Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The lateral rectus abdominis positioned stoma (LRAPS) in the construction of end colostomies, loop ileostomies and ileal conduits

  • How-I-Do-It
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Stomas are traditionally constructed through the belly of the rectus muscle. Parastomal herniation is common with the use of mesh prophylaxis still deliberated.

Methods

A novel trephine, the lateral rectus abdominis positioned stoma or LRAPS, that minimises damage to the musculature of the anterior abdominal wall, has been used in the construction of end colostomies, loop ileostomies and ileal conduits.

Results

In a cohort of 106 patients with end colostomy, the cumulative rate of parastomal herniation at 1, 2 and 3 years were 6, 10 and 17%, respectively. In 56 patients in whom an ileal conduit was performed, there was no clinical or radiological evidence of parastomal herniation at 1 year.

Conclusion

In contrast to a traditional trephine through the belly of the muscle, this technique avoids damage to the rectus abdominis muscle. Early symptomatic parastomal herniation is unusual after LRAPS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goligher JC (1984) Surgery of the Anus Rectum and Colon, 5th edn. Bailliere Tindall, UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bayer I, Kyzer S, Chaimoff C (1986) A new approach to primary strengthening of colostomy with Marlex mesh to prevent paracolostomy hernia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 163:579–580

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stephenson BM, Evans MD, Hilton J, McKain ES, Williams GL (2010) Minimal anatomical disruption in stoma formation: the lateral rectus abdominis positioned stoma (LRAPS). Colorectal Dis 12:1049–1052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mainwaring A, Stephenson BM, Carter AC (2016) Is a sublay prophylactic mesh a necessary prerequisite to prevent ileal conduit herniation? Scand J Urol 50:93–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Askar OM (1977) Surgical anatomy of the aponeurotic expansions of the anterior abdominal wall. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 59:313–321

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown JM, Williams GL, Stephenson BM (2016) Avoiding inferior epigastric artery damage at stoma formation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98:348–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Momani H, Miller C, Stephenson BM (2014) Stoma siting and the 'arcuate line' of Douglas: might it be of relevance to later herniation? Colorectal Dis 16:141–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, Aktan AO (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1559–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Powell-Chandler A, Williams CR, Stephenson BM (2015) Can we avoid rectus abdominis muscle atrophy and midline shift after colostomy creation? Surgery 57:178–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reddick EJ, Olsen DO (1989) Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. A comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 3:131–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Narang SK, Alam NN, Campain NJ, Pathak S, McGrath JS, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2017) Parastomal hernia following cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review. Hernia 21:163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Haes F, Bullen NL, Antoniou GA, Smart NJ, Antoniou SA (2020) Systematic review and meta-analysis of incisional hernia post-reversal of ileostomy. Hernia 24:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hardt J, Seyfried S, Weiß C, Post S, Kienle P, Herrle F (2016) A pilot single-centre randomised trial assessing the safety and efficacy of lateral pararectus abdominis compared with transrectus abdominis muscle stoma placement in patients with temporary loop ileostomies: the PATRASTOM trial. Colorectal Dis 18:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seyfried S, Lucas V, Galata C, Reißfelder C, Weiß C, Kienle P, Hardt J (2020) Incisional hernia rate after ileostomy closure in lateral pararectal stoma versus transrectal stoma placement: follow-up of the randomized PATRASTOM trial. Colorectal Dis 22:445–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS) (2020) Collaborative and West Midlands Research Collaborative Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 395(10222):417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A, Bombardo-Junca J, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Rebasa P, Ayguavives-Garnica I, Navarro-Soto S (2009) The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy A new clinico-radiological classification. Colorectal Dis 11:173–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagayoshi K, Nagai S, Hisano K, Mizuuchi Y, Fujita H, Nakamura M (2020) Atrophic change of the abdominal rectus muscle significantly influences the onset of parastomal hernias beyond existing risk factors after end colostomy. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02192-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hardt J, Meerpohl JJ, Metzendorf MI, Kienle P, Post S, Herrle F (2019) Lateral pararectal versus transrectal stoma placement for prevention of parastomal herniation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 4:CD009487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tivenius M, Näsvall P, Sandblom G (2019) Parastomal hernias causing symptoms or requiring surgical repair after colorectal cancer surgery-a national population-based cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 34:1267–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jones HG, Rees M, Aboumarzouk OM, Brown J, Cragg J, Billings P, Carter B, Chandran P (2018) Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD08905

    Google Scholar 

  21. García-Alamino JM, López-Cano M, Kroese L, Helgstrand F, Muysoms F (2019) Quality assessment and risk of bias of systematic reviews of prophylactic mesh for parastomal hernia prevention using AMSTAR and ROBIS tools. World J Surg 43:3003–3012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Holland J, Chesney T, Dossa F, Acuna S, Fleshner KA, Baxter NN (2019) Do North American colorectal surgeons use mesh to prevent parastomal hernia? A survey of current attitudes and practice. Can J Surg 62:426–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Correa Marinez A, Bock D, Erestam S, Engström A, Kälebo P, Nielsen YW, Rosenberg J, Haglind E, Angenete E (2020) Methods of Colostomy Construction: No effect on Parastomal Hernia Rate: Results from Stoma-const – A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003843

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. M. Stephenson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I declare no competing interests and no funding was obtained for this work.

Ethical approval

Not deemed necessary.

Human and animal rights

Nothing to declare.

Informed consent

Formal consent is not required for this narrative.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stephenson, B.M. The lateral rectus abdominis positioned stoma (LRAPS) in the construction of end colostomies, loop ileostomies and ileal conduits. Hernia 25, 803–808 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02275-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02275-7

Keywords

Navigation