Skip to main content
Log in

Re-evaluating birds’ ability to detect Glass patterns

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glass patterns (GPs) are static stimuli that consist of randomly positioned dot-pairs that are spatially integrated to create the perception of a global form. However, when multiple independently generated static GPs are presented sequentially (termed ‘dynamic’ GP), observers report a percept of coherent motion, and data show an improvement in sensitivity. This increased sensitivity has been attributed to a summation of the form signals provided by the individual GPs. In Experiment 1, we tested whether pigeons also show a heightened sensitivity to dynamic GPs. Our results show that pigeons are significantly better at learning to discriminate dynamic GPs from noise compared with static GPs. However, in contrast to previous research, we found that pigeons did not perform well enough with our static GPs to extract sensitivity measurements. In Experiment 2, we compared our static GPs to those that have been used previously. We show that the difference in the comparison noise patterns is important. We used dipole noise patterns, while previous studies used uniform noise patterns that differ in mean dot spacing to the S+. We argue that prior findings from the use of GPs in pigeons should be re-evaluated using dynamic GP stimuli with noise that consist of dipoles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson SJ, Swettenham JB (2006) Neuroimaging in human amblyopia. Strabismus 14:21–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bischof WF, Reid SL, Wylie DR, Spetch ML (1999) Perception of coherent motion in random dot displays by pigeons and humans. Percept Psychophys 61:1089–1101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burr DC, Ross J (2006) The effects of opposite-polarity dipoles on the detection of Glass patterns. Vis Res 46:1139–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cavoto KK, Cook RG (2001) Cognitive precedence for local information in hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim B 27:3–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavoto BR, Cook RG (2006) The contribution of monocular depth cues to scene perception by pigeons. Psychol Sci 17:628–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RG (2000) The comparative psychology of avian visual cognition. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 9:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RG (2001) Hierarchical stimulus processing in pigeons. In: Cook RG (ed) Avian visual cognition. http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/cook/

  • Dakin SC, Bex PJ (2002) Summation of concentric orientation structure: seeing the Glass or the window? Vis Res 42:2013–2020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day AM, Palomares M (2014) How temporal frequency affects global form coherence in Glass patterns. Vis Res 95:18–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feczko E, Shulman GL, Petersen SE, Pruett JR (2014) Interactions between concentric form-from-structure and face perception revealed by visual masking but not adaptation. J Vis 14:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler J, Cohen L (1990) Practical statistics for field biology. Wiley, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Franconeri SL, Simons DJ (2003) Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Percept Psychophys 65:999–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fremouw T, Herbranson WT, Shimp CP (2002) Dynamic shifts of pigeon local/global attention. Anim Cognit 5:233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geisler WS (1999) Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction. Nature 400:65–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glass L (1969) Moiré effect from random dots. Nature 223:578–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodos W (2012) What Birds See and What They Don’t: Luminance, contrast, and spatial and temporal resolution. In: Lazareva OF, Shimizu T, Wasserman EA (eds) How animals see the world: comparative behavior, biology, and evolution of vision. Oxford University Press, London, pp 5–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DM, Bischof WF, Wong-Wylie DR, Spetch ML (2001) Detection of glass patterns by pigeons and humans: implications for differences in higher-level processing. Psychol Sci 12:338–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazareva OF, Shimizu T, Wasserman EA (2012) How animals see the world: Behavior, biology, and evolution of vision. Oxford University Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nankoo J-F, Madan CR, Spetch ML, Wylie DR (2012) Perception of dynamic Glass patterns. Vis Res 72:55–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nankoo J-F, Madan CR, Spetch ML, Wylie DR (2014) Perception of complex motion in humans and pigeons (Columba livia). Exp Brain Res 232:1843–1853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nankoo J-F, Madan CR, Spetch ML, Wylie DR (2015) Temporal summation of global form signals in dynamic Glass patterns. Vis Res 107:30–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Or CC-F, Khuu SK, Hayes A (2007) The role of luminance contrast in the detection of global structure in static and dynamic, same- and opposite polarity, Glass patterns. Vis Res 47:253–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qadri MA, Cook RG (2014) The perception of Glass patterns by starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Psychon B Rev. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0709-z

  • Riesenhuber M, Poggio T (1999) Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nat Neurosci 2:1019–1025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riesenhuber M, Poggio T (2000) Models of object recognition. Nat Neurosci 3:1199–1204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross J, Badcock DR, Hayes A (2000) Coherent global motion in the absence of coherent velocity signals. Curr Biol 10:679–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Kohn A (2007) Glass pattern responses in macaque V2 neurons. J Vis 7:1–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MA, Bair W, Movshon JA (2002) Signals in macaque striate cortical neurons that support the perception of glass patterns. J Neurosci 22:8334–8345

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson HR, Wilkinson F (1998) Detection of global structure in Glass patterns: Implications for form vision. Vis Res 38:2933–2947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson HR, Wilkinson F, Asaad W (1997) Concentric orientation summation in human form vision. Vis Res 37:2325–2330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada to M.L.S. and D.R.W., and by an NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship (Doctoral-level) to C.R.M. All research was conducted in accordance with Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines and with approval from the University of Alberta Animal Welfare Policy Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-François Nankoo.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 334 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nankoo, JF., Madan, C.R., Wylie, D.R. et al. Re-evaluating birds’ ability to detect Glass patterns. Anim Cogn 18, 945–952 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0865-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0865-1

Keywords

Navigation