Skip to main content
Log in

Bone substitute first or screws first? A biomechanical comparison of two operative techniques for tibial-head depression fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate a drillable and injectable bone substitute (calcium phosphate cement) and the operative technique enabled by the drillable option in a new biomechanical fracture model for tibial depression fractures in synthetic bones.

Materials and methods

Lateral depression fractures of the tibial plateau (AO 41-B2, Schatzker III) were created in a biomechanical fracture model in three different synthetic bones (Sawbone 3401, Synbone 1110/1116). Reproducible fractures were generated employing Synbone 1110, which exhibited a comparable strength to human osteoporotic bones and was used for the further experiments. After reduction of the fractures, the stabilization was performed with two different operative techniques. In group 1, first an osteosynthesis with four screws was performed and then the metaphyseal defect was filled up with calcium phosphate cement (Norian drillable). In group 2, initially the filling up with Norian drillable was done enabling a complete filling of the defect, followed by placing of the screws. Displacement under cyclic loading with 250 N for 3,000 cycles, stiffness, and maximum load in load-to-failure tests were determined.

Results

A comparison of the two operative techniques of stabilization showed a distinctly lower displacement and higher stiffness for group 2 when the defect was filled up first. For the maximum load, no significant differences could be demonstrated.

Conclusions

A complete filling of the defect by first applying the calcium phosphate cement significantly reduces the secondary loss of reduction of the depression fracture fragment under cyclic loading with a clinically relevant partial weight bearing. The beneficial effects of drillable calcium phosphate cement may also be transferable to defects other than tibial-head depression fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wiss DA. Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery fractures. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kösters C, Schliemann B, Raschke MJ. Tibial head fractures in the elderly. Unfallchirurg. 2011;114(3):251–60. doi:10.1007/s00113-010-1943-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Trenholm A, Landry S, McLaughlin K, Deluzio KJ, Leighton J, Trask K, Leighton RK. Comparative fixation of tibial plateau fractures using alpha-BSM, a calcium phosphate cement, versus cancellous bone graft. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(10):698–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenwald AS, Boden SD, Goldberg VM, Khan Y, Laurencin CT, Rosier RN. Bone-graft substitutes: facts, fictions, and applications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(2 suppl 2):S98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weigel B, Nerlich M. Praxisbuch Unfallchirurgie, vol. 1. Heidelberg: Springer; 2005. p. 656.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Yetkinler DN, McClellan RT, Reindel ES, Carter D, Poser RD. Biomechanical comparison of conventional open reduction and internal fixation versus calcium phosphate cement fixation of a central depressed tibial plateau fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15(3):197–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Welch RD, Zhang H, Bronson DG. Experimental tibial plateau fractures augmented with calcium phosphate cement or autologous bone graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(2):222–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McDonald E, Chu T, Tufaga M, Marmor M, Singh R, Yetkinler D, Matityahu A, Buckley JM, McClellan RT. Tibial plateau fracture repairs augmented with calcium phosphate cement have higher in situ fatigue strength than those with autograft. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(2):90–5. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e3e28f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Petersen W, Zantop T, Raschke MJ. Tibial head fracture: open reposition and osteosynthesis-arthroscopic reposition and osteosynthesis (ARIF). Unfallchirurg. 2006;109(3):235–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Doht S, Lehnert T, Frey S, Fehske K, Jansen H, Blunk T, Meffert RH. Effective combination of bone substitute and screws in the jail technique: a biomechanical study of tibial depression fractures. Int Orthop. 2012;36(10):2121–5. doi:10.1007/s00264-012-1604-8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karunakar MA, Egol KA, Peindl R, Harrow ME, Bosse MJ, Kellam JF. Split depression tibial plateau fractures: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16(3):172–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Raschke MJ, Stange R. Alterstraumatologie, Prophylaxe, Therapie und Rehabilitation. 1st edn. Urban & Fischer; 2009. pp. 475–487.

  13. Wirth CJ, Mutschler W, Bischoff HP, Pueschmann H, Neu J. Komplikationen in Orthopaedie und Unfallchirurgie. 1st edn. Thieme Verlag; 2010. pp. 275–284.

  14. Zhang W, Luo CF, Putnis S, Sun H, Zeng ZM, Zeng BF. Biomechanical analysis of four different fixations for the posterolateral shearing tibial plateau fracture. Knee. 2012;19(2):94–8. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2011.02.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lindeque B, Baldini T. A biomechanical comparison of three different lateral tibia locking plates. Orthopedics. 2010;33(1):18–21. doi:10.3928/01477447-20091124-25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurien T, Pearson RG, Scammell BE. Bone graft substitutes currently available in orthopaedic practice: the evidence for their use. Bone Joint J. 2013;5:583–97. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.95B5.30286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goff T, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV. Use of bone graft substitutes in the management of tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2013;44(Suppl 1):S86–94. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(13)70019-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author thanks the IZKF (Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research), University Clinics of Wuerzburg, for the financial support of her biomechanical studies. The authors would like to thank Jürgen Schmid from Synthes GmbH for providing supportive information on Norian drillable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanie Hoelscher-Doht.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoelscher-Doht, S., Jordan, M.C., Bonhoff, C. et al. Bone substitute first or screws first? A biomechanical comparison of two operative techniques for tibial-head depression fractures. J Orthop Sci 19, 978–983 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0613-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0613-4

Keywords

Navigation