Abstract
The synthesis problems of non-isothermal water networks, combining heat exchanger network and water network (WN), usually consist of a significant number of constraints and variables, namely, flow rates, contaminant concentrations, temperatures and a large number of non-linear terms. In most cases, solving medium and large-scale synthesis problems is computationally too expensive and challenging. In order to circumvent that problem, we propose a compact superstructure and mixed-integer non-linear programming model for the simultaneous synthesis of non-isothermal WNs. The proposed superstructure includes heat integration stages enabling direct and indirect heat exchanges with a manageable number of hot and cold streams. This reduces the models size enabling easier solutions of the synthesis problems using local solvers. In addition, a superstructure reduction strategy is proposed making the superstructure flexible and adaptable for different types of problems, namely, pinched and threshold, and providing additional reduction of connections within the proposed superstructure. The proposed model is solved using a two-step solution strategy including initialisation and design steps. The model is applied to the examples of different complexities including single and multiple contaminant problems, and water-using and wastewater treatment units. Using the proposed iterative strategy, the improved locally optimal solutions are identified for most examples, minimising the total annual cost of the overall network.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- c :
-
Contaminant
- cs :
-
Heating stage for cold streams
- hs :
-
Cooling stage for hot streams
- i :
-
Hot process stream
- j :
-
Cold process stream
- p :
-
Process unit
- s :
-
Freshwater source
- t :
-
Treatment unit
- CP:
-
Cold process stream
- CST:
-
Heating stages
- HP:
-
Hot process stream
- HST:
-
Cooling stages
- PU:
-
Process unit
- SC:
-
Contaminant
- SFW:
-
Freshwater source
- TU:
-
Treatment unit
- AF:
-
Annual investment factor for treatment units
- B :
-
Cost exponent for heat exchangers
- C CU :
-
Cold utility cost per unit of heat load [$/(W year)]
- CF:
-
Fixed charge for heat exchangers ($)
- CFW s :
-
Cost of freshwater ($/kg)
- C HU :
-
Hot utility cost per unit of heat load [$/(W year)]
- C i,CU :
-
Area cost coefficient for coolers ($/m2)
- C j,HU :
-
Area cost coefficient for heaters ($/m2)
- C i,j :
-
Area cost coefficient for heat exchangers ($/m2)
- C p :
-
Specific heat capacity of water [J/(kg °C)]
- EMAT:
-
Exchanger minimum approach temperature (°C)
- H :
-
Plant operating hours per annum (h)
- h CU :
-
Individual heat transfer coefficient for cold utility [W/(m2 °C)]
- h HU :
-
Individual heat transfer coefficient for hot utility [W/(m2 °C)]
- h i :
-
Individual heat transfer coefficient for hot stream i [W/(m2 °C)]
- h j :
-
Individual heat transfer coefficient for cold stream j [W/(m2 °C)]
- HRAT:
-
Heat recovery approach temperature (°C)
- IC t :
-
Investment cost coefficient for treatment unit t ($/t)
- OC t :
-
Operating cost coefficient for treatment unit t ($/h)
- tcuin:
-
Inlet temperature of cold utility (°C)
- tcuout:
-
Outlet temperature of cold utility (°C)
- thuin:
-
Inlet temperature of hot utility (°C)
- thuout:
-
Outlet temperature of hot utility (°C)
- U :
-
Overall heat transfer coefficient [W/(m2 °C)]
- α t :
-
Investment cost exponent for treatment unit t
- xFW s,c :
-
Concentration of contaminant c in freshwater source s (ppm)
- \( {\text{xPU}}_{p,c}^{{({\text{in}},\hbox{max} )}} \) :
-
Maximum concentration of contaminant c at the inlet to process unit p (ppm)
- \( {\text{xPU}}_{p,c}^{{({\text{out}},\hbox{max} )}} \) :
-
Maximum concentration of contaminant c at the outlet from process unit p (ppm)
- \( {\text{TPU}}_{p}^{{({\text{in}})}} \) :
-
Inlet temperature of the process unit p (°C)
- \( {\text{TTU}}_{t}^{{({\text{in}})}} \) :
-
Inlet temperature of the treatment unit t (°C)
- \( {\text{TPU}}_{p}^{{({\text{out}})}} \) :
-
Outlet temperature of the process unit p (°C)
- \( {\text{TTU}}_{t}^{{({\text{out}})}} \) :
-
Outlet temperature of the treatment unit t (°C)
- \( T_{\text{w}}^{(\hbox{max} )} \) :
-
Maximum temperature of water streams within the network (°C)
- \( T_{\text{w}}^{(\hbox{min} )} \) :
-
Minimum temperature of water streams within the network (°C)
- TFW s :
-
Temperature of freshwater from source s (°C)
- TWW(out) :
-
Temperature of wastewater discharged into the environment (°C)
- LPU p,c :
-
Mass load of contaminant c in process unit p (kg/s)
- N STU :
-
Number of treatment units allowed to be selected
- RR t,c :
-
Removal ratio of contaminant c in treatment unit t (%/100)
- Γ :
-
Upper bound for driving force
- FW s :
-
Mass flow rate of freshwater from source s (kg/s)
- FIP s,p :
-
Mass flow rate of freshwater from source s to process unit p (kg/s)
- FIT s,t :
-
Mass flow rate of freshwater from source s to treatment unit t (kg/s)
- FIHS s,hs :
-
Mass flow rate of freshwater from source s to cooling stage hs (kg/s)
- FICS s,cs :
-
Mass flow rate of freshwater from source s to heating stage cs (kg/s)
- FIE s :
-
Mass flow rate of freshwater from source s to wastewater mixer (kg/s)
- FHS hs :
-
Water mass flow rate at cooling stage hs (kg/s)
- FPHS p,hs :
-
Mass flow rate of water from process unit p to cooling stage hs (kg/s)
- FTHS t,hs :
-
Mass flow rate of water from treatment unit t to cooling stage hs (kg/s)
- \( {\text{FRHS}}_{{{{hs}}^{'} ,{{hs}}}} \) :
-
Mass flow rate of water from cooling stage hs′ to cooling stage hs (kg/s)
- FCSHS cs,hs :
-
Mass flow rate of water from heating stage cs to cooling stage hs (kg/s)
- FCS cs :
-
Water mass flow rate at heating stage cs (kg/s)
- FPCS p,cs :
-
Mass flow rate of water from process unit p to heating stage cs (kg/s)
- FTCS t,cs :
-
Mass flow rate of water from treatment unit t to heating stage cs (kg/s)
- \( {\text{FRCS}}_{{{{cs}}^{'} ,{{cs}}}} \) :
-
Mass flow rate of water from heating stage cs′ to heating stage cs (kg/s)
- FHSP hs,p :
-
Mass flow rate of water from cooling stage hs to process unit p (kg/s)
- FHST hs,t :
-
Mass flow rate of water from cooling stage hs to treatment t (kg/s)
- FHSCS hs,cs :
-
Mass flow rate of water from cooling stage hs to heating stage cs (kg/s)
- FHSE hs :
-
Mass flow rate of water from cooling stage hs to wastewater mixer (kg/s)
- FCSP cs,p :
-
Mass flow rate of water from heating stage cs to process unit p (kg/s)
- FCST cs,t :
-
Mass flow rate of water from heating stage cs to treatment unit t (kg/s)
- FCSE cs :
-
Mass flow rate of water from heating stage cs to wastewater mixer (kg/s)
- \( {\text{FPU}}_{p}^{{({\text{in}})}} \) :
-
Water flow rate at the process unit p inlet (kg/s)
- \( {\text{FPU}}_{p}^{{({\text{out}})}} \) :
-
Water flow rate at the process unit p outlet (kg/s)
- \( {\text{FP}}_{{p^{'} ,p}} \) :
-
Water flow rate from process unit p′ to process unit p (kg/s)
- FTP t,p :
-
Water flow rate from treatment unit t to process unit p (kg/s)
- FPE p :
-
Mass flow rate of water from process unit p to wastewater mixer (kg/s)
- \( {\text{FTU}}_{t}^{{({\text{in}})}} \) :
-
Water flow rate at the treatment unit t inlet (kg/s)
- \( {\text{FTU}}_{t}^{{({\text{out}})}} \) :
-
Water flow rate at the treatment unit t outlet (kg/s)
- FPT p,t :
-
Water flow rate from process unit p to treatment unit t (kg/s)
- \( {\text{FT}}_{{t^{'} ,t}} \) :
-
Water flow rate from treatment unit t′ to treatment unit t (kg/s)
- FTE t :
-
Mass flow rate of water from treatment unit t to wastewater mixer (kg/s)
- FWW(out) :
-
Mass flow rate of water discharged into the environment (kg/s)
- xFHS hs,c :
-
Concentration of contaminant c at the cooling stage hs (ppm)
- xFCS cs,c :
-
Concentration of contaminant c at the heating stage cs (ppm)
- \( {\text{xPU}}_{p,c}^{{({\text{in}})}} \) :
-
Concentration of contaminant c at the inlet to process unit p (ppm)
- \( {\text{xPU}}_{p,c}^{{({\text{out}})}} \) :
-
Concentration of contaminant c at the outlet from process unit p (ppm)
- \( {\text{xTU}}_{t,c}^{{({\text{in}})}} \) :
-
Concentration of contaminant c at the inlet to treatment unit t (ppm)
- \( {\text{xTU}}_{t,c}^{{({\text{out}})}} \) :
-
Concentration of contaminant c at the outlet from treatment unit t (ppm)
- \( {\text{xWW}}_{c}^{{({\text{out}})}} \) :
-
Concentration of contaminant c in the wastewater discharged into the environment (ppm)
- \( {\text{THS}}_{{hs}}^{{({\text{in}})}} \) :
-
Inlet temperature of hot stream at cooling stage hs (°C)
- \( {\text{THS}}_{{hs}}^{{({\text{out}})}} \) :
-
Outlet temperature of hot stream at cooling stage hs (°C)
- \( {\text{TCS}}_{{cs}}^{{({\text{in}})}} \) :
-
Inlet temperature of cold stream at heating stage cs (°C)
- \( {\text{TCS}}_{{cs}}^{{({\text{out}})}} \) :
-
Outlet temperature of cold stream at heating stage cs (°C)
- fc j :
-
Heat capacity flowrate of cold stream j (W/°C)
- fh i :
-
Heat capacity flowrate of hot stream i (W/°C)
- thin i :
-
Inlet temperature of hot stream i (°C)
- thout i :
-
Outlet temperature of hot stream i (°C)
- tcin j :
-
Inlet temperature of cold stream j (°C)
- tcout j :
-
Outlet temperature of cold stream j (°C)
- qhu:
-
Hot utility load (W)
- qcu:
-
Cold utility load (W)
- ech i :
-
Heat content of hot stream i (W)
- ecc j :
-
Heat content of cold stream j (W)
- qc i :
-
Heat load exchanged between hot stream i with the cold utility (W)
- qh j :
-
Heat load exchanged between cold stream j with the hot utility, W
- q i,j,k :
-
Heat load exchanged by hot stream i and cold stream j in stage k (W)
- th i,k :
-
Temperature of hot stream i at the temperature location k (°C)
- tc j,k :
-
Temperature of cold stream j at the temperature location k (°C)
- Δt i,j,k :
-
Temperature approach between hot i and cold j at temperature location k (°C)
- Δthu j :
-
Temperature approach between hot utility and cold stream j (°C)
- Δtcu i :
-
Temperature approach between cold utility and hot stream i (°C)
- z i,j,k :
-
Existence of match (i, j) in stage k
- zcu i :
-
Existence of match between hot stream i and cold utility
- zhu j :
-
Existence of match between cold stream j and hot utility
- yTU t :
-
Existence of treatment unit t
- CU:
-
Cold utility
- GAMS:
-
General algebraic modelling system
- HEN:
-
Heat exchanger network
- HU:
-
Hot utility
- in:
-
Inlet
- L:
-
Lower bound
- LMTD:
-
Logarithmic mean temperature difference
- LP:
-
Linear programming
- LV:
-
Level value
- max:
-
Maximum
- MILP:
-
Mixed-integer linear programming
- min:
-
Minimum
- MINLP:
-
Mixed-integer non-linear programming
- NLP:
-
Non-linear programming
- NPV:
-
Net present value
- out:
-
Outlet
- TAC:
-
Total annual cost
- U:
-
Upper bound
- WN:
-
Water network
- WTN:
-
Wastewater treatment network
References
Ahmetović E, Grossmann IE (2011) Global superstructure optimization for the design of integrated process water networks. AIChE J 57:434–457. doi:10.1002/aic.12276
Ahmetović E, Kravanja Z (2012) Solution strategies for the synthesis of heat-integrated process water networks. Chem Eng Trans 29:1015–1020
Ahmetović E, Kravanja Z (2013) Simultaneous synthesis of process water and heat exchanger networks. Energy 57:236–250. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.02.061
Ahmetović E, Kravanja Z (2014) Simultaneous optimization of heat-integrated water networks involving process-to-process streams for heat integration. Appl Therm Eng 62:302–317. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.06.010
Ahmetović E, Martín M, Grossmann IE (2010) Optimization of energy and water consumption in corn-based ethanol plants. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:7972–7982. doi:10.1021/ie1000955
Ahmetović E, Ibrić N, Kravanja Z (2014) Optimal design for heat-integrated water-using and wastewater treatment networks. Appl Energy 135:791–808. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.063
Ahmetović E, Ibrić N, Kravanja Z, Grossmann IE (2015) Water and energy integration: a comprehensive literature review of non-isothermal water network synthesis. Comput Chem Eng 82:144–171. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.06.011
Bagajewicz M, Rodera H, Savelski M (2002) Energy efficient water utilization systems in process plants. Comput Chem Eng 26:59–79. doi:10.1016/s0098-1354(01)00751-7
Biegler LT, Grossmann IE, Westerberg AW (1997) Systematic methods of chemical process design. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
Bogataj M, Bagajewicz MJ (2008) Synthesis of non-isothermal heat integrated water networks in chemical processes. Comput Chem Eng 32:3130–3142. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.05.006
Chen C-L, Liao H-L, Jia X-P, Ciou Y-J, Lee J-Y (2010) Synthesis of heat-integrated water-using networks in process plants. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 41:512–521. doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2010.04.004
Dong H-G, Lin C-Y, Chang C-T (2008) Simultaneous optimization approach for integrated water-allocation and heat-exchange networks. Chem Eng Sci 63:3664–3678. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2008.04.044
Duran MA, Grossmann IE (1986) Simultaneous optimization and heat integration of chemical processes. AIChE J 32:123–138. doi:10.1002/aic.690320114
El-Halwagi MM, Manousiouthakis V (1989) Synthesis of mass exchange networks. AIChE J 35:1233–1244. doi:10.1002/aic.690350802
Floudas CA (1995) Nonlinear and mixed-integer optimization: fundamentals and applications. Oxford University Press, New York
Foo DCY (2009) State-of-the-art review of pinch analysis techniques for water network synthesis. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:5125–5159. doi:10.1021/ie801264c
Foo D (2013) A generalised guideline for process changes for resource conservation networks. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15:45–53. doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0475-4
Gilron J (2014) Water–energy nexus: matching sources and uses. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16:1471–1479. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0853-1
Hou Y, Wang J, Chen Z, Li X, Zhang J (2014) Simultaneous integration of water and energy on conceptual methodology for both single- and multi-contaminant problems. Chem Eng Sci 117:436–444. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2014.07.004
IAE (2012) World energy outlook, Chapter 19, water for energy. Is energy becoming a thirstier resource? www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/world-energy-outlook-2012.html. Accessed 5 April 2015
Ibrić N, Ahmetović E, Kravanja Z (2014a) Simultaneous optimization of water and energy within integrated water networks. Appl Therm Eng 70:1097–1122. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.03.019
Ibrić N, Ahmetović E, Kravanja Z (2014b) Two-step mathematical programming synthesis of pinched and threshold heat-integrated water networks. J Clean Prod 77:116–139. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.004
Ibrić N, Ahmetović E, Kravanja Z (2015) A compact superstructure for the synthesis of non-isothermal process water networks. In: Paper presented at the 10th conference on sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems, Dubrovnik, Croatia, SDEWES2013-0853, 22–27 September 2013, p 1–12
Jeżowski J (2010) Review of water network design methods with literature annotations. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:4475–4516. doi:10.1021/ie901632w
Karuppiah R, Grossmann IE (2006) Global optimization for the synthesis of integrated water systems in chemical processes. Comput Chem Eng 30:650–673. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2005.11.005
Karuppiah R, Peschel A, Grossmann IE, Martín M, Martinson W, Zullo L (2008) Energy optimization for the design of corn-based ethanol plants. AIChE J 54:1499–1525. doi:10.1002/aic.11480
Klemeš JJ (2012) Industrial water recycle/reuse. Curr Opin Chem Eng 1:238–245. doi:10.1016/j.coche.2012.03.010
Klemeš JJ, Varbanov PS, Kravanja Z (2013) Recent developments in process integration. Chem Eng Res Des 91:2037–2053. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2013.08.019
Kuo W-CJ, Smith R (1997) Effluent treatment system design. Chem Eng Sci 52:4273–4290. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00186-3
Leewongtanawit B, Kim J-K (2008) Synthesis and optimisation of heat-integrated multiple-contaminant water systems. Chem Eng Process 47:670–694. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2006.12.018
Leewongtanawit B, Kim J-K (2009) Improving energy recovery for water minimisation. Energy 34:880–893. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.03.004
Li B-H, Ruan Z-Z, Chang C-T (2013) Automatic synthesis of alternative heat-integrated water-using networks. Chem Eng Trans 35:151–156
Li A-H, Yang Y-Z, Liu Z-Y (2015) Analysis of water-using networks with multiple contaminants involving regeneration recycling. Chem Eng Sci 134:44–56. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2015.04.044
Linnhoff B, Hindmarsh E (1983) The pinch design method for heat exchanger networks. Chem Eng Sci 38:745–763. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(83)80185-7
Liu Z, Luo Y, Yuan X (2015) Simultaneous integration of water and energy in heat-integrated water allocation networks. AIChE J 61:2202–2214. doi:10.1002/aic.14823
Manan ZA, Tea SY, Alwi SRW (2009) A new technique for simultaneous water and energy minimisation in process plant. Chem Eng Res Des 87:1509–1519. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2009.04.013
Martínez-Patiño J, Picón-Núñez M, Serra LM, Verda V (2011) Design of water and energy networks using temperature–concentration diagrams. Energy 36:3888–3896. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.042
Parand R, Yao HM, Pareek V, Tadé MO (2014) Use of pinch concept to optimize the total water regeneration network. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:3222–3235. doi:10.1021/ie402712b
Pintarič ZN, Ibrić N, Ahmetović E, Grossmann IE, Kravanja Z (2014) Designing optimal water networks for the appropriate economic criteria. 39. doi:10.3303/CET1439171
Rosenthal RE (2015) GAMS: a user’s guide. GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC
Sahu GC, Bandyopadhyay S (2012) Energy optimization in heat integrated water allocation networks. Chem Eng Sci 69:352–364. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2011.10.054
Savulescu L, Kim J-K, Smith R (2005a) Studies on simultaneous energy and water minimisation—Part I: systems with no water re-use. Chem Eng Sci 60:3279–3290. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2004.12.037
Savulescu L, Kim J-K, Smith R (2005b) Studies on simultaneous energy and water minimisation—Part II: systems with maximum re-use of water. Chem Eng Sci 60:3291–3308. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2004.12.036
Smith R (2005) Chemical process design and integration. Wiley, Chichester
Tawarmalani M, Sahinidis VN (2005) A polyhedral branch-and-cut approach to global optimization. Math Program 103:225–249. doi:10.1007/s10107-005-0581-8
Varbanov PS (2014) Energy and water interactions: implications for industry. Curr Opin Chem Eng 5:15–21. doi:10.1016/j.coche.2014.03.005
Varbanov PS, Seferlis P (2014) Process innovation through integration approaches at multiple scales: a perspective. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16:1229–1234. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0837-1
Wan Alwi SR, Ismail A, Manan ZA, Handani ZB (2011) A new graphical approach for simultaneous mass and energy minimisation. Appl Therm Eng 31:1021–1030. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.11.026
Wang YP, Smith R (1994) Wastewater minimisation. Chem Eng Sci 49:981–1006. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(94)80006-5
Wang YP, Smith R (1995) Wastewater minimization with flowrate constraints. Trans IChemE 73(Part A):889–904
Wenzel H, Dunn RF, Gottrup L, Kringelum J (2002) Process integration design methods for water conservation and wastewater reduction in industry. Part 3: experience of industrial application. Clean Technol Environ Policy 4:16–25. doi:10.1007/s10098-002-0146-y
Yan F, Wu H, Li W, Zhang J (2016) Simultaneous optimization of heat-integrated water networks by a nonlinear program. Chem Eng Sci 140:76–89. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2015.09.036
Yang L, Grossmann IE (2013) Water targeting models for simultaneous flowsheet optimization. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:3209–3224. doi:10.1021/ie301112r
Yee TF, Grossmann IE (1990) Simultaneous optimization models for heat integration—II. Heat exchanger network synthesis. Comput Chem Eng 14:1165–1184. doi:10.1016/0098-1354(90)85010-8
Zhou R-J, Li L-J (2015) Simultaneous optimization of property-based water-allocation and heat-exchange networks with state-space superstructure. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:9758–9769. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01486
Zhou R-J, Li L-J, Dong H-G, Grossmann IE (2012a) Synthesis of interplant water-allocation and heat-exchange networks. Part 1: fixed flow rate processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:4299–4312. doi:10.1021/ie2014789
Zhou R-J, Li L-J, Dong H-G, Grossmann IE (2012b) Synthesis of interplant water-allocation and heat-exchange networks. Part 2: integrations between fixed flow rate and fixed contaminant-load processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:14793–14805. doi:10.1021/ie3019752
Zhou L, Liao Z, Wang J, Jiang B, Yang Y, Yu H (2015) Simultaneous optimization of heat-integrated water allocation networks using the mathematical model with equilibrium constraints strategy. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:3355–3366. doi:10.1021/ie501960e
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) for providing financial support within the SCOPES 2013–2016 (Scientific Co-operation between Eastern Europe and Switzerland) Joint Research Project (CAPE-EWWR: IZ73Z0_152622/1), Slovenian Research Agency (Program No. P2-0032) and Bilateral Project (No. 05-39-116-14/14) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia as well as for the support from the Erasmus Mundus Action 2-JoinEUsee Penta programme.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Simultaneous optimisation and heat integration model (M2)
The minimum consumption of hot utility (qhu) is constrained by inequalities Eqs. (31), (32) according to the pinch location method (Duran and Grossmann 1986). Minimum consumption of cold utility (qcu) is defined by the global energy balance given by Eq. (33).
Equations (34) and (35) give heat content of hot and cold streams.
Within the model M1, flow rates of the process water streams are unknown as well as the inlet/outlet temperatures of the hot/cold streams. Accordingly, discontinuous derivatives appear in Eqs. (31) and (32) making the NLP/MINLP models (M1–2) difficult to solve. In order to circumvent this problem, a smooth approximation of the max operator was used (Biegler et al. 1997).
HEN synthesis model (M3)
The following Eqs. (36)–(56) were included in the modified HEN synthesis model proposed by Yee and Grossmann (1990):
Total energy exchanged by hot stream i and cold stream j
Energy exchanged by hot stream i and cold stream j in stage k
Energy exchanged by hot stream i with the cold utility and cold stream j with the hot utility
Supply temperature of hot and cold streams i and j
Feasibilities of temperatures across temperature intervals
Logical constraints for heat loads
Logical constraints for temperature differences
Heat loads of hot stream i and cold stream j
Connecting equations for the combined models
According to the proposed solutions strategy, as described in detail in section Solution approach, firstly a combined models M1–2 was solved providing initialisation and water/utility bounds, and afterwards a combined model M1–3 for the simultaneous synthesis of non-isothermal WNs is solved. In order to enable a solution of the combined models, appropriate connecting equations have to be defined. Heat capacity flow rates and inlet/outlet temperatures that appear in models M2 and M3 related to the flow rates and temperatures of the process water streams within the model M1 were given as follows.
Connecting equations for hot water streams
Connecting equations for cold water streams
Additional constraints
By solving the models (M1–2) an initialisation point can be provided for the models (M1–3), which is solved in the second synthesis step, as well as providing rigorous upper and lower bounds for freshwater and utilities consumption. The upper and lower bounds represent level values (LVs) of variables from the models M1–2. Equation (63) is applied in the case studies involving only one water source. Constraining freshwater consumption on the minimum values can cause significant increase in investment as addressed in Example 4 regarding the pinched problems with multiple water sources.
Heat exchanger related parameters
Heat exchange areas
Temperature-driving forces
Heat transfer coefficients
Appendix 2
Variable bounds for the water network model (M1)
Based on the data given as parameters for each example (mass load of contaminants and maximum inlet and outlet contaminant concentration), the maximum and minimum water flowrate required for each process unit can be calculated as follows:
Accordingly, if each process unit used freshwater (no water reuse), a process would consume a maximum amount of freshwater.
Equations (79)–(83) are used for defining upper bounds for flow rates for each water stream as follows:
The upper and lower bounds on temperatures of hot and cold streams entering and leaving cooling and heating stages are based on the maximum and minimum temperature within the WN knowing the temperatures of process units, treatment units, freshwater and wastewater stream discharged into the environment.
The identified minimum and maximum temperatures of water streams within the network are used as lower and upper bounds for hot and cold water streams as follows:
For the given concentration of the contaminant within freshwater streams and maximum inlet/outlet contaminant concentrations within the process units, upper and lower bounds can be identified for any given process water stream:
Variables bounds for the models M2 and M3
Upper and lower bounds for the heat integration (M2) and HEN synthesis (M3) models are defined in the following section. The upper bound for heat load required for cooling of hot stream i [Eq. (146)] and heating of cold stream j [Eq. (147)] can be calculated based on the upper bounds for the heat capacity flow rate and upper/lower bound for hot stream i and cold stream j temperatures as given by Eqs. (148)–(157)
The minimum approach temperatures and upper/lower bounds for temperatures of the streams across the temperature interval k are defined as follows:
The upper bound for driving forces is set to Γ = \( T_{\text{w}}^{(\hbox{max} )} . \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ibrić, N., Ahmetović, E. & Kravanja, Z. Mathematical programming synthesis of non-isothermal water networks by using a compact/reduced superstructure and an MINLP model. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18, 1779–1813 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1152-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1152-9