Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sex differences in symptomatology of psychosis-risk patients and in prediction of psychosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Women's Mental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sex differences may be important for understanding underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and developing effective preventions and treatments of mental disorders. Despite sex differences in the onset of psychosis, patients at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) are underinvestigated for sex effects, especially with respect to models for prediction of conversion to psychosis. We studied psychopathological sex differences in referrals to a German early detection service and in its subgroup of converters and examined sex-specific psychopathological prediction models. In 152 male and 90 female referrals (88% at CHR; 35% converters), symptoms assessed with the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes were investigated for sex differences using effect sizes. Sex-specific prediction models of psychosis were separately generated using Cox regressions with a LASSO operator. We found different small sex effects (0.10 < Rosenthal’s r < 0.30) in the referral and in the converter sample. In the referral sample, exclusively, males showed more pronounced symptoms (all negative symptoms incl. reduced stress tolerance, grandiosity, and disorganized communication); in converters, females experienced more pronounced perceptual abnormalities, bizarre thinking, and odd behaviors, while males expressed and experienced emotions to a lower degree. Furthermore, sexes differed in psychosis-predictive symptoms: “suspiciousness” and “disorganized communication” were prominent in prediction of psychosis in males, whereas “trouble with focus and attention” was so in females. While most sex differences in patients attending an early detection service seem to reflect general differences that are not specifically related to psychosis, others might be psychosis-specific. These results can inform the development of more individualized and effective interventions for CHR patients based on more precise sex-specific prediction models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Koeln Fortune Program/Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne (grant numbers 8/2005, 27/2006) to Dr. Schultze-Lutter. The study’s sponsor had no role in the study design, data collection, or analysis, or in interpretation, writing, or submission of the report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marlene Rosen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study (or their parents if they were minor).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Table S1

(DOCX 89 kb)

Table S2

(DOCX 106 kb)

Table S3

(DOCX 105 kb)

Table S4

(DOCX 19 kb)

Table S5

(DOCX 15 kb)

Table S6

(DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosen, M., Haidl, T.K., Ruhrmann, S. et al. Sex differences in symptomatology of psychosis-risk patients and in prediction of psychosis. Arch Womens Ment Health 23, 339–349 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-019-01000-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-019-01000-3

Keywords

Navigation