Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical recognition of conspecifics in a neotropical lizard, Liolaemus pacha (Iguania: Liolaemidae): relation to visual displays, season and sex

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ethology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemical cues play an important role in sexual recognition in several lizard species. Here, we investigated whether the neotropical lizard, Liolaemus pacha (Iguania: Liolaemidae) can discriminate between chemical information obtained from males or females. In addition, we also considered the effect of season (reproductive vs. post-reproductive) and the sex of the tested individual. We experimentally tested scent discrimination, using a terrarium previously occupied by a male, a female, and an untreated terrarium as control as sources of different chemical scents. We counted the number of tongue flicks, a measure of chemical exploratory behavior, and the visual displays triggered by these scents for 10 min. Males performed significantly more tongue flicks when female scent was present than when male and control scents were present, indicating sexual recognition. However, females did not show a significant difference in those same conditions, indicating a lack of sexual recognition. For visual displays, males showed significantly higher rates to female and male scents than to control, whereas females did not show any difference. During the reproductive season, the number of tongue flicks and visual displays were higher than during the post-reproductive season. Our results suggest that for male L. pacha, chemical cues play an important role in mate recognition. We discuss the apparent lack of recognition in females. We suggest that the observed seasonal behavioral differences might be associated with physiological changes related mainly to reproduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdala CS, Quinteros AS (2014) Los últimos 30 años de la familia de lagartijas más diversa de Argentina. Actualización taxonómica y sistemática de Liolaemidae. Cuad Herpetol 28:55–82. http://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/471. Accessed 8 July 2016

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird TA, McGee AA, York JR (2015) Responses to femoral gland secretions by visually adept male and female collared lizards. Ethology 121:513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM, Griffin CL, Lanham EJ, Johnston GR (2000) Recognition of pheromones from group members in a gregarious lizard, Egernia stokesii. J Herpetol 34:92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information—theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera AL, Willink A (1980) Biogeografía de América Latina. Secretaría General de la Organización de los Estados Americanos, Programa Regional de Desarrollo Científico Tecnológico, Washington D.C

  • Carazo P, Font E, Desfilis E (2007) Chemosensory assessment of rival competitive ability and scent mark function in a lizard (Podarcis hispanica). Anim Behav 74:895–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WE Jr (1994) Chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in lizards: a review with hypotheses on its origin and its ecological and phylogenetic relationships. J Chem Ecol 20:439–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WE Jr (1998) Evaluation of swab and related tests as a bioassay for assessing responses by squamate reptiles to chemical stimuli. J Chem Ecol 24:841–866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WE Jr, Pérez-Mellado V (2002) Pheromonal recognition of sex, reproductive condition, and species by the lacertid lizard Podarcis hispanica. J Exp Zool 292:523–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Font E, Desfilis E (2002) Chemosensory recognition of familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by juveniles of the Iberian wall lizard Podarcis hispanica. Ethology 108:319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Font E, Barbosa D, Sampedro C, Carazo P (2012) Social behavior, chemical communication, and adult neurogenesis: studies of scent mark function in Podarcis wall lizards. Gen Comp Endocr 177:9–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halloy M (2012) Visual display variations in neotropical lizards, Liolaemus quilmes (Iguania: Liolaemidae): relation to sex and season. Herpetol J 22:265–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloy M, Robles C (2003) Patrones de actividad y abundancias relativas en un lagarto del noroeste argentino, Liolaemus quilmes (Iguania: Liolaemidae). Cuad Herpetol 17:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloy M, Robles C, Cuezzo F (2006) Diet in two syntopic neotropical lizard species of Liolaemus (Liolaemidae): interspecific and intersexual differences. Rev Esp Herpetol 20:47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloy M, Robles C, Salica MJ, Semhan R, Juárez Heredia V, Vicente N (2013) Estudios del comportamiento y ecología de lagartijas de los géneros Liolaemus y Phymaturus (Iguania: Liolaemini). Cuad Herpetol 27:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern M (1992) Nasal chemical senses in reptiles: structure and function. In: Gans C, Crews D (eds) Biology of reptilia. Hormones, brain and behavior, vol 18E. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 423–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Head ML, Keogh JS, Doughty P (2005) Male southern water skinks (Eulamprus heatwolei) use both visual and chemical cues to detect female sexual receptivity. Acta Ethol 8:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyghe K, Vanhooydonck B, Herrel A, Tadić Z, Van Damme R (2012) Female lizards ignore the sweet scent of success: male characteristics implicated in female mate preference. Zoology 115:217–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson BG, Jones TM (2007) The role of chemical communication in mate choice. Biol Rev 82:265–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juárez Heredia V, Robles C, Halloy M (2013) A new species of Liolaemus from the darwinii group (Iguania: Liolaemidae) Tucumán province, Argentina. Zootaxa 3681:524–538. http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2013/f/z03681p538f.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2016

  • Labra A (2008) Multi-contextual use of chemosignals by Liolaemus lizards. In: Hurst JL, Beynon RJ, Roberts SC, Wyatt TD (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 11. Springer, New York, pp 357–365

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Labra A, Niemeyer HM (1999) Intraspecific chemical recognition in the lizard Liolaemus tenuis. J Chem Ecol 25:1799–1811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Labra A, Beltrán S, Niemeyer HM (2001) Chemical exploratory behavior in the lizard Liolaemus bellii. J Herpetol 35:51–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lailvaux SP, Irschick DJ (2006) A functional perspective on sexual selection: insights and future prospects. Anim Behav 72:263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López P, Aragón P, Martín J (1998) Iberian rock lizards (Lacerta monticola cyreni) assess conspecific information using composite signals from faecal pellets. Ethology 104:809–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López P, Aragón P, Martín J (2003) Responses of female lizards, Lacerta monticola, to males’ chemical cues reflect their mating preference for older males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López P, Amo L, Martín J (2006) Reliable signaling by chemical cues of male traits and health state in male lizards, Lacerta monticola. J Chem Ecol 32:473–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martín J, López P (2013) Responses of female rock lizards to multiple scent marks of males: effects of male age, male density and scent over-marking. Behav Process 94:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason RT (1992) Reptilian pheromones. In: Gans C, Crews D (eds) Biology of reptilia. Hormones, brain and behavior, vol 18E. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 114–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason RT, Parker MR (2010) Social behavior and pheromonal communication in reptiles. J Comp Physiol A 196:729–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendiburu F (2015) Agricolae: statistical procedures for agricultural research. R package version 1.2-3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae

  • Olsson M, Madsen T (1995) Female choice on male quantitative traits in lizards—why is it so rare? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 8 July 2016

  • Ramírez-Pinilla MP (1992) Ciclos reproductivos y de cuerpos grasos en dos poblaciones de Liolaemus darwinii (Reptilia: Sauria: Tropiduridae). Acta Zoológica Lilloana 42:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Robles C, Halloy M (2009) Home ranges and reproductive strategies in a neotropical lizard, Liolaemus quilmes (Iguania: Liolaemidae). South Am J Herpetol 4:253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robles C, Halloy M (2012) Lack of evidence for mate choice in a neotropical lizard, Liolaemus quilmes (Iguania: Liolaemidae): weight, colour and familiarity. Salamandra 48:115–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenk K (1995) Of tongues and noses: chemoreception in lizards and snakes. Trends Ecol Evol 10:7–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott ML, Llewelyn L, Higgie M, Hoskin CJ, Pyke K, Phillips BL (2015) Chemoreception and mating behaviour of a tropical Australian skink. Acta Ethol 18:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PW, Hudson KR, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, pp 69–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaug H, Fournier D, Bolker B, Magnusson A, Nielsen A (2014) Generalized linear mixed models using AD model builder. R package version 0.8.0

  • Swierk L, Myers A, Langkilde T (2013) Male mate preference is influenced by both female behaviour and morphology. Anim Behav 85:1451–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas M (2011) Detection of female mating status using chemical signals and cues. Biol Rev 86:1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente N, Halloy M (2015) Male headbob display structure in a neotropical lizard, Liolaemus pacha (Iguania: Liolaemidae): relation to social context. Herpetol J 25:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and animal behaviour. Communication by smell and taste. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. We also thank field assistants who have accompanied us to the field site, Recursos Naturales y Suelos of the Tucumán province for permission to work in the field (Res: 169-13, Expte. No. 936-330-2012), CONICET for a scholarship to NSV, and Fundación Miguel Lillo (MH) for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalin S. Vicente.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Animal care and experiments were conducted according to guidelines for the use of animals in research, published in Animal Behaviour (1991). All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vicente, N.S., Halloy, M. Chemical recognition of conspecifics in a neotropical lizard, Liolaemus pacha (Iguania: Liolaemidae): relation to visual displays, season and sex. J Ethol 34, 329–335 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-016-0479-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-016-0479-3

Keywords

Navigation