Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes of the early endoscopic-assisted suturectomy for treatment of multisuture craniosynostosis

  • Research
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To present the outcomes and adverse events associated with the endoscopic-assisted, minimally invasive suturectomy in patients with multisuture synostosis. This retrospective cohort study included children < 65 days of age who underwent endoscopic-assisted suturectomy (EAS) for multisuture craniosynostosis at a single tertiary referral center from 2013 to 2021. The primary outcome was calvarial expansion, and the secondary outcome was adverse events. The pre- and post-operative 3-dimensional brain computed tomography (CT) scan was used to calculate the intracranial volume and cephalic index. During a period of 2 years, 10 infants (10–64 days) diagnosed with multisuture synostosis underwent single-stage EAS of every affected suture in our center. The coronal suture was the most prevalent involved suture among our cases. The mean age and weight of the patients were 39 ± 17.5 days and 4.39 ± 0.8 kg, respectively. The surgical procedure took 42 ± 17.4 min of time and caused 46 ± 25.4 mL of bleeding on average. Ninety percent of the operations were considered successful (n = 9) regarding calvarial expansion. There were two complications, one requiring an open vault surgery and one repairing a leptomeningeal cyst. In the eight patients who did not necessitate further interventions, the mean pre-operative intracranial volume was 643.3 ± 189.4 cm3. The follow-up results within the average of 38.9 months after surgery showed that as age increases, the intracranial volume also increased significantly (R: 0.6, P < 0.0001), which suggests continued skull growth in patients who underwent EAS. With the low rate of intra- or post-operative complications and promising results on revising the restricted skull sutures, EAS seems both a safe and effective therapeutic modality in patients with multisuture synostosis, especially if completed in the first months after birth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the final published article.

References

  1. Manjila S, Chim H, Eisele S, Chowdhry SA, Gosain AK, Cohen AR (2010) History of the Kleeblattschädel deformity: origin of concepts and evolution of management in the past 50 years. Neurosurg Focus 29(6):E7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yilmaz E, Mihci E, Nur B, Alper ÖM, Taçoy Ş (2019) Recent advances in craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurol 99:7–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis C, Lauritzen CG (2009) Frontobasal suture distraction corrects hypotelorism in metopic synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 20(1):121–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stanton E, Urata M, Chen J-F, Chai Y (2022) The clinical manifestations, molecular mechanisms and treatment of craniosynostosis. Dis Model Mech 15(4):dmm049390

  5. Mehta VA, Bettegowda C, Jallo GI, Ahn ES (2010) The evolution of surgical management for craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Focus 29(6):E5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jimenez DF, McGinity MJ, Barone CM (2018) Endoscopy-assisted early correction of single-suture metopic craniosynostosis: a 19-year experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr 23(1):61–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan JW, Stewart CL, Stalder MW, Hilaire HS, McBride L, Moses MH (2013) Endoscope-assisted versus open repair of craniosynostosis: a comparison of perioperative cost and risk. J Craniofac Surg 24(1):170–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Riordan CP, Zurakowski D, Meier PM, Alexopoulos G, Meara JG, Proctor MR et al (2020) Minimally invasive endoscopic surgery for infantile craniosynostosis: a longitudinal cohort study. J Pediatr 216:142–9.e2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Rocco C (2021) Is the helmet doing most of the job in the endoscopic correction of craniosynostosis? Neurosurg Focus 50(4):E9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gandolfi BM, Sobol DL, Farjat AE, Allori AC, Muh CR, Marcus JR (2017) Risk factors for delayed referral to a craniofacial specialist for treatment of craniosynostosis. J Pediatr 186(165–71):e2

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang JH, Yang J, Kim KH, Phi JH, Kim S-K, Wang K-C et al (2021) Combined unilateral coronal-lambdoid suture synostosis: surgical outcome of suturectomy and postoperative helmet therapy. Child’s Nerv Syst 37(1):277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thwin M, Schultz TJ, Anderson PJ (2015) Morphological, functional and neurological outcomes of craniectomy versus cranial vault remodeling for isolated nonsyndromic synostosis of the sagittal suture: a systematic review. JBI Evid Synth 13(9):309–368

    Google Scholar 

  13. Akai T, Yamashita M, Shiro T, Hamada S, Maruyama K, Iizuka H et al (2022) Long-term outcomes of non-syndromic and syndromic craniosynostosis: analysis of demographic, morphologic, and surgical factors. Neurol Med Chir 62(2):57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chiang SN, Skolnick GB, Naidoo SD, Smyth MD, Patel KB (2022) “Outcomes after endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomy and orthotic therapy for syndromic craniosynostosis.” Plast Reconstr Surg

  15. Melin AA, Moffitt J, Hopkins DC, Shah MN, Fletcher SA, Sandberg DI et al (2020) Is less actually more? An evaluation of surgical outcomes between endoscopic suturectomy and open cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 31(4):924–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barone CM, Jimenez DF (2004) Endoscopic approach to coronal craniosynostosis. Clin Plast Surg 31(3):415–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jimenez DF, Barone CM (2007) Early treatment of anterior calvarial craniosynostosis using endoscopic-assisted minimally invasive techniques. Child’s Nerv Syst 23:1411–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ridgway EB, Berry-Candelario J, Grondin RT, Rogers GF, Proctor MR (2011) The management of sagittal synostosis using endoscopic suturectomy and postoperative helmet therapy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7(6):620–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Riordan CP, Zurakowski D, Meier PM, Alexopoulos G, Meara JG, Proctor MR et al (2020) Minimally invasive endoscopic surgery for infantile craniosynostosis: a longitudinal cohort study. J Pediatr 216(142–9):e2

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pellicer E, Siebold BS, Birgfeld CB, Gallagher ER (2018) Evaluating trends in headache and revision surgery following cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 141(3):725–734

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Seruya M, Oh AK, Boyajian MJ, Posnick JC, Myseros JS, Yaun AL et al (2011) Long-term outcomes of primary craniofacial reconstruction for craniosynostosis: a 12-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(6):2397–2406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morrison KA, Lee JC, Souweidane MM, Feldstein NA, Ascherman JA (2018) Twenty-year outcome experience with open craniosynostosis repairs: an analysis of reoperation and complication rates. Ann Plast Surg 80(4):S158–S163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shakir S, Roy M, Lee A, Birgfeld CB (2022) Management of sagittal and lambdoid craniosynostosis: minimally invasive approaches. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin 34(3):421–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Proctor MR (2014) Endoscopic craniosynostosis repair. Translational pediatrics 3(3):247

  25. Dlouhy BJ, Nguyen DC, Patel KB, Hoben GM, Skolnick GB, Naidoo SD et al (2016) Endoscope-assisted management of sagittal synostosis: wide vertex suturectomy and barrel stave osteotomies versus narrow vertex suturectomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 18(6):674–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zubovic E, Skolnick GB, Naidoo SD, Bellanger M, Smyth MD, Patel KB (2020) Endoscopic treatment of combined metopic-sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 26(2):113–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fernandes MB, Maximino LP, Perosa GB, Abramides DV, Passos-Bueno MR, Yacubian-Fernandes A (2016) Apert and Crouzon syndromes—cognitive development, brain abnormalities, and molecular aspects. Am J Med Genet A 170(6):1532–1537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang JC, Nagy L, Demke JC (2016) Syndromic craniosynostosis. Facial Plast Surg Clin 24(4):531–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mohanty A, Frank TS, Mohamed S, Godwin K, Malkani GG (2021) Ultra-early synostectomy and cranial remodeling orthoses in the management of craniosynostoses. Neurosurg Focus 50(4):E8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Berry-Candelario J, Ridgway EB, Grondin RT, Rogers GF, Proctor MR (2011) Endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy and postoperative helmet therapy for treatment of craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Focus 31(2):E5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rottgers SA, Lohani S, Proctor MR (2016) Outcomes of endoscopic suturectomy with postoperative helmet therapy in bilateral coronal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 18(3):281–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Han M-h, Kang JY, Han HY, Cho Y-h, Jang D-H (2017) Relationship between starting age of cranial-remolding-orthosis therapy and effectiveness of treatment in children with deformational plagiocephaly. Child’s Nerv Syst 33(8):1349–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mackel CE, Bonnar M, Keeny H, Lipa BM, Hwang SW (2017) The role of age and initial deformation on final cranial asymmetry in infants with plagiocephaly treated with helmet therapy. Pediatr Neurosurg 52(5):318–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Greene AK, Mulliken JB, Proctor MR, Meara JG, Rogers GF (2008) Phenotypically unusual combined craniosynostoses: presentation and management. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(3):853–862

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sloan GM, Wells KC, Raffel C, McComb JG (1997) Surgical treatment of craniosynostosis: outcome analysis of 250 consecutive patients. Pediatrics 100(1):e2-e

  36. Domeshek LF, Woo A, Skolnick GB, Naidoo S, Segar D, Smyth M et al (2019) Postoperative changes in orbital dysmorphology in patients with unicoronal synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 30(2):483–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hersh DS, Hoover-Fong JE, Beck N, Dorafshar AH, Ahn ES (2017) Endoscopic surgery for patients with syndromic craniosynostosis and the requirement for additional open surgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr 20(1):91–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Honeycutt JH (2014) editor Endoscopic-assisted craniosynostosis surgery. Seminars in plastic surgery: Thieme Medical Publishers

  39. Rivero-Garvía M, Marquez-Rivas J, Rueda-Torres AB, Ollero-Ortiz Á (2012) Early endoscopy-assisted treatment of multiple-suture craniosynostosis. Child’s Nerv Syst 28(3):427–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jimenez DF, Barone CM (2010) Multiple-suture nonsyndromic craniosynostosis: early and effective management using endoscopic techniques. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5(3):223–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Delye HHK, Borstlap WA, van Lindert EJ (2018) Endoscopy-assisted craniosynostosis surgery followed by helmet therapy. Surg Neurol Int 9:59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim SY, Choi JW, Shin H-J, Lim SY (2019) Reliable manifestations of increased intracranial pressure in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 47(1):158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sawh-Martinez R, Steinbacher DM (2019) Syndromic craniosynostosis. Clin Plast Surg 46(2):141–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Grosser JA, Kogan S, Layton RG, Pontier JF, Bins GP, Runyan CM (2023) The need for additional surgery after passive versus active approaches to syndromic craniosynostosis: a meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 11(3):e4891

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Esparza J, Hinojosa J, García-Recuero I, Romance A, Pascual B, de Aragón AM (2008) Surgical treatment of isolated and syndromic craniosynostosis. Results and complications in 283 consecutive cases. Neurocirugía 19(6):509–29

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

OY, RT, and MS: preparation of primary draft.

AF, SZ, and AJ: data collection.

MH, MM: initial idea and supervision.

RR, OI, and GJ: supervision on manuscript preparation and final review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Sadegh Masoudi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences waived ethical approval due to the retrospective nature of the study and the fact that all interventions and follow-ups were part of routine care. At the time of the operation, each participant provided written informed consent for participation and publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yousefi, O., Taheri, R., Sabahi, M. et al. Outcomes of the early endoscopic-assisted suturectomy for treatment of multisuture craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Rev 46, 289 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02191-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02191-1

Keywords

Navigation