Skip to main content
Log in

The value of interleukin-6 in predicting disease relapse for Takayasu arteritis during 2-year follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the value of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in predicting long-term disease prognosis for Takayasu arteritis (TA).

Methods

Sixty-seven TA patients, who had IL-6 levels detected at the first visit and had a regular follow-up of at least 2 years, were enrolled. Data recorded up to March 31, 2019, including clinical presentations, laboratory indices, treatments, and radiological images were collected and used for analysis. The value of IL-6 in predicting disease relapse and imaging progression was analyzed.

Results

IL-6 levels were positively related with disease activity index, including Kerr scores, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Patients were divided into three groups according to baseline serum IL-6 levels: low group (< 5.4 pg/mL, n = 29), medium group (5.4–11.5 pg/mL, n = 20), and high group (> 11.5 ng/mL, n = 18). Patients in the medium and high group had higher disease activity than those in the low group (p < 0.01). Baseline IL-6 levels were correlated with luminal stenosis (p < 0.05), although no significant correlations with long-term imaging progression were observed. Patients with more than 2 episodes of disease relapses were most commonly seen in the medium group (p < 0.05). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis indicated that medium and high IL-6 levels were positive predictors for disease relapse (HR 4.3, 95%CI 1.3–18.7 p = 0.07 for medium group; HR 2.1, 95% CI 0.7–48.9, p = 0.19 for high group) with disease status and treatment adjusted.

Conclusions

IL-6 may be a valuable predictor of TA disease relapse during long-term follow-up. Treatments targeted at IL-6 pathways might reduce disease relapse and have better prognostic effects for TA.

Key Points

• Positive relationships between IL-6 levels and disease activity index, including Kerr scores, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, etc. were indicated.

• Medium and high baseline IL-6 levels were valuable for predicting disease relapse during the 2-year follow-up.

• Baseline IL-6 levels were positively correlated with luminal stenosis on imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang L, Zhang H, Jiang X, Zou Y, Qin F, Song L, Guan T, Wu H, Xu L, Liu Y, Zhou X, Bian J, Hui R, Zheng D (2014) Clinical manifestations and long-term outcome for patients with Takayasu arteritis in China. J Rheumatol 41:2439–2446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yilmaz N, Can M, Oner FA, Kalfa M, Emmungil H, Karadag O, Yildiz F, Kimyon G, Yilmazer B, Gerdan V, Bilge SY, Ilhan B, Cobankara V, Kasifoglu T, Cefle A, Kisacik B, Onat AM, Akar S, Onen F, Erken E, Kiraz S, Aksu K, Keser G, Mumcu G, Direskeneli H (2013) Impaired quality of life, disability and mental health in Takayasu’s arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 52:1898–1904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Watanabe Y, Miyata T, Tanemoto K (2015) Current clinical features of new patients with Takayasu arteritis observed from a cross-country research in Japan: age and sex specificity. Circulation 132:1701–1709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kerr FS, Hallahan CW, Gordano J et al (1994) Takayasu arteritis. Ann Intern Med 120:919–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Misra R, Danda D, Rajappa SM, Ghosh A, Gupta R, Mahendranath KM, Jeyaseelan L, Lawrence A, Bacon PA, Indian Rheumatology Vasculitis (IRAVAS) group (2013) Development and initial validation of the Indian Takayasu clinical activity score (ITAS2010). Rheumatology (Oxford) 52:1795–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alibaz-Oner F, Aydin SZ, Akar S, Aksu K, Kamali S, Yucel E, Karadag O, Ozer H, Kiraz S, Onen F, Inanc M, Keser G, Akkoc N, Direskeneli H (2015) Assessment of patients with Takayasu arteritis in routine practice with Indian Takayasu clinical activity score. J Rheumatol 42:1443–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma LY, Li CL, Ma LL et al (2019) Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the carotid artery for evaluating disease activity in Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Res Ther 21:24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung JW, Kim HC, Choi YH, Kim SJ, Lee W, Park JH (2007) Patterns of aortic involvement in Takayasu arteritis and its clinical implications: evaluation with spiral computed tomography angiography. J Vasc Surg 45:906–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang L, Li D, Yan F, Dai X, Li Y, Ma L (2012) Evaluation of Takayasu arteritis activity by delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiol 155:262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Germano G, Monti S, Ponte C et al (2017) The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of large-vessel vasculitis: an update. Clin Exp Rheumatol 35(Suppl):194–198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang X, Zhou J, Sun Y, Shi H, Ji Z, Jiang L (2018) 18F-FDG-PET/CT: an accurate method to assess the activity of Takayasu’s arteritis. Clin Rheumatol 37:1927–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tamura N, Maejima Y, Tezuka D, Takamura C, Yoshikawa S, Ashikaga T, Hirao K, Isobe M (2017) Profiles of serum cytokine levels in Takayasu arteritis patients: potential utility as biomarkers for monitoring disease activity. J Cardiol 70:278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun Y, Ma L, Yan F, Liu H, Ding Y, Hou J, Jiang L (2012) MMP-9 and IL-6 are potential biomarkers for disease activity in Takayasu’s arteritis. Int J Cardiol 156:236–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsuyama A, Sakai N, Ishigami M, Hiraoka H, Kashine S, Hirata A, Nakamura T, Yamashita S, Matsuzawa Y (2003) Matrix metalloproteinases as novel disease markers in Takayasu arteritis. Circulation 108:1469–1473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ishihara T, Haraguchi G, Kamiishi T, Tezuka D, Inagaki H, Isobe M (2011) Sensitive assessment of activity of Takayasu's arteritis by pentraxin3, a new biomarker. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1712–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alibaz-Oner F, Aksu K, Yentur SP, Keser G, Saruhan-Direskeneli G, Direskeneli H (2016) Plasma pentraxin-3 levels in patients with Takayasu’s arteritis during routine follow-up. Clin Exp Rheumatol 34:s73–s76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kong X, Sun Y, Ma L, Chen H, Wei L, Wu W, Ji Z, Ma L, Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Zhao Z, Hou J, Dai S, Yang C, Jiang L (2016) The critical role of IL-6 in the pathogenesis of Takayasu arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 34:S21–S27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao Q, Lv N, Dang A et al (2019) Association of interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 expression, gene polymorphisms, and Takayasu arteritis in a Chinese Han population. Clin Rheumatol 38:143–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alibaz-Oner F, Yentur SP, Saruhan-Direskeneli G et al (2015) Serum cytokine profiles in Takayasu’s arteritis: search for biomarkers. Clin Exp Rheumatol 33:S 32–S 35

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pulsatelli L, Boiardi L, Assirelli E et al (2017) Interleukin-6 and soluble interleukin-6 receptor are elevated in larger-vessel vasculitis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 103:102–110

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kong X, Ma L, Ji Z, Dong Z, Zhang Z, Hou J, Zhang S, Ma L, Jiang L (2018) Pro-fibrotic effect of IL-6 via aortic adventitial fibroblasts indicates IL-6 as a treatment target in Takayasu arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 36:62–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen R, Sun Y, Cui X, Ji Z, Kong X, Wu S, Huang Q, Dai X, Zhang S, Ma L, Jiang L (2019) Autophagy promotes aortic adventitial fibrosis via the IL-6/Jak1 signaling pathway in Takayasu’s arteritis. J Autoimmun 99:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arend WP, Michel BA, Bloch DA et al (1990) The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 33:1129–1134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hata A, Noda M, Moriwaki R et al (1996) Angiographic findings of Takayasu arteritis: new classification. Int J Cardiol 54:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yao X, Huang J, Zhong H, Shen N, Faggioni R, Fung M, Yao Y (2014) Targeting interleukin-6 in inflammatory autoimmune disease and cancers. Pharmacol Ther 141:125–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Manku S, Wong W, Luo Z, Seidman MA, Alabdurubalnabi Z, Rey K, Enns W, Avina-Zubieta JA, Shojania K, Choy JC (2018) IL-6 expression is correlated with increased T-cell proliferation and survival in the arterial wall in giant cell arteritis. Cardiovasc Pathol 33:55–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Burja B, Feichtinger J, Lakota K, Thallinger GG, Sodin-Semrl S, Kuret T, Rotar Ž, Ješe R, Žigon P, Čučnik S, Mali P, Praprotnik S, Tomšič M, Hočevar A (2019) Utility of serological biomarkers for giant cell arteritis in a large cohort treatment-naïve patients. Clin Rheumatol 38:317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kong X, Zhang X, Lv P et al (2018) Treatment of Takayasu arteritis with the IL-6R antibody tocilizumab vs. cyclophosphamide. Int J Cardiol 266:222–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun Y, Ma L, Kong X et al (2017) Cyclophosphamide could be a better choice than methotrexate as induction treatment for patients with more severe Takayasu’s arteritis. Rheumatol Int 37:2019–2026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. van Sleen Y, Sandovici M, Abdulahad WH et al (2019) Markers of angiogenesis and macrophage products for predicting disease course and monitoring vascular inflammation in giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez034

  31. Yoshifuji H (2019) Pathophysiology of large vessel vasculitis and utility of interleukin-6 inhibition therapy. Mod Rheumatol 29:287–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Koster MJ, Warrington KJ (2017) Giant cell arteritis: pathogenic mechanisms and new potential therapeutic targets. BMC Rheumatol 1:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Low C, Conway R (2019) Current advances in the treatment of giant cell arteritis: the role of biologics. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X19827222

  34. Adler S, Reichenbach S, Gloor A et al (2019) Risk of relapse after discontinuation of tocilizumab therapy in giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 58:1939–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun Y, Kong X, Wu S, Ma L, Yan Y, Lv P, Jiang L (2019) YKL-40 as a new biomarker of disease activity in Takayasu arteritis. Int J Cardiol 293:231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Loricera J, Bianco R, Hernandez JL et al (2016) Tocilizumab in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective study and literature review. Clin Exp Rheumatol 34:S44–S53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mekinian A, Resche-Rigon M, Comarmond C, Soriano A, Constans J, Alric L, Jego P, Busato F, Cabon M, Dhote R, Estibaliz L, Koné-Paut I, Landron C, Lavigne C, Lioger B, Michaud M, Ruivard M, Sacre K, Gottenberg JE, Gaches F, Goulenok T, Salvarani C, Cacoub P, Fain O, Saadoun D, French Takayasu network (2018) Efficacy of tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis: multicenter retrospective study of 46 patients. J Autoimmun 91:55–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 81601398, NSFC 81771730, and NSFC 81801598).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lindi Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Kong, X., Cui, X. et al. The value of interleukin-6 in predicting disease relapse for Takayasu arteritis during 2-year follow-up. Clin Rheumatol 39, 3417–3425 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05066-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05066-8

Keywords

Navigation