Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the effects of Er:YAG laser, Nd:YAG laser, and two different desensitizers on dentin permeability: in vitro study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser, neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser, PrevDent nano-hydroxyapatite toothpaste plus Repairing Serum Kit (PNH), and NUPRO Sensodyne Prophylaxis Paste with NovaMin (NPP) on dentin permeability reduction. Forty dentin discs obtained from bovine incisors were divided into four study groups: Er:YAG laser-treated (2940 nm; 0.2 W, 80 mJ/pulse, 3 Hz); Nd:YAG laser-treated (1064 nm; 1 W, 10 Hz); PNH-treated; and NPP-treated groups. The quantitative changes in permeability of each dentin disc were measured using a computerized fluid filtration method (CFFM) before and after desensitizer treatments. The data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon, paired-samples t, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests. The dentin surfaces and tubules were also morphologically detected by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In all groups, dentin permeability was significantly reduced after the desensitizer and laser treatments (p < 0.05). Among the groups, we detected a significant difference in only when comparing the Er:YAG laser- and NPP-treated groups (p = 0.034). SEM analysis revealed physical changes in the dentin surface in all groups. This in vitro study shows that all tested desensitizers and laser treatments reduced dentin permeability. Also, surface changes, such as complete or partial occlusion or shrinkage of dentin tubules, were observed in all groups. Although the laser groups performed best, the PNH protocol can be considered as an alternative therapeutic product. In addition, clinical and laboratory studies should be performed for this product, and their efficacy should be assessed by combined therapy with lasers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Lima Pedro R, Krammer G, da Motta L, de Castro Costa M (2016) Effect of desensitizing products on the morphology of dentin substrate. J Dent Probl Solut 3(1):002–005. https://doi.org/10.17352/2394-8418.000022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Montazerian M, Zanotto ED (2016) Bioactive and inert dental glass-ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res A 104(5):1231–1249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilliam D, Orchardson R (2006) Advances in the treatment of root dentine sensitivity: mechanisms and treatment principles. Endod Top 13:13–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartold P (2006) Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. Aust Dent J 51(3):212–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Walters PA (2005) Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. J Contemp Dent Pract 6(2):107–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Birang R, Poursamimi J, Gutknecht N, Lampert F, Mir M (2007) Comparative evaluation of the effects of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in dentin hypersensitivity treatment. Lasers Med Sci 22(1):21–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lan W-H, Liu H-C (1996) Treatment of dentin hypersensitivity by Nd:YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg 14(2):89–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dundar A, Yavuz T, Orucoglu H, Daneshmehr L, Yalcin M, Sengun A (2015) Evaluation of the permeability of five desensitizing agents using computerized fluid filtration. Niger J Clin Pract 18(5):601–606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ling T, Gillam D, Barber P, Mordan N, Critchell J (1997) An investigation of potential desensitizing agents in the dentine disc model: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Oral Rehabil 24(3):191–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tuner J, Beck-Kristensen P, Ross G, Ross A (2016) Photobiomodylation in dentistry. In: Convissar RA (ed) Principles and practice of laser dentistry. Elsevier, St.Louis, pp 267

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kimura Y, Wilder-Smith P, Yonaga K, Matsumoto K (2000) Treatment of dentine hypersensitivity by lasers: a review. J Clin Periodontol 27(10):715–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mozaffari HR, Ehteshami A, Zallaghi F, Chiniforush N, Moradi Z (2016) Microleakage in class V composite restorations after desensitizing surface treatment with Er:YAG and CO2 lasers. Laser Therapy 25(4):259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tschoppe P, Zandim DL, Martus P, Kielbassa AM (2011) Enamel and dentine remineralization by nano-hydroxyapatite toothpastes. J Dent 39(6):430–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kunam D, Manimaran S, Sampath V, Sekar M (2016) Evaluation of dentinal tubule occlusion and depth of penetration of nano-hydroxyapatite derived from chicken eggshell powder with and without addition of sodium fluoride: an in vitro study. J Conservative Dentistry: JCD 19(3):239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Layer TM (2011) Development of a fluoridated, daily-use toothpaste containing NovaMin technology for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. J Clin Dent 22(3):59–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Milleman JL, Milleman KR, Clark CE, Mongiello KA, Simonton TC, Proskin HM (2012) NUPRO sensodyne prophylaxis paste with NovaMin for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: a 4-week clinical study. Am J Dent 25(5):262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oruçoğlu H, Sengun A, Yilmaz N (2005) Apical leakage of resin based root canal sealers with a new computerized fluid filtration meter. J Endod 31(12):886–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Outhwaite WC, Mckenzie DM, Pashley DH (1974) A versatile split-chamber device for studying dentin permeability. J Dent Res 53(6):1503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yilmaz NA, Ertas E, Orucoğlu H (2017) Evaluation of five different desensitizers: a comparative dentin permeability and SEM investigation in vitro. Open Dent J 11:15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Komabayashi T, Imai Y, Ahn C, Chow LC, Takagi S (2010) Dentin permeability reduction by a sequential application of calcium and fluoride–phosphate solutions. J Dent 38(9):736–741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwarz F, Arweiler N, Georg T, Reich E (2002) Desensitizing effects of an Er:YAG laser on hypersensitive dentine. J Clin Periodontol 29(3):211–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Soares M, Porciúncula GB, Lucena M, Gueiros L, Leão JC, Carvalho A (2016) Efficacy of Nd:YAG and GaAlAs lasers in comparison to 2% fluoride gel for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Gen Dent 64(6):66–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Holland G, Narhi M, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R (1997) Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 24(11):808–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pashley DH, O'meara J, Kepler E, Galloway S, Thompson S, Stewart F (1984) Dentin permeability: effects of desensitizing dentifrices in vitro. J Periodontol 55(9):522–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Talioti E, Hill R, Gillam D (2014) The efficacy of selected desensitizing OTC products: a systematic review. ISRN Dent 2014

  26. West N, Addy M, Jackson R, Ridge D (1997) Dentine hypersensitivity and the placebo response. J Clin Periodontol 24(4):209–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gillam D, Mordan N, Newman H (1997) The dentin disc surface: a plausible model for dentin physiology and dentin sensitivity evaluation. Adv Dent Res 11(4):487–501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pereira JC, Segala AD, Gillam DG (2005) Effect of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin subjected to different surface pre-treatments—an in vitro study. Dent Mater 21(2):129–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Elgalaid TO, Creanor SL, Creanor S, Hall AF (2008) The repeatability of human dentine permeability measurement in vitro. J Dent 36(1):42–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schmalz G, Hiller K-A, Nunez LJ, Stoll J, Weis K (2001) Permeability characteristics of bovine and human dentin under different pretreatment conditions. J Endod 27(1):23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vano M, Derchi G, Barone A, Covani U (2014) Effectiveness of nano-hydroxyapatite toothpaste in reducing dentin hypersensitivity: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Quintessence Int 45(8)

  32. Renton-Harper P, Midda M (1992) Nd:YAG laser treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Br Dent J 172(1):13–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tunar OL, Gürsoy H, Çakar G, Kuru B, Ipci SD, Yılmaz S (2014) Evaluation of the effects of Er: YAG laser and desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate, and their combinations on human dentine tubules: a scanning electron microscopic analysis. Photomed Laser Surg 32(10):540–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Öncü E, Karabekiroğlu S, Ünlü N (2017) Effects of different desensitizers and lasers on dentine tubules: an in-vitro analysis. Microsc Res Tech

  35. Corrêa Aranha AC, Domingues FB, Franco VO, Gutknecht N, De Paula Eduardo C (2005) Effects of Er:YAG and Nd:YAG lasers on dentin permeability in root surfaces: a preliminary in vitro study. Photomed Laser Ther 23(5):504–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kara C, Orbak R (2009) Comparative evaluation of Nd: YAG laser and fluoride varnish for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Endod 35(7):971–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Gatto R, Monaco A (2011) Effectiveness of laser in dentinal hypersensitivity treatment: a systematic review. J Endod 37(3):297–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Orchardson R, Peacock JM, John Whitters C (1997) Effect of pulsed Nd:YAG laser radiation on action potential conduction in isolated mammalian spinal nerves. Lasers Surg Med 21(2):142–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Severino M, Gatto R, Monaco A (2013) Lasers for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity a meta-analysis. J Dent Res 92(6):492–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kantorowitz Z, Featherstone JD, Fried D (1998) Caries prevention by CO2 laser treatment: dependency on the number of pulses used. J Am Dent Assoc 129(5):585–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Borges A, Barcellos D, Gomes C (2012) Dentin hypersensitivity-etiology, treatment possibilities and other related factors: a literature review. World J Dentistry 3(1):60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. He S, Wang Y, Li X, Hu D (2011) Effectiveness of laser therapy and topical desensitising agents in treating dentine hypersensitivity: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 38(5):348–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Low SB, Allen EP, Kontogiorgos ED (2015) Reduction in dental hypersensitivity with nano-hydroxyapatite, potassium nitrate, sodium monoflurophosphate and antioxidants. Open Dent J 9:92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kulal R, Jayanti I, Sambashivaiah S, Bilchodmath S (2016) An in-vitro comparison of nano hydroxyapatite, NovaMin and Proargin desensitizing toothpastes—a SEM study. J Clinical Diagnostic Res: JCDR 10(10):ZC51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Gopinath NM, John J, Nagappan N, Prabhu S, Kumar ES (2015) Evaluation of dentifrice containing nano-hydroxyapatite for dentinal hypersensitivity: a randomized controlled trial. J Int Oral Health: JIOH 7(8):118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Apel C, Birker L, Meister J, Weiss C, Gutknecht N (2004) The caries-preventive potential of subablative Er:YAG and Er:YSGG laser radiation in an intraoral model: a pilot study. Photomed Laser Ther 22(4):312–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sevda Kurt.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals. The study is an in vitro study, and the bovine teeth obtained from slaughterhouse materials were used.

Informed consent

Formal consent is not required for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurt, S., Kırtıloğlu, T., Yılmaz, N.A. et al. Evaluation of the effects of Er:YAG laser, Nd:YAG laser, and two different desensitizers on dentin permeability: in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci 33, 1883–1890 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2546-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2546-1

Keywords

Navigation