Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A new test of action verb naming: normative data from 290 Italian adults

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Verbs and nouns can be selectively impaired, suggesting that they are processed, at least in part, by distinct neural structures. While several tests of object naming are available, tasks involving action verb naming with normative data are lacking. We report the construction and standardization of a new test for the assessment of picture naming of actions.

Material and methods

The test includes 50 stimuli, strictly controlled for several confounding variables. Normative data on 290 Italian subjects pooled across homogenous subgroups for age, sex, and education are reported.

Results

Multiple regression analyses revealed that age and education significantly correlated with the subject’s score. In particular, increasing age negatively affected performance, while the performance increased with a higher education.

Conclusions

In the clinical practice, the availability of equivalent scores will help the comparison with performance in the picture naming of objects. This test allows investigating action naming deficits in aphasic patients, in Parkinson’s disease patients and in further neurodegenerative disorders, in which a specific impairment of action verbs is expected, filling a gap in the clinical neuropsychological assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Druks J (2002) Verbs and nouns. A review of the literature. J Neurolinguistics 15:289–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gentner D (1982) Why nouns are learned before verbs: linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In: Kuczaj S II (ed) language development, Language, thought and culture, vol 2. Lawrence Erlbaum associate, Hillsdale, pp 301–304

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cappa SF, Perani D (2003) The neural correlates of noun and verb processing. J Neurolinguistics 16:183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crepaldi D, Berlingeri M, Cattinelli I, Borghese NA, Luzzatti C, Paulesu E (2013) Clustering the lexicon in the brain: a meta-analysis of the neurofunctional evidence on noun and verb processing. Front Hu Neurosci 7:303

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pisoni A, Mattavelli G, Casarotti A, Comi A, Riva M, Bello L, Papagno C (2018) Object-action dissociation: a voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping study on 102 patients after glioma removal. NeuroImage Clin 18:986–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Damasio AR, Tranel D (1993) Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90:4957–4960

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Daniele A, Silveri MC, Giustolisi L, Gainotti G (1993) Category-specific deficits for grammatical classes of words: evidence for possible anatomical correlates. Ital J Neurol Sci 14(1):87–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aggujaro S, Crepaldi D, Pistarini C, Taricco M, Luzzatti C (2006) Neuroanatomical correlates of impaired retrieval of verbs and nouns: interaction of grammatical class, imageability and actionality. J Neurolinguistics 19:175–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kemmerer D, Rudrauf D, Manzel K, Tranel D (2012) Behavioral patterns and lesion sites associated with impaired processing of lexical and conceptual knowledge of actions. Cortex 48:826–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Crepaldi D, Berlingeri M, Paulesu E, Luzzatti C (2011) A place for nouns and a place for verbs? A critical review of neurocognitive data on grammatical-class effects. Brain Lang 116:33–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Laine M, Martin N (2006) Anomia: theoretical and clinical aspects. Taylor and Francis, Hove, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miceli G, Silveri C, Villa G, Caramazza A (1984) On the basis for the agrammatic’s difficulty in producing main verbs. Cortex 20(2):207–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miceli G, Silveri C, Nocentini U, Caramazza A (1988) Patterns of dissociation in comprehension and production of nouns and verbs. Aphasiology 2(3/4):351–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038808248937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baxter DM, Warrington EK (1985) Category specific phonological dysgraphia. Neuropsychologia 23:653–666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zingeser L, Berndt RS (1990) Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia. Brain Lang 39(1):14–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(90)90002-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marcotte K, Graham NL, Black SE, Tang-Wai D, Chow TW, Freedman M, Rochon E, Leonard C (2014) Verb production in the nonfluent and semantic variants of primary progressive aphasia: the influence of lexical and semantic factors. Cogn Neuropsychol 31:565–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Daniele A, Barbier A, Di Giuda D, Vita MG, Piccininni C, Spinelli P, Tondo G, Fasano A et al (2013) Selective impairment of action-verb naming and comprehension in progressive supranuclear palsy. Cortex 49:948–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bertella L, Albani G, Greco E, Priano L, Mauro A, Marchi SA, Bulla D, Semenza C (2002) Noun verb dissociation in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Cogn 48:277–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cotelli M, Borroni B, Manenti R, Zanetti M, Arévalo A, Cappa SF, Padovani A (2007) Action and object naming in Parkinson’s disease without dementia. Eur J Neurol 14:632–637

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Péran P, Cardebat D, Cherubini A, Piras F, Luccichenti G, Peppe A, Caltagirone C (2009) Object naming and action-verb generation in Parkinson’s disease: a fMRI study. Cotyex 45:960–971

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fernandino L, Conant LL, Binder JR, Blindauer K, Hiner B, Spangler K, Desai RH (2013) Parkinson’s disease disrupts both automatic and controlled processing of action verbs. Brain Lang 127:65–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Herrera E, Rodrìguez-Ferreiro J, Cuetos F (2012) The effect of motion content in action naming by Parkinson’s disease patients. Cortex 48:900–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Papagno C, Trojano L (2018) Cognitive and behavioral disorders in Parkinson’s disease: an update. I: cognitive impairments. Neurol Sci 39:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3154-82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Papeo L, Cecchetto C, Mazzon G, Granello G, Cattaruzza T, Verriello L, Eleopra R, Rumiati RI (2015) The processing of action and action-words in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Cortex 64:136–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Catricalà E, Della Rosa P, Ginex V, Mussetti Z, Plebani V, Cappa SF (2013) An Italian battery for the assessment of semantic memory disorders. Neurol Sci 34:985–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-1181-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Laiacona M, Barbarotto R, Baratelli E, Capitani E (2016) Revised and extended norms for a picture naming test sensitive to category dissociations. Neurol Sci 37:1499–1510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Capitani E, Laiacona M (1997) Composite neuropsychological batteries and normative values. Standardisation based on equivalent scores, with a review of published data. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 19:795–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639708403761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Akinina Y, Malyutina S, Ivanova M, Iskra E, Mannova E, Dragoy O (2015) Russian normative data for 375 action pictures and verbs. Behav Res Methods 47:691–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Druks J, Masterson J (2000) An object and action naming battery. Psychology Press, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cuetos F, Alija M (2003) Normative data and naming times for action pictures. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 35:168–177. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schwitter V, Boyer B, Méot A, Bonin P, Laganaro M (2004) French normative data and naming times for action pictures. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36:564–576. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shao Z, Roelofs A, Meyer AS (2014) Predicting naming latencies for action pictures: Dutch norms. Behav Res Ther 46:274–283. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0358-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alyahya RSW, Druks J (2016) The adaptation of the object and action naming battery into Saudi Arabic. Aphasiology 30(4):463–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Edmonds LA, Donovan NJ (2012) Item-level psychometrics and predictors of performance for Spanish/English bilingual speakers on an Object and Action Naming Battery. J Speech Lang Hear Res 55:359–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. De Witte E, Satoer D, Robert E, Colle H, Verheyen S, Visch-Brink E, Marien P (2015) The Dutch linguistic intraoperative protocol: a valid linguistic approach to awake brain surgery. Brain Lang 140:35–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Duñabeitia JA, Crepaldi D, Meyer AS, New B, Pliatsikas C, Smolka E, Brysbaert M (2018) MultiPic: a standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages. Quart J Exp Psychol 71:808–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Crepaldi D, Aggujaro S, Arduino LS, Zonca G, Ghirardi G, Inzaghi MG, Colombo M, Chierchia G, Luzzatti C (2006) Noun–verb dissociation in aphasia: the role of imageability and functional locus of the lesion. Neuropsychologia 44:73–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Capitani E (1997) Normative data and neuropsychological assessment. Common problems in clinical practice and research. Neuropsychol Rehab 7:295–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Novelli G, Papagno C, Capitani E, Laiacona M, Vallar G, Cappa SF (1986) Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale: taratura su soggetti normali [three clinical tests of verbal long-term memory: standardization on normal subjects]. Arch Neurol Psicol Psich 47:477–506

    Google Scholar 

  40. Papagno C, Cappa SF, Garavaglia P, Capitani E, Laiacona M, Vallar G (1995) La comprensione non letterale del linguaggio: taratura su soggetti normali. Arch PsicoloNeurol Psichiat 56:402–420

    Google Scholar 

  41. Papagno C, Casarotti A, Comi A, Gallucci M, Riva M, Bello L (2012) Measuring clinical outcomes in neuro-oncology. A battery to evaluate low-grade gliomas (LGG). J Neuro-Oncol 108(2):269–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0824-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rofes A, Miceli G (2014) Language Mapping with Verbs and Sentences in Awake Surgery: A Review. Neuropsychol Rev 24:185–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Akinina Y, Dragoy O, Ivanova MV, Iskra EV, Soloukhina OA, Petryshevsky AF, Fedina ON, Turken AU, Skklovsky VM, Dronkers NF (2019) Grey and white matter substrates of action naming. Neuropsychologia 131:249–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.015

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Hauck T, Probst M, Zimmer C, Ringel F, Meyer B, Wohlschlaeger A, Krieg SM (2019) Language function shows comparable cortical patterns by functional MRI and repetitive nTMS in healthy volunteers. Brain Imag Behav 13(4):1071–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Claudio Luzzatti for his contribution to the realization of this test.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Costanza Papagno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the local committee of the University of Milano-Bicocca

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

To explain how to use the correction grid, we report an example of patient XZ, female, 60 years, 17 years of education, affected by non-fluent primary progressive aphasia. Her raw score was 44. Given her age and education, the raw score can be adjusted by subtracting 1.2 to the 44. The adjusted score is therefore 42.8, corresponding to an equivalent score of 2, which is a normal performance.

Table 4 Correction grid for action naming test

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papagno, C., Casarotti, A., Zarino, B. et al. A new test of action verb naming: normative data from 290 Italian adults. Neurol Sci 41, 2811–2817 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04353-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04353-1

Keywords

Navigation