Abstract
Tadpoles risk attack from both aquatic and aerial predators. We investigated how body size and group size influenced the behaviour of tadpoles before and during a predatory attack from above to test the predictions of the theoretical economic escape model. We examined escape (swimming) response of small and large Cuban tree frog (Osteopilus septentrionalis) tadpoles kept under three density treatments and predicted that increased group size, body size and depth in the water column would all reduce perceived risk and, therefore, escape responses to simulated predation. Compared with the lower density groups, tadpoles in higher density groups moved shorter distances, and many individuals did not even move away in response to being touched. Contrary to our predictions based on the economic escape model, smaller tadpoles (which should be more vulnerable to a greater suite of predators) were less reactive than larger tadpoles, and this result may reflect different costs of escape. Finally, although tadpoles might be exposed to a wider range of predator species (aerial as well as aquatic predators), we found no effect of initial depth on escape responses. In conclusion, it appears that the main benefit of increased group density in O. septentrionalis tadpoles is likely to be predator dilution, and that variation in densities of tadpoles influences the escape behaviour of individual tadpoles, regardless of tadpole size.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bateman PW, Fleming PA (2014) Living on the edge: effects of body size, group density and microhabitat selection on escape behaviour of Southern Leopard Frogs (Lithobates sphenocephalus) Current Zoology In Press, accepted 10 April 2014
Bateman PW, Fleming PA, Rolek B (2014) Bite me: decoy blue tails as a risky defence tactic for lizards. Curr Zoo 60:333–337
Branch LC (1983) Social behavior of the tadpoles of Phyllomedusa vaillanti. Copeia 1983:420–428
Breden F, Lum A, Wassersug R (1982) Body size and orientation in aggregates of toad tadpoles Bufo woodhousei. Copeia 1982:672–680
Caldwell JP (1989) Structure and behavior of Hyla geographica tadpole schools, with comments on classification of group behavior in tadpoles. Copeia 1989:938–948
Caro T (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Cooper WEJ, Frederick WG (2010) Predator lethality, optimal escape behavior, and autotomy. Behav Ecol 21:91–96
Eidietis L (2005) Size-related performance variation in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpole tactile-stimulated startle response. Can J Zool 83:1117–1127
Emerson SB (1978) Allometry and jumping in frogs: helping the twain to meet. Evolution 32:551–564
Feder ME (1983) The relation of air breathing and locomotion to predation on tadpoles, Rana berlandieri by turtles. Physiol Zool 56:522–531
Feder ME, Moran CM (1985) Effect of water depth on costs of aerial respiration and its alternatives in tadpoles of Rana pipiens. Can J Zool 63:643–648
Goater CP, Semlitsch RD, Bernasconi MV (1993) Effects of body size and parasite infection on the locomotory performance of juvenile toads, Bufo bufo. Oikos 66:129–136
Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190
Grant JW, Noakes DL (1987) Escape behaviour and use of cover by young-of-the-year brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44:1390–1396
Hawlena D, Boochnik R, Abramsky Z, Bouskila A (2006) Blue tail and striped body: why do lizards change their infant costume when growing up? Behav Ecol 17:889–896
John-Alder HB, Morin PJ (1990) Effects of larval density on jumping ability and stamina in newly metamorphosed Bufo woodhousii fowleri. Copeia 1990:856–860
Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University, Oxford
Laurila A, Kujasalo J, Ranta E (1997) Different antipredator behaviour in two anuran tadpoles: effects of predator diet. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:329–336
McIntyre PB, McCollum SA (2000) Responses of bullfrog tadpoles to hypoxia and predators. Oecologia 125:301–308
Meshaka WE (2001) The Cuban treefrog in Florida: life history of a successful colonizing species. University Press of Florida Gainesville, Florida
Miller BM, McDonnell LH, Sanders DJ, Lewtas KLM, Turgeon K, Kramer DL (2011) Locomotor compensation in the sea: body size affects escape gait in parrotfish. Anim Behav 82:1109–1116
Moore MK, Townsend VRJ (1998) The interaction of temperature, dissolved oxygen and predation pressure in an aquatic predator–prey system. Oikos:329–336
Persson L, Leonardsson K, de Roos AM, Gyllenberg M, Christensen B (1998) Ontogenetic scaling of foraging rates and the dynamics of a size-structured consumer-resource model. Theor Popln Biol 54:270–293
Peters RH (1986) The ecological implications of body size vol 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Richards SJ, Bull CM (1990) Size-limited predation on tadpoles of three Australian frogs. Copeia 1990:1041–1046
Rodríguez-Prieto I, Fernández-Juricic E, Martín J (2006) Anti-predator behavioral responses of mosquito pupae to aerial predation risk. J Insect Behav 19:373–381
Schael DM, Rudstam LG, Post JR (1991) Gape limitation and prey selection in larval yellow perch (Perca flavescens), freshwater drum (Aplodinotus grunniens), and black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:1919–1925
Semlitsch RD (1990) Effects of body size, sibship, and tail injury on the susceptibility of tadpoles to dragonfly predation. Can J Zool 68:1027–1030
Semlitsch RD, Gibbons JW (1988) Fish predation in size-structured populations of treefrog tadpoles. Oecologia 75:321–326
Shine R (2010) The ecological impact of invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) in Australia. Q Rev Biol 85:253–291
Spieler M (2003) Risk of predation affects aggregation size: a study with tadpoles of Phrynomantis microps (Anura: Microhylidae). Anim Behav 65:179–184
Spieler M, Linsenmair KE (1999) Aggregation behaviour of Bufo maculatus tadpoles as an antipredator mechanism. Ethology 105:665–686
Stankowich T, Blumstein DT (2005) Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc R Soc Ser B 272:2627–2634
Wassersug R (1971) On the comparative palatability of some dry-season tadpoles from Costa Rica. Am Midl Nat 86:101–109
Wassersug RJ (1989) Locomotion in amphibian larvae (or ‘Why aren’t tadpoles built like fishes?’). Am Zool 29:65–84
Wassersug RJ, Lum AM, Potel MJ (1981) An analysis of school structure for tadpoles (Anura: Amphibia). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:15–22
Watson CM, Roelke CE, Pasichnyk PN, Cox CL (2012) The fitness consequences of the autotomous blue tail in lizards: an empirical test of predator response using clay models. Zoology 115:339–344
Watt PJ, Nottingham SF, Young S (1997) Toad tadpole aggregation behaviour: evidence for a predator avoidance function. Anim Behav 54:865–872
Webb PW (1981) Responses of northern anchovy Engraulis mordax, larvae to predation by a biting planktivore, Amphiprion percula. Fish Bull 79
Ydenberg RC, Dill LM (1986) The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv Stud Behav 16:229–249
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bateman, P.W., Fleming, P.A. Body size and group size of Cuban tree frog (Osteopilus septentrionalis) tadpoles influence their escape behaviour. acta ethol 18, 161–166 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0201-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0201-9