Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Performance of γ-aluminium oxide nanoparticles for arsenic removal from groundwater

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the applicability of γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles (NPs) adsorbent for removal of arsenite and arsenate from aqueous solution. The nano-adsorbent was characterized using zeta potential analysis, dynamic light scattering, field emission scanning microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. Batch adsorption studies were carried out to optimize adsorption parameters such as contact time, stirring speed, initial arsenic concentration, adsorbent dose, pH and effect of different competing anions. Langmuir adsorption capacities obtained at 298 K are 769.23 µg/g and 1000 µg/g for As(III) and As(V) removal correspondingly. The adsorption mechanism was well established by pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Negative values of enthalpy (ΔH°) obtained during adsorption [− 29.12 kJ/mol and − 35.55 kJ/mol for As(III) and As(V), respectively] confirmed the process was exothermic in nature. The negative values of ΔG° [− 6.14 to − 3.86 kJ/mol for As(III) and − 9.32 to − 6.68 kJ/mol for As(V)] further affirmed that the adsorption process is spontaneous in nature. There was no requirement of additional external energy supply for the enhanced removal as the adsorption was less favoured at high temperature. Phosphate and sulphate had the profound effect on reduction in the removal efficiency. Good regenerating efficiency of γ-Al2O3 NPs up to fourth cycle implied economic feasibility of the adsorbent. The effectiveness of γ-Al2O3 was also proved for removal of arsenic from real arsenic-contaminated groundwater.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Hamouz OCS, Akintola OS (2017) Removal of lead and arsenic ions by a new series of aniline based polyamines. Process Saf Environ Prot 106:180–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen SJ, Mckay G, Porter JF (2004) Adsorption isotherm models for basic dye adsorption by peat in single and binary component systems. J Colloid Interface Sci 280(2):322–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Altundoğan HS, Altundoğan S, Tümen F, Bildik M (2002) Arsenic adsorption from aqueous solutions by activated red mud. Waste Manag 22(3):357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (2012) Standards for examination of water and waste water, 22nd edn. American Public Health Association, America Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentahar Y, Hurel C, Draoui K, Khairoun S, Marmier N (2016) Adsorptive properties of Moroccan clays for the removal of arsenic(V) from aqueous solution. Appl Clay Sci 119:385–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bose P, Sharma A (2002) Role of iron in controlling speciation and mobilization of arsenic in subsurface environment. Water Res 36(19):4916–4926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd GE, Adamson AW, Myers LS Jr (1947) The exchange adsorption of ions from aqueous solutions by organic zeolites. II. Kinetics1. J Am Chem Soc 69(11):2836–2848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborti D, Mukherjee SC, Pati S, Sengupta MK, Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Basu GK (2003) Arsenic groundwater contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, Bihar, India: a future danger? Environ Health Perspect 111(9):1194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborti D, Rahman MM, Chatterjee A, Das D, Das B, Nayak B, Sengupta MK (2016) Fate of over 480 million inhabitants living in arsenic and fluoride endemic Indian districts: magnitude, health, socio-economic effects and mitigation approaches. J Trace Elem Med Biol 38:33–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborti D, Das B, Rahman MM, Nayak B, Pal A, Sengupta MK, Saha KC (2017) Arsenic in groundwater of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC), India: critical review and modes of mitigation. Chemosphere 180:437–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry SA, Ahmed M, Siddiqui SI, Ahmed S (2016) Fe(III)–Sn(IV) mixed binary oxide-coated sand preparation and its use for the removal of arsenite and arsenate from water: application of isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamics. J Mol Liq 224:431–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CJ, Wang SL, Chiou JM, Tseng CH, Chiou HY, Hsueh YM, Lai MS (2007) Arsenic and diabetes and hypertension in human populations: a review. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 222(3):298–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury UK, Biswas BK, Chowdhury TR, Samanta G, Mandal BK, Basu GC, Roy S (2000) Groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India. Environ Health Perspect 108(5):393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta PK, Ray AK, Sharma VK, Millero FJ (2004) Adsorption of arsenate and arsenite on titanium dioxide suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci 278(2):270–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2000) Regulations on the disposal of arsenic residuals from drinking water treatment plants. Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA (EPA/600/R-00/025). http://www.epa.gov/ORD/WebPubs/residuals/index.htm

  • Garelick H, Jones H, Dybowska A, Valsami-Jones E (2009) Arsenic pollution sources. In: Whitacre DM (ed) Reviews of environmental contamination, vol 197. Springer, New York, pp 17–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles DE, Mohapatra M, Issa TB, Anand S, Singh P (2011) Iron and aluminium based adsorption strategies for removing arsenic from water. J Environ Manag 92(12):3011–3022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami A, Raul PK, Purkait MK (2012) Arsenic adsorption using copper(II) oxide nanoparticles. Chem Eng Res Des 90(9):1387–1396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen HK, Núñez P, Grandon R (2006) Electrocoagulation as a remediation tool for wastewaters containing arsenic. Miner Eng 19(5):521–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ho YS, McKay G (1998) The kinetics of sorption of basic dyes from aqueous solution by sphagnum moss peat. Can J Chem Eng 76(4):822–827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inaba K, Haga M, Ueda K, Itoh A, Takemoto T, Yoshikawa H (2016) New adsorbent for removal of inorganic arsenic(III) from groundwater. Chem Lett 46(1):58–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan TA, Chaudhry SA, Ali I (2013) Thermodynamic and kinetic studies of Arsenate removal from water by zirconium oxide-coated marine sand. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(8):5425–5440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Kim C, Choi I, Rengaraj S, Yi J (2004) Arsenic removal using mesoporous alumina prepared via a templating method. Environ Sci Technol 38(3):924–931

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Kim KW, Cho J (2006) Removal and transport mechanisms of arsenics in UF and NF membrane processes. J Water Health 4(2):215–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar E, Bhatnagar A, Kumar U, Sillanpää M (2011) Defluoridation from aqueous solutions by nano-alumina: characterization and sorption studies. J Hazard Mater 186(2):1042–1049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lata S, Samadder SR (2016) Removal of arsenic from water using nano adsorbents and challenges: a review. J Environ Manag 166:387–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leupin OX, Hug SJ (2005) Oxidation and removal of arsenic(III) from aerated groundwater by filtration through sand and zero-valent iron. Water Res 39(9):1729–1740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin SH, Juang RS (2002) Heavy metal removal from water by sorption using surfactant-modified montmorillonite. J Hazard Mater 92(3):315–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lunge S, Singh S, Sinha A (2014) Magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles from tea waste for arsenic removal. J Magn Magn Mater 356:21–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumder DNG, Haque R, Ghosh N, De BK, Santra A, Chakraborti D, Smith AH (2000) Arsenic in drinking water and the prevalence of respiratory effects in West Bengal, India. Int J Epidemiol 29(6):1047–1052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee SC, Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Sengupta MK, Lodh D, Chanda CR, Chakraborti D (2003) Neuropathy in arsenic toxicity from groundwater arsenic contamination in West Bengal, India. J Environ Sci Health, Part A 38(1):165–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee SC, Saha KC, Pati S, Dutta RN, Rahman MM, Sengupta MK, Nayak B (2005) Murshidabad—one of the nine groundwater arsenic-affected districts of West Bengal, India. Part II: dermatological, neurological, and obstetric findings. Clin Toxicol 43(7):835–848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murcott S (2012) Arsenic contamination in the world. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassar MY, Khatab M (2016) Cobalt ferrite nanoparticles via a template-free hydrothermal route as an efficient nano-adsorbent for potential textile dye removal. RSC Adv 6(83):79688–79705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nassar MY, Mohamed TY, Ahmed IS, Samir I (2017) MgO nanostructure via a sol–gel combustion synthesis method using different fuels: an efficient nano-adsorbent for the removal of some anionic textile dyes. J Mol Liq 225:730–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naujokas MF, Anderson B, Ahsan H, Aposhian HV, Graziano JH, Thompson C, Suk WA (2013) The broad scope of health effects from chronic arsenic exposure: update on a worldwide public health problem. Environ Health Perspect 121(3):295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ning RY (2002) Arsenic removal by reverse osmosis. Desalination 143(3):237–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owlad M, Aroua MK, Daud WAW, Baroutian S (2009) Removal of hexavalent chromium-contaminated water and wastewater: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 200(1–4):59–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patra AK, Dutta A, Bhaumik A (2012) Self-assembled mesoporous γ-Al2O3 spherical nanoparticles and their efficiency for the removal of arsenic from water. J Hazard Mater 201:170–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponder SM, Darab JG, Bucher J, Caulder D, Craig I, Davis L, Shuh DK (2001) Surface chemistry and electrochemistry of supported zerovalent iron nanoparticles in the remediation of aqueous metal contaminants. Chem Mater 13(2):479–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhakar R, Samadder SR (2018) Low cost and easy synthesis of aluminium oxide nanoparticles for arsenite removal from groundwater: a complete batch study. J Mol Liq 250:192–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Mukherjee SC, Mondal BK, Paul K, Lodh D, Roy S (2001) Chronic arsenic toxicity in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India—a review and commentary. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 39(7):683–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Ng JC, Naidu R (2009) Chronic exposure of arsenic via drinking water and its adverse health impacts on humans. Environ Geochem Health 31(1):189–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy PK, Majumder A, Banerjee G, Roy MB, Pal S, Mazumdar A (2015) Removal of arsenic from drinking water using dual treatment process. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17(4):1065–1076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma YC, Srivastava V, Singh VK, Kaul SN, Weng CH (2009) Nano-adsorbents for the removal of metallic pollutants from water and wastewater. Environ Technol 30(6):583–609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AH, Lopipero PA, Bates MN, Steinmaus CM (2002) Arsenic epidemiology and drinking water standards. Science 296(5576):2145–2146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Temkin MJ, Pyzhev V (1940) Recent modifications to Langmuir isotherms. Acta Phys Chim Sin 12:217–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Tofik AS, Taddesse AM, Tesfahun KT, Girma GG (2016) Fe–Al binary oxide nanosorbent: synthesis, characterization and phosphate sorption property. J Environ Chem Eng 4(2):2458–2468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CH, Hsiao CK, Chen CL, Hsu LI, Chiou HY, Chen SY, Hsueh Y-M, Wu M-M, Chen CJ (2007) A review of the epidemiologic literature on the role of environmental arsenic exposure and cardiovascular diseases. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 222(3):315–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber TW, Chakravorti RK (1974) Pore and solid diffusion models for fixed-bed adsorbers. AIChE J 20(2):228–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber WJ, Morris JC (1963) Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. J Sanit Eng Div 89(2):31–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen Z, Zhang Y, Dai C, Chen B, Guo S, Yu H, Wu D (2014) Synthesis of ordered mesoporous iron manganese bimetal oxides for arsenic removal from aqueous solutions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 200:235–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeldowitsch J (1934) The catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide on manganese dioxide. Acta Physicochim URSS 1:364–449

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are sincerely grateful to the SERB-DST (Project No. SB/EMEQ-010/2014) for their financial support for the present research work. We would like to thank Department of ESE/IIT(ISM) Dhanbad, for providing all support needed. The authors would also like to acknowledge Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, for allowing us to perform XRD analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, 826004, India

    Somaparna Ghosh, Roshan Prabhakar & S. R. Samadder

Authors
  1. Somaparna Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roshan Prabhakar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. R. Samadder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. R. Samadder.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 612 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghosh, S., Prabhakar, R. & Samadder, S.R. Performance of γ-aluminium oxide nanoparticles for arsenic removal from groundwater. Clean Techn Environ Policy 21, 121–138 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1622-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1622-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation