Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation on the benefits of mycophenolate mofetil and therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of Japanese patients with lupus nephritis

  • Original article
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is recommended as a first-line immunosuppressant to treat lupus nephritis (LN). Prognosis and therapeutic response in LN are known to vary depending on race. We investigated the benefits of MMF and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in the treatment of Japanese LN patients.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 20 patients with LN who started MMF treatment were included. Clinical data were collected regularly after MMF administration. We evaluated complete remission (CR) rate as the primary outcome. Predictors of CR were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. In the research of TDM, the correlation with the area under the curve (AUC) was analyzed at MMF dose, single-point value, treatment response, and adverse events.

Results

Overall, 70% of cases showed CR; both flare-ups and refractory cases had favorable results. Cases of LN with nephrotic syndrome (NS) or class III/IV + V showed a significantly lower CR rate (p < 0.005). The ratio of maintaining CR after MMF therapy was as high as 85.7%. In multivariate analysis, NS was an independent negative predictor of CR (HR 0.09, 95% confidence interval 0.01–0.81; p = 0.03). The relationship between AUC and MMF dose was low, and AUC correlated with trough level (r = 0.73). AUC tended to be high in the treatment responder (p = 0.09), but did not correlate with adverse events of infection (p = 0.92).

Conclusion

MMF is a beneficial treatment option for Japanese LN patients, and further investigation on TDM-based therapy is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Austin HA 3rd, Klippel JH, Balow JE, le Riche NG, Steinberg AD, Plotz PH, et al. Therapy of lupus nephritis. Controlled trial of prednisone and cytotoxic drugs. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:6149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hahn BH, McMahon MA, Wilkinson A, Wallace WD, Daikh DI, Fitzgerald JD, et al. American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64:797–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertsias GK, Tektonidou M, Amoura Z, Aringer M, Bajema I, Berden JH, et al. The Joint European League against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1771–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Korbet SM, Schwartz MM, Evans J, Lewis EJ; Collaborative Study Group. Severe lupus nephritis: racial differences in presentation and outcome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:244–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Le Meur Y, Büchler M, Thierry A, Caillard S, Villemain F, Lavaud S, et al. Individualized mycophenolate mofetil dosing based on drug exposure significantly improves patient outcomes after renal transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:2496–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:1725.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB, et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revised. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:241–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:221–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson AG, Rigby RJ, Taylor PJ, Jones CE, Allen J, Franzen K, et al. The kinetics of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolite in adult kidney transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;66:492–500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Appel GB, Contreras G, Dooley MA, Ginzler EM, Isenberg D, Jayne D, et al. Aspreva Lupus Management Study Group. Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1103–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ginzler EM, Dooley MA, Aranow C, Kim MY, Buyon J, Merrill JT, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2219–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mok CC. Prognostic factors in lupus nephritis. Lupus. 2005;14:39–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Najafi CC, Korbet SM, Lewis EJ, Schwartz MM, Reichlin M, Evans J. Significance of histologic patterns of glomerular injury upon long-term prognosis in severe lupus glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 2001;59:2156–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bao H, Liu ZH, Xie HL, Hu WX, Zhang HT, Li LS. Successful treatment of class V + IV lupus nephritis with multitarget therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19:2001–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Parikh SV, Nagaraja HN, Hebert L, Rovin BH. Renal flare as a predictor of incident and progressive CKD in patients with lupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9:279–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dooley MA, Jayne D, Ginzler EM, Isenberg D, Olsen NJ, Wofsy D, et al. ALMS Group. Mycophenolate versus azathioprine as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1886–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Houssiau FA, D’Cruz D, Sangle S, Remy P, Vasconcelos C, Petrovic R, et al; MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial Group. Azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil for long-term immunosuppression in lupus nephritis: results from the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010; 69:2083–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaw LM, Korecka M, Venkataramanan R, Goldberg L, Bloom R, Brayman KL. Mycophenolic acid pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics provide a basis for rational monitoring strategies. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:534–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zahr N, Arnaud L, Marquet P, Haroche J, Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Hulot JS, et al. Mycophenolic acid area under the curve correlates with disease activity in lupus patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:2047–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van Gelder T, Berden JH, Berger SP. To TDM or not to TDM in lupus nephritis patients treated with MMF? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:560–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lertdumrongluk P, Somparn P, Kittanamongkolchai W, Traitanon O, Vadcharavivad S, Avihingsanon Y. Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in severe lupus nephritis. Kidney Int. 2010;78:389–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Okamoto M, Wakabayashi Y, Higuchi A, Kadotani Y, Ogino S, Ushigome H, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:859–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported partly by a Grant-in-Aid for Progressive Renal Diseases Research, Research on Rare and Intractable Disease, from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. The authors also acknowledge Editage for providing editorial and publication support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takayuki Katsuno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Department of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine received research promotion grants from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co, Novartis Pharma K.K, Kowa Pharmaceutical Co, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co ., Ltd, Pfizer Japan Inc, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co ., Ltd, Torii Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd, Astellas Pharma Inc, MSD K.K, Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd, Teijin Pharma Limited, and Mochida Pharmaceutical Co ., Ltd.

Human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee at which the studies were conducted (IRB Approval Number 2017-0086) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

The ethical committee approved this retrospective cohort study without written informed consent, but informed consent was obtained from most patients at the time of renal biopsy.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katsuno, T., Ozaki, T., Ozeki, T. et al. Investigation on the benefits of mycophenolate mofetil and therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of Japanese patients with lupus nephritis. Clin Exp Nephrol 22, 1341–1350 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-018-1590-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-018-1590-2

Keywords

Navigation