Abstract
The essential guidelines are presented of a postgraduate course on electrochemistry for master studies at the University of Valencia (Spain). This course has been designed for students with a minimal knowledge of electrochemistry. It is based on laboratory experiments that, starting from an initial theoretical core, promotes the in-laboratory discussion of concepts, operations, functional relations, etc. The course, although focused on voltammetric techniques, covers the main concepts and experimental aspects of electrochemistry and particular attention is put to erroneous conceptions regarding fundamental physicochemical concepts and operations (misconceptions) as well as on general aspects of the scientific methodology (meta-conceptions) around this discipline.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Since the times of Faraday, electrochemistry has played an ever-growing capital role in the development of concepts and theories in physics and chemistry [1]. Currently, electrochemistry is directly involved in important application fields, namely, energy generation and storage, electrosynthesis, corrosion, and electroanalysis [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Figure 1 summarizes one of the possible schemes of the main areas of electrochemistry divided into fundamental research and fields of application.
In spite of this significant role, electrochemistry is not everywhere presented as an individual subject in the curriculum of chemistry studies, and is mainly covered in physical chemistry and analytical chemistry programs [8, 9]. There, electrochemistry is usually taught within thermodynamics and kinetics (in physical chemistry), and within “instrumental methods” (in analytical chemistry), where it is taught together—and preferentially—with spectroscopy (atomic and molecular) and chromatographic techniques, in graduate and postgraduate (master) courses. In the context of the recent Bologna re-organization of university studies in Europe [10], postgraduate masters have been implemented as tools for effectively linking the recent graduates to the professional context in two directions: research associated to universities and R&D programs and normalized professional activities such as analytics, plant and process control in industry, etc. [9].
In this context, the University of Valencia (Spain) developed since 2010 a “master of analytical techniques in chemistry” (Técnicas analíticas en Química, TAC), ascribed to the departments of analytical chemistry and inorganic chemistry, to be imparted to graduates in physics, chemistry, biology, chemical engineering, and environmental sciences. The subject comprised a monographic course on “electrochemical techniques” with a scheduled time equivalent of 24 h with mixed theoretical–experimental character. The “open” character of this master implies that a part of the students have only a very basic (almost naïve) knowledge of electrochemistry so that there is a need to address the concepts for “non-electrochemists.” This situation can be seen as particularly interesting [11] but in turn involves difficulties from the educational point of view. It is known that alternative conceptions are particularly influential in chemistry imparted to non-chemists, in particular with regard of electrochemistry, as recently reviewed by Tsarpalis [12]. The current report describes the aims, structure, and epistemological and educational basis of an educational project devoted to impart an electrochemistry course in the frame of the aforementioned master.
Educational approach
Challenges on teaching electrochemistry
The first challenge to be faced in the postgraduate electrochemistry course is topical: roughly, first-level electrochemistry is confined to the Nernst equation(s) and the Faraday laws of electrolysis in general chemistry courses [13], whereas a second-level electrochemistry is provided in instrumental analysis courses. The latter is focused on coulometry, potentiometry, and amperometry, frequently extended to the essential aspects of voltammetry, including stripping analysis for trace metals in solution. The access to this second-level approach to electrochemistry is exclusively given to chemistry graduates. It is not taught for biology and chemical engineering graduates.
The second problem deals with the wide variety of techniques and application fields of electrochemistry [14, 15]. These range from pH measurements, widely used by chemists, engineers, biologist, etc., to techniques used in specialized contexts, such as electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, which is important in corrosion science and polymer science. Keeping in mind that the aim of the postgraduate course is to link the instruction of graduates to a future professional context, it seems obvious that the lack of specific treatment of electrochemistry is a problem superimposed to the variety of techniques potentially accessed by the graduates in their future professional activity.
A third (group of) issue(s) deals with the intrinsic difficulties of teaching/learning electrochemistry, most of them common to all science, but several of which are specific to chemistry and electrochemistry. The persistence of misconceptions, spontaneous conceptions, or alternative conceptions, widely studied by educational research in the last decades [16, 17], is one of the essential trends in this regard. The “spontaneous conceptions” refer to those acquired by the students as a result of a variety of influences differing from the genuine scientific knowledge. These were characterized by (i) the variety of influences determining their generation (“common sense,” mass media information, …) and (ii) their reluctance to be changed by means of most conventional educational approaches. The first examples were studied around the persistence of a pre-Galilean view of motion in secondary school students despite orthodox instruction [16, 17]. Subsequent research identified erroneous conceptions having the above characteristic trends in almost all branches of science, chemistry in particular [18,19,20]. Research in electrochemistry teaching has been focused on common misconceptions of students in understanding electrochemical cells [21, 22], electric circuits and oxidation–reduction equations [23], galvanic cells and potentials [24,25,26,27,28], among others [29,30,31,32,33]. However, these studies are largely focused on secondary school students and there are no systematic studies at the graduate/postgraduate level. Table 1 summarizes several of the described students’ misconceptions in electrochemistry.
In the graduate/postgraduate context, studies on analytical chemistry education showed the existence of a “black box” view of instrumentation [34, 35], which even extends to electrochemistry. For our purposes, the relevant point to emphasize is that such misconceptions concern not only specific concepts and methods, but also meta-conceptions. The meta-conceptions involve concepts sustained by concrete definitions and also concepts “in flux,” associated with operational and or relational definitions [36], analytical strategies, and operational skills [34]. The meta-conceptions can be viewed as the spontaneous ideas about of how science works, how scientific knowledge in constructed, and how science and technology are applied to solve problems. Ultimately, these meta-conceptions deal with something like a naive epistemology. Several were characterized around chemical analysis [34, 35] and also operate in the context of teaching electrochemistry (see Table 2).
Additionally, postgraduate teaching should involve the analysis of uncertainties in measurements, which are frequently misinterpreted even in the research literature, including differentiation/integration [37]. Also, the links between thermodynamics and kinetics [38, 39], the meaning of the Butler-Volmer equation and electron transfer coefficients [40,41,42], nucleation phenomena, etc., need careful attention [43, 44].
Methodological approaches
There is a variety of methodological options available for educational purposes. Specifically treating instrumental analysis, purely laboratory-based approaches [45], and mixed theory/laboratory [46] approaches, as well as investigative [47], technological-based [48], among others [49,50,51,52,53], strategies have been proposed. In the field of electrochemistry, there are plenty of experiments available for their use in education (graduate level) [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61], all essentially focused on voltammetric measurements. However, the problem is how to integrate the experiments into a significant teaching of basic concepts of basic electrochemical basic concepts and techniques.
In this context, the transition between preconceived ideas of the studied phenomena and the “scientific,” elaborated understanding of the same plays a crucial role in higher education [62], where students’ unreflective studying may lead to a fragmented perception of scientific knowledge [63]. Inquiry-based approaches [64, 65] emphasize the interest of integrating the conceptual knowledge into the inquiry and discovery sequences [66, 67], ultimately aimed to construct scientific description of phenomena (either physical or physical-technological) consistently with the hypothetical-deductive nature of science [68]. In this regard, given the organization constraints (vide infra), the proposed postgraduate course is based on a series of laboratory experiments conceived as investigative, laboratory mini-projects [69] with a des-regulated configuration. The central idea is to obtain a series of empirical results immediately submitted to collective discussion through open questions complemented by exercises to be solved at home.
Aims, structure, and methodology of the postgraduate master
The postgraduate master was conceived on the basis of two main aims:
-
(a)
To promote the understanding of the fundamental science concepts and procedures involved in electrochemistry with particular attention to common misconceptions.
-
(b)
To promote an operational view of the concepts and methods involved in the most common electrochemical techniques.
The lessons, in total 24 h, are taught to two groups of 12 postgraduate students. The classroom/laboratory sessions are divided into one preliminary classroom session (3 h) and five laboratory sessions (20 h). Finally, a written test follows (1 h). This structure is common and necessarily adopted to all disciplines within the TAC master. According to this educational structure, the adopted methodology combines investigative [47], mixed theory/laboratory [46], and discovery [49] approaches. They follow an inquiry learning philosophy [62,63,64,65,66,67] by presenting a series of “open,” de-regulated laboratory experiments. The latter comprise data analyses involving inferences and predictions with detailed concept clarifications. Table 1 summarizes the structure and topics of the course. For reasons of time confinements, experiments are based on voltammetric measurements using conventional equipment. Due to the availability of three potentiostatic devices, the group of 12 students is divided into 3 groups, each group working with an electrochemical device in the research laboratory. The customary safety cautions were adopted.
The first “theoretical” session starts with the description of the well-known experiment of water electrolysis, presenting a basic concept of electrochemistry. Here, the emphasis is put on the idea that electrochemistry is focused on processes involving the transfer of electrons (more generally, charge) across the interface separating an ionic conductor (the electrolyte) and an electronic conductor (the electrode). This process is treated as a heterogeneous chemical reaction coupled to processes of charge transport (diffusion as a typical case) in each of the involved phases. Possible parallel chemical reactions (e.g., gas evolution, precipitation/dissolution of solids) are mentioned in order to outline how complicate the overall electrode process may be. Depending on the electron transfer rate and the rate of transport of electroactive species, the electrochemical processes can be divided into electrochemically reversible (operationally, “fast” charge transfer as compared to a slower transport) and electrochemically irreversible (similarly, “slow” charge transfer as compared to a faster transport). This distinction is essential, because only reversible processes can provide electrochemical parameters having thermodynamic significance; i.e., only for such processes, the Nernst equation applies. It is also important to remark that electrochemical measurements are an important source of thermodynamic and kinetic data. However, most electrochemical data (for instance, most standard electrode potentials) are not obtained from direct electrochemical measurements because of the irreversibility of the involved electrochemical processes. An approximation to this generalized, introductory view to electrochemistry can be seen in [70].
Each laboratory session was conducted upon launching an experiment whose performance was accompanied/followed by possible descriptions, predictions, etc., intercalating explanations and concept definitions. In the development of the laboratory lessons, attention was paid to the clarification of electrochemistry concepts, procedures, and scope. Figure 2 shows a simplified scheme representative of the implementation of misconceptions and meta-conceptions in the laboratory lessons. The experiments have been selected among well-known electrochemical processes following a flexible sequence in which the students are challenged to propose explanations and predictions and subsequently propose methods for testing predictions. Two consecutive experiments are scheduled in each laboratory session, as described in Table 3, but eventually, additional experiments are performed. The discussions are intended to clarify experimental aspects (what concrete operations/observations provide information on electrochemical features), conceptual aspects (what concepts are involved in descriptions), and integrated explanations.
Discussion
Table 4 summarizes the experiments, conceptual aspects, and implications to be discussed in the laboratory sessions L1 and L2, both structured around molecular electrochemistry. Session L1.1 starts from a brief description of the cell, electrodes, equipment, software, etc., and the performance of cyclic voltammograms using air-saturated aqueous buffer solutions (sodium acetate buffer at pH 4.75 and potassium phosphate at pH 7.00) at glassy carbon and gold working electrodes. Figure 3 depicts typical cyclic voltammograms recorded at Au electrodes in these solutions. Here, the students are challenged to describe the different voltammetric signals appearing in the voltammograms. The oxygen evolution reaction (OER), the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), and the reduction of dissolved oxygen (oxygen reduction reaction, ORR) can easily be seen by the students at both glassy carbon and Au (or alternatively Pt) electrodes. At Au electrodes, however, additional processes appear consisting of an anodic wave at ca. 1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl followed by a sharp cathodic peak at ca. 0.5 V in the subsequent potential scan in the negative direction. The interpretation of these signals in terms of Au oxidation to a fine layer of gold oxide(s)/oxohydroxydes has motivated abundant literature [71, 72]; for the purposes of the course, the relevant point to underline is the non-inert character of the electrodes.
Several “open” questions can be proposed to the students around the application of the Nernst equations:
-
Are the recorded (approximate) electrode potentials equal to those expected from the standard potentials?
-
Are the potentials shifted according to the experimental pH variations?
-
How to explain the differences between the response at glassy carbon and Au electrodes?
-
What is the role of the Ag/AgCl reference electrode and how to explain its (essentially) constant potential?
Apart from the general aspects dealing with the available potential range, these questions are addressed to identify the electrochemical processes which frequently occur under non-thermodynamic control and need considering the kinetics of the charge transfer charge transport processes.
With regard to the electrode materials, it is important to remark on the need to deeply treat the interpretative schemes on electrochemical phenomena. For instance, the students frequently propose that “there is different hydrogen overpotential at carbon and at Pt”; the question is that this overpotential can be seen as the expression of the kinetic complications appearing in the electrochemical process. The Volmer-Heyrovsky and Volmer-Tafel mechanisms of HER can be briefly discussed here.
Several important details can be treated here, for instance, the need for supporting electrolyte and the definition from the above experiments of the “solvent window”; i.e., the interval of potentials available for studying other electrochemical processes. This “solvent window” depends on the electrode material and the pH, as can be clearly seen upon examining the voltammograms in Fig. 2b, recorded at pH 4.75 and pH 7.00. The solvent window also depends on the currents which are measured. The smaller these currents are, the narrower the window. Additional questions can be optionally treated here: mercury electrodes and non-aqueous solvents. Another important question is the cleaning/activation of solid electrodes, also accessible to available experimentation.
The session L1.2 is centered on the voltammetry of a 1–5 mM solution of K4Fe(CN)6 in 0.10 M KCl at different potential scan rates. This permits to study an essentially reversible electrochemical system with well defined and essentially symmetrical anodic and cathodic peaks [51, 52]. In this case, the electrochemical process is a single electron transfer (Fe(CN)64− → Fe(CN)63− + e−) but the interpretation of the voltammetric features is not trivial. Here the foot of the peak corresponds to a region of Nernstian control where the current growths exponentially upon varying the potential, but the justification of the appearance of a peak requires the consideration of the depletion of oxidized/reduced species in the vicinity of the electrode so that passing the peak. A more detailed discussion is made based on the general equation expressing the proportionality of the current to the gradient of concentration of the electroactive species in the vicinity of the electrode. The variation of the concentration gradients along the voltammogram, although qualitatively, can promote a rather complete view of the coupled mass transfer/electron transfer process [14, 38].
Importantly, the students should realize that the well-established theoretical diagnostic criteria [73,74,75] for reversibility (typically, peak potential separation of 59 mV (for a one-electron transfer) at 298 K, peak potentials independent on the potential scan rate) are generally not accomplished as a result of deviations from reversibility and the presence of uncompensated resistive and capacitive effects distorting the voltammetric response [74, 76]. In practice, the process would be considered as reversible when the half sum of the cathodic and anodic peak potentials, i.e., the mid-peak potential, remains independent of the potential scan rate. The students are challenged to verify this behavior upon performing experiments at different sweep rates. The same experimental arrangement allows us to verify the condition of diffusive control (peak current proportional to the square root of the potential scan rate). Here, the students should previously define a criterion for peak current measurement by defining a proper base line.
The session L2.1 is structured around the voltammetry of a 1–5 mM dopamine solution in phosphate or acetate buffer. Here, the response is clearly different from that recorded in potassium hexacyanoferrate solutions, the cyclic voltammograms displaying an anodic peak with no coupled cathodic counterpart. The interpretation of this voltammetry involves the consideration of two possibilities: an irreversible electron transfer process and/or coupled chemical reactions. The voltammetry of dopamine has been widely studied [77,78,79] and consists of an initial two-electron oxidation yielding dopamine quinone which is followed by fast cyclization reaction and other subsequent processes. Operational criteria for testing this complicated pathway can be obtained by varying the potential scan rate. The central idea is that at high sweep rates the experimental observation time is short enough to detect the initial oxidation product before it reacts significantly. Then, the students can predict that, at large sweep rates, a cathodic signal coupled to the initial oxidation peak should appear.
The session L2.2 is conceived as a flexible academic space for introducing, optionally, aspects complementing the precedent core of voltammetric issues. In several courses, the research projects under development were presented by collaborators. In several others, different alternatives were treated (see Table 4). One of them is the electrochemistry in non-aqueous solvents, based on the reversible reduction of dissolved oxygen to the superoxide anion radical in DMSO solution (important remark: the need of the disposal of suitable supporting electrolytes such as Bu4NPF6) [80]. This process offers the possibility of easily studying the importance of chemical reactions coupled to electron transfer, simply adding water or any proton-donating species [81]. Another alternative is to discuss how to discern the oxidation state of an electroactive species in cyclic voltammetry, a problem for which different proposals are available [82, 83]. Finally, another interesting case study is the voltammetry of Cu(II) in aqueous media containing high concentrations of chloride ions. Here, the voltammograms, as illustrated in Fig. 4, show two pairs of cathodic/anodic peaks corresponding to the stepwise reduction of Cu(II)-chloride complexes to Cu(I)-chloride complexes and Cu metal. This experiment provides an excess to discuss the stabilization of the Cu(I) oxidation state by chloride complexation, the estimate of complexation constants from voltammetric data, disproportionation equilibria, and stripping analysis.
The session L3.1 is devoted to the study of the conventional stripping analysis of trace metal ions in aqueous media. Experiments with ca. 0.1 mM CuSO4·5H2O solutions in acetate buffer are carried out using glassy carbon working electrodes. Testing the influence of the potential range, electrodeposition potential, and electrodeposition time is carried out, eventually using pulsed techniques (differential pulse voltammetry or square wave voltammetry) as a detection mode. Importantly, the well-known capabilities and limitations of this technique for multicomponent analysis are discussed [14, 84]. This discussion opens the introduction of electrode modification strategies.
In all cases, the structure of the laboratory lessons is configured around an initial core of experimental features with its concomitant series of explanatory schemes, derivations, and related aspects. Particular importance is paid to make explicit the operational aspects and functional relations to be known. This is the case of electropolymerization as illustrated in Fig. 5. Here, the formation of polyaniline layers on a glassy carbon electrode is demonstrated by the progressive decrease of the initial oxidation wave of the monomer at + 1.0 V coupled with the increase of the peak height for reversible reduction/oxidation of polyaniline forms in successive scans. Electropolymerization is seen within the frame of an important concept: electrode modification. Here, a variety of modification strategies can be applied involving a tremendous variety of materials. It is important to connect the idea of electrode modification with the basic concept of electrocatalysis and its application not only for analytical purposes but also for preparative ones and energy production [85, 86].
The sessions L4.1 and L4.2 are devoted to the introduction of ion-insertion electrochemistry, which is of crucial importance in the fields of electroanalysis and energy production and storage. The first session is devoted to the electrochemistry of Prussian blue-modified graphite electrodes in contact with 0.10 M KCl solution. The oxidation and reduction of Prussian blue have been widely studied in the context of the voltammetry of immobilized particles [87,88,89] literature, being the classical example [90,91,92] of ion insertion electrochemistry [93]. Applications in the heritage field are also presented [94,95,96,97]. Electrocatalysis is often introduced using the reduction of H2O2 at Prussian blue-modified graphite electrodes.
Table 5 summarizes an example of development of an educational sequence initiated by the performance of a single experiment: the voltammetry of a microparticulate deposit of Prussian blue (PB) transferred by abrasion onto the surface of a graphite lead. The relevant point to emphasize is that the electrochemical processes can be described in terms of the reduction and oxidation in the solid state mediated by the entrance/issue of K+ ions into/from the solid lattice. This experiment provides an opportunity for removing an extended misconception: that electrochemical processes operate necessarily through dissolved species and, in particular, that only dissolved species can be analyzed by means of electrochemical methods.
The first-level description of the experimental results corresponds to the appearance of two one-electron essentially reversible couples. The solid-state nature of such processes involves the need of a second-level description, based on the coupling of electron transfer across the electrode|PB interface and the electron transport in the PB solid [87,88,89,90,91,92,93]. This experiment is expanded to develop a potentiometric sensor for K+ ion determination and the concomitant treating of the concepts of sensitivity and selectivity. The session L4.2 is just devoted to the application in the analytical field through so-called solid contact potentiometric sensors. We used the sensing of chloride and perchlorate ions using microparticulate deposits of Au(I)-Cu(I) heterotrimetallic alkynyl cluster complexes containing ferrocenyl groups [98, 99]. These deposits provide essentially reversible ferrocenyl-based oxidation processes mediated by anion insertion. The formal potentials become linearly dependent on the logarithm of the anion concentration in a wide range of concentrations. Here, two aspects can be discussed: (i) ideally, the response is Nernstian and slopes of 59 mV decade−1 should be obtained when the temperature is of 25 °C and (ii) the formal potentials deviate from linearity at high anion concentrations. By the first token, it is pertinent to remark that there is the possibility of potentiometric sensing even when non-Nernstian behavior is operative. By the second, there is an opportunity to discuss a frequently neglected theoretical aspect: thermochemical activities rather than concentrations enter, strictly, in the Nernst equation. Deviations from the above linearity derive from the fact that the numerical value of activities and concentrations diverge as larger is the concentration of the analyte.
Session L.5 is built around the study of eurocent coins (or equivalent) in contact with electrolytes having different aggressive characters: water, 0.10 M NaClO4, 0.10 M NaCl. In the first part (L5.1), the potentiodynamic polarization curves are obtained. Figure 6 illustrates typical results. Here, for reasons of time economy, potential scan rates of 10 mV s−1, higher than those routinely used in this type of measurements, are employed. The discussion is limited to the general information provided by this technique around the corrosion potential. Eventually, the discussion of the Tafel regions and the calculation of the corrosion resistance are made.
The second part of the session is devoted to record the EIS data on eurocent coins in contact with the above electrolytes. The impedance spectra are obtained at the open circuit potential previously approximated by a short equilibration (2–5 min) time. Optionally, the bias potential can be fixed at ca. − 0.60 V vs. Ag/AgCl in order to use the reduction of dissolved oxygen as a redox probe [100]. The impedance spectra are initially modeled using the Randles circuit introducing subsequent modifications (replacement of capacitors by constant phase elements, addition of Warburg elements). The essential educational aims are to present the three basic representations (Nyquist and Bode plots), discuss the physical meaning of the basic circuit elements, namely, solution resistance (Rs), charge transfer resistance (Rct), and double-layer capacitance (Cdl) and fitting experimental data to the proposed equivalent circuits, establishing several operational associations; for instance, between inclined sections in Nyquist plots with Warburg elements. Figure 7 shows the Nyquist plot corresponding to the impedance spectrum recorded for a eurocent coin in contact with mineral water. This can be used to illustrate how successive equivalent circuits lead to approximate experimental data starting from the classical Randles circuit (Fig. 7a) and incorporating new elements (two parallel RC units in Fig. 7b) representative of the resistance and the capacity associated with the corrosion patina. Of course, it has to be emphasized that the modeling process is not arbitrary and that the circuit elements should necessarily have a definite physical meaning.
Implications for teaching/learning
Annotations taken during the open laboratory lessons, systematically performed since 2012, permitted us to identify several specific misconceptions and meta-conceptions in the graduate students. These are complemented by the results obtained in the writing test usually carried out several days after the end of the series of laboratory sessions. Here, we attempted to acquire information not only on specific electrochemical issues but also on general abilities. An example of the “final test” is provided as an Annex. As relevant conclusions for learning/teaching, one can mention:
-
(a)
The students underestimate to a great extent the capabilities of electrochemistry. This is reflected, for instance, by the ignorance of the use of electrosynthesis as the main method to fabricate aluminum [7] always exhibited by ca. 90% of students (see Fig. 8a).
-
(b)
A significant proportion of students (around 60%) was not aware of the existence of methods of data treatment (deconvolution, mathematical differentiation, etc.) applicable to electrochemical (and other instrumental) techniques (see also Fig. 8a).
-
(c)
The electrochemical process was usually seen as reversible-like and the kinetics of the electron transfer process was frequently considered as a negligible matter. Then, the overall electrochemical experiment is seen as a single, monolithic process with no kinetic constraints nor modification of the composition of the system.
-
(d)
The electrochemical experiment was seen as depending almost exclusively on the composition of the electrolyte solution; the reference electrode, composition of the working electrode, the presence of dissolved oxygen, etc., are generally ignored.
-
(e)
The electrode was understood as an inert component of the system at all. Electrode cleaning, activating, and modifying was frequently avoided.
-
(f)
The students suffer from a tendency to perform an “automatic” analysis of data. In cases in which one disparate point (see Annex, Exercise 1A), or a non-linear tendency (Annex, exercise 1B) appear, these features are ignored; simply, by do not performing the pertinent graphical representation. Incorrect problem solving was of ca. 90% (Fig. 8b).
-
(g)
In analytical applications, interference of other than the analyte electroactive compounds are regarded as absent. The same for subtle matrix effects associated with parallel reactions. In fact, the standard addition method, a general analytical method, was correctly applied (Annex, exercise 1C) by only ca. 50% of graduates (Fig. 8b, c).
-
(h)
Electrochemical techniques were applied exclusively to analytes in solution. The possibility of solid-state electrochemistry analysis was in generally not considered avoided.
-
(i)
Once described in the laboratory sessions, the students correctly identify electrochemical processes (see Annex, exercise 2) with errors and/or omissions around 10%. However, the percentage of erroneous responses increases up to ca. 50% when predictive issues are demanded (Fig. 8c).
-
(j)
The routine interpretation of data resulted in omission of the activity/concentration dichotomy (Fig. 8d).
-
(k)
The traditional focus of redox chemistry in the inorganic context motivates a lack in organic electrochemistry when, for instance, the oxidation of catechols to quinones is treated (Fig. 8d).
In summary, current data suggest that there is a need of a serious consideration of general learning problems in chemistry from a much more practical perspective not limited to electrochemistry.
Conclusions
A proposal of postgraduate course on electrochemistry corresponding to master studies in the University of Valencia (Spain) to be imparted to students with minimal previous studies on this discipline is described. As essential guidelines, the attendance of covering the main conceptual and operational aspects of electrochemistry, focused on voltammetric techniques, and the attendance to misconceptions and meta-conceptions around the same.
The proposed methodology is based on the performance of open, partially regulated laboratory experiments, giving opportunity for an in-lab discussion of concepts, relationships, and operational aspects dealing with the main electrochemistry topics. There are, however, significant problems associated with the presence of misconceptions and meta-conceptions conditioning the learning.
References
Bockris JO’M, Reddy AKN (1998) Modern electrochemistry, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, New York
Dubal DP, Wu YP, Holze R (2016) Supercapacitors: from the Leyden jar to electric busses. ChemTexts 2:13
Gründler P (2017) Chemical sensors. ChemTexts 3:16
Imbihl R (2019) Electrochemical promotion of catalytic reactions. ChemTexts 5:2
Pyun S-I (2021) Strategies of metal corrosion protection. ChemTexts 7:2
Pyun S-I (2021) Thermodynamic aspects of energy potential systems with focus on osmotic potential and selectively permeable membrane (Donnan) systems including two applications of the Donnan potential. ChemTexts 7:20
Ratvik AP, Mollaabbasi R, Alamdari H (2022) Aluminium production process: from Hall-Héroult to modern smelters. ChemTexts 8:10
Kellner R (2004) Education of analytical chemists in Europe. The WPAC Eurocurriculum on Analytical Chemistry. Anal Chem 66:98ª-102ª
Salzer R (2009) Master programs in analytical chemistry. Anal Bioanal Chem 394:649–653
BENELUX (2009). http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna/conference/documents/Leuven-Lovain-la-Neuve-Communiqué-April-2009.pdf
Scholz F (2023) Benefits of electrochemistry studies for the majority of students who will not become electrochemists. J Solid State Electrochem. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-023-05415-y
Tsarpalis G (2019) Teaching and learning electrochemistry. Isr J Chem 59:478–492
Chambers JQ (1983) Electrochemistry in the general chemistry curriculum. J Chem Educ 60:259–262
Scholz F (2015) Voltammetric techniques of analysis: the essentials. ChemTexts 1:17
Mirceski V, Skrzypek S, Stojanov L (2018) Square-wave voltammetry. ChemTexts 4:17
Driver R (1981) Pupil’s alternative frameworks in science. Eur J Sci Educ 10:37–60
Gilbert J, Watts DM (1983) Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: changing perspectives in science education. Stud Sci Educ 10:61–98
Novick S, Nussbaum J (1978) Junior high school pupils’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter: an interview study. Sci Educ 62:273–281
Voska KW, Heikkinen HW (2000) Identification and analysis of student conceptions used to solve chemical equilibrium problems. J Res SciTeach 37:160–176
Wheeler AE, Kass H (2006) Student misconceptions in chemical equilibrium. Sci Educ 62:223–232
Garnett PJ, Treagust DF (1992) Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: electrochemical (galvanic) and electrolytic cells. J Res Sci Teach 29:1079–1099
Sanger MJ, Greenbowe TJ (1997) Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: Galvanic, electrolytic and concentration cells. J Res Sci Teach 34:377–398
Garnett PJ, Treagust DF (1992) Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: electric circuits and oxidation-reduction equations. J Res Sci Teach 29:121–142
Ogude AN, Bradley JD (1994) Ionic conduction and electrical neutrality in operating electrochemical cells. J Chem Educ 71:29–34
Sanger MJ (1999) Greenbowe TJ Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: galvanic, electrolytic and concentration cells. J Chem Educ 76:853–860
Ozkaya AR (2002) Conceptual difficulties experienced by prospective teachers in electrochemistry: half cell potential, cell potential and chemical and electrochemical equilibrium in galvanic cells. J Chem Educ 79:735–738
Hamza KM, Wickman P-O (2013) Supporting students’ progression in science: Continuity between the particular, the contingent, and the general. Sci Educ 97:113–138
Loh ASL, Subramaniam R, Tan KCD (2014) Exploring students’ understanding of electrochemical cells using an enhanced two-tier diagnostic instrument. Res Sci Tech Educ 32:229–250
Acar B, Tarhan L (2007) Effect of cooperative learning strategies on students’ understanding of concepts in electrochemistry. Int J Sci Math Educ 5:349–373
Schmidt H, Marohn A, Harrison AG (2007) Factors that prevent learning in electrochemistry. J Res Sci Teach 44:258–283
Potgieter M, Harding A, Engelbrecht J (2008) Transfer of algebraic and graphical thinking between mathematics and chemistry. J Res Sci Teach 45:197–218
Rahayu S, Treagust DF, Chandrasegaran AL, Kita M, Ibnu S (2011) Assessment of electrochemical concepts: a comparative study involving senior high-schoolsudents in Indonesia and Japan. Res Sci Tech Educ 29:169–188
Sia DT, Treagust DF, Chandrasegaran AL (2012) High school students’ proficiency and confidence levels in displaying their understanding of basic electrolysis concepts. Int J Sci Math Educ 10:1325–1345
Doménech-Carbó A, Gimeno-Adelantado JV, Bosch-Reig F (2009) Misconceptions and metaconceptions in instrumental análisis. Acta Sci 11:73–87
Doménech-Carbó A, Gimeno-Adelantado JV, Bosch-Reig F (2010) Black boxes in analytical chemistry: university students misconceptions of instrumental analysis. J US-China Educ Rev 7:15–29
Doménech-Carbó A, Casasús-Lacoma E, Doménech-Carbó MT (1993) The classical concept of mass: theoretical difficulties and students definitions. Int J Sci Educ 15:163–173
Oldham KB (2018) How Grünwald unified and potential for the calculus, and how his discovery helps electrochemists. ChemTexts 4:1
Seeber R, Zanardi C, Inzelt G (2015) Links between electrochemical thermodynamics and kinetics. ChemTexts 1:18
Inzelt G (2014) Crossing the bridge between thermodynamics and electrochemistry. From the potential of the cell reaction to the electrode potential. Chem Texts 1:1–11
Batchelor-McAuley C, Kätelhön E, Barnes EO, Compton RG, Laborda E, Molina A (2015) Recent advances in voltammetry. ChemistryOpen 4:224–260
Tanner EEL, Barnes EO, Tickell CB, Goodrich P, Hardacre C, Compton RG (2015) Application of asymmetric Marcus−Hush theory to voltammetry in room-temperature Ionic Liquids. J Phys Chem C 119:7360–7370
Guidelli R, Compton RG, Feliu JM, Gileadi E, Lipkowski J, Schmickler W, Trasatti S (2014) Defining the transfer coefficient in electrochemistry: an assessment (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 86:245–258
Milchev A (2016) Nucleation phenomena in electrochemical systems: thermodynamic concepts. ChemTexts 2:2
Milchev A (2016) Nucleation phenomena in electrochemical systems: kinetic models. ChemTexts 2:4
Fitch A, Wang Y, Mellican S, Macha S (1996) Lead lab teaching instrumentation with one analyte. Anal Chem 68:727A-731A
Wright JC (1996) Authentic learning environment in analytical chemistry using cooperative methods and open-ended laboratories in large lecture courses. J Chem Educ 73:827–832
Wenzel TJ (1995) A new approach to undergraduate analytical chemistry. Anal Chem 67:470–475
Smith S, Stovall I (1996) Networked instructional chemistry: using technology to teach chemistry. J Chem Educ 73:911–915
May MA, Gupta VK (1997) Electrochemistry “discovery” course for undergraduates. J Chem Educ 74:824–828
Tsaparlis G, Gorezi M (2005) A modification of a conventional expository physical chemistry laboratory to accommodate an inquiry/project-based component: method and students’ evaluation. Can J Sci Math Tech Educ 5:111–131
Sesen BA, Tarhan L (2013) Inquiry-based laboratory activities in electrochemistry: high school students’ achievements and attitudes. Res Sci Educ 43:413–435
Hawkins I, Phelps AJ (2013) Virtual laboratory vs. traditional laboratory: which is more effective for teaching electrochemistry? Chem Educ Res Pract 14:516–523
Supasorn S (2015) Grade 12 students’ conceptual understanding and mental models of galvanic cells before and after learning by using small-scale experiments in conjunction with a model kit. Chem Educ Res Pract 16:393–407
Baldwin RP, Ravichandran K, Potenc RK (1984) A cyclic voltammetric experiment for the instrumental analysis laboratory. J Chem Educ 61:820–822
Gunasigham H, Ang KP (1985) Voltammetry as a model for teaching chemical instrumentation. J Chem Educ 62:610–612
Arévalo A, Pastor G (1985) Verification of the Nernst equation and determination of a standard electrode potential. J Chem Educ 62:882–884
Thorp HH (1992) Electrochemistry of proton-coupled redox reactions. J Chem Educ 69:250–252
Walczak MM, Dryer DA, Jacobson DD, Foss MG, Flynn NT (1997) pH-dependent redox couple: illustrating the Nernst equation using cyclic voltammetry. J Chem Educ 74:1195–1197
García-Aranda P, Losada J, Vicente-Pérez S (1997) Cation analysis by differential pulse polarography. J Chem Educ 74:544–545
Petrovic S (2000) Cyclic voltammery of hexachloroiridate(IV): an alternative to the electrochemical study of the ferricyanide ion. Chem Educ 5:231–235
Collado-Sánhez C, Hernández-Brito JJ, Pérez-Peña J, Torres-Padrón M, Gelado-Caballero MD (2005) Adsorptive stripping voltammetry of environmental indicators: determination of zinc in algae. J Chem Educ 82:271–273
Marton F, Säljö R (1997) Approaches to learning, in the experience of learning: implications for teaching and studying in higher education, 2nd ed., Marton F, Hounsell D, Entwistle N, Eds. Scottish Potential Press, Edinburgh, pp 39–58
Lindblom-Ylänne S, Parpala A, Postareff L (2019) What constitutes the surface approach to learning in the light of new empirical evidence? Stud Higher Educ 44:2183–2195
Pedaste M, Mäeots M, Siiman LA, de Jong T, van Riesen SAN, Kamp ET, Manolo CC, Zacharia ZC, Tsourlidaki E (2015) Phases of potential-based learning: definitions and the potential cycle. Educ Res Rev 14:47–61
Lazonder AW, Harmsen R (2016) Meta-analysis of potential-based learning: effects of guidance. Rev Educ Res 86:681–718
Schwarz CV, Reiser BJ, Davis EA, Kenyon L, Achér A, Fortus D, Shwartz Y, Hug B, Krajcik J (2009) Developing a learning potential for scientific modeling: making scientific modeling potential and meaningful for learners. TEA J Res Sci Teach 46:632–654
Orozco M, Boon M, Susarrey Arce A (2022) Learning electrochemistry through scientific Potential. Conceptual modelling as learning objective and as scaffold. Eur J Eng Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2047894
Boon M (2020) Scientific methodology in the engineering sciences, in the Routledge handbook of the philosophy of engineering, 1st ed., Michelfelder DP, Doorn N, Eds. Routledge, New York, pp 80–94
Cancela A, Maceiras R, Sánchez A, Izquierdo M, Urréjola S (2016) Use of learning miniprojects in a chemistry laboratory for engineering. Eur J Eng Educ 41:23–33
Doménech-Carbó A (2021) Electrochemistry of porous materials, 2nd ed. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, chapters 1 and 2
Burke LD, Nugent PF (1997) The electrochemistry of gold: I the redox behaviour of the metal in aqueous media. Gold Bull 30:43–53
Doyle RL, Lyons MEG (2014) The mechanism of oxygen evolution at superactivated gold electrodes in aqueous alkaline solution. J Solid State Electrochem 18:3271–3286
Nicholson RS, Shain I (1964) Theory of stationary electrode polarography. Single scan and cyclic methods applied to reversible, irreversible, and kinetic systems. Anal Chem 36:706–723
Bard AJ, Faulkner LR (2001) Electrochemical methods, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Scholz F (2010) Electroanalytical methods, guide to experiments and applications, 2nd revised and extendededn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
Nicholson RS (1965) Some examples of the numerical solution of nonlinear integral equations. Anal Chem 37:667–671
Amatore C, Savéant JM (1978) Do ECE mechanisms occur in conditions where they could be characterized by electrochemical kinetic techniques? J Electroanal Chem 86:227–232
Amatore C, Nadjo L, Savéant JM (1978) Convolution and finite difference approach: application to cyclic voltammetry and spectroelectrochemistry. J Electroanal Chem 147:321–331
Ciolkowski EL, Maness KM, Cahill PS, Wightman RM, Evans DH, Fosset B, Amatore C (1994) Anal Chem 66:3611–3617
Sawyer DT, Chiericato G, Angelis CT, Nanni EJ, Tsuchiya T (1982) Effects of media and electrode materials on the electrochemical reduction of dioxygen. Anal Chem 54:1720–1724
Cofré P, Sawyer DT (1986) Electrochemical reduction of dioxygen to perohydroxyl (HO2·) in aprotic solvents that contain Bronsted acids. Anal Chem 58:1057–1062
Scholz F, Hermes M (1999) The determination of the redox state of a dissolved otencialr by cyclic voltammetry in the case of electrochemically reversible systems. Electrochem Commun 1: 345–348. See corrigendum (2000) in Electrochem Commun 2:814
Doménech-Carbó A, Martini M, de Carvalho LM, Doménech-Carbó MT (2012) Square wave voltammetric determination of the redox state of a reversibly oxidized/reduced depolarizer in solution and in solid state. J Electroanal Chem 684:13–19
Wang J (1985) Stripping analysis. Principles, instrumentation, and applications. Wiley-VCH
Inzelt G (2008) Conducting polymers—a new era in electrochemistry. Monographs in electrochemistry series, Scholz F, Edit. Springer, Berlin
Wolfart F, Hryniewicz BM, Góes MS, Corrêa CM, Torresi R, Minadeo MAOS, Córdoba de Torresi SI, Oliveira RD, Marchesi LF, Vidoytti M (2017) Conducting polymers revisited: applications in energy, electrochromism and molecular recognition. J Solid State Electrochem 21:2489–2515
Scholz F, Meyer B (1998) Voltammetry of solid microparticles immobilized on electrode surfaces, Electroanalytical Chemistry, A Series of Advances. Bard AJ, Rubinstein I, Eds, Marcel Dekker, New York 20:1–86
Scholz F, Schröder U, Gulabowski R, Doménech-Carbó A (2014) Electrochemistry of immobilized particles and droplets, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg
Doménech-Carbó A, Labuda J, Scholz F (2013) Electroanalytical chemistry for the analysis of solids: characterization and classification (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 85:609–631
Scholz F, Dostal A (1995) The formal potentials of the solid metal hexacyanometalates. Angew Chem Int Ed 34:2685–2687
Dostal A, Meyer B, Scholz F, Schröder U, Bond AM, Marken F, Shaw SJ (1995) Electrochemical study of microcrystalline solid Prussian blue particles mechanically attached to graphite and gold electrodes: electrochemically induced lattice reconstruction. J Phys Chem 99:2096–2103
Dostal A, Kauschka G, Reddy SJ, Scholz F (1996) Lattice contractions and expansions which accompany the electrochemical conversion of Prussian blue and the reversible and irreversible insertion of rubidium and thallium ions. J Electroanal Chem 406:155–163
Scholz F, Doménech-Carbó A (2019) The thermodynamics of insertion electrochemical electrodes – a team play of electrons and ions across two separate interfaces. Angew Chem Int Ed 58:3279–3284
Doménech-Carbó A, Doménech-Carbó MT, Costa V (2009) Electrochemical methods for archaeometry, conservation and restoration, monographs in electrochemistry series, Scholz F Edit. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg
Doménech-Carbó A, Doménech-Carbó MT (2018) Electroanalytical techniques in archaeological and art conservation. Pure Appl Chem 90:447–462
Doménech-Carbó A, Scholz F (2019) Electrochemical age determinations of metallic specimens – the utilization of the corrosion clock. Acc Chem Res 52:400–406
Doménech-Carbó A (2020) Voltammetry of immobilized particles for the future. J Solid State Electrochem 24:2063–2065
Doménech-Carbó A, Koshevoy IO, Montoya N, Pakkanen TA (2010) Electrochemically assisted anion insertion in Au(I)-Cu(I) heterotrimetallic clusters bearing ferrocenyl groups: application to the fluride/chloride discrimination in aqueous media. Electrochem Commun 12:206–209
Doménech-Carbó A, Koshevoy IO, Montoya N, Pakkanen TA (2010) Electrochemical anion sensing using electrodes chemically modified with Au(I)-Cu(I) heterotrimetallic alkynyl cluster complexes containing ferrocenyl groups. Anal Bioanal Chem 397:2013–2022
Doménech-Carbó A, Lastras M, Rodríguez F, Cano E, Piquero-Cilla J, Osete-Cortina L (2014) J Solid State Electrochem 18:399–409
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Prof. Fritz Scholz by his constructive comments and suggestions during the preparation of the manuscript. Financial support from Project PID2020-113022GB-I00 supported by MCIN/AEI/10/13039/501100011033, Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (ERDF), and Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI), is gratefully acknowledged.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Annex
Annex
Writing “final test”
It consists of three questions within the general types exemplified above.
1(A).- We obtain the following data corresponding to the variation of peak current with potential scan rate for the oxidation of ferrocene at Pt electrode (data recorded for a 2.0 mM ferrocene solution in DMF using 0,10 M Bu4NPF6 as the supporting electrolyte):
v (mV/s) | 5 | 10 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 500 | 1000 |
ipc (μA) | 23 | 35 | 71 | 104 | 199 | 238 | 327 |
Discuss if the process can be considered as diffusion-controlled.
1(B):- We obtain the following data corresponding to the variation of peak current with potential scan rate for the oxidation of Fe(CN)64− at glassy carbon electrode (data recorded for a 2.0 mM K4Fe(CN)6 plus 0.10 M KCl aqueous solution):
v (mV/s) | 5 | 10 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 500 | 1000 |
ipc (μA) | 10 | 18 | 96 | 192 | 383 | 940 | 1780 |
Discuss if the process can be considered as diffusion-controlled.
1(C).- We dispose of a Cu2+ solution of unknown concentration. An aliquot of the same is spiked with different volumes of a standard solution of Cu2+ and the peak current for the stripping peak recorded in a conventional experiment are recorded. Based in the following experimental data, calculate the concentration of Cu2+ in the problem solution.
Conc. of added Cu2+ (μM) | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 |
Peak current (μA) | 55 | 76 | 93 | 114 | 135 |
2.- The figure below shows two cyclic voltammograms recorded at a gold electrode (geometrical surface area 0.018 cm2) on a 2 mM K4Fe(CN)6 plus 0.25 M HAc/NaAc aqueous solution at pH 4.75 previously degasified. Describe all the electrochemical processes and draw (approximately) the voltammogram to be recorded in the extended potential range in an equivalent solution at pH 8.75.
3.- The figure below shows three Nyquist plots corresponding to three different impedance spectra. Discuss:
-
(a)
What spectrum would be the most appropriate to be described by a Randles circuit.
-
(b)
What spectrum would require for its description (at least) two capacitive elements.
-
(c)
What spectrum shows significant diffusive effects.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Doménech-Carbó, A., Martini, M., Di Turo, F. et al. Electrochemistry for non-electrochemists: a postgraduate formative project. J Solid State Electrochem 28, 1069–1083 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-023-05429-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-023-05429-6