Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transmission of light in the visible spectrum (400–700 nm) and blue spectrum (360–540 nm) through CAD/CAM polymers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

CAD/CAM-fabricated long-term temporary restorations from high-density polymers can be applied for a wide range of indications. Milled from monolithic, mono-colored polymer blocks, the translucency of the material plays an important role for an esthetically acceptable result. The aim of this study was to compare the transmittance through visible light and blue light of CAD CAM polymers to a glass-ceramic material of the same color.

Materials and methods

Ambarino High-Class (AM), Telio-CAD (TC), Zenotec PMMA (ZT), Cercon base PMMA (CB), CAD Temp (CT), Artbloc Temp (AT), Polycon ae (PS), New Outline CAD (NC), QUATTRO DISK Eco PMMA (GQ), Lava Ultimate (LU), and Paradigm MZ 100 (PA) were employed in this study using the feldspathic glass-ceramic Vita Mark II (MK) as control group. Using a spectrophotometer, the overall light transmittance was measured for each material (n = 40) and was calculated as the integration (t c (λ) dλ [10-5]) of all t c values for the wavelengths of blue light (360–540 nm). Results were compared to previous data of the authors for visible light (400 to 700 nm).

Results

Wilcoxon test showed significant differences between the light transmittance of visible and blue light for all materials.

Conclusion

CAD/CAM polymers showed different translucency for blue and visible light. This means clinicians may not conclude from the visible translucency of a material to its permeability for blue light. This influences considerations regarding light curing.

Clinical relevance

CAD/CAM polymers need to be luted adhesively; therefore, clinicians should be aware about the amount of blue light passing through a restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alt V, Hannig M, Wostmann B, Balkenhol M (2011) Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dent Mater 27:339–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goncu Basaran E, Ayna E, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV (2011) Load-bearing capacity of handmade and computer-aided design–computer-aided manufacturing-fabricated three-unit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite. Acta Odontol Scand 69:144–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Trottmann A, Özcan M, Fischer J, Hämmerle CH (2012) Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Investig 16:1669–1677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Güth JF, Almieda e Silva JS, Ramberger M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D (2012) Treatment concept with CAD/CAM-fabricated high-density polymer temporary restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 24:310–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Güth JF, Almieda e Silva JS, Beuer F, Edelhof D (2012) Enhancing the predictability of complex rehabilitation with a removable CAD/CAM-fabricated long-term temporary prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosth Dent 197:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Edelhoff D, Beuer F, Schweiger J, Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF (2012) CAD/CAM-generated high-density polymer restorations fort the pretreatment of complex cases: a case report. Quintessence Int 43:457–467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stawarczyk B, Basler T, Ender A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hämmerle C (2012) Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. J Prosth Dent 107:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiegand A, Stucki L, Hoffmann R, Attin T, Stawarczyk B (2015) Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers. Clin Oral Invest 19:2007–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elsaka SE (2014) Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent 16:531–540

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD (1996) Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 75:18–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brodbelt RH, O'Brien WJ, Fan PL (1980) Translucency of dental porcelains. J Dent Res 59:70–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O'Brien WJ, Johnston WM, Fanian F (1985) Double-layer color effects in porcelain systems. J Dent Res 64:940–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Powers JM, Dennison JB, Lepeak PJ (1978) Parameters that affect the color of direct restorative resins. J Dent Res 57:876–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morgan J (1953) Introduction to geometric and physical optics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brodbelt RHW, O'Brien WJ, Fan PL, Frazer-Dib JG, Yu R (1981) Translucency of human dental enamel. J Dent Res 60:1749–1753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Güth JF, Zuch T, Zwinge S, Engels J, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D (2013) Optical properties of manually and CAD/CAM-fabricated polymers. Dent Mater J 32:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakajima M, Arimoto A, Prasansuttiporn T, Thanatvarakorn O, Foxton RM, Tagami J (2012) Light transmission characteristics of dentine and resin composites with different thickness. J Dent 40(Suppl 2):e77–e82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lie N, Stawarczyk B (2015) Quantification of the amount of blue light passing through monolithic zirconia with respect to thickness and polymerization conditions. J Prosth Dent 113:114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Flury S, Lussi A, Hickel R, Ilie N (2014) Light curing through glass ceramic with a second- and a third-generation LED curing unit: effect of curing mode on the degree of conversion of dual-curing resin cements. Clin Oral Investig 18:809–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ilie N, Stawarczyk B (2014) Quantification of the amount of light passing through zirconia: the effect of material shade, thickness, and curing conditions. J Dent 42:684–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Neuman MG, Schmitt CC, Ferreira GC, Corrêa IC (2006) The initiating radical yields and the efficiency of polymerization for various dental photoinitiators excited by different light curing units. Dent Mater 22:576–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan-Frederik Güth.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

The research was supported by the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Germany.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 393 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 1224 kb)

ESM 3

(PDF 19.2 kb)

ESM 4

(PDF 19.4 kb)

ESM 5

(PDF 19.2 kb)

ESM 6

(PDF 19.2 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Güth, JF., Kauling, A.E.C., Ueda, K. et al. Transmission of light in the visible spectrum (400–700 nm) and blue spectrum (360–540 nm) through CAD/CAM polymers. Clin Oral Invest 20, 2501–2506 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1755-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1755-x

Keywords

Navigation