Skip to main content
Log in

Factors associated with clinical and radiological status on admission in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grading scales yield objective measure of the severity of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and serve as to guide treatment decisions and for prognostication. The purpose of this cohort study was to determine what factors govern a patient’s disease-specific admission scores in a representative Central European cohort. The Swiss Study of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage includes anonymized data from all tertiary referral centers serving subarachnoid hemorrhage patients in Switzerland. The 2009–2014 dataset was used to evaluate the impact of patient and aneurysm characteristics on the patients’ status at admission using descriptive and multivariate regression analysis. The primary/co-primary endpoints were the GCS and the WFNS grade. The secondary endpoints were the Fisher grade, the presence of a thick cisternal or ventricular clot, the presence of a new focal neurological deficit or cranial nerve palsy, and the patient’s intubation status. In our cohort of 1787 consecutive patients, increasing patient age by 10 years and low pre-ictal functional status (mRS 3–5) were inversely correlated with “high” GCS score (GCS ≥ 13) (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.97 and OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.31–1.46), “low” WFNS grade (grade VI–V) (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04–1.20 and OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.66–3.27), and high Fisher grade (grade III–IV) (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00–1.17 and OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.55–4.32). Other independent predictors for the patients’ clinical and radiological condition at admission were the ruptured aneurysms’ location and its size. In sum, chronological age and pre-ictal functional status, as well as the ruptured aneurysm’s location and size, determine the patients’ clinical and radiological condition at admission to the tertiary referral hospital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Rooij NK, Linn FH, van der Plas JA, Algra A, Rinkel GJ (2007) Incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review with emphasis on region, age, gender and time trends. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78(12):1365–1372. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.117655

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ingall T, Asplund K, Mahonen M, Bonita R (2000) A multinational comparison of subarachnoid hemorrhage epidemiology in the WHO MONICA stroke study. Stroke 31(5):1054–1061. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.5.1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rinkel GJ, Djibuti M, Algra A, van Gijn J (1998) Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Stroke 29(1):251–256. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.29.1.251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, Holman R, International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial Collaborative G (2002) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 360(9342):1267–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mugikura S, Takahashi S, Higano S, Shirane R, Sakurai Y, Yamada S (2002) Predominant involvement of ipsilateral anterior and posterior circulations in moyamoya disease. Stroke 33(6):1497–1500. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000016828.62708.21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salary M, Quigley MR, Wilberger JE Jr (2007) Relation among aneurysm size, amount of subarachnoid blood, and clinical outcome. J Neurosurg 107(1):13–17. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS-07/07/0013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lanzino G, Kassell NF, Germanson TP, Kongable GL, Truskowski LL, Torner JC, Jane JA (1996) Age and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: why do older patients fare worse? J Neurosurg 85(3):410–418. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.85.3.0410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wostrack M, Sandow N, Vajkoczy P, Schatlo B, Bijlenga P, Schaller K, Kehl V, Harmening K, Ringel F, Ryang YM, Friedrich B, Stoffel M, Meyer B (2013) Subarachnoid haemorrhage WFNS grade V: is maximal treatment worthwhile? Acta Neurochir 155(4):579–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1634-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen DS, Macdonald RL (2005) Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2(2):110–118. https://doi.org/10.1385/NCC:2:2:110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaja BNR, Cusimano MD, Etminan N, Hanggi D, Hasan D, Ilodigwe D, Lantigua H, Le Roux P, Lo B, Louffat-Olivares A et al (2013) Clinical prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 18(1):143–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-012-9792-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Teasdale GM, Drake CG, Hunt W, Kassell N, Sano K, Pertuiset B, De Villiers JC (1988) A universal subarachnoid hemorrhage scale: report of a committee of the world federation of neurosurgical societies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51(11):1457. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.51.11.1457

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2(7872):81–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. van Heuven AW, Dorhout Mees SM, Algra A, Rinkel GJ (2008) Validation of a prognostic subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale derived directly from the Glasgow coma scale. Stroke 39(4):1347–1348. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.498345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM (1980) Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 6(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198001000-00001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Frontera JA, Claassen J, Schmidt JM, Wartenberg KE, Temes R, Connolly ES Jr, MacDonald RL, Mayer SA (2006) Prediction of symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the modified fisher scale. Neurosurgery 59(1):21–27; discussion 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000218821.34014.1B

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vale FL, Bradley EL, Fisher WS 3rd (1997) The relationship of subarachnoid hemorrhage and the need for postoperative shunting. J Neurosurg 86(3):462–466. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Demirgil BT, Tugcu B, Postalci L, Guclu G, Dalgic A, Oral Z (2003) Factors leading to hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 46(6):344–348. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-812500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mocco J, Ransom ER, Komotar RJ, Schmidt JM, Sciacca RR, Mayer SA, Connolly ES Jr (2006) Preoperative prediction of long-term outcome in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 59(3):529–538; discussion 529-538. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000228680.22550.A2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosen DS, Macdonald RL (2004) Grading of subarachnoid hemorrhage: modification of the world World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies scale on the basis of data for a large series of patients. Neurosurgery 54(3):566–575; discussion 575-566. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000108862.32404.A5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Taki W, Sakai N, Suzuki H, Group P (2011) Determinants of poor outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage when both clipping and coiling are available: Prospective Registry of Subarachnoid Aneurysms Treatment (PRESAT) in Japan. World Neurosurg 76(5):437–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2011.04.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lagares A, Gómez PA, Lobato RD, Alén JF, Alday R, Campollo J (2001) Prognostic factors on hospital admission after spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir 143(7):665–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010170044

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pierot L, Cognard C, Anxionnat R, Ricolfi F, Investigators C (2010) Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: factors affecting the rate and outcome of endovascular treatment complications in a series of 782 patients (CLARITY study). Radiology 256(3):916–923. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10092209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruiz-Sandoval JL, Cantu C, Chiquete E, Leon-Jimenez C, Arauz A, Murillo-Bonilla LM, Villarreal-Careaga J, Barinagarrementeria F, Investigators R (2009) Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in a Mexican multicenter registry of cerebrovascular disease: the RENAMEVASC study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 18(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2008.09.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lagares A, de Toledo P, Fernandez-Alen JA, Ibanez J, Arikan F, Sarabia R, Ballenilla F, Gabarros A, Horcajadas A, Rodriguez-Boto G et al (2008) Spontaneous Subarachnoid Haemorrhage multicenter database from the Group for the Study of Vascular Pathology of the Spanish Society for Neurosurgery: presentation, inclusion criteria and development of an internet-based registry. Neurocirugia (Astur) 19(5):405–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1130-1473(08)70207-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jaja BN, Attalla D, Macdonald RL, Schweizer TA, Cusimano MD, Etminan N, Hanggi D, Hasan D, Johnston SC, Le Roux P et al (2014) The Subarachnoid Hemorrhage International Trialists (SAHIT) Repository: advancing clinical research in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 21(3):551–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-014-9990-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Macdonald RL, Cusimano MD, Etminan N, Hanggi D, Hasan D, Ilodigwe D, Jaja B, Lantigua H, Le Roux P, Lo B et al (2013) Subarachnoid Hemorrhage International Trialists data repository (SAHIT). World Neurosurg 79(3–4):418–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ikawa F, Ohbayashi N, Imada Y, Matsushige T, Kajihara Y, Inagawa T, Kobayashi S (2004) Analysis of subarachnoid hemorrhage according to the Japanese standard stroke registry study—incidence, outcome, and comparison with the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 44(5):275–276. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.44.275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fischer T, Johnsen SP, Pedersen L, Gaist D, Sorensen HT, Rothman KJ (2005) Seasonal variation in hospitalization and case fatality of subarachnoid hemorrhage—a nationwide Danish study on 9,367 patients. Neuroepidemiology 24(1–2):32–37. https://doi.org/10.1159/000081047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schatlo B, Fung C, Fathi AR, Sailer M, Winkler K, Daniel RT, Bijlenga P, Ahlborn P, Seule M, Zumofen D, Reinert M, Woernle C, Stienen M, Levivier M, Hildebrandt G, Mariani L, Bernays R, Fandino J, Raabe A, Keller E, Schaller K (2012) Introducing a nationwide registry: the Swiss study on aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (Swiss SOS). Acta Neurochir 154(12):2173–2178; discussion 2178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1500-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bederson JB, Connolly ES Jr, Batjer HH, Dacey RG, Dion JE, Diringer MN, Duldner JE Jr, Harbaugh RE, Patel AB, Rosenwasser RH et al (2009) Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 40(3):994–1025. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.191395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Farrell B, Godwin J, Richards S, Warlow C (1991) The United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: final results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 54(12):1044–1054. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.54.12.1044

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bonferroni C (1937) Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilita. In: Volume in Onore di Ricarrdo dalla Volta. Universita di Firenza, pp 1–62

  33. Rosengart AJ, Schultheiss KE, Tolentino J, Macdonald RL (2007) Prognostic factors for outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 38(8):2315–2321. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.484360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Deruty R, Pelissou-Guyotat I, Mottolese C, Amat D, Bognar L (1995) Level of consciousness and age as prognostic factors in aneurysmal SAH. Acta Neurochir 132(1–3):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01404840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rabinstein AA, Friedman JA, Nichols DA, Pichelmann MA, McClelland RL, Manno EM, Atkinson JL, Wijdicks EF (2004) Predictors of outcome after endovascular treatment of cerebral vasospasm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25(10):1778–1782

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Risselada R, Lingsma HF, Bauer-Mehren A, Friedrich CM, Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yarnold J, Sneade M, Steyerberg EW, Sturkenboom MC (2010) Prediction of 60 day case-fatality after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: results from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Eur J Epidemiol 25(4):261–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9432-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Avdagic SS, Brkic H, Avdagic H, Smajic J, Hodzic S (2015) Impact of comorbidity on early outcome of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by cerebral aneurysm rupture. Med Arch 69(5):280–283. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2015.69.280-283

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Boogaarts HD, Conde MP, Janssen E, van Nuenen WF, de Vries J, Donders R, Westert GP, Grotenhuis JA, Bartels RH (2014) The value of the Charlson co-morbidity index in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir 156(9):1663–1667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2160-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47(11):1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Naval NS, Kowalski RG, Chang TR, Caserta F, Carhuapoma JR, Tamargo RJ (2014) The SAH score: a comprehensive communication tool. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 23(5):902–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.07.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zeiler FA, Lo BW, Akoth E, Silvaggio J, Kaufmann AM, Teitelbaum J, West M (2017) Predicting outcome in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) utilizing the full outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score. Neurocrit Care 27(3):381–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-017-0396-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Fortuny LA, Adams CB, Briggs M (1980) Surgical mortality in an aneurysm population: effects of age, blood pressure and preoperative neurological state. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 43(10):879–882. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.43.10.879

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. O’Sullivan MG, Dorward N, Whittle IR, Steers AJ, Miller JD (1994) Management and long-term outcome following subarachnoid haemorrhage and intracranial aneurysm surgery in elderly patients: an audit of 199 consecutive cases. Br J Neurosurg 8(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688699409002389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ryttlefors M, Enblad P, Kerr RS, Molyneux AJ (2008) International subarachnoid aneurysm trial of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling: subgroup analysis of 278 elderly patients. Stroke 39(10):2720–2726. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.506030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rowe JG, Molyneux AJ, Byrne JV, Renowden S, Aziz TZ (1996) Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a minimally invasive approach with advantages for elderly patients. Age Ageing 25(5):372–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/25.5.372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Laidlaw JD, Siu KH (2003) Poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: outcome after treatment with urgent surgery. Neurosurgery 53(6):1275–1280; discussion 1280-1272. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000093199.74960.FF

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kazumata K, Kamiyama H, Ishikawa T (2006) Reference table predicting the outcome of subarachnoid hemorrhage in the elderly, stratified by age. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 15(1):14–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2005.08.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nieuwkamp DJ, Rinkel GJ, Silva R, Greebe P, Schokking DA, Ferro JM (2006) Subarachnoid haemorrhage in patients > or = 75 years: clinical course, treatment and outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77(8):933–937. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.084350

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ryttlefors M, Howells T, Ronne-Engstrom E, Nilsson P, Enblad P (2010) Neurointensive care is justified in elderly patients with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage—an outcome and secondary insults study. Acta Neurochir 152(2):241–249; discussion 249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0496-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Awe OO, Gonzalez LF, Hasan D, Maltenfort M, Rossenwasser R, Jabbour P (2011) Treatment outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients aged 70 years and older. Neurosurgery 68(3):753–758; discussion 758. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318207a9fb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Horiuchi T, Tanaka Y, Hongo K (2005) Surgical treatment for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in the 8th and 9th decades of life. Neurosurgery 56(3):469–475; discussion 469-475. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000153926.67713.B8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Al-Khindi T, Macdonald RL, Schweizer TA (2010) Cognitive and functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 41(8):e519–e536. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Vlak MH, Rinkel GJ, Greebe P, Greving JP, Algra A (2013) Lifetime risks for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: multivariable risk stratification. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84(6):619–623. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-303783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Juvela S (2003) Prehemorrhage risk factors for fatal intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 34(8):1852–1857. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000080380.56799.DD

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kassell NF, Torner JC, Haley EC, Jane JA, Adams HP, Kongable GL (1990) The international cooperative study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. Part 1: overall management results. J Neurosurg 73(1):18–36. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1990.73.1.0018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Eskesen V, Rosenorn J, Schmidt K, Ronde F (1987) Pre-existing arterial hypertension in subarachnoid haemorrhage: an unfavourable prognostic factor. Br J Neurosurg 1(4):455–461. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688698708999636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Germanson TP, Lanzino G, Kongable GL, Torner JC, Kassell NF (1998) Risk classification after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Surg Neurol 49(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(97)00337-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Juvela S (1992) Alcohol consumption as a risk factor for poor outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. BMJ 304(6843):1663–1667. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.304.6843.1663

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Kongable GL, Lanzino G, Germanson TP, Truskowski LL, Alves WM, Torner JC, Kassell NF (1996) Gender-related differences in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 84(1):43–48. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.84.1.0043

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

To Ethan Taub, MD, for reviewing the manuscript, to Selina Ackermann for editorial assistance, and to the members and collaborators of the Swiss SOS Study group.

Funding

This research was supported by departmental funds of the Department of Surgery, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. The Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics receives funding from Stiftung Institut für klinische Epidemiologie.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

DZ, MR, RA, HB, LM, and RG designed the study. DZ, MR, SB, MS, CF, DD, NM, AF, MC, DS, JG, DV, TR, RB, MS, JB, and SM carried out sample collection. DZ, MR, RA, and HB performed data analysis. DZ, MR, KB, HB, LM, and RG wrote the manuscript. DZ, MR, RA, HB, KB, and RG revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel W. Zumofen.

Ethics declarations

Statement of human rights

Internal Review Board (IRB) and Ethical Committee approval were obtained for all participating centers (under the supervision of the Geneva ethical committee board no. 11-233R, NAC 11-085R). Most local Ethic Committees waived the need for obtaining written informed consent (justification: disproportionality). Written informed consent was obtained however from all participating patients for both the retrospective collection of data in 2009 and the prospective collection of data from 2010 onward if the local Ethic Committee had requested it. As of 2014 (implementation of the new Swiss Human Research Act), written informed consent was obtained from all participating patients in all participating centers. Consent to publish: No consent to publish from the participants to report individual patient data was obtained as no individual participant’s data in any form will be published.

Trial registration

This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database and does not require clinical trial registration.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Reporting

Our results are reported as recommended in the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Previous presentation: Preliminary results of this study were presented in form of a poster and abstract at the Joint Annual Meeting of the Swiss Society of Neurosurgery and the Swiss Society of Neuroradiology, September 2015, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Additional information

On behalf of the Swiss SOS Study Group Members and collaborators of the Swiss SOS Study Group are listed in the appendix

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 46184 kb)

Appendix: Swiss SOS Study Group

Appendix: Swiss SOS Study Group

Members or collaborators of the Swiss SOS Study Group that were not listed as authors include Javier Fandino, Daniel Colluccia, Marta Arrighi, Alice Venier, Dominique E. Kuhlen, Michael Reinert, Astrid Weyerbrock, Martin Hlavica, Jean-Yves Fournier, Andreas Raabe, Juergen Beck, David Bervini, Karl Schaller, Roy T. Daniel, Daniele Starnoni, Mahmoud Messerer, Marc Levivier, Emanuela Keller, Luca Regli, Oliver Bozinov, Sina Finkenstaedt, Luca Remonda, Christoph Stippich, Jan Gralla, Zsolt Kulcsar, Vitor Mendes-Pereira, Alessandro Cianfoni, Peter Ahlborn, Nicolas R. Smoll, Veit Rohde, Sina Tok, Fabian Baumann, Karl Kothbauer, Hassen Kerkeni, Hiroki Dan-Ura, Hans Landolt, Khaled Mostaguir, Yvan Gasche, Asita Sarrafzadeh, Gerhard Hildebrandt, Kerstin Winkler, Christoph Woernle, and Rene Bernays.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zumofen, D.W., Roethlisberger, M., Achermann, R. et al. Factors associated with clinical and radiological status on admission in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurg Rev 41, 1059–1069 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-0952-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-0952-2

Keywords

Navigation