Abstract
The deformation modulus of a rock mass (E m) is an important parameter in rock mechanics and engineering and its determination is a difficult task. Therefore, several equations were proposed using regression analysis of E m and rock mass class. Among them, widely used equations based on Q and RMR were selected for the calculation of E m values for different rock types which are encountered along the tunnel alignment of the Kulekhani III Hydroelectric Project, Nepal. From the results, it is found that some of the equations show E m value to be highly sensitive to the rock mass class while others show less sensitivity. Different values of E m were obtained from different equations for the same class and eight different rock types. Even a small change in RMR causes large variation in E m value. Maximum differences in obtained values are about 5–30 GPa for same rock class. In such condition, it becomes very difficult to choose deformability value to design engineering projects in rock mass. The graphs obtained from different equations show linear to fluctuating pattern depending upon the sensitivity of equation towards rock class.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barton N (1983) Application of Q system, index tests to estimate shear strength and deformability of rock masses. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on engineering geology and underground construction, vol I(II), Lisbon, pp. 51–70
Barton N (2002) Some new Q value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:185–216
Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6(4):189–236
Bieniawski ZT (1973) Engineering classification of rock masses. Trans S Afr Inst Civ Eng 15(12):335–344
Bieniawski ZT (1978) Determining rock mass deformability—experience from case histories. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15(5):237–247
Carvalho J (2004) Estimation of rock mass modulus (see paper by Hoek and Diederichs 2006)
Diederichs MS, Kaiser PK (1999) Stability of large excavations in laminated hard rock masses: the Voussoir analogue revisited. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:97–117
Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Kayabasi A (2003) Predicting the deformation moduli of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:701–710
Grander WS (1987) Design of drilled piers in the Atlantic Piedmont. In: Smith RE, editor. Foundations and excavations in decomposed rock of the piedmont providence. 1 GSP ASCE, no 9, pp 62–86
Grimstad E, Barton N (1993) Updating the Q-system for NMT. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on sprayed concrete, Fagernes. Norw Concr Assoc, Oslo, p 20
Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1165–1186
Hoek E, Diederichs MS (2006) Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(2):203–215
Hoek E, Carranza-Torres CT, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. In: Proceedings of the fifth North American rock mechanics symposium, vol 1, Toronto, pp 267–73
Kayabasi A, Gokceoglu C, Ercanoglu M (2003) Estimating the deformation modulus of rock masses: a comparative study. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:55–63
Mitri HS, Edrissi R, Henning J (1994) Finite element modeling of cable bolted stopes in hard rock ground mines. In: Presented at the SME annual meeting, New Mexico, Albuquerque, pp 94–116
Nicholson GA, Bieniawski ZT (1990) A nonlinear deformation modulus based on rock mass classification. Int J Min Geol Eng 8:181–202
Palmstrom A (1996) RMi—a rock mass characterization system for rock engineering purposes. Ph. D. Thesis, Oslo University
Palmström A (2000) Recent developments in rock support estimates by the RMi. J Rock Mech Tunn Technol 6(1):1–19
Palmstrom A, Singh R (2001) The deformation modulus of rock masses—comparisons between in situ tests and indirect estimates. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16(3):115–131
Panthee S, Singh PK, Kainthola A, Singh TN (2016) Control of rock joint parameters on deformation of tunnel opening. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8(4):489–498
Read SAL, Richards LR, Perrin ND (1999) Applicability of the Hoek–Brown failure criterion to New Zealand greywacke rocks. In: Vouille G, Berest P, editors. Proceedings of the ninth international congress on rock mechanics, vol 2, Paris, pp 655–60
Serafim JL, Pereira JP (1983) Consideration of the geomechanical classification of Bieniawski. In: Proc. Int. Symp. Eng Geol Underground Construction, vol 1(II) (Lisbon), pp 33–44
Shen J, Karakus M, Xu C (2012) A comparative study for empirical equations in estimating deformation modulus of rock masses. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 32:245–250
Sonmez H, Gokceoglu C, Ulusay R (2004) Indirect determination of the modulus of deformation of rock masses based on the GSI system. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1:849–857
Stephens RE, Banks DC (1989) Moduli for deformation studies of the foundation and abutments of the Portugues Dam—Puerto Rico. In: Rock mechanics as a guide for efficient utilization of natural resources: Proceedings of the 30th US symposium, Morgantown. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 31–38
Stöcklin J, Bhattarai KD (1977) Geology of Kathmandu Area and Central Mahabharat Range, Nepal Himalaya. Kathmandu: Report of Department of Mines and Geology, UNDP, p 86
Zhang L, Einstein HH (2004) Using RQD to estimate the deformation modulus of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:337–341
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Panthee, S., Singh, P.K., Kainthola, A. et al. Comparative study of the deformation modulus of rock mass. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77, 751–760 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0974-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0974-3