Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A one-to-one telestroke network: the first Italian study of a web-based telemedicine system for thrombolysis delivery and patient monitoring

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over 10 years after European approval, thrombolysis is still limited by a restricted time window and non-optimal territorial coverage. Implementation of telestroke can give a growing number of patients access to treatment. We hereby present the first Italian telemedicine study applied to both the acute and the monitoring phase of stroke care. From January 2011 to December 2013, we tested a web-based, drip, and treat interaction model, connecting the cerebrovascular specialist of one hub center to the Emergency Department of a Spoke center. We then compared thrombolysis delivered using the telestroke model with thrombolysis provided at the Hub Stroke Unit at the time when the telemedicine program was activated. Telethrombolysis data were then compared with data from the two main international telestroke projects (TEMPiS and REACH), and other European telestroke studies performed at the time of writing. We collected a total of 131 thrombolysis procedures (25 telethrombolysis and 106 thrombolysis patients at the Stroke Unit). Statistical analysis with the t test yielded no statistically significant differences between the two populations in door-to-scan, door-to-needle (DTN), and onset-to-treatment times (OTT). Our OTT and DTN pathway times were longer than the TEMPiS and REACH studies but comparable with other European telemedicine trials, despite different models of interaction and number of centers. Our study in a northeastern province of Italy confirms the potential of applying telemedicine to a cerebrovascular pathology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lees KR, Bluhmki E, von Kummer R, Brott TG, Toni D, Grotta JC, ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS and EPITHET rt-PA Study Group et al (2010) Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an update pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet 375:1695–1703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Donnan GA, Davis SM, Parsons MW, Ma H, Dewey HM, Howells DW (2011) How to make better use of thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Nature Rev Neurol 7:400–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Katzan IL, Hammer MD, Hixson ED, Furlan AJ, Abou-Chebl A, Nadzam DM, Cleveland Clinic Health System Stroke Quality Improvement Team (2004) Utilization of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol 61:346–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rubin MN, Demaerschalk BM (2014) The use of telemedicine in the management of acute stroke. Neurosurg Focus 36(1):E4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Muller-Barna P, Schwamm LH, Haberl RL (2012) Telestroke increases use of acute stroke therapy. Curr Opin Neurol 25:5–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson RE, Saltzman GM, Skalbrin EJ, Demaerschalk BM, Majersik JJ (2011) The cost-effectiveness of telestroke in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 77:1590–1598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Switzer JA, Demaerschalk BM, Xie J, Fan L, Villa KF, Wu EQ (2013) Cost-effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals’ perspectives. Circ Cardiovasc Quality Outcomes 6:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Switzer JA, Hall C, Gross H, Waller J, Nichols FT, Wang S et al (2009) A web-based telestroke system facilitates rapid treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients in rural emergency departments. J Emerg Med 36:12–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hess DC, Wang S, Hamilton W, Lee S, Pardue C, Waller JL et al (2005) REACH: clinical feasibility of a rural telestroke network. Stroke 36:2018–2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang S, Gross H, Lee SB, Pardue C, Waller J, Nichols FT et al (2004) Remote evaluation of acute ischemic stroke in rural community hospitals in Georgia. Stroke 35:1763–1768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Audebert HJ, Kukla C, von Claranau SC, Kuhn J, Vatankhah B, Schenkel J et al (2005) Telemedicine for safe and extended use of thrombolysis in stroke: the telemedicine pilot project for integrative stroke care (TEMPiS) in Baviera. Stroke 36:287–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Audebert HJ, Kukla C, Vatankhah B, Gotzler B, Schenkel J, Hofer S et al (2006) Comparison of tissue plasminogen activator administration management between telestroke network hospitals and academic stroke centers: the telemedical pilot project for integrative stroke care in Bavaria/Germany. Stroke 37:1822–1827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Muller-Barna P, Hubert GJ, Boy S, Bogdahn U, Wiedmann S, Heuschmann PU, Audebert HJ (2014) Telestroke units serving as a model of care in rural areas: 10-year experience of the telemedical project for integrative stroke care. Stroke 45:2739–2744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Richard S, Lavandier K, Zioueche Y, Pelletier S, Vezain A, Ducrocq X (2014) Use of telemedicine to manage severe ischemic strokes in a rural area with an elderly population. Neurol Sci 35:683–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lazaridis C, DeSantis SM, Jauch EC, Adams RJ (2013) Telestroke in South Carolina. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Diseases 22:946–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Amorim E, Shih M, Koehler SA, Massaro LL, Zaidi SF, Jumaa MA et al (2013) Impact of telemedicine implementation in thrombolytic use for acute ischemic stroke: the University of Pittsburgh medical center telestroke network experience. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Diseases 22:527–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pedragosa A, Alvarez-Sabin J, Molina CA, Sanclemente C, Martin MC, Alonso F et al (2009) Impact of a telemedicine system on acute stroke care in a community hospital. J Telemed Telecare 15:260–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pedragosa A, Alvarez-Sabin J, Molina CA, Brugues J, Ribò M (2011) Endovenous thrombolysis in a district hospital using the telestroke system. Revista de Neurol 53:139–145

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T, Obler R, Zivin JA, Rao R et al (2008) Efficacy of site-independet telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol 7:787–795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Agarwal S, Day DJ, Sibson L, Barry PJ, Collas D, Metcalf K et al (2014) Thrombolysis delivery by a regional telestroke network-experience from the UK National Health Service. J Am Heart Assoc 3:e000408

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sairanen T, Soinila S, Nikkanen M, Rantanem K, Mustonoja S, Farkkila M et al (2011) Two years of Finnish telestroke: thrombolysis at spokes equal to that at the hub. Neurology 76:1145–1152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiborg A, Widder B (2003) Teleneurology to improve stroke care in rural areas. The telemedicine in stroke in Swabia (TESS) project. Stroke 34:2951–2957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Handschu R, Scibor M, Wacker A, Stark DR, Kohrmann M, Erbguth F et al (2014) Feasibility of certified quality management in a comprehensive stroke care network using telemedicine: STENO project. Research 9:1011–1016

    Google Scholar 

  24. Martinez-Sanchez P, Miralles A, De Barros RS, Prefasi D, Sanz-Cuesta BE, Fuentes B et al (2014) The effect of telestroke systems among neighboring hospitals: more and better? The Madrid Telestroke Project. J Neurol 261:1768–1773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanders KA, Figiel C, Kiely JM, Gwynn MW, Johnston LH (2013) Expanding access to intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator treatment with a practice-based telestroke system. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Diseases 22:e546–e548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hill E, Whitehead M, MacInnes B, Ellis G, Talbot A, Brodie F et al (2013) The first 100 Thrombolysis cases in a novel Scottish mesh telestroke system. Scott Med J 58:213–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Audebert HJ, Schenkel J, Heuschmann PU, Bogdahn U, Haberl RL (2006) Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the telemedic pilot project for integrative stroke care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria Germany. Lancet Neurol 5:742–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schwamm LH, Holloway RG, Amarenco P, Audebert HI, Bakas T, Chumbler NR et al (2009) American Heart Association Stroke Council; interdisciplinary council on peripheral vascular disease. A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke system of care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 40:2616–2634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Giometto.

Ethics declarations

Source of funding

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union under Grant Agreement No. C046273 (HEALTH OPTIMization throUgh telemedicine—Health Optiumum).

Disclosures

None.

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nardetto, L., Dario, C., Tonello, S. et al. A one-to-one telestroke network: the first Italian study of a web-based telemedicine system for thrombolysis delivery and patient monitoring. Neurol Sci 37, 725–730 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2569-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2569-y

Keywords

Navigation