Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance evaluation of concrete made with double-processed recycled aggregate (DPRA): mechanical grinding and silica fume impregnation technique

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The depletion of natural aggregate sources has increased exponentially due to the enormous demand for concrete. Therefore, the recycled aggregate (RA) extracted from old concrete structures may reduce the demand for natural aggregate (NA). This paper introduced a new double processing technique that combines mechanical grinding in the Los Angeles Abrasion Machine (LAAM) followed by silica fume (SF) impregnation technique to produce high-quality double-processed recycled aggregate (DPRA). To examine the effect of DPRA, five different types of DPRAs [viz: DPRA (0RVS), DPRA (200RVS), DPRA (300RVS), DPRA (400), and DRA (500RVS)] were utilized to replace NA in an M30 grade control mix. In this investigation, different DPRAs were employed to replace NA in each concrete mix (e.g., 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%). In addition, experiments were carried out to examine the workability, strength, and durability of concrete made with DPRAs. The compressive strength has decreased by 7.58% compared to the control mix at a 75% replacement level of NA. Similarly, the Rapid Chloride Penetration Test (RCPT) value within the lower permeability zone is up to a 75% replacement level of NA with DPRA (400RVS). Further mechanical crushing in an LAAM with 400 revolutions followed by SF impregnation of 10% concentration is the optimum processing to produce superior quality double-processed recycled aggregate (DPRA). Based on the experimental investigations, a 75% substitution level of DPRA (400RVS) in place of NA is finally suggested for structural concrete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Neville AM (2011) Concrete technology, 2nd edn. Pearson education Asia, New delhi

    Google Scholar 

  2. Verian KP, Ashraf W, Cao Y (2018) Properties of recycled concrete aggregate and their influence in new concrete production. Resour Conserv Recycl 133:30–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Messari-Becker L, Mettke A, Knappe F, Storck U, Bollinger K, Grohmann M (2014) Recycling concrete in practice—a chance for sustainable resource management. Struct Concr 15:556–562. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201400010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh M, Choudhary K, Srivastava A, Singh Sangwan K, Bhunia D (2017) A study on environmental and economic impacts of using waste marble powder in concrete. J Build Eng 13:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Leite FDC, Motta RDS, Vasconcelos KL, Bernucci L (2011) Laboratory evaluation of recycled construction and demolition waste for pavements. Constr Build Mater 25:2972–2979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kisku N, Joshi H, Ansari M, Panda SK, Nayak S, Dutta SC (2017) A critical review and assessment for usage of recycled aggregate as sustainable construction material. Constr Build Mater 131:721–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Verma A, Babu VS, Arunachalam S (2021) Characterization of recycled aggregate by the combined method: acid soaking and mechanical grinding technique. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen W, Jin R, Xu Y, Wanatowski D, Li B, Yan L, Pan Z, Yang Y (2019) Adopting recycled aggregates as sustainable construction materials: a review of the scientific literature. Constr Build Mater 218:483–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Bayati HKA, Das PK, Tighe SL, Baaj H (2016) Evaluation of various treatment methods for enhancing the physical and morphological properties of coarse recycled concrete aggregate. Constr Build Mater 112:284–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mehta PK, Meryman H (2009) Tools for reducing carbon emissions due to cement consumption. Struct Mag 11–15. http://www.structuremag.org/article.aspx?articleID=830. Accessed 24 May 2021

  11. Bostanci SC (2020) Use of waste marble dust and recycled glass for sustainable concrete production. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fan Y, Xiao J, Tam VWY (2014) Effect of old attached mortar on the creep of recycled aggregate concrete. Struct Concr 15:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201300055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaikh FUA (2016) Effect of ultrafine fly ash on the properties of concretes containing construction and demolition wastes as coarse aggregates. Struct Concr 17:116–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201500030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ccanz (2011) Best practice guide for the use of recycled aggregates in new concrete

  15. Nitesh KJNS, Rao SV, Kumar PR (2019) An experimental investigation on torsional behaviour of recycled aggregate based steel fiber reinforced self compacting concrete. J Build Eng 22:242–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao D, Zhang L (2018) Flexural performance and evaluation method of steel fiber reinforced recycled coarse aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater 159:126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi C, Li Y, Zhang J, Li W, Chong L, Xie Z (2016) Performance enhancement of recycled concrete aggregate—a review. J Clean Prod 112:466–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ying J, Meng Q, Xiao J (2017) Effect of CO2-modified recycled aggregate on compressive strength of concrete. Jianzhu Cailiao Xuebao/J Build Mater 20:277–282. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2017.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shima H, Tateyashiki H, Matsuhashi R, Yoshida Y (2005) An advanced concrete recycling technology and its applicability assessment through input-output analysis. J Adv Concr Technol 3:53–67. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.3.53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pawluczuk E, Kalinowska-Wichrowska K, Bołtryk M, Jiménez JR, Fernández JM (2019) The influence of heat and mechanical treatment of concrete rubble on the properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12030367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz A (2004) Treatments for the improvement of recycled aggregate. J Mater Civ Eng 16:597–603. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:6(597)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abbas A, Fathifazl G, Burkan Isgor O, Razaqpur AG, Fournier B, Foo S (2008) Proposed method for determining the residual mortar content of recycled concrete aggregates. J ASTM Int. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI101087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Babu VS, Mullick AK, Jain KK, Singh PK (2014) Strength and durability characteristics of high-strength concrete with recycled aggregate-influence of processing. J Sustain Cem Mater 4:54–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2014.976777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dimitriou G, Savva P, Petrou MF (2018) Enhancing mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater 158:228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Spaeth V, Djerbi Tegguer A (2013) Improvement of recycled concrete aggregate properties by polymer treatments. Int J Sustain Built Environ 2:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kazemian F, Rooholamini H, Hassani A (2019) Mechanical and fracture properties of concrete containing treated and untreated recycled concrete aggregates. Constr Build Mater 209:690–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ismail S, Ramli M (2014) Mechanical strength and drying shrinkage properties of concrete containing treated coarse recycled concrete aggregates. Constr Build Mater 68:726–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tam VWY, Tam CM, Le KN (2007) Removal of cement mortar remains from recycled aggregate using pre-soaking approaches. Resour Conserv Recycl 50:82–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Verma A, Babu VS, Srinivasan A (2021) Strength and durability properties of treated recycled aggregate concrete by soaking and mechanical grinding method: influence of processing technique. J Mater Civ Eng 33:04021286. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zega CJ, Di Maio AA (2009) Recycled concrete made with different natural coarse aggregates exposed to high temperature. Constr Build Mater 23:2047–2052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hanif A, Kim Y, Lu Z, Park C (2017) Early-age behavior of recycled aggregate concrete under steam curing regime. J Clean Prod 152:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi): 1489(part-1)-1991. Indian standard portland-pozzolana cement specification part-1 fly ash based, third revision; 1991, (n.d.)

  33. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi): 15388-2003. Indian standard specification for silica fume, (n.d.)

  34. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi): 2386–1997. Indian standard methods of test for aggregates for concrete (Part-I to Part-VIII), Reaffirmed 1997, (n.d.)

  35. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi): 383-2016. Indian standard specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete, (n.d.)

  36. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi): 456-2000. Indian standard plain and reinforced concrete-code of practice, fourth revision. (n.d.)

  37. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi): 10262-2019. Indian standard specificat for concrete mix proportioning guidelines, second revision, (n.d.)

  38. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi):1199-1999. Indian standard methods of sampling and analysis of concrete, Reaffirmed 1999, (n.d.)

  39. Babu VS, Mullick AK, Jain KK, Singh PK (2014) Mechanical properties of high strength concrete with recycled aggregate-influence of processing. Indian Concr J 88:10–26

    Google Scholar 

  40. Silva RV, De Brito J, Dhir RK (2015) The influence of the use of recycled aggregates on the compressive strength of concrete: a review. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 19:825–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2014.974831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Verma A, Babu VS, Arunachalam S (2022) Influence of acetic acid soaking and mechanical grinding treatment on the properties of treated recycled aggregate concrete. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01360-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Berredjem L, Arabi N, Molez L (2020) Mechanical and durability properties of concrete based on recycled coarse and fine aggregates produced from demolished concrete. Constr Build Mater 246:118421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Babu VS, Mullick AK, Jain KK, Singh PK (2014) Mechanical properties of high strength concrete with processed recycled aggregate—influence of mixing techniques. Indian Concr J 88:42–56

    Google Scholar 

  44. Poon CS, Shui ZH, Lam L (2004) Effect of microstructure of ITZ on compressive strength of concrete prepared with recycled aggregates. Constr Build Mater 18:461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Verma A, Sarath Babu V, Arunachalam S (2021) Influence of mixing approaches on strength and durability properties of treated recycled aggregate concrete. Struct Concr 22:E121–E142. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202000221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tam VWY, Gao XF, Tam CM (2005) Microstructural analysis of recycled aggregate concrete produced from two-stage mixing approach. Cem Concr Res 35:1195–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Limbachiya MC, Leelawat T, Dhir RK (2000) Use of recycled concrete aggregate in high-strength concrete. Mater Struct Constr 33:574–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02480538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chakradhara Rao M, Bhattacharyya SK, Barai SV (2011) Influence of field recycled coarse aggregate on properties of concrete. Mater Struct Constr 44:205–220. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9620-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mukharjee BB, Barai SV (2017) Mechanical and microstructural characterization of recycled aggregate concrete containing silica nanoparticles. J Sustain Cem Mater 6:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2016.1230899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Khoshkenari AG, Shafigh P, Moghimi M, Bin Mahmud H (2014) The role of 0–2mm fine recycled concrete aggregate on the compressive and splitting tensile strengths of recycled concrete aggregate concrete. Mater Des 64:345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kang M, Weibin L (2018) Effect of the aggregate size on strength properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2428576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bai G, Zhu C, Liu C, Liu B (2020) An evaluation of the recycled aggregate characteristics and the recycled aggregate concrete mechanical properties. Constr Build Mater 240:117978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kou SC, Poon CS (2012) Enhancing the durability properties of concrete prepared with coarse recycled aggregate. Constr Build Mater 35:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Erdoǧdu Ş (2005) Effect of retempering with superplasticizer admixtures on slump loss and compressive strength of concrete subjected to prolonged mixing. Cem Concr Res 35:907–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.08.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kou SC, Poon CS, Etxeberria M (2011) Influence of recycled aggregates on long term mechanical properties and pore size distribution of concrete. Cem Concr Compos 33:286–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi): 1881-122:1983., Test. Concr. Method Determ. Water Absorption, London. (n.d.)

  57. Evangelista L, de Brito J (2010) Durability performance of concrete made with fine recycled concrete aggregates. Cem Concr Compos 32:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Behera M, Bhattacharyya SK, Minocha AK, Deoliya R, Maiti S (2014) Recycled aggregate from C&D waste & its use in concrete—a breakthrough towards sustainability in construction sector: a review. Constr Build Mater 68:501–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Mehdipour I, Razzaghi MS, Amini K, Shekarchi M (2013) Effect of mineral admixtures on fluidity and stability of self-consolidating mortar subjected to prolonged mixing time. Constr Build Mater 40:1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Shaikh FUA, Nguyen HL (2013) Properties of concrete containing recycled construction and demolition wastes as coarse aggregates. J Sustain Cem Mater 2:204–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2013.833861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Xuan D, Zhan B, Poon CS (2017) Durability of recycled aggregate concrete prepared with carbonated recycled concrete aggregates. Cem Concr Compos 84:214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sargam Y, Melugiri Shankaramurthy B, Wang K (2020) Characterization of RCAs and their concrete using simple test methods. J Sustain Cem Mater 9:61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2019.1692093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ramirez-Meneses E, Dominguez-Crespo MA, Torres-Huerta AM (2012) Stabilized metal nanoparticles from organometallic precursors for low temperature fuel cells. Recent Pat Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.2174/187221013804484881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ismail S, Ramli M (2013) Engineering properties of treated recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) for structural applications. Constr Build Mater 44:464–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Tam VWY, Tam CM (2007) Assessment of durability of recycled aggregate concrete produced by two-stage mixing approach. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0379-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Li W, Xiao J, Sun Z, Kawashima S, Shah SP (2012) Interfacial transition zones in recycled aggregate concrete with different mixing approaches. Constr Build Mater 35:1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Sabir BB, Wild S, O’Farrell M (1998) A water sorptivity test for mortar and concrete. Mater Struct Constr 31:568–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02481540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Nehdi M, Pardhan M, Koshowski S (2004) Durability of self-consolidating concrete incorporating high-volume replacement composite cements. Cem Concr Res 34:2103–2112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Pedro D, de Brito J, Evangelista L (2018) Durability performance of high-performance concrete made with recycled aggregates, fly ash and densified silica fume. Cem Concr Compos 93:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Shaikh F, Chavda V, Minhaj N, Arel HS (2018) Effect of mixing methods of nano silica on properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Struct Concr 19:387–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201700091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Kannan S, Arunachalam K, Brindha D (2021) Performance analysis of recycled aggregate concrete with chemical admixture. Struct Concr 22:E8–E21. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Otsuki N, Miyazato S, Yodsudjai W (2003) Influence of recycled aggregate on interfacial transition zone, strength, chloride penetration and carbonation of concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 15:443–451. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2003)15:5(443)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Tam VWY, Gao XF, Tam CM, Chan CH (2008) New approach in measuring water absorption of recycled aggregates. Constr Build Mater 22:364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Sasanipour H, Aslani F, Taherinezhad J (2019) Effect of silica fume on durability of self-compacting concrete made with waste recycled concrete aggregates. Constr Build Mater 227:116598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Kou SC, Zhan BJ, Poon CS (2012) Feasibility study of using recycled fresh concrete waste as coarse aggregates in concrete. Constr Build Mater 28:549–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Tam VWY, Wang K, Tam CM (2008) Assessing relationships among properties of demolished concrete, recycled aggregate and recycled aggregate concrete using regression analysis. J Hazard Mater 152:703–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Limbachiya M, Meddah MS, Ouchagour Y (2012) Use of recycled concrete aggregate in fly-ash concrete. Constr Build Mater 27:439–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Wang J, Zhang J, Cao D, Dang H, Ding B (2020) Comparison of recycled aggregate treatment methods on the performance for recycled concrete. Constr Build Mater 234:117366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Guo Z, Chen C, Lehman DE, Xiao W, Zheng S, Fan B (2020) Mechanical and durability behaviours of concrete made with recycled coarse and fine aggregates. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 24:171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2017.1371083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Evangelista L, De Brito J (2014) Concrete with fine recycled aggregates: a review. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 18:129–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2013.851038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Kou SC, Poon CS, Agrela F (2011) Comparisons of natural and recycled aggregate concretes prepared with the addition of different mineral admixtures. Cem Concr Compos 33:788–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Kim JH, Sung JH, Jeon CS, Lee SH, Kim HS (2019) A study on the properties of recycled aggregate concrete and its production facilities. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Zhang H, Wang Y, Lehman DE, Geng Y, Kuder K (2020) Time-dependent drying shrinkage model for concrete with coarse and fine recycled aggregate. Cem Concr Compos 105:103426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. de Brito J (2010) Abrasion resistance of concrete made with recycled aggregates. Int J Sustain Eng 3:58–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397030903254710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Tam VWY, Tam CM (2008) Diversifying two-stage mixing approach (TSMA) for recycled aggregate concrete: TSMAs and TSMAsc. Constr Build Mater 22:2068–2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Xiao J, Li W, Sun Z, Lange DA, Shah SP (2013) Properties of interfacial transition zones in recycled aggregate concrete tested by nanoindentation. Cem Concr Compos 37:276–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Leite MB, Monteiro PJM (2016) Microstructural analysis of recycled concrete using X-ray microtomography. Cem Concr Res 81:38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Said AM, Zeidan MS, Bassuoni MT, Tian Y (2012) Properties of concrete incorporating nano-silica. Constr Build Mater 36:838–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Wang Q, Zhang Y, Fang Y, Zhang Y, Wu F (2020) Prediction of the mechanical behavior of recycled concrete with fresh concrete waste aggregate. Struct Concr 21:761–771. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Ann KY, Moon HY, Kim YB, Ryou J (2008) Durability of recycled aggregate concrete using pozzolanic materials. Waste Manag 28:993–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Pedro D, de Brito J, Evangelista L (2017) Evaluation of high-performance concrete with recycled aggregates: use of densified silica fume as cement replacement. Constr Build Mater 147:803–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology, Guna, India, for carrying out this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology, Guna, 473226, India

    Ravindra Kumar Goliya & V. S. Babu

Authors
  1. Ravindra Kumar Goliya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. S. Babu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravindra Kumar Goliya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goliya, R.K., Babu, V.S. Performance evaluation of concrete made with double-processed recycled aggregate (DPRA): mechanical grinding and silica fume impregnation technique. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 25, 1050–1068 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01592-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01592-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation