Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to describe our policy in selecting different types of anaesthesia and anterior tension-free techniques for the repair of recurrent inguinal hernias previously treated by anterior approach and to evaluate early and late outcomes.
Methods
The medical records of 111 patients who underwent recurrent inguinal hernia repair by anterior approach in the period 2000–2013 were reviewed. Fifty patients (45 %) were over 70 years old and 63 (56.7 %) had one or more co-morbidities. Hernias with large defects were the most frequently observed (59.5 %), and no-mesh techniques were the most frequent failed repair (75.7 %). Different anterior tension-free techniques and types of anaesthesia were used, depending on hernia and patient characteristics. Seventy-three patients (65.8 %) were operated on an outpatient basis.
Results
Mean follow-up period was 89 months (range 10–183). No perioperative deaths, medical events, or visceral injuries were recorded. Early postoperative complications occurred in 11 patients: 4 haematomas (3.6 %), 5 seromas (4.5 %), 1 superficial wound infection (0.9 %) and 1 ischemic orchitis (0.9 %). Late complications consisted in 3 cases of chronic moderate pain (3.2 %) and 2 re-recurrences (2.1 %).
Conclusions
Recurrent inguinal hernia previously treated by open anterior technique can be repaired using the same approach, often on an outpatient basis, with a low rate of recurrence and postoperative complications. To be safe and effective, the repair should be performed by appropriately trained surgeons, well versed in the use of different types of anaesthesia and surgical techniques depending on patient and hernia characteristics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grant AM, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data (corrected). Hernia 6:130–136
Sevonius D, Gunnarsson D, Nordin P, Nilsson E, Sandblom G (2011) Recurrent groin hernia surgery. Br J Surg 98:1489–1494
Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403
National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Technology appraisal guidance no 83: laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. NICE, London, 2004 uptake report. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta83
Pisanu A, Podda M, Saba A, Porceddu G, Uccheddu A (2014) Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 9:355–366
Aufenacker TJ, de Lange DH, Burg MD, Kuiken BW, Hensen EF, Schoots IG, Gouma DJ, Simons MP (2005) Hernia surgery changes in the Amsterdam region 1994–2001: decrease in operations for recurrent hernia. Hernia 9:46–50
Itani KMF, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Awad SS, Duh Q-Y, Ferzli GS (2009) Management of recurrent inguinal hernias. J Am Coll Surg 209:653–658
Gianetta E, Cuneo S, Vitale B, Camerini G, Marini P, Stella M (2000) Anterior tension-free repair of recurrent inguinal hernia under local anesthesia. A 7-year experience in a teaching hospital. Ann Surg 231:132–136
Deysine M (2008) Recurrent inguinal herniorrhaphy: the centripetal approach utilizing a pre-formed polypropylene plug. Hernia 12:271–275
Feliu X, Torres G, Viñas X, Martìnez-Ródenas F, Fernández-Sallent E, Pie J (2004) Preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: laparoscopic and open approach. Hernia 8:113–116
Beets GL, Dirksen CD, Go PM, Geisler FE, Baeten CG, Kootstra G (1999) Open or laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia? A randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 13:323–327
Arvidsson D, Berndsen FH, Larsson LG, Leijonmarck CE, Rimbäck G, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Spangen L, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 92:1085–1091
Campanelli G, Pettinari D, Nicolosi FM, Cavalli M, Avesani EC (2006) Inguinal hernia recurrence: classification and approach. Hernia 10:159–161
Wantz GE (1986) Testicular atrophy as a sequela of inguinal hernioplasty. Int Surg 71:159–163
(1986) Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain Suppl 3:S1–226
Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608
Bisgaard T, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2008) Re-recurrence after operation for recurrent inguinal hernia. A nationwide 8-year follow-up study on the role of type of repair. Ann Surg 247:707–711
Eklund A, Rudberg C, Leijonmarck CE, Rasmussen I, Spangen L, Wickbom G, Wingren U, Montgomery A (2007) Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair. Surg Endosc 2:634–640
Kouhia ST, Huttunen R, Silvasti SO, Heiskanen JT, Ahtola H, Uotila-Nieminen M, Kiviniemi VV, Hakala T (2009) Lichtenstein hernioplasty versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia—a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 249:384–387
Dedemadi G, Sgourakis G, Karaliotas C, Christofides T, Kouraklis G, Karaliotas C (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open tension-free repair of recurrent inguinal hernias: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 20:1099–1104
Kumar S, Nixon SJ, MacIntyre IM (1999) Laparoscopic or Lichtenstein repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: one unit’s experience. J R Coll Surg Edinb 44:301–302
Nordin P, Zetterström H, Gunnarsson U, Nilsson E (2003) Local, regional, or general anaesthesia in groin hernia repair: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 362:853–858
Shaikh I, Olabi B, Wong VMY, Nixon SJ, Kumar S (2011) NICE guidance and current practise of recurrent and bilateral groin hernia repair by Scottish surgeons. Hernia 15:387–389
Licheri S, Erdas E, Martinasco L, Pisano G, Pomata M, Daniele GM (2004) Il trattamentodell’erniainguinale con ilProlene Hernia System (P.H.S.). Chir Ital 56:127–134
Tuveri M, Calò PG, Borsezio V, Melis G, Medas F, Tuveri A, Nicolosi A (2007) Inguinal hernia repair with the dynamic self-regulating prosthesis (PAD system). Recurrence and complications in 236 consecutive patients. Chir Ital 59:539–544
Atabek U, Spence RK, Pello M, Alexander J, Story L, Camishion RC (1994) A survey of preferred approach to inguinal hernia repair: laparoscopic or inguinal incision? Am Surg 60:255–258
Johner A, Faulds J, Wiseman SM (2011) Planned ilioinguinal nerve excision for prevention of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. Surgery 150:534–541
Hsu W, Chen CS, Lee HC, Liang HH, Kuo LJ, Wei PL, Tam KW (2012) Preservation versus division of ilioinguinal nerve on open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 36:2311–2319
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Conflict of interest
EE, FM, LG, SL, GP, AN, and PGC declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erdas, E., Medas, F., Gordini, L. et al. Tailored anterior tension-free repair for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia previously repaired by anterior approach. Hernia 20, 393–398 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1475-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1475-9