Abstract
Objectives
This systematic review investigated the hypothesis that preheated resin composites (RCs) used as luting agents improve the mechanical properties, physicochemical performance, and color of indirect ceramic restorations.
Materials and methods
Literature search was performed in three databases (Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) and in the grey literature (OpenGrey, ProQuest, and Catalog of Theses & Dissertations from CAPES). Eligibility criteria included only studies comparing at least one preheated RC used as a luting agent with resin cements.
Results
Data regarding the mechanical properties, physicochemical characteristics, and color were analyzed qualitatively, and the microtensile bond strength and film thickness were also evaluated by meta-analysis. The search strategy identified 3894 papers, and 28 were full-text screened. Seven studies were included in the review, and 5 were included in the meta-analysis. No significant difference was found for microtensile bond strength (P = 0.14). Preheated RCs showed significantly higher film thickness than resin cements (P = 0.001).
Conclusion
Overall, the use of preheated RCs as luting agents offers similar to poorer performance than using resin cements for bonding indirect restorations.
Clinical relevance.
Despite the claim that preheated RC could be used as a luting agent, further studies should investigate the effect of clinically unacceptable film thickness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhu LL, Ji Y, Wang Q, Qiu LH (2019) Evaluation of the bond strength of resin cements to new lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic materials. Sci Adv Mater 11:1501–1509. https://doi.org/10.1166/sam.2019.3421
Barbon FJ, Moraes RR, Isolan CP et al (2019) Influence of inorganic filler content of resin luting agents and use of adhesive on the performance of bonded ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 122:566-e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.013
Coelho NF, Barbon FJ, Machado RG et al (2019) Response of composite resins to preheating and the resulting strengthening of luted feldspar ceramic. Dent Mater 35:1430–1438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.021
D’Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini M et al (2012) Clinical evaluation on porcelain laminated veneers bonded with light-cured composite: results up 7 years. Clin Oral Investig 16:1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0593-0
Mounajjed R, Salinas TJ, Ingr T et al (2018) Effect of different resin luting cements on the marginal fit of lithium disilicate pressed crowns. J Prost Dent 119:975–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.001
Jassé FF, de Campos EA, Lefever D, Di Bella E et al (2013) Influence of filler charge on gloss of composite materials before and after in vitro tooth brushing. J Dent 41:41–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.04.011
Magne P, Razaghy M, Carvalho MA et al (2018) Luting of inlays, onlays, and overlays with preheated restorative composite resin does not prevent seating accuracy. Int J Esthet Dent 13:318–332
Gresnigt MM, Özcan M, Carvalho M et al (2017) Effect of luting agent on the load to failure and accelerated-fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate laminate veneers. Dent Mater 13:1392–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.010
Manso AP, Carvalho RM (2017) Dental cements for luting and bonding restorations: self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Clin 61:821–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.006
Fleming GJ, Maguire FR, Bhamra G (2006) The strengthening mechanism of resin cements on porcelain surfaces. J Dent Res 85:272–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500313
Lee JH, Um CM, Lee IB (2006) Rheological properties of resin composites according to variations in monomer and filler composition. Dent Mater 22:515–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.008
Liu P, He L, Song J et al (2008) Microstructure and thermal properties of silyl-terminated polycaprolactone–polysiloxane modified epoxy resin composites. J Appl Polym Sci 109:1105–1113. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.28292
May LG, Kelly JR (2013) Influence of resin cement polymerization shrinkage on stresses in porcelain crowns. Dent Mater 29:1073–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.018
Froes-Salgado NR, Silva LM, Kawano Y et al (2010) Composite pre-heating: effects on marginal adaptation, degree of conversion and mechanical properties. Dent Mater 26:908–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.023
Marcondes RL, Lima VP, Barbon FJ et al (2020) Viscosity and thermal kinetics of 10 preheated restorative resin composites and effect of ultrasound energy on film thickness. Dent Mater 36:1356–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.004
Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P et al (2019) Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: a systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent 121:590–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.006
Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona A (2013) Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater 29:174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.012
Gugelmin BP, Miguel LC, Baratto Filho F et al (2020) Color stability of ceramic veneers luted with resin cements and pre-heated composites: 12 months follow-up. Braz Dent J 31:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202002842
A Della Bona (2020) Color and appearance in dentistry, Springer International Publishing AG.
Lopes LCP, Terada RSS, Tsuzuki FM et al (2020) Heating and preheating of dental restorative materials- a systematic review. Clin Oral Invest 24:4225–4235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03637-2
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2020) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Cuevas-Suarez CE, de Oliveira WL, Lund RG et al (2019) Bonding performance of universal adhesives: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 21:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a41975
Reboul T, Thaï HH, Cetik S et al (2018) Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 18:212–218. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_165_17
Sampaio CS, Barbosa JM, Cáceres E et al (2017) Volumetric shrinkage and film thickness of cementation materials for veneers: an in vitro 3D microcomputed tomography analysis. J Prosthet Dent 117:784–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.029
Alvarado MSU, García DME, Guillén ADJP et al (2020) Evaluation of the bond strength and marginal seal of indirect restorations of composites bonded with preheating resin. Eur J Dent 14:644–650. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716630
Sartori N, Peruchi LD, Phark JH et al (2016) The influence of intrinsic water permeation on different dentin bonded interfaces formation. J Dent 48:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.03.005
Goulart M, Borges Veleda B, Damin D et al (2018) Preheated composite resin used as a luting agent for indirect restorations: effects on bond strength and resin-dentin interfaces. Int J Esthet Dent 13:86–97
Zeller DK, Fischer J, Rohr N (2021) Viscous behavior of resin composite cements. Dent Mater J 40:253–259. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-313 (Epub 2020 Oct 8)
Al-Ahdal K, Silikas N, Watts DC (2014) Rheological properties of resin composites according to variations in composition and temperature. Dent Mater 30:517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.005
Layton DM, Walton TR (2012) The up to 21-year clinical outcome and survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers: accounting for clustering. Int J Prosthodont 25:604–612
Yüksel E, Zaimoğlu A (2011) Influence of marginal fit and cement types on microleakage of all-ceramic crown systems. Braz Oral Res 25:261–266. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242011000300012
Heintze SD (2013) Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. Dent Mater 29:59–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.158
Perroni AP, Kaizer MR, Della Bona A et al (2018) Influence of light-cured luting agents and associated factors on the color of ceramic laminate veneers: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Dent Mater 34:1610–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.298
Funding
This study was partly funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior — Brasil (CAPES) — Finance Code 001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barbon, F.J., Isolan, C.P., Soares, L.D. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on using preheated resin composites as luting agents for indirect restorations. Clin Oral Invest 26, 3383–3393 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04406-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04406-z