Skip to main content
Log in

Memory for own behaviour in pinnipeds

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pinnipeds are aquatic predators feeding on a vast range of prey, and their social behaviour differs greatly between species (from extreme polygyny in some sea lions to monogamy in some true seals). It has been hypothesised that the foraging and social complexity of their lifestyle should drive the evolution of their cognitive abilities. To investigate how aware pinnipeds are of their own behaviour, a grey seal (Halichoerus grypus), two harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and four South American sea lions (Otaria flavescens) were trained to repeat their own behaviour on command. Three already trained behaviours were used, and the animal was asked to repeat the behaviour twice to ensure that the animal recalled its own behaviour and not the command given for the previous behaviour. All three species could recall their own behaviour significantly better than by chance. The duration for which the animals could recall their behaviour was tested using a staircase paradigm. A delay was implemented between the completion of the behaviour and the command to repeat it. The delay was increased after correct responses and decreased after incorrect responses. The performance of all species fell towards chance level after 12–18 s, with no significant difference between species. These results indicate that sea lions and true seals are aware of their own behaviour and that true seals have similar short-term memory abilities. It also shows that pinnipeds have less developed short-term memory abilities compared to other aquatic predators, such as the bottlenose dolphin. The complexity of pinniped foraging and social behaviour does not seem to have driven the evolution of short-term memory abilities in these animals but might have contributed to their ability to recall their own behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asselin S, Hammill MO, Barrette C (1993) Underwater vocalizations of ice breeding gray seals. Can J Zool 71(11):2211–2219

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley A, Eysenck MW, Anderson MC (2010) Memory. East Sussex, Psychology Press, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  • Beninger RJ, Kendall SB, Vanderwolf CH (1974) The ability of rats to discriminate their own behaviours. Can J Psychol/Rev Can Psychol 28(1):79–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg I, Haug T, Nilssen KT (2002) Harbour Seal (Phoca vitulina) Diet in Vester » len, North Norway. Sarsia N Atl Mar Sci 87(6):451–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop AM, Onoufriou J, Moss S, Pomeroy PP, Twiss SD (2016) Cannibalism by a Male Grey Seal (Halichoerus grypus) in the North Sea. Aquat Mamm 42(2):137–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy A, McGowen M, Sherwood C, Grossman L, Goodman M, Wildman D (2012) Comparative analysis of encephalization in mammals reveals relaxed constraints on anthropoid primate and cetacean brain scaling. J Evol Biol 25(5):981–994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen WD, Beck CA, Austin DA (2009) Pinniped ecology. In: Perrin WF, Würsig B, Thewissen JGM (eds) Encyclopedia of marine mammals. Elsevier, San Diego, pp 533–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlow A, Onoufriou J, Bishop A, Davison N, Thompson D (2016) Corkscrew seals: grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) infanticide and cannibalism may indicate the cause of spiral lacerations in seals. Plos One 11(6):e0156464

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burns JJ (2009) Harbor Seal and spotted seal Phoca vitulina and P. largha. In: Perrin WF, Würsig B, Thewissen JGM (eds) Encyclopedia of marine mammals. Elsevier, San Diego, pp 533–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappozzo HL, Perrin WF (2009) South American Sea Lion: Otaria flavescens. In: Perrin WF, Würsig B, Thewissen JGM (eds) Encyclopedia of marine mammals, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, pp 1076–1079

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH (1980) Primates, brains and ecology. J Zool 190(Mar):309–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan RB (2003) Short term memory for behavior in the Bottlenose Dolphin (Turisops truncates). Psychology. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Manoa, p 80

  • Dunbar RI, Shultz S (2007) Evolution in the social brain. Science 317(5843):1344–1347

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg JF, Wilson DE (1978) Relative brain size and feeding strategies in the Chiroptera. Evolution 32(4):740–751

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox KC, Muthukrishna M, Shultz S (2017) The social and cultural roots of whale and dolphin brains. Nat Ecol Evol 1(11):1699

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haelters J, Kerckhof F, Jauniaux T, Degraer S (2012) The Grey Seal (Halichoerus grypus) as a Predator of Harbour Porpoises (Phocoena phocoena)? Aquat Mamm 38(4):343–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall A, Thompson D (2009) Grey seal Halichoerus grypus. In: Perrin WF, Würsig B, Thewissen JGM (eds) Encyclopedia of marine mammals. Elsevier, San Diego, pp 501–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall AJ, Watkins J, Hammond PS (1998) Seasonal variation in the diet of harbour seals in the south-western North Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 170:269–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Heers T, van Neer A, Becker A, Gross S, Hansen KA, Siebert U, Abdulmawjood A (2018) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) as a confirmatory and rapid DNA detection method for grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) predation on harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). J Sea Res 140:32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Higdon JW, Bininda-Emonds OR, Beck RM, Ferguson SH (2007) Phylogeny and divergence of the pinnipeds (Carnivora: Mammalia) assessed using a multigene dataset. BMC Evol Biol 7(1):216

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jouventin P, Cornet A (1980) The sociobiology of pinnipeds. Adv Study Behav 11:121–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin AE (2012) Behavior modification in applied settings. Waveland Press, Long Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Konigson S, Fjalling A, Berglind M, Lunneryd SG (2013) Male gray seals specialize in raiding salmon traps. Fish Res 148:117–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen E, Suuronen P (2010) Live-capture of grey seals in a modified salmon trap. Fish Res 102(1–2):214–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold MF, Begeman L, van Bleijswijk JDL, Ijsseldijk LL, Witte HJ, Grone A (2015) Exposing the grey seal as a major predator of harbour porpoises. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282(1798):20142429

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundström K, Hjerne O, Alexandersson K, Karlsson O (2007) Estimation of grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) diet composition in the Baltic Sea. NAMMCO Sci Publ 6:177–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino L (1998) A comparison of encephalization between odontocete cetaceans and anthropoid primates. Brain Behav Evol 51(4):230–238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marino L (2002) Convergence of complex cognitive abilities in cetaceans and primates. Brain Behav Evol 59(1–2):21–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martín HF (2016) Self-cognition in marine mammals studied by the mirror test. Master thesis, Department of Biology, Odense University of Southern Denmark

  • Mauck B, Dehnhardt G (2007) Spatial multiple-choice matching in a harbour seal (Phoca vitulina): differential encoding of landscape versus local feature information? Anim Cogn 10(4):397–405

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mercado E, Murray SO, Uyeyama RK, Pack AA, Herman LM (1998) Memory for recent actions in the bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): repetition of arbitrary behaviors using an abstract rule. Anim Learn Behav 26(2):210–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercado E, Uyeyama RK, Pack AA, Herman LM (1999) Memory for action events in the bottlenosed dolphin. Anim Cogn 2:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen B, Haug T, Nilssen KT (2002) Summer diet of grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) in Faroese waters. Sarsia N Atlant Mar Sci 87(6):462–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin A (2006) Levels of consciousness and self-awareness: a comparison and integration of various neurocognitive views. Conscious Cogn 15(2):358–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pack AA, Herman LM, Roitblat HL (1991) Generalization of visual matching and delayed matching by a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus). Learn Behav 19(1):37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Paukner A, Anderson JR, Donaldson DI, Ferrari PF (2007) Cued repetition of self-directed behaviors in macaques (Macaca nemestrina). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 33(2):139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor K, Callenbach EBE, Davis GW (2002) Don’t shoot the dog: how to improve yourself and others through behavioral training, revised edition. Ringpress Books Ltd., Gloucestershire

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralls K, Fiorelli P, Gish S (1985) Vocalizations and vocal mimicry in captive harbor seals, phoca-vitulina. Can J Zool 63(5):1050–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepúlveda M, Pérez M, Sielfeld W, Oliva D, Durán L, Rodríguez L, Araos V, Buscaglia M (2007) Operational interaction between South American sea lions Otaria flavescens and artisanal (small-scale) fishing in Chile: results from interview surveys and on-board observations. Fish Res 83(2–3):332–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ (2010) Cognition, evolution, and behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimp CP (1982) On metaknowledge in the pigeon: an organism’s knowledge about its own behavior. Anim Learn Behav 10(3):358–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Stansbury A (2015) Vocal learning and development in the grey seal, Halichoerus grypus. University of St Andrews, St Andrews

    Google Scholar 

  • van Neer A, Jensen LF, Siebert U (2015) Grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) predation on harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) on the island of Helgoland, Germany. J Sea Res 97:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall TR, Smith AP (2016) Delayed matching-to-sample: a tool to assess memory and other cognitive processes in pigeons. Behav Proc 123:26–42

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Wayne Phillips, Benjamin Doshner and Omar del Oso from Dolphin adventure for their support and for the predisposition of the animals in Dolphin Adventure. We also thank Abel Reyes, Jesus Manuel Perez, Jesus Silva, Kelli Rust, Luis Hernández and Paola Valle for training the animals and providing their session time with them.

Funding

This study was funded by the Danish Research Council (Grant No. 400200536) and the Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research (ITAW) University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (Grant No. 60079084).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simeon Quirinus Smeele.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The animals from Dolphin Adventure were kept under permits from Mexican Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources [permit: INE/CITES/DGVS-EF-P-0033-NAY/00 (PIMVS)]. The animals from Fjord&Bælt (permit: J.nr.SVANA-610-00084) and The University of Southern Denmark (permit: 2300-50120-00003-09) were kept under permits from the Danish Ministry of Food and Agriculture. The experiments did not require an application to the Animal Ethics Committee of neither Denmark nor Mexico, as animals participated voluntarily in the experiments and were not affected by them in any way. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smeele, S.Q., Anderson Hansen, K., Ortiz, S.T. et al. Memory for own behaviour in pinnipeds. Anim Cogn 22, 947–958 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01286-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01286-x

Keywords

Navigation