De Werfhorst, H. G. (2018). Inequality in Teacher Judgements , Expectations and Track Recommendations : A Review Study. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Retrieved from https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/33184714/blg_864911.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.
Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.509.
Glock, S., & Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2013). Does nationality matter? The impact of stereotypical expectations on student teachers’ judgments. Social Psychology of Education, 16(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9197-z.
Glock, S., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Klapproth, F., & Böhmer, M. (2012). Improving teachers’ judgments: Accountability affects teachers’ tracking decisions. International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education, 1, 89–98.
Glock, S., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Pit-ten Cate, I. M. (2015). Are school placement recommendations accurate? The effect of students’ ethnicity on teachers’ judgments and recognition memory. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0237-2.
Golding, J. M., Fowler, S. B., Long, D. L., & Latta, H. (1990). Instructions to disregard potentially useful information: The effects of pragmatics on evaluative judgments and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(2), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90073-9.
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). Goal effects on action and cognition. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 361–399). New York: Guilford Press.
Gresch, C., Baumert, J., & Maaz, K. (2009). Empfehlungsstatus, Übergangsemphelung und der Wechsel in die Sekundarstufe I: Bildungsentscheidungen und soziale Ungleichheit [Teachers’ tracking recommendations, their legal status, and the transition to lower secondary education: Educational decisions and social inequality]. In J. Baumert, K. Maaz, & U. Trautwein (Eds.), Bildungsentscheidungen. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, special issue no. 12 (pp. 230–256). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Haberlandt, K. (1994). Methods in reading research. In M. A. Gernsbachet (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 1-31). San Diego: Academic Press.
Hallinan, M. T. (1992). The organization of students for instruction in the middle school. Sociology of Education, 65(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112678.
Hallinan, M. T., & Dame, N. (1996). Track mobility in secondary school. Social Forces, 74(3), 983–1002. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580389.
Harlen, W. (2005). Trusting teachers’ judgement: Research evidence of the reliability and validity of teachers’ assessment used for summative purposes. Research Papers in Education, 20(3), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520500193744.
Hemsley, G. D., & Marmurek, H. H. C. (1982). Person memory: The processing of consistent and inconsistent person information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8(3), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167282083007.
Hoffrage, U., & Reimer, T. (2004). Models of bounded rationality: The approach of fast and frugal heuristics. Management Revue, 15(4), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2004-4-437.
Hoge, R. D., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement : A review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 59(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059003297.
Hörstermann, T., Pit-ten Cate, I. M., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2017). Primacy effects in attention, recall and judgment patterns of simultaneously presented student information: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. In Hughes (Ed.), Student achievement: Perspectives, assessment and improvement strategies (pp. 1–28). Nova Science: Hauppage.
Jarrold, C., Tam, H., Baddeley, A. D., & Harvey, C. E. (2010). The nature and position of processing determines why forgetting occurs in working memory tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17(6), 772–777. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.772.
Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902.
Kaiser, J., Retelsdorf, J., Südkamp, A., & Möller, J. (2013). Achievement and engagement: How student characteristics influence teacher judgments. Learning and Instruction, 28, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.06.001.
Kaiser, J., Südkamp, A., & Möller, J. (2017). The effects of student characteristics on teachers’ judgment accuracy: Disentangling ethnicity, minority status, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 871–888. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000156.
Klapproth, F., Glock, S., Böhmer, M., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Martin, R. (2012). School placement decisions in Luxembourg: Do teachers meet the education Ministry’s standards? The Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 1(special issue), 765–771.
Klapproth, F., Glock, S., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Martin, R., & Böhmer, M. (2013). Prädiktoren der Sekundarschulempfehlung in Luxemburg: Ergebnisse einer large scale Untersuchung [predictors of recommendations for secondary school type in Luxembourg: Results of a large scale study]. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft., 16(2), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-013-0340-1.
Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Böhmer, M., & Gräsel, C. (2009). Verarbeitung schülerbezogener Information als zielgeleiteter Prozess: Der Lehrer als “flexibler Denker” [Goal-directed processing of students’ attributes: The teacher as “flexible thinker”]. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23(34), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.23.34.175.
Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Böhmer, M., & Gräsel, C. (2013). The impact of accountability on teachers’ assessments of student performance: A social cognitive analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 16(2), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9215-9.
Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Hörstermann, T., Glock, S., & Böhmer, I. (2018a). Teachers’ assessments of students’ achievements: The ecological validity of studies using case vignettes. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(4), 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1370686.
Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Pit-ten Cate, I. M., & Hörstermann, T. (2018b). Teachers ’ judgments and decision-making : Studies concerning the transition from primary to secondary education and their implications for teacher education. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, M. Toepper, H. A. Pant, C. Lautenbach, & C. Kuhn (Eds.), Assessment of learning outcomes in higher education – Cross-national comparisons and perspectives (pp. 73–101). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lee, H., Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, C. (1999). Motivated search: Effects of choice accountability, issue involvement, and prior knowledge on information acquisition and use. Journal of Business Research, 45(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00067-8.
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255.
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Bridging individual, interpersonal, and institutional approaches to judgment and decision making: The impact of accountability on cognitive bias. In S. L. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (pp. 431–457). Cambridge: University Press.
Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., Marsh, H. W., & Trautwein, U. (2005). Teacher frame of reference and the big-fish–little-pond effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.10.002.
Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.37.
Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O’Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish–little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6.
McKown, C., & Weinstein, R. S. (2008). Teacher expectations, classroom context, and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46(3), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.05.001.
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background – Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Vol. II). OECD Publishing.. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264091504-en.
Patel, V. L., & Groen, G. J. (1986). Knowledge based solution strategies in medical reasoning. Cognitive Science, 10(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1001_4.
Pietsch, M., & Stubbe, T. C. (2007). Inequality in the transition from primary to secondary school: School choices and educational disparities in Germany. European Educational Research Journal, 6(4), 424–445. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.4.424.
Pit-ten Cate, I. M., & Hörstermann, T. (in press). Akademische profile von Schüler*innen zur Bestimmung der Akkuratheit von Schulübergangsempfehlungen – Eine Validierungsstudie [using students’ academic profiles to determine the accuracy of school transition decision: A validation study]. In S. Glock & H. Kleen (Eds.), Stereotype in der Schule [stereotypes in the school]. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Pit-ten Cate, I. M., & Hörstermann, T. (2012). Towards a criterion to judge the accuracy of transition decisions. Poster presented at the European conference on educational research. Cadiz, Spain.
Pit-ten Cate, I. M., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2016). Accuracy of teachers’ tracking decisions: Short- and long-term effects of accountability. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0259-4.
Santavirta, N., Solovieva, S., & Theorell, T. (2007). The association between job strain and emotional exhaustion in a cohort of 1.028 Finnish teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X92045.
Schalke, D., Brunner, M., Geiser, C., Preckel, F., Keller, U., Spengler, M., & Martin, R. (2013). Stability and change in intelligence from age 12 to age 52: Results from the Luxembourg MAGRIP study. Developmental Psychology, 49(8), 1529–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030623.
Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. (1993). On the origin of intermediate effects in clinical case recall. Memory & Cognition, 21, 338–351.
Schneider, W., & Chein, J. M. (2003). Controlled and automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 27(3), 525–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00011-9.
Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992). Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 217–245). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Renkl, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.004.
Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49(1-2), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90034-S.
Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51(4), 455–498. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051004455.
Sherman, J. W., Lee, A. Y., Bessenoff, G. R., & Frost, L. A. (1998). Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: Encoding flexibility under cognitive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.589.
Southworth, S., & Mickelson, R. A. (2007). The interactive effects of race, gender and school composition on college track placement. Social Forces, 86(2), 497–523. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/86.2.497.
Stangor, C., & McMillan, D. (1992). Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.42.
Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027627.
Südkamp, A., Praetorius, A. K., & Spinath, B. (2018). Teachers’ judgment accuracy concerning consistent and inconsistent student profiles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.016.
Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M., & Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.001.
Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.74.
Tetlock, P. E., & Kim, J. I. (1987). Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 700–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.700.
Timmermans, A. C., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. (2015). Accurate, inaccurate, or biased teacher expectations: Do Dutch teachers differ in their expectations at the end of primary education? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12087.
Tobisch, A., & Dresel, M. (2017). Eye tracking – Ein vielversprechender Zugang zur Erfassung unterschiedlicher Informationsverarbeitungsprozesse bei der Beurteilung einer heterogenen Schülerschaft? [Eyse-tracking: A promosing approach to the assessment of information processing srategies when judging a heterogeneous student group?]. Paper presented at the 5th meeting of the Gesellschaft für Empirische Bildungsforschung (GEBF), Heidelberg.
Urhahne, D., Chao, S.-H., Florineth, M. L., Luttenberger, S., & Paechter, M. (2011). Academic self-concept, learning motivation, and test anxiety of the underestimated student. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X504500.
van Ophuysen, S. (2006). Vergleich diagnostischer Entscheidungen von Novizen und Experten am Beispiel der Schullaufbahnempfehlung [comparison of diagnostic decisions between novices and experts: The example of school career recommendation]. Zeitschrift Für Entwicklungspsychologie Und Pädagogische Psychologie, 38(4), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637.38.4.154.
Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1999). The big-fish-little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 305–329. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0985.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Ulrich Keller for his support in conducting the logistic regression model analysis with completely crossed random intercept effects.
Funding
The research reported in this paper was funded by Grants INTER/DFG/11/03 and C10/LM/784116 from the Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg (FNR) and Grant GR 1863/5-3 from the German Research Foundation (DFG).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Ineke Pit-ten Cate, PhD, studied both experimental Psychology and Pedagogy in the Netherlands and worked clinically and academically in different international settings.
Current themes of research:
Since joining the University in Luxembourg in 2011, she has been involved in teaching and research concerning the diagnostic competence of teachers in regards to judgment of student performance and decisions on educational pathways, especially in consideration of challenges associated with a increasingly heterogeneous student population and the identification of special educational needs.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Krischler, M., & Pit-ten Cate I.M. (2019). Pre- and in-service teachers´ attitudes toward students with learning difficulties and challenging behavior. Frontiers in Psychology-section Educational Psychology, article nr 430021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00327.
Pit-ten Cate, I.M., & Glock, S. (2018). Teacher expectations concerning students with immigrant background or special educational needs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 3–5, (Special Issue: “Pygmalion’s 50th anniversary: The state of the art Teacher Expectation research”), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2018.1550839.
Glock, S., Kovacs, C., & Pit-ten Cate, I.M. (2018, online). Teacher attitudes towards ethnic minority students: Effects of cultural school diversity. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12248.
Pit-ten Cate, I. M., & Glock, S. (2018). Teachers’ attitudes towards students with high- and low-educated parents. Social Psychology of Education, 21, 725–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9436-z.
Pit-ten Cate, I. M., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2016). Accuracy of teachers’ tracking decisions: short- and long-term effects of accountability. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31, 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0259-4.
Thomas Hörstermann, PhD, is a data analyst/statistician at the university of Luxembourg.
Current themes of research:
His research interest concern the application of multivariate approaches to study teachers´ judgment formation and decision making processes.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Hörstermann, T., Pit-ten Cate, I.M., & Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2018). Übergangsentscheidungen in Luxemburg: Die Passung zwischen Leistungs- und Anforderungsniveau und deren Relation zum späteren Lernerfolg. In: Thomas Lentz, Isabell Baumann & Achim Küpper. (Eds),Nationaler Bildungsbericht Luxemburg 2018, (pp. 96–103). Esch-sur-Alzette, LU: Université du Luxembourg (LUCET) & SCRIPT.
Hörstermann, T., Pit-ten Cate, I.M., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2016). Primacy effects in attention, recall and judgment patterns of simultaneously presented student information: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. In: Gary Hughes (Ed), Student achievement: Perspectives, assessment and improvement strategies (chapter 1, pp 1–28). Hauppage, NY: Nova Science. Series Title: Education in a Competitive and Globalizing World
Hörstermann T., Krolak-Schwerdt S. (2014) Comparing regression approaches in modelling compensatory and noncompensatory judgment formation. In: Spiliopoulou M., Schmidt-Thieme L., Janning R. (eds) Data analysis, machine learning and knowledge discovery. Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization (pp 379–387). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01595-8_41.
Hörstermann T., Krolak-Schwerdt S. (2011) Teachers´ typology of student categories. A cluster analytic study.In: Gaul W., Geyer-Schulz A., Schmidt- Thieme L., Kunze J. (eds) Challenges at the interface of data analysis, computer science, and optimization Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization (pp 547–555). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24466-7_56.
Sabine Glock, PhD, is senior researcher at the Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Germany.
Current themes of research:
Her research interests are implicit and explicit cognition in educational psychology contexts.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Kleen, H. & Glock, S. (2018). A further look into ethnicity: The impact of stereotypical expectations on teachers' judgments of female ethnic minority students. Social Psychology of Education, 21, 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9451-0.
Glock, S. & Kleen, H. (2017). Gender and student misbehavior: Evidence from implicit and explicit measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.015
Glock, S. & Klapproth, F. (2017). Bad boys, good girls? Implicit and explicit attitudes toward ethnic minority students among elementary and secondary school teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.04.002.
Glock, S. (2016). Does ethnicity matter? The Impact of stereotypical expectations on in-service teachers' judgments of students. Social Psychology of Education, 19, 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9349-7.
Glock, S. (2016). Stop talking out of turn: The influence of students' gender and ethnicity on preservice teachers' intervention strategies for student misbehavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.012.
Glock, S. & Karbach, J. (2015). Preservice teachers’ implicit attitudes toward racial minority students: Evidence from three implicit measures. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.03.006.
Cornelia Gräsel is professor at the Bergische Universität Wuppertal
Current themes of research:
Her research currently focusses on evidence-based teacher education and on different mechanisms, which might be able to improve teacher education.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Gräsel C. (2019) Transfer von Forschungsergebnissen in die Praxis. In: Donie C. et al. (eds). Grundschulpädagogik zwischen Wissenschaft und Transfer. Jahrbuch Grundschulforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26231-0_1.
Gräsel, C., Decristan, J. & König, J. (2017). Adaptiver Umgang mit Heterogenität im Unterricht – eine Einführung in das Themenheft. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 45, 195–206.
Gräsel, C., & Trempler, K. (2017). Entwicklung von Professionalität pädagogischen Personals. Interdisziplinäre Betrachtungen, Befunde und Perspektiven. VS Verlag: Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07274-2.
Schuchart, C. & Gräsel, C. (2017). Reformen- Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung im Fokus.Journal für Lehrerinnenbildung, 17(3), 4–56.
Böhmer, I., Gräsel, C., Hörstermann, T. & Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2012). Die Informationssuche bei der Erstellung der Übergangsempfehlung: die Rolle von Fallkonsistenz und Expertise. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 40, 140–155.
Gräsel, C., Bormann, I., Schütte, K., Trempler, K. & Fischbach, R. (2013). Outlook on research in education for sustainable development.Policy Futures in Education, 11, 115–127
Ines Böhmer is teacher at a vocational school and PhD student.
Current themes of research:
Her research interests focus on teachers’ school tracking decisions at the end of primary school. Her research also concerns teachers’ stereotypes and their effect on decisions and behaviors.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Böhmer, I., Gräsel, C., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Hörstermann, T. & Glock, S. (2017). Teachers’ school tracking decisions. In D. Leutner, J. Fleischer, J. Grünkorn & E. Klieme (Eds.), Competence Assessment in Education: Research, Models and Instruments. Heidelberg: Springer.
Böhmer, I., Hörstermann, T., Gräsel, C., Krolak-Schwerdt, S. & Glock, S. (2015). Eine Analyse der Informationssuche bei der Erstellung der Übergangsempfehlung: Welcher Urteilsregel folgen Lehrkräfte? TJournal for Educational Research Online, 7, 59–81.
Böhmer, I., Gräsel, C., Hörstermann, T. & Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2012). Die Informationssuche bei der Erstellung der Übergangsempfehlung: die Rolle von Fallkonsistenz und Expertise. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 40, 140–155.
Nölle, I., Hörstermann, T., Gräsel, C. & Krolak-Schwerdt, S (2011). Die Übergangsempfehlung am Ende der Grundschulzeit. Welche Merkmale von Schülerinnen und Schülern erachten Lehrkräfte als übergangsrelevant?Schulverwaltung NRW, 22, 94–95.
Sabine Krolak-Schwerdt was professor of Educational Measurement at the University of Luxembourg (2008-2017), where she headed the Institute of Teacher Professionalization and Psychology of Education.
Current themes of research:
Her research focused on educational psychology, social cognition, and language as well as multivariate methods. More specifically, her research interests included the professionalization and diagnostic competences of teachers, social cognition and social judgments as well as the application of multivariate approaches to analyse large datasets
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Böhmer, M., & Gräsel, C. (2013). The impact of accountability on teachers’ assessments of student performance: a social cognitive analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9215-9.
Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Hörstermann, T., Glock, S., & Böhmer, I. (2018). Teachers’ Assessments of Students’ Achievements: The Ecological Validity of Studies Using Case Vignettes. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86, 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1370686.
Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Junker, N., Roth, R., & Wintermantel, M. (2008). Processing Person Descriptions: How Does Text Coherence Influence Encoding and Retrieval of Person Information? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08318018.
Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Pit-ten Cate, I. M., & Hörstermann, T. (2018). Teachers ’ judgments and decision-making : Studies concerning the transition from primary to secondary education and their implications for teacher education. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, M. Toepper, H. A. Pant, C. Lautenbach, & C. Kuhn (Eds.), Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education – Cross-national Comparisons and Perspectives. (pp. 73–101) Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Sabine Krolak-Schwerdt passed away in December 2017
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 72 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pit-ten Cate, I.M., Hörstermann, T., Krolak-Schwerdt, S. et al. Teachers’ information processing and judgement accuracy: effects of information consistency and accountability. Eur J Psychol Educ 35, 675–702 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00436-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00436-6