Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this prospective randomized multicenter trial was to evaluate the recurrence rates and complications of open versus laparoscopic repairs of inguinal hernias.

Methods

Patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernias were randomized to Shouldice repair, Bassini operation, tension-free hernioplasty (Lichtenstein repair), laparoscopic transabdominal extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP), or laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP). The primary outcome parameter was the rate of recurrence at 3 years. The secondary outcome was the rate of intraoperative, perioperative, and long-term complications. Follow-up comprised of clinical examination after 1, 2, and 3 years.

Results

Three hundred and sixty-five patients were randomly assigned to one of the five procedures. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that the cumulative 3-year recurrence rate was 3.4% in the Bassini group, 4.7% in the Shouldice group, 0% in the Lichtenstein group, 4.7% in the TAPP group, and 5.9% in the TEP group (p = 0.48). Comparing open (Bassini, Shouldice, Lichtenstein) versus laparoscopic (TAPP, TEP) techniques (p = 0.29) and comparing the use of mesh prostheses (Lichtenstein, TAPP, TEP) versus suturing techniques (Bassini, Shouldice) (p = 0.74) showed no significance in the rate of recurrence. The rates of intraoperative (p = 0.15), perioperative (p = 0.09), and long-term complications (p = 0.13) were without significance between the five groups. Comparing mesh techniques (Lichtenstein, TAPP, TEP) versus suturing techniques (Bassini, Shouldice) showed no significance in the rate of complications. The per-protocol analysis for the comparison of mesh (Lichtenstein, TAPP, TEP) versus suturing (Bassini, Shouldice) techniques revealed that recurrences (p = 0.74), intraoperative (p = 0.64), perioperative (p = 0.27), and long-term complications (p = 0.91) were evenly distributed.

Conclusions

In this multicenter study, no significant difference in the recurrence rate and complications between laparoscopic and open methods of hernia repair was revealed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ger R (1982) The management of certain abdominal herniae by intra-abdominal closure of the neck of the sac. Preliminary communication. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 64:342–344

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liem MS, van der Graaf Y, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Stassen LP, Vente JP, Weidema WF, Schrijvers AJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336:1541–1547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. [No authors listed] (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group. Lancet 354:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM; EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001785

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Camps J, Cornet DA, Nguyen NX, Litke BS, Annibali R, Salerno GM (1995) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Results of a multicenter trial. Ann Surg 221:3–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1996) Open “tension-free” repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. Eur J Surg 162:447–453

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith CD (1997) Inguinal herniorrhaphy: posterior buttressed mesh repair via laparoscopy (TEP). Video, American College of Surgeons CC-1866, Ciné-Med, Woodbury, Connecticut

  8. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr (1997) Transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Video, American College of Surgeons CC-1871, Ciné-Med, Woodbury, Connecticut

  9. Payne JH Jr, Grininger LM, Izawa MT, Podoll EF, Lindhal PJ, Balfour J (1994) Laparoscopic or open inguinal herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial. Arch Surg 129:973–981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157:188–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon MI, Abrams KR (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90:1479–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pokorny H, Klingler A, Scheyer M, Függer R, Bischof G (2006) Postoperative pain and quality of life after laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized trial. Hernia 10:331–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W; Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 456 Investigators (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18–20, 1090, Vienna, Austria

    H. Pokorny, A. Klingler, T. Schmid, R. Fortelny, C. Hollinsky, R. Kawji, E. Steiner, H. Pernthaler, R. Függer & M. Scheyer

Authors
  1. H. Pokorny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Klingler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Schmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Fortelny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Hollinsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. Kawji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. E. Steiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. H. Pernthaler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. R. Függer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. M. Scheyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Pokorny.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pokorny, H., Klingler, A., Schmid, T. et al. Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Hernia 12, 385–389 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0357-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0357-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation