Abstract
Deficit in planning and problem-solving, affecting a wide range of neuropsychological patients, has been widely investigated using the Tower of London (ToL) test, as developed by Shallice (Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 298:199–209, 1). The ToL taps on several executive functions (EF), such as planning, time for planning or rule breaks, which may be usefully indexed by different ToL measurements. However, in its original version, the different aspects involved in ToL are not evaluated in a specific way.
Here, we report the standardization of the ToL, on 896 individuals aged 15–86 years, taking in account individual factors (i.e. gender, age, years of education) which may affect performances on ToL. We computed several indexes on the ToL including score, planning and execution times, perseverations, rule breaks and self-monitoring. We found that these indexes were affected by individual factors such as gender, age and education. Present results not only provide extensive normative data according to gender, as well as different age and education ranges, but also represent a very useful instrument for a more fine-grained diagnosis of EF deficits in a wide range of neuropsychological patients, including traumatic brain injury and brain-damaged patients, as well as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shallice T (1982) Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Part B 298:199–209
Unterrainer JM, Owen AM (2006) Planning and problem solving: from neuropsychology to functional neuroimaging. J Physiol Paris 99(4–6):308–317
Nitschke K, Köstering L, Finkel L, Weiller C, Kaller CP (2017) A meta-analysis on the neural basis of planning: activation likelihood estimation of functional brain imaging results in the Tower of London task. Hum Brain Mapp 38(1):396–413. doi:10.1002/hbm.23368
Sullivan JR, Riccio CA, Castillo CL (2009) Concurrent validity of the tower tasks as measures of executive function in adults: a meta-analysis. Appl Neuropsychol 16(1):62–75. doi:10.1080/09084280802644243
Andrews G, Halford GS, Chappell M, Maujean A, Shum DH (2014) Planning following stroke: a relational complexity approach using the Tower of London. Front Hum Neurosci 8:1032. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.01032
Rainville C, Amieva H, Lafont S, Dartigues JF, Orgogozo JM, Fabrigoule C (2002) Executive function deficits in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a study with a Tower of London task. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 17(6):513–530
Rainville C, Lepage E, Gauthier S, Kergoat MJ, Belleville S (2012) Executive function deficits in persons with mild cognitive impairment: a study with a Tower of London task. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 34(3):306–324. doi:10.1080/13803395.2011.639298
Sánchez-Benavides G, Gómez-Ansón B, Quintana M, Vives Y, Manero RM, Sainz A, Blesa R, Molinuevo JL, Peña-Casanova J (2010) Problem-solving abilities and frontal lobe cortical thickness in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 16(5):836–845. doi:10.1017/S135561771000069X
Carlin D, Bonerba J, Phipps M, Alexander G, Shapiro M, Grafman J (2000) Planning impairments in frontal lobe dementia and frontal lobe lesion patients. Neuropsychologia 38(5):655–665
Culbertson WC, Moberg PJ, Duda JE, Stern MB, Weintraub D (2004) Assessing the executive function deficits of patients with Parkinson’s disease: utility of the Tower of London-Drexel. Assessment 11(1):27–39
Lam BY, Raine A, Lee TM (2014) The relationship between neurocognition and symptomatology in people with schizophrenia: social cognition as the mediator. BMC Psychiatry 14:138. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-138
Riccio CA, Wolfe ME, Romine C, Davis B, Sullivan JR (2004) The Tower of London and neuropsychological assessment of ADHD in adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 19(5):661–671
Culbertson WC, Zillmer EA (2005) Tower of London—Drexel University, second edition (TOLDX). Multi-Health Systems, Toronto
Phillips LH, Wynn V, Gilhooly KJ, Della Sala S, Logie RH (1999) The role of memory in the Tower of London task. Memory 7(2):209–231
Phillips LH, Smith L, Gilhooly KJ (2002) The effects of adult aging and induced positive and negative mood on planning. Emotion 2(3):263–272
Carder H, Handley S, Perfect T (2004) Deconstructing the Tower of London: alternative moves and conflict resolution as predictors of task performance. Q J Exp Psychol A 57(8):1459–1483
D’Antuono G, La Torre FR, Marin D, Antonucci G, Piccardi L, Guariglia C (2016) Role of working memory, inhibition, and fluid intelligence in the performance of the Tower of London task. Appl Neuropsychol Adult 20:1–11
Unterrainer JM, Rahm B, Kaller CP, Leonhart R, Quiske K, Hoppe-Seyler K, Meier C, Müller C, Halsband U (2004) Planning abilities and the Tower of London: is this task measuring a discrete cognitive function? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 26(6):846–856
Zook NA, Davalos DB, Delosh EL, Davis HP (2004) Working memory, inhibition, and fluid intelligence as predictors of performance on Tower of Hanoi and London tasks. Brain Cogn 56(3):286–292
Boghi A, Rasetti R, Avidano F, Manzone C, Orsi L, D’Agata F, Caroppo P, Bergui M, Rocca P, Pulvirenti L, Bradac GB, Bogetto F, Mutani R, Mortara P (2006) The effect of gender on planning: an fMRI study using the Tower of London task. NeuroImage 33(3):999–1010
Andrés P, Van der Linden M (2000) Age-related differences in supervisory attentional system functions. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 55(6):373–380
Bugg JM, Zook NA, DeLosh EL, Davalos DB, Davis HP (2006) Age differences in fluid intelligence: contributions of general slowing and frontal decline. Brain Cogn 62(1):9–16
Zook N, Welsh MC, Ewing V (2006) Performance of healthy, older adults on the Tower of London Revised: associations with verbal and nonverbal abilities. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 13(1):1–19
Rabbitt P, Lowe C (2000) Patterns of cognitive ageing. Psychol Res 63(3–4):308–316
Basso A, Capitani E, Laiacona M (1987) Raven’s coloured progressive matrices: normative values on 305 adult normal controls. Funct Neurol 2:189–194
Raven JC (1938) Standard progressive matrices: sets A, B, C, D and EHK. Lewis, London
Krikorian R, Bartok J, Gay N (1994) Tower of London procedure: a standard method and developmental data. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 16(6):840–850
Spinnler H, Tognoni G (1987) Standardizzazione e taratura italiana di test neuropsicologici. Ital J Neurol Sci 8(Suppl):1–120
Bianchi A, Dai Prà M (2009) Twenty years after Spinnler and Tognoni: new instruments in the Italian neuropsychologist’s toolbox. Neurol Sci 29:209–217
Paolucci S, Di Vita A, Massicci R, Traballesi M, Bureca I, Matano A, Iosa M, Guariglia C (2012) Impact of participation on rehabilitation results: a multivariate study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 48(3):455–466
Ciurli P, Bivona U, Barba C, Onder G, Silvestro D, Azicnuda E, Rigon J, Formisano R (2010) Metacognitive unawareness correlates with executive function impairment after severe traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 16:1–9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
The sheet score is provided in supplementary materials. Please write to the corresponding author to obtain the full protocol of the ToL. (PDF 18 kb).
ESM 1
(PDF 18 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boccia, M., Marin, D., D’Antuono, G. et al. The Tower of London (ToL) in Italy: standardization of the ToL test in an Italian population. Neurol Sci 38, 1263–1270 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-2957-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-2957-y