Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of telestroke systems among neighboring hospitals: more and better? The Madrid Telestroke Project

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A telestroke system was established between a community hospital lacking an on-call neurologist and a comprehensive stroke center only 13 km away. Our goal was to analyze the impact of telestroke on the number of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), door-to-needle times and stroke outcomes. An observational before-and-after study of patients with acute ischemic stroke (IS) who were attended in a community hospital during the 2 years before the telestroke system was implemented (pre-telestroke group) and the first 2 years after telestroke was established (telestroke group). The number of IVT, the door-to-needle time (min), the outcomes [modified Rankin Scale (mRS)] and the safety (mortality and hemorrhagic transformations) were compared between groups. During the pre-telestroke years, 259 patients with IS were attended (28 phone activations), 12 of whom received IVT (4.7 %). During the telestroke years, 225 patients with IS were attended (42 telestroke activations), of whom 18 (8 %) received IVT. The door-to-needle times were lower in the telestroke group [median interquartile range: 66 (54) vs. 143.5 (48) min, P < 0.0001]. The safety was similar in both groups; however, the 3-month mRS scores were lower in the telestroke group (P = 0.049). The multiple linear regression analysis showed a negative association between telestroke and door-to-needle time [β-coefficient (SE) = −59.089 (14.461)], adjusted for confounders. In conclusion, telestroke systems are effective, even between nearby hospitals, shortening door-to-needle time and improving stroke outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Capampangan DJ, Wellik KE, Bobrow BJ, Aguilar MI, Ingall TJ, Kiernan TE, Wingerchuk DM, Demaerschalk BM (2009) Telemedicine versus telephone for remote emergency stroke consultations: a critically appraised topic. Neurologist 15:163–166. doi:10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181a4b79c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwamm LH, Holloway RG, Amarenco P, Audebert HJ, Bakas T, Chumbler NR, Handschu R, Jauch EC, Knight WA 4th, Levine SR, Mayberg M, Meyer BC, Meyers PM, Skalabrin E, Wechsler LR, American Heart Association Stroke Council, Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease (2009) A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 40(7):2616–2634. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.192360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson RE, Saltzman GM, Skalabrin EJ, Demaerschalk BM, Majersik JJ (2011) The cost-effectiveness of telestroke in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 77(17):1590–1598. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318234332d

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Demaerschalk BM, Bobrow BJ, Raman R, Kiernan TE, Aguilar MI, Ingall TJ, Dodick DW, Ward MP, Richemont PC, Brazdys K, Koch TC, Miley ML, Snyder CRH, Corday DA, Meyer BC, STRokE DOC AZ TIME Investigators (2010) Stroke team remote evaluation using a digital observation camera in Arizona: the initial mayo clinic experience trial. Stroke 41(6):1251–1258. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574509

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T, Obler R, Zivin JA, Rao R, Thomas RG, Lyden PD (2008) Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol 7(9):787–795. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70171-6

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zaidi SF, Jumma MA, Urra XN, Hammer M, Massaro L, Reddy V, Jovin T, Lin R, Wechsler LR (2011) Telestroke-guided intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator treatment achieves a similar clinical outcome as thrombolysis at a comprehensive stroke center. Stroke 42(11):3291–3293. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.625046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hess DC, Wang S, Hamilton W, Lee S, Pardue C, Waller JL, Gross H, Nichols F, Hall C, Adams RJ (2005) REACH: clinical feasibility of a rural telestroke network. Stroke 36:2018–2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwamm LH, Rosenthal ES, Hirshberg A, Schaefer PW, Little EA, Kvedar JC, Petkovska I, Koroshetz WJ, Levine SR (2004) Virtual telestroke support for the emergency department evaluation of acute stroke. Acad Emerg Med 11:1193–1197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khan K, Shuaib A, Whittaker T, Saqqur M, Jeerakathil T, Butcher K, Crumley P (2010) Telestroke in northern Alberta: a two year experience with remote hospitals. Can J Neurol Sci 37:808–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Demaerschalk BM, Miley ML, Ciernan TJ, Bobrow BJ, Corday DA, Wellik KE, Aguilar MI, Ingall TJ, Dodick DW, Brazdys K, Koch TC, Ward MP, Richemont PC, STARR Coinvestigators (2009) Stroke telemedicine. Mayo Clin Proc 84:53–64. doi:10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60808-2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiborg A, Widder B (2003) Teleneurology to improve stroke care in rural areas: the Telemedicine in Stroke in Swabia (TESS) Project. Stroke 34:2951–2956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Audebert HJ, Kukla C, von Claranau SC, Kuhn J, Vatankhah B, Schenkel J, Ickenstein GW, Haberl RL, Horn M (2005) Telemedicine for safe and extended use of thrombolysis in stroke: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria. Stroke 36:287–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pedragosa A, Alvarez-Sabín J, Rubiera M, Rodriguez-Luna D, Maisterra O, Molina C, Brugués J, Ribó M (2012) Impact of telemedicine on acute management of stroke patients undergoing endovascular procedures. Cerebrovasc Dis 34(5–6):436–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiménez CC, Tur S, Legarda I, Vives B, Gorospe A, Torres MJ, Merino P, Campillo C (2012) The application of telemedicine for stroke in the Balearic Islands: the Balearic Telestroke project. Rev Neurol 54(1):31–40

    Google Scholar 

  15. de Leciñana-Cases MA, Gil-Núñez A, Díez-Tejedor E (2009) Relevance of stroke code, stroke unit and stroke networks in organization of acute stroke care-the Madrid acute stroke care program. Cerebrovasc Dis 27(Suppl 1):140–147. doi:10.1159/000200452

    Google Scholar 

  16. Henninger N, Chowdhury N, Fisher M, Moonis M (2009) Use of telemedicine to increase thrombolysis and advance care in acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 27(suppl 4):9–14. doi:10.1159/000213053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martínez-Sánchez P, Fuentes B, Martínez-Martínez M, Ruiz-Ares G, Fernández-Travieso J, Sanz-Cuesta BE, Cuellar-Gamboa L, Díez-Tejedor E (2013) Treatment with statins and ischemic stroke: dose the dose matter? Neurology 80(19):1800–1805. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182918d38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Audebert HJ, Schenkel J, Heuschmann PU, Bogdahn U, Haberl RL, Telemedic pilot project for Integrative Stroke Care Group (2006) Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the Telemedicine Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPIS) in Bavaria, Germany. Lancet Neurol 5(6):742–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sairanen T, Soinila S, Nikkanen M, Rantanen K, Mustanoja S, Färkkilä M, Pieninkeroinen I, Numminen H, Baumann P, Valpas J, Kuha T, Kaste M, Tatlisumak T, Finnish Telestroke Task Force (2011) Two years of Finnish Telestroke: thrombolysis at spokes equal to that at the hub. Neurology 76(13):1145–1152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lees KR, Bluhmki E, von Kummer R, Brott TG, Toni D, Grotta JC, Albers GW, Kaste M, Marler JR, Hamilton SA, Tilley BC, Davis SM, Donnan GA, Hacke W, ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS and EPITHET rt-PA Study Group, Allen K, Mau J, Meier D, del Zoppo G, De Silva DA, Butcher KS, Parsons MW, Barber PA, Levi C, Bladin C, Byrnes G (2010) Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet 375(9727):1695–1703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fonarow GC, Zhao X, Smith EE, Saber JL, Reeves MJ, Bhatt DL, Xian Y, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Schwamm LH (2014) Door-to-needle times for tissue plasminogen activator administration and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke before and after a quality improvement initiative. JAMA 311(16):1632–1640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Juliette Siegfried and her team at ServingMED.com for their editorial assistance. This project was provided with grants from Cohesion Funds of the Spanish National Health System, the Mutua Madrileña Foundation and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (TIN 2011-28523).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

This study was approved by the local ethics committee of La Paz University Hospital and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All patients, or their legal representatives if the patient was unable to consent, signed the informed consent in the telestroke group prior to their inclusion in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Patricia Martínez-Sánchez or Exuperio Díez-Tejedor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martínez-Sánchez, P., Miralles, A., Sanz de Barros, R. et al. The effect of telestroke systems among neighboring hospitals: more and better? The Madrid Telestroke Project. J Neurol 261, 1768–1773 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7419-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7419-3

Keywords

Navigation