Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of electric vehicle development on China’s energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of electric vehicle development on China’s greenhouse gas emissions and fossil energy consumption from a life cycle perspective. Based on vehicle technology and China’s energy development plan, the potential for energy conservation and greenhouse gas emissions reduction of electric vehicles is explored. Utilizing a logistic model, the market evolution of electric vehicles under different timing for banning the sale of the traditional fuel vehicle is simulated and analyzed, and the corresponding effect on energy conservation and greenhouse gas emissions reduction is also examined. The results show that the high proportion of coal-fired thermal power limits the energy saving and emission reduction potential of electric vehicles in China. The life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and fossil energy consumption intensities of electric vehicles in various regions are approximately − 2.63%–30.98% (− 7.63–89.81 g CO2-eq/km) and 17.71%–43.16% (0.67–1.64 MJ/km) lower than those of traditional fuel vehicles, respectively. As the proportion of renewable electricity generation continues to increase, by 2050, replacing traditional fuel vehicles with electric vehicles can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 22.32% and fossil energy consumption by 29.94% in all regions of China. In addition, if China plans to ban the sale of traditional fuel vehicle between 2040 and 2060, the cumulative fossil energy savings and greenhouse gas emission reductions during the period of 2020–2050 can reach approximately 25.70–73.47 million TJ and 1511.95–4303.87 million tons of CO2-eq, respectively.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Berkeley N, Bailey D, Jones A, Jarvis D (2017) Assessing the transition towards Battery Electric Vehicles: A Multi-Level Perspective on drivers of, and barriers to, take up. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 106:320–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicer Y, Dincer I (2018) Life cycle environmental impact assessments and comparisons of alternative fuels for clean vehicles. Resour Conserv Recycl 132:141–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito TLF, Islam T, Stettler M, et al (2019) Transitions between technological generations of alternative fuel vehicles in Brazil. Energy Policy 134:110915

  • Ecoinvent Centre (2019) Ecoinvent Data and Reports v.3.6.

  • China Automotive Technology & Research Center (2020) China Energy Saving and New Energy Vehicle Yearbook. China Railway Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • China National Energy Administration (2020) China Electric Power Statistical Yearbook 2020. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • China Petroleum Economics and Technology Research Institute (2019) World and China Energy Outlook. Beijing

  • China State Information Center (2021) China’s auto market outlook in 2021. Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenna E, Gauch M, Widmer R et al (2021) Towards more flexibility and transparency in life cycle inventories for Lithium-ion batteries. Resour Conserv Recycl 170:105619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong F, Liu Y (2020) Policy evolution and effect evaluation of new-energy vehicle industry in China. Resour Policy 67:101655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egbue O, Long S, Samaranayake VA (2017) Mass deployment of sustainable transportation: evaluation of factors that influence electric vehicle adoption. Clean Technol Environ Policy 19:1927–1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehsani M, Singh KV, Bansal HO, Mehrjardi RT (2021) State of the Art and Trends in Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Proc IEEE

  • Elshkaki A (2019) Material-energy-water-carbon nexus in China’s electricity generation system up to 2050. Energy 189:116355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnann T, Stephens TS, Lin Z et al (2018) What drives the market for plug-in electric vehicles? A review of international PEV market diffusion models. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 93:158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao H, Cheng X, Liu Z, Zhao F (2017) Electric vehicles for greenhouse gas reduction in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 56:68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haustein S, Jensen AF, Cherchi E (2021) Battery electric vehicle adoption in Denmark and Sweden: recent changes, related factors and policy implications. Energy Policy 149:112096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulshof D, Mulder M (2020) Willingness to Pay for CO2 emission reductions in passenger car transport. Environ Resour Econ 75:899–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Tokyo

  • ISO (2006a) International Standard 14040. Environmental Management Life Cycle Assessment Requirements and Guidelines.

  • ISO (2006b) International Standard 14040.Environmental Management Life Cycle Assessment Principles and Framework

  • Jensen AF, Cherchi E, Mabit SL, Ortúzar JdeD (2017) Predicting the potential market for electric vehicles. Transp Sci 51:427–440. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke W, Zhang S, He X et al (2017) Well-to-wheels energy consumption and emissions of electric vehicles: mid-term implications from real-world features and air pollution control progress. Appl Energy 188:367–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krail M, Schade W (2016) Measures to promote the diffusion of alternative fuel vehicles in EU27. Energy Environ 1:155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriegler E, Bauer N, Popp A et al (2017) Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): an energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. Glob Environ Chang 42:297–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang J, Cheng S, Zhou Y et al (2013) Energy and environmental implications of hybrid and electric vehicles in China. Energies 6:2663–2685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévay PZ, Drossinos Y, Thiel C (2017) The effect of fiscal incentives on market penetration of electric vehicles: a pairwise comparison of total cost of ownership. Energy Policy 105:524–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotfi A, Lotfi A, Halal WE (2014) Forecasting technology diffusion: a new generalisation of the logistic model. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 26:943–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matak N, Krajačić G (2020) Assessment of mitigation measures contribution to CO 2 reduction in sustainable energy action plan. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22:2039–2052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China (2021) Fuel consumption limits for passenger cars. Beijing, China

  • Morisita M (1965) The fitting of the logistic equation to the rate of increase of population density. Popul Ecol 7:52–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (2020) China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2020. China Statistics Press, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • National Development and Reform Commission (2016) China 2050 high renewable energy penetration scenario and roadmap study. Beijing

  • Nelder JA (1962) 182. note: an alternative form of a generalized logistic equation. Biometrics 18:614–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plötz P, Gnann T, Sprei F (2016) Can policy measures foster plug-in electric vehicle market diffusion? World Electr Veh J 8:789–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao Q, Zhao F, Liu Z et al (2017) Cradle-to-gate greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric and internal combustion engine vehicles in China. Appl Energy 204:1399–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramli AF, Ab Muis Z, Ho WS et al (2019) Carbon Emission Pinch Analysis: an application to the transportation sector in Iskandar Malaysia for 2025. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:1899–1911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos RA (2013) Logistic function as a forecasting model: It‟ s application to business and economics. Int J Eng 2:2305–8269

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocco MV, Casalegno A, Colombo E (2018) Modelling road transport technologies in future scenarios: theoretical comparison and application of well-to-wheels and input-output analyses. Appl Energy 232:583–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaie F, Javadi S, Meyar-Naimi H, Feshki-Farahani H (2020) Environmental sustainability policy on plug-in hybrid electric vehicle penetration utilizing fuzzy TOPSIS and game theory. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22:787–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Zhang H, Yu Z (2021) Electric vehicle life cycle energy saving and emission reduction benefit analysis and environmental impact assessment. Resour Ind 02:100–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinde AM, Dikshit AK, Odlare M, et al (2021) Life cycle assessment of bio-methane and biogas-based electricity production from organic waste for utilization as a vehicle fuel. Clean Technol Environ Policy 1–11

  • Singh KV, Bansal HO, Singh D (2019) A comprehensive review on hybrid electric vehicles: architectures and components. J Mod Transp 27:77–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh V, Singh V, Vaibhav S (2020) A review and simple meta-analysis of factors influencing adoption of electric vehicles. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 86:102436

  • Singh KV, Bansal HO, Singh D (2021) Development of an adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system–based equivalent consumption minimisation strategy to improve fuel economy in hybrid electric vehicles. IET Electr Syst Transp

  • Stangarone T (2021) South Korean efforts to transition to a hydrogen economy. Clean Technol Environ Policy 23:509–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • State Statistical Bureau of China (2018) China Statistical Yearbook 2018. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun S, Wang W (2018) Analysis on the market evolution of new energy vehicle based on population competition model. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 65:36–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarasov VE, Tarasova VV (2019) Logistic equation with continuously distributed lag and application in economics. Nonlinear Dyn 97:1313–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wappelhorst S, Cui H (2020) Growing momentum: Global overview of government targets for phasing out sales of new internal combustion engine vehicles. https://theicct.org/blog/staff/global-ice-phaseout-nov2020. Accessed 8 May 2021

  • Watabe A, Leaver J, Shafiei E, Ishida H (2020) Life cycle emissions assessment of transition to low-carbon vehicles in Japan: combined effects of banning fossil-fueled vehicles and enhancing green hydrogen and electricity. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22:1775–1793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Dong J, Lin Z, Hu L (2016) Predicting market potential and environmental benefits of deploying electric taxis in Nanjing, China. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 49:68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.08.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Wang B, Jiao K (2020) Life cycle assessment of fuel cell, electric and internal combustion engine vehicles under different fuel scenarios and driving mileages in China. Energy 198:117365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Yu B, Yang B et al (2021) Life cycle environmental assessment of electric and internal combustion engine vehicles in China. J Clean Prod 285:124899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yin R, Hu S, Yang Y (2019) Life cycle inventories of the commonly used materials for lithium-ion batteries in China. J Clean Prod 227:960–971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Han Q (2017) Development of electric vehicles for China’s power generation portfolio: a regional economic and environmental analysis. J Clean Prod 162:71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Liang Y, Yu E et al (2017) Review of electric vehicle policies in China: Content summary and effect analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 70:698–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao F, Chen K, Hao H et al (2019) Technology development for electric vehicles under new energy vehicle credit regulation in China: scenarios through 2030. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shouheng Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, X., Sun, S. Impact of electric vehicle development on China’s energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Clean Techn Environ Policy 23, 2909–2925 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02209-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02209-6

Keywords

Navigation