Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The calculation for ultimate surrounding earth pressure on deep-buried tunnels in aeolian sand stratum to prevent surface collapse

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aeolian sand is characterized by low shear strength and poor self-stabilization, making the construction of tunnels in this stratum highly susceptible to collapse and instability, as well as causing surface subsidence and sand leakage, causing significant impacts on the local geology and environment. Tunnel linings that can provide adequate support are vital to the safety of construction. Firstly, the engineering and mechanical properties of aeolian sand were analyzed. Next, a combination of model tests, PFC modeling, and elastoplastic theory was applied to compare the extent of collapsed arches in deeply buried aeolian sand tunnels with and without support. Finally, a Newtonian iterative method was applied to derive the calculation of the soil pressure around the sand tunnel, and the applicability of the method was verified utilizing arithmetic examples. The results indicate the following: Tunnel collapsed arch cannot be formed during the aeolian sand tunnel excavation without support, but can be formed with support, and the range of this is by the Kastner (1949) formula. The extent of the collapsed arch in supported tunnels is related to the original earth stress, the support reaction force, and the tunnel radius, and is a half times the distance of the tunnel diameter outside the tunnel boundary when the burial depth is four times the diameter of the tunnel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available on request to the authors.

References

  • Bai E, Guo W, Tan Y (2019) Negative externalities of high-intensity mining and disaster prevention technology in China. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(7):5219–5235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandini A, Berry P, Boldini D (2015) Tunnelling-induced landslides: the Val di Sambro tunnel case study. Eng Geol 196:71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli F, Motta E (2006) Numerical analysis for provision of tunneling-induced ground deformation in granular soil. Geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground. Proceedings of the 5th international conference of TC 28 of the ISSMGE, the Netherlands, 15–17 Jun 2005, pp 503–508

  • Chen KH, Peng FL (2018) An improved method to calculate the vertical earth pressure for deep shield tunnel in Shanghai soil layers. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 75:43–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng WC, Li G, Liu N, Xu J, Horpibulsuk S (2020) Recent massive incidents for subway construction in soft alluvial deposits of Taiwan: a review. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 96:103178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang HK, Meguid MA (2013) An efficient finite–discrete element method for quasi-static nonlinear soil–structure interaction problems. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 37(2):130–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou S (2012) Study on the construction technique of Luotuochang tunnel in aeolian sand formation. Chang’an University, Xi an (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang Q, Zhang D, Zhou P, Wong LNY (2013) Ground reaction curves for deep circular tunnels considering the effect of ground reinforcement. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Y, Chen Z, Tao L, Cui J, Yan Q (2019) Model tests on longitudinal surface settlement caused by shield tunnelling in sandy soil. Sustain Cities Soc 47:101504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenner CN (1936) Bore-hole investigations in Yellowstone Park. J Geol 44:225–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan BS (2003) Key points of tunnel engineering design. China communications press (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang M, Yin Z (2012) Analysis of stress redistribution in soil and earth pressure on tunnel lining using the discrete element method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 32:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamata H, Mashimo H (2003) Centrifuge model test of tunnel face reinforcement by bolting. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 18(2–3):205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastner H (1949) Über den echten Gebirgsdruck beim Bau tiefliegender Tunnel. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch A (2010) Experimental investigation of the face stability of shallow tunnels in sand. Acta Geotech 5(1):43–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong C (2016) Research on construction mechanical behavior of large-scale high-density urban tunnel group. Southwest Jiaotong University (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee CJ, Chiang KH, Kuo CM (2004) Ground movement and tunnel stability when tunneling in sandy ground. J Chin Inst Eng 27(7):1021–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei M, Peng L, Shi C (2014) Calculation of the surrounding rock pressure on a shallow buried tunnel using linear and nonlinear failure criteria. Autom Constr 37:191–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Fan W, Fan L (2019) Analytical scrutiny of loosening pressure on deep twin-tunnels in rock formations. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 83:373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZY, Cao YW, Liang NX, Mei YJ (2006) The compaction mechanism of aeolian sand. Chin J Highw Transp 19(5):6–11 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CW (2005) Spatial strata stress field evolution regularity induced by mining engineering and simulation. The Yellow River Water Conservancy Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu DP (2015) Research on engineering characteristics of low embankment of aeolian sand and gravel soil under vehicle load. Chang’an University (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JQ, Liu C, Liu XY, Wang S, Yuan HL, Li CJ, Dong JL (2021) Prediction of water–mud inrush hazard from weathered granite tunnel by an improved seepage erosion model. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80(12):9249–9266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Zhu J, Zhang H, Ma X, Xie J (2022) Geological conditions of saturated soft loess stratum and influence of tunnel excavation and dewatering system on its groundwater environment. Bull Eng Geol Environ 81(3):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mou XY, Gu P (2010) Summary of domestic research on the characteristics of aeolian sand project. J Inner Mongolia Agric Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 31(01):307–310 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oggeri C, Oreste P (2012) Tunnel static behavior assessed by a probabilistic approach to the back-analysis. Am J Appl Sci 9(7):1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oggeri C, Ova G (2004) Quality in tunnelling: ITA-AITES working group 16 final report. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 19(3):239–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeed H, Uygar E (2022) Equation for maximum ground surface settlement due to bored tunnelling in cohesive and cohesionless soils obtained by numerical simulations. Arab J Sci Eng 47(4):5139–5165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong J (2020) General formulas for calculating surrounding rock pressure of tunnels and underground spaces. KSCE J Civ Eng 24(4):1348–1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Zhao Y, Li C, Li C, Lan T, Ping S, Cao Y (2019a) An experimental study on the corrosion characteristics of the karst tunnel engineering area in Southwest China. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(6):4047–4061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G (2019) Study on Face stability analysis of the aeolian sand tunnel. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 218(1):012126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Lai J, Qiu J, Xu W, Wang L, Luo Y (2020) Geohazards, reflection and challenges in mountain tunnel construction of China: a data collection from 2002 to 2018. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 11(1):766–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZJ, Wang RL, Xu JX, Wu F, Li XG, Dou TM, Li W, Zhang F (2019b) Study on calculation method of surrounding rock pressure of deep aeolian sand tunnel based on field measurement. Tunn Constr (Chin Engl) 39(12):1931–1939 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang Y, Liu H, Zhang W, Chu J, Zhou D, Xiao Y (2018) Application of transparent soil model test and DEM simulation in study of tunnel failure mechanism. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 74:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong F, Chen X, Ge C et al (2016) Case study of modified H-B strength criterion in discrimination of surrounding rock loose circle. J Tunn Undergr Space Technol 56:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang DY (2009) Research on physical properties of aeolian sand engineering in Mu Us Desert. Chang’an University (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Tian Z, Di H, Guo P, Fu L (2020) Investigation of a loess-mudstone landslide and the induced structural damage in a high-speed railway tunnel. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79(5):2201–2212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Z, Chen Z, He C, Kou H (2021) Investigation on the evolution characteristics and transfer mechanism of surrounding rock pressure for a hard-rock tunnel under high geo-stress: case study on the Erlang Mountain Tunnel, China. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80(11):8339–8361

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by High-Speed Rail Joint-Fund Funded Projects (U1934213) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Fund (5210082505).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 610031, China

    Kaimeng Ma, Junru Zhang, Yi Dai & Ping Zhou

  2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, 621000, China

    Chao Kong

  3. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, 050043, China

    Qiang Xu

Authors
  1. Kaimeng Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junru Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yi Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chao Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ping Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qiang Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junru Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Human and animal rights and informed consent

This study did not involve human participants.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, K., Zhang, J., Dai, Y. et al. The calculation for ultimate surrounding earth pressure on deep-buried tunnels in aeolian sand stratum to prevent surface collapse. Bull Eng Geol Environ 81, 390 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02894-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02894-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation