Skip to main content
Log in

State of the art: open mesh-based inguinal hernia repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Open inguinal hernia repair remains the most universal, ubiquitous, reliable, and cost-effective method of addressing the global burden of groin hernias. Advances in anatomic understanding and technique have refined a few well-established techniques that can address the majority of the burden of disease with low rates of morbidity, recurrence, and chronic pain. Prosthetic reinforcement has become routine because of the clear reduction in recurrence rates in general practice conferred by mesh and the less-appreciated consideration of simplification of the repair whereby operator variability, hernia type, anatomic variation, patient habitus, tissue deficiencies, and surgical technique are homogenized by reproducible standard techniques. While minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic approaches have increased in popularity, availability, and reliability, open inguinal-repair techniques continue to provide durability, low risk, minimal cost, ease of training and dissemination, and excellent outcomes and remain a fundamental foundation for the practice and art of hernia surgery. Additionally, as chronic pain and quality of life metrics supersede recurrence as the primary clinical outcome of inguinal hernia repair, the ability to offer a “tailored approach” with several options ranging from tissue- and mesh-based open repairs to minimally invasive prosthetic reinforcement has become an important consideration in providing each patient with different options and the best possibility of a favorable outcome. Paramount to this is a solid understanding of the anatomy and standardization of proper technique for each operation to minimize complications and maximize patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wantz G (1989) The operation of Bassini as described by Attilio Catterina. Surg Gynecol Obstet 168:67–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Read R (1987) The centenary of Bassini’s contribution to inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 153:324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bendavid R (2001) The Shouldice repair. In: Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui ME, Flament JB, Phillips EH (eds) Abdominal wall hernias. Springer, New York, pp 370–375

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Kockerling F, Koch A, Adolf D, Keller T, Lorenz R, Fortelny RH, Schug-Pass C (2018) Has Shouldice repair in a selected group of patients with inguinal hernia comparable results to Lichtenstein, TEP and TAPP techniques? World J Surg 42(7):2001–2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4433-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lichtenstein IL (1986) Hernia repair without disability. Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1993) Critical scrutiny of the open tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 165:369–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal Hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Miserez M, Peeters E, Aufenacker T, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Jorgensen LN, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smitanski M, Weber G, Simons P (2014) Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 18:151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1236-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simons MP, Aufenacker TJ, Berrevoet F, Bingener J, Bisgaard T, Bittner R, Bonjer HJ, Bury K, Campanelli G, Chen DC, Chowbey PK, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Eker HH, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, van den Heuvel BJ, Hope WW, Jorgensen LN, Klinge U, Köckerling F, Kukleta JF, Konate I, Liem AL, Lomanto D, Loos MJA, Lopez-Cano M, Miserez M, Misra MC, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Muysoms FE, Niebuhr H, Nordin P, Pawlak M, van Ramshorst GH, Reinpold WMJ, Sanders DL, Sani R, Schouten N, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Simmermacher RKJ, Tran HM, Tumtavitikul S, van Veenendaal N, Weyhe D, Wijsmuller AR (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Klinge U, Kockerling F, Kuhry E, Kukleta J, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Reinpold W, Rosenberg J, Sauerland S, Schug-Pass C, Singh K, Timoney M, Weyhe D, Chowbey P (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25(9):2773–2843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1799-6 (Epub 2011 Jul 13)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Daes J, Felix E (2017) Critical view of the myopectineal orifice. Ann Surg 266(1):e1–e2. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramjist JK, Dossa F, Stukel TA, Urbach DR, Fu L, Baxter NN (2018) Reoperation for inguinal hernia recurrence in Ontario: a population-based study. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1822-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suguita FY, Essu FF, Oliveira LT, Iuamoto LR et al (2017) Learning curve takes 65 repetitions of totally extraperitoneal laparoscopy on inguinal hernias for reduction of operating time and complications. Surg Endos 31(10):3939–3945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pokorny H, Klingler A, Schmid T, Fortelny R, Hollinsky C, Kawji R, Steiner E, Pernthaler H, Függer R, Scheyer M (2008) Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Hernia 12:385–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0357-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alfieri S, Amid PK, Campanelli G, Izard G, Kehlet H, Wijsmuller AR, Di Miceli D, Doglietto GB (2011) International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia 15(3):239–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0798-9 (Epub 2011 Mar)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amato B, Moja L, Panico S, Persico G, Rispoli C, Rocco N, Moschetti I (2012) Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD001543. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001543.pub4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bittner R, Sauerland S, Schmedt CG (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 5:605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bay-Nielsen M, Nilsson E, Nordin P, Kehlet H (2004) Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia in young males. Br J Surg 91:1372–1376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Porrero JL, Bonachia O, Lopez-Buenadicha A, Sanjuanbenito A, Sanchez-Cabezudo C (2005) Repair of primary inguinal hernia: Lichtenstein vs Shouldice techniques. Prospective randomized study of pain and hospital costs. Cir Esp 2:75–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Malik A, Bell CM, Stukel TA, Urbach DR (2016) Recurrence of inguinal hernias repaired in a large hernia surgical specialty hospital and general hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Can J Surg 59(1):19–25

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. C. Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the authors.

Statement on human and animal rights

This article does not contain any study with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of article informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The article is part of the Topical Collection “Forum on primary monolateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, D.C., Morrison, J. State of the art: open mesh-based inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 23, 485–492 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01983-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01983-z

Keywords

Navigation