Abstract
The diagnostic value of head magnetic resonance imaging after negative head computed tomography for emergency department patients with vague neurologic symptoms, such as dizziness and altered mental status, remains an ongoing discussion. The objective of this study is to detect the subgroup of patients with such presentations having minor strokes whom may benefit from primary and secondary stroke prevention. We conducted a retrospective analysis and stratified patient risk factors associated with positive findings on subsequent head MRI ordered by the emergency department physician following a normal head CT. Two hundred fifty-two patients presenting with atypical stroke symptoms to the emergency department had a negative head CT followed by head MRI within 24 h ordered by emergency department clinician (123 males and 129 females; mean age of 59.4). Twenty nine of the 252 patients (11.5 %) had findings of acute to subacute infarct on the subsequent MRI. Positive MRI findings were statistically correlated with the following variables: age (p < 0.001), history of hyperlipidemia (p = 0.019), hypertension (p < 0.001), diabetes (p = 0.004), anticoagulation use (p = 0.029), and prior transient ischemic attack or stroke (p < 0.001). The mean age of the MRI-positive group was 74.1 years, with a mean difference of 16.7 ± 2.4 years more than the MRI-negative group (95 % CI, 11.8–21.5 years) (t = 6.8, p < 0.001). Emergency physicians caring for patients with vague neurologic complaints should maintain a lower threshold for ordering a head MRI despite a negative head CT for elderly patients with a history of prior stroke or transient ischemic attack to exclude a CT occult or minor ischemic stroke.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chalela JA et al (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet 369:293–298
Mitchell P, Wilkinson ID, Hoggard N et al (2001) Detection of subarachnoid haemorrhage with magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70:205–211
Kastrup O, Wanke I, Maschke M (2005) Neuroimaging of infections. NeuroRx 2(2):324–332
Newman-Toker DE, Hsieh YH, Camargo CA Jr, Pelletier AJ, Butchy GT, Edlow JA (2008) Spectrum of dizziness visits to US emergency departments: cross-sectional analysis from a nationally representative sample. Mayo Clin Proc 83:765–775
Goyal N, Donnino MW, Vachhani R, Bajwa R, Ahmad T, Otero R (2006) The utility of head computed tomography in the emergency department evaluation of syncope. Intern Emerg Med 1:148–150
Giglio P, Bednarczyk EM, Weiss K, Balshi R (2005) Syncope and head CT scans in the emergency department. Emerg Radiol 12(1–2):44–46
Wasay M, Dubey N, Bakshi R (2005) Dizziness and yield of emergency head CT scan: is it cost effective? Emerg Med J 22:312
Lawhn-Heath C, Buckle C, Christoforidis G, Straus C (2013) Utility of head CT in the evaluation of vertigo/dizziness in the emergency department. Emerg Radiol 20:45–49
Lovett JK, Dennis MS, Sandercock PA, Bamford J, Warlow CP, Rothwell PM (2003) Very early risk of stroke after a first transient ischemic attack. Stroke 34(8):138–140
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2010 Emergency Department Summary Tables. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/2010_ed_web_tables.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2016
Burke JF, Kerber KA, Iwashyna TJ, Morgenstern LB (2012) Wide variation and rising utilization of stroke magnetic resonance imaging: data from 11 states. Ann Neurol 71(2):179–185
Xiao H et al (2012) Evaluation and treatment of altered mental status patients in the emergency department: life in the fast lane. World J Emerg Med 3(4):270–277
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hammoud, K., Lanfranchi, M., Li, S.X. et al. What is the diagnostic value of head MRI after negative head CT in ED patients presenting with symptoms atypical of stroke?. Emerg Radiol 23, 339–344 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-016-1408-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-016-1408-z