Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation of Signal Intensity and ICP/OES-Related Concentration of Gadolinium-based Nanomagnetic Particles in Molecular MRI: In Vitro Study

  • Published:
Applied Magnetic Resonance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Imaging methods have an important role in the management of patient’s health care. Some of the advantages made magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an exclusive modality. Gd-DTPA is one of the most common contrast agents in clinical applications. In this study, the concentrations of three gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents were measured and quantification accuracy of these contrast agents by MRI method was investigated. Different concentrations from the Gd-DTPA, Gd2O3–DEG and paramagnetoliposome nanoparticles (encapsulated Gd2O3–DEG nanoparticles in liposome) samples were prepared. Physical characteristics of the contrast agents were investigated by DLS and TEM methods. The T 1-weighted images of the prepared samples were recorded using MRI scanner. For each sample, gadolinium concentrations were determined using the relaxation rates and relaxivities. Determined concentrations by the experimental and ICP/OES methods were compared and the standard errors of the results were determined. Morphology, dimension and hydrodynamic diameter of the contrast agents were investigated. The hydrodynamic diameter of Gd2O3–DEG and PML nanoparticles were 90 ± 7.2 nm (with PdI = 0.328) and 96.8 ± 6.5 nm (with PdI = 0.299), respectively. In assessment of gadolinium concentrations, standard deviations of the experimental and ICP/OES data were ranged from 0.007 to 0.04. P values of all data points were higher than 0.05 that confirm there is no significant difference between the experimental and ICP/OES measurements. From the results, it could be concluded that MR systems could be used as an accurate and available method to estimate gadolinium concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. R. Bashir, Hepatobiliary Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agents for Liver Imaging (Elsevier Health Sciences, 2013), pp. 1–249

  2. Medical Imaging for improved patient care. European Science Foundation policy briefing (2007)

  3. L. Telgmann, M. Sperling, U. Karst, Anal. Chim. Acta 764, 1–16 (2013)

  4. Z. Zhou, L. Zheng-Rong, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 5(1), 1–18 (2013)

  5. P. Caravan, J.J. Ellison, T.J. McMurry, R.B. Lauffer, Chem. Rev. 99, 2293–2352 (1999)

  6. Y. Zhang, N. Kohler, M. Zhang, Biomaterials 23, 1553–1561 (2002)

  7. P. Caravan, Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 512–523 (2006)

  8. S. Laurent, L.V. Elst, R.N. Muller, Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 1, 128–137 (2006)

  9. G. Schuhmanngiampieri, H. Schmittwillich, T. Frenzel, W.R. Press, H.J. Weinmann, Invest. Radiol. 26, 969–974 (1991)

  10. N. Kamaly, A.D. Miller, J.D. Bell, Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 10, 1158–1183 (2010)

  11. H.J. Weinmann, R.C. Brasch, W.R. Press, G.E. Wesbey, Am. J. Roentgenol. 142, 619–624 (1984)

  12. M. Port, C. Corot, O. Rousseaux, I. Raynal, L. Devoldere, J.M. Idee, A. Dencausse, S. Le Greneur, C. Simonot, D. Meyer, Magn. Reson Mater. Phy. Biol. Med. 12, 121–127 (2001)

  13. E. Waters, S. Wickline, Basic Res. Cardiol. 103, 114–121 (2008)

  14. A. Hengerer, J. Grimm, Biomed. Imaging Interv. J. 2(2), 1–7 (2006)

  15. G.M. Lanza, P.M. Winter, S.D. Caruthers, A.M. Morawski, A.H. Schmieder, K.C. Crowder, S.A. Wickline, J. Nucl. Cardiol. 11(6), 733–743 (2004)

  16. B. Gimi, Proc. IEEE Inst. Electr. Electron Eng. 93(4), 784–799 (2005)

  17. D. Artemov, J. Cell. Biochem. 90, 518–524 (2003)

  18. J.C. Gore, H.C. Manning, C.C. Quarles, K.W. Waddell, T.E. Yankeelov, Magn. Reson. Imaging 29, 587–600 (2011)

  19. N. Riyahi-Alam, Z. Behrouzkia, A. Seifalian, S.H. Jahromi, Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 137(3), 324–334 (2010)

  20. H.B. Na, I.C. Song, T. Hyeon, Adv. Mater. 21(21), 2133–2148 (2009)

  21. S. Riyahi-Alam, S. Haghgoo, E. Gorji, N. Riyahi-Alam, Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 14(1), 3 (2015)

  22. R. Zohdiaghdam, N. Riyahi-Alam, H.R. Moghimi, S. Haghgoo, A. Alinaghi, G. Azizian, B. Rafiei, J. Microencapsul. 30(7), 613–623 (2013)

  23. G. Azizian, N. Riyahi-Alam, S. Haghgoo, M. Saffari, R. Zohdiaghdam, E. Gorji, Mater. Sci. Pol. 31(2), 158–164 (2013)

  24. G. Azizian, N. Riyahi-Alam, S. Haghgoo, H.R. Moghimi, R. Zohdiaghdam, B. Rafiei, E. Gorji, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 7(1), 1–10 (2012)

  25. B.J. Berne, R. Pecora, Dynamic Light Scattering: With Applications to Chemistry, Biology, and Physics (Courier Dover Publications, USA, 2000), pp. 38–53

  26. B. Carrero-González, M.T. De La Cruz, M.A. Casermeiro, J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 12(1), 165–182 (2012)

  27. G.E. Gold, E. Han, J. Stainsby, G. Wright, J. Brittain, C. Beaulieu, Am. J. Roentgenol. 183(2), 343–351 (2004)

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our thanks to Food and Drug Laboratory Research Center and Imam Khomeini Hospital for their supports. Also, the authors appreciate Dr.Faraz Kalantari and Dr.Salman Zakariaee for the paper revision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nader Riyahi Alam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikfar, B., Riyahi Alam, N., Haghgoo, S. et al. Correlation of Signal Intensity and ICP/OES-Related Concentration of Gadolinium-based Nanomagnetic Particles in Molecular MRI: In Vitro Study. Appl Magn Reson 47, 77–86 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-015-0729-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-015-0729-5

Keywords

Navigation