Skip to main content
Log in

Risk management by geotechnical monitoring for safe excavation of a large rock cavern: a case study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present report highlights the methods used to monitor the rock mass behavior and performance of a cavern during excavation in order to verify and, if necessary, adjust the rock support to ensure safe construction at each stage of excavation. The present geotechnical monitoring practice for underground structures involves convergence monitoring with the help of optical targets and rock mass displacement with the help of borehole extensometers. More importantly, it involves detailed planning to finalize the position of each monitoring instrument, based on the location and orientation of geological features. It is equally important to ensure proper recording of monitoring data in order to analyze and take immediate action in case of any adverse situation. This requires dedicated high-end automated software, which can record, analyse and produce significant results from a large quantity of recorded data, to prevent what could otherwise be a catastrophic failure. Initially, geotechnical monitoring was carried out in the recently excavated zone of the cavern on a daily basis. Based on continuous monitoring data for at least 1 week, the frequency of subsequent monitoring can be decided. In most cases, the deformation of rock mass was considerably less than the alarming values which were calculated based on detailed design for different rock classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boon CW, Houlsby GT, Utili S (2015) Designing tunnel support in jointed rock masses via the DEM. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(2):603–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIL (2010) Geotechnical monitoring and instrumentation. 4923/DSB/PUA/0014. Engineers India Ltd, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • EIL (2011) Design package for Cavern Storage. 4923/REP/PUA/0310. Engineers India Ltd, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimstad E, Barton N (1993).Updating of the Q-system for NMT. In: Proceedings of international symposium on sprayed concrete-modern use of wet mix sprayed concrete for underground support, Fagernes, pp 46–66

  • Gunhan S (2015) Collaborative learning experience in a construction project site Trip. J Prof Issue Eng Educ Pract 141(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu I, Liao H (2010) Method of up-slope mitigation priority for Alishan mountain road in Taiwan. J Perform Constr Facil 24(4):373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS (1893) Part I: Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part I General provision and buildings

  • Jimeno CL (1997) Manual of tunnels and underground workings. Entorno Gráfico, Madrid. (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavvadas MJ (2003) Monitoring and modelling ground deformations during tunneling. Proceedings of 11th FIG Symposium on Deformation Measurements. Santorini, Greece

  • Lipponen A (2007) Applying GIS to assess the vulnerability of the paijanne water-conveyance tunnel in Finland. Environ Geol 53(3):493–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S (2006) Deformation measurements during the construction of large dam projects. Chin J Undergr Space Eng 6(Z2):1346–1348

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Zhao Z (2007) Deformation monitoring of 70 m span box girders of Hang-Zhou Bay Sea-Cross Bridge at construction stage. World Bridge 7(2):58–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustafar MA, Simons WJF, Omar KM, Ambrosius BAC (2014) Monitoring of local deformations in north borneo, 6991, FIG congress 2014 engaging the challenges - enhancing the relevance, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 16–21 June 2014

  • Naha K, Srinivasan R, Jayaram S (1990) Structural evolution of the Peninsular Gneiss-an Early Precambrian migmatitic complex from South India. J of Geologische Rundschau Stuttgart 79(1):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash D, Singh CK, Singh PC, Deepak, Kumar A (2011) GIS based terrain modelling of the area NW of karimnagar, Southern India. Int J Remote Sens Appl 11(2):6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Taromi M, Eftekhari A, Hamidi JK, Aalianvari A (2016) A discrepancy between observed and predicted NATM tunnel behaviors and updating: a case study of the Subzkuh tunnel. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi:10.1007/s-10064-016-0862-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Xei W, Meng Y (2006) Design of safety monitoring information system of subway tunnel based on GIS. Railw Comput Appl 15(3):15–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Mandal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhatkar, T., Mandal, A., Kumar, C. et al. Risk management by geotechnical monitoring for safe excavation of a large rock cavern: a case study. Bull Eng Geol Environ 76, 1209–1216 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0963-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0963-6

Keywords

Navigation