Abstract
Available documentation about the development of the female gametophyte of Crassulaceae is very limited. The aim of this study was to extend the embryological knowledge of Crassulaceae by analysing the development of the embryo sac in Sedum sediforme. Transmission electron microscopy and light microscopy including Nomarski optics (DIC) were used to observe individual stages of female gametophyte development. Cytochemical staining enabled detection of lipids, insoluble polysaccharides and proteins in gametophyte cells during their formation. Their increased accumulation was observed during nucellar cell and unfunctional cell degeneration in the embryo sac at the coenocytic and cellular stages (megagametogenesis). The female gametophyte develops in anatropous, bitegmic and crassinucellate ovules. The mature embryo sac is built of seven cells but after antipodes degeneration it is formed by the egg apparatus and a central cell. The monosporic Polygonum type was observed. One megaspore mother cell (MMC) formed three cells after meiosis. A triad was formed from a functional megaspore (placed chalazally), one uninucleate megaspore and a binucleate cell located at the micropylar end. Plasmodesmata with adhering electron-dense dome were noticed in walls of the coenocytic embryo sac and in the outer walls of ephemeral antipodes. Moreover, similar to synergids, antipodes form wall ingrowths. Here, we report new structural features of the antipodal cells (the presence of plasmodesmata with an electron-dense dome) which have not been described before. This new structural observation indicates that these cells participate in substance transport and that this process can probably be additionally regulated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The haploid gametophyte is one of two generations described during the seed plants life cycle, whose major function and result is the production of female and male gametes (Yadegari and Drews 2004). Gametophyte and consequently gamete production is associated with two processes: sporogenesis and gametogenesis. During sporogenesis, haploid spores are formed after meiosis. Next, the spores develop into gametophytes during gametogenesis. The gametophytes harbour the gametes as an egg cell and a central cell (female gametophyte) and sperm cells (male gametophyte) (Sánchez-León and Vielle-Calzada 2010; Schmidt et al. 2015). In angiosperms, the phenomenon of double fertilisation can be observed, in which one of the sperm cells fuses with an egg cell and a second male gamete fuses with a central cell. Plasma membrane and nuclear fusion are two successively observed processes (Jensen 1973; Raghavan 2000, 2006). Double fertilisation provides the generation of the embryo and endosperm. Plant reproduction is closely related with the female gametophyte. In angiosperms, the female gametophyte is involved in pollen tube reception, control of seed development initiation and both sexual and asexual seed formation (Wang et al. 2006; Drews and Koltunow 2011; Wang et al. 2017). The female gametophyte allows the formation of seeds in which embryos develop either after fertilisation (zygotic embryos) or without fertilisation (during gametophytic apomixis) (Drews and Koltunow 2011; Schmidt et al. 2015).
The female gametophyte (i.e. embryo sac or megagametophyte) (Reiser and Fischer 1993; González-Gutiérrez et al. 2014; Rojek et al. 2018) develops in the nucellus, which is covered with integument(s). The Polygonum type of development occurs in most flowering plants, including species of the family Crassulaceae and genus Sedum (Mauritzon 1933; Thiede and Eggli 2007). However, megaspores/cells formed during megasporogenesis exhibit variation in number and arrangement (Maheshwari 1937; Bouman 1984). In the monosporic Polygonum type, the most frequent arrangement is a linear tetrad of megaspores. In representatives of Crassulaceae, linear, T-shaped, oblique T-shaped and isobilateral (this is doubtful) tetrads have been noticed (Johri et al. 1992). Linear triads have also been observed, where the micropylar cell is mononuclear or binucleated or even with a binucleated middle. One or a maximum of three arrangement types of cells formed after megasporogenesis occur in representatives of the family. In some Crassulaceae species, for example in Aeonium guttatum, the formation of female gametophyte from one-nucleate, three-nucleate or four-nucleate cells has been observed during megagametogenesis (Mauritzon 1933).
The monosporic Polygonum and bisporic Allium type (two species) of female gametophyte development has been observed only in the most species-rich genus—Sedum (ca. 420 species)—within Crassulaceae. This is the biggest genus of the 33–35 described in the family (Hart and Bleij 2003; Christenhusz and Byng 2016). Regardless of the type of development (Polygonum or Allium) the embryo sac is built of seven cells: an egg cell, two synergids, a central cell and three antipodal cells. So far, embryological data, including the ultrastructural and cytochemical information collected for the Crassulaceae family, mainly presents the process of embryogenesis (Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno and Bohdanowicz 2006; Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno et al. 2012; Czaplejewicz and Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno 2013). In contrast, informations about previous processes that occur in the ovule before fertilisation are very limited. The development of the female gametophyte of a few species from Crassulaceae and genus Sedum has been subject of research, but this process has been observed only with the use of light microscopy. The available documentation is primarily based on schematic drawings (Sharp 1913; Souéges 1927; Mauritzon 1933; Johri et al. 1992; Wojciechowicz and Samardakiewicz 1998; Thiede and Eggli 2007). The ultrastucture and cytochemistry of Crassulaceae has only been studied with reference to Sedum hispanicum L. (Brzezicka and Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno 2018). The paper was the first to report the occurrence of a new kind of plasmodesmata (simple plasmodesmata with an electron-dense dome) during the development of the embryo sac. Compound and simple plasmodesmata with adjacent electron-dense material have been previously described during embryogenesis only in cell walls of suspensors in Crassulaceae (Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno and Bohdanowicz 2010; Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno et al. 2011; Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno and Płachno 2012). The unique structural features observed during embryological studies on Crassulaceae mean that this family is an interesting research area, which would allow a better understanding of the potential function of female gametophyte cells.
Sedum sediforme (Jacq.) Pau belongs to the highly polyphyletic genus Sedum series Rupestria (Nikulin et al. 2016) and family Crassulaceae which comprises approximate 1400 species of dicotyledonous plants (Christenhusz and Byng 2016). Sedum series Rupestria is a group which is monophyletic and endemic to the Euro-Mediterranean region (Gallo and Zika 2014). So far, studies on S. sediforme ovules have been performed during embryogenesis to identify the structure and function of suspensors (Majcher 2017). During embryogenesis, ultrastructural and cytochemical studies have also been conducted on ovules of other species from the series Rupestria-S. rupestre L. (Czaplejewicz and Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno 2013). In S. sediforme and S. rupestre, plasmodesmata with an electron-dense material have not been recorded in the cell walls of the suspensor basal cell (Czaplejewicz and Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno 2013; Majcher 2017). So far, a lack of these plasmodesmata has only been observed in representatives of the Sedum series Rupestria in Crassulaceae and this has meant that this species has become an interesting research topic for us. The different structural features observed in the above-mentioned species during embryogenesis in comparison to the other Crassulaceae may also suggest that at the earlier stages of development (megasporogenesis and megagametogenesis) some new structural features can appear. During our research, we tested whether the absence of plasmodesmata with an electron-dense dome during embryogenesis means that they are missing during female gametophyte development.
In this article, we present an anatomical, cytochemical and ultrastructural study of the female gametophyte in Sedum (Crassulaceae). The main purpose of the study was to determine the type of female gametophyte development in Sedum sediforme (Jacq.) Pau and gain an understanding of the reproductive processes in Crassulaceae. These studies are the first to be in representatives of Sedum series Rupestria (S. sediforme) during megasporogenesis and megagametogenesis. During the research, we tested the hypothesis that species from genus Sedum show variability in the development of the embryo sac. This was tested with regard to the type/manner of female gametophyte development and its structure. The present research is aimed at conducting a first comparative ultrastructural and cytochemical analysis of the female gametophyte within Sedum, which will contribute to the determination of structural differences, similarities, and characteristics features for the study species. The observations made during this study are discussed in comparison to embryological data obtained for other angiosperms.
Materials and methods
Plant material
To study the development of the female gametophyte in S. sediforme, the flowers were harvested both before and at the stage of anthesis. Ovules at different developmental stages were isolated using preparative needles during growing seasons in years 2015–2017. Plants of selected species were obtained from collection of the Botanical Garden of the Jagiellonian University in Kraków (Poland).
Clearing technique
Developing S. sediforme ovules were fixed in methanol:acetic acid (3:1, v/v) for 24 h and then were cleared as described by Rojek et al. (2018). The material was rinsed successively in 96% (10 min) and 100% (3 times for 10 min) methanol. Then, the specimens were treated with acidulated DMP (dimethyl pimelimidate) overnight and placed in DMP:propylene oxide (1:1, v/v for 20 min; 1:3 for 20 min) and finally in clear propylene oxide (20 min). The clearing process was carried out gradually in a mixture of cedar oil and propylene oxide (1:10, v/v) overnight in an open Eppendorf tube. The analysed material was placed in a drop of pure cedar oil on a microscope slide. A light microscope (Nikon Eclipse E 800) with differential interference contrast (DIC) optics was used for observations.
Electron and light microscopy observations
Procedure used for transmission electron microscopic observations (TEM) and light microscopic analyses (LM) were the same as those used for the study of ovules (during female gametophyte development and embryogenesis (Czaplejewicz and Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno 2013; Brzezicka and Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno 2018) in another species from genus Sedum. The first samples were fixed in a mixture of 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 2.5% formaldehyde (prepared from paraformaldehyde) in 0.05 M cacodylate buffer (pH = 7.0) and then rinsed with the same buffer and post-fixed overnight in 1% osmium tetraoxide in cacodylate buffer at 4 °C. Ovules were treated for 1 h with aqueous solution of 1% uranyl acetate (only for TEM) and next dehydrated in an acetone series.
For TEM, specimens were embedded in Spurr’s epoxy resin (Spurr 1969) and cut for ultrathin sections (50–100 nm) with a diamond knife on a Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome and then post-stained (uranyl acetate in 50% ethanol and 0.04% lead citrate). The sections were examined using a Philips CM 100 and FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit TWIN/BioTWIN transmission electron microscope (Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk) at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV.
For LM, ovules were also embedded in Spurr’s resin and then were cut into semi-thin sections (0.5–1.5 μm) with a glass knife on a Sorvall MT 2B ultramicrotome. Sections were stained using toluidine blue O (TBO) for control, periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) reagent (Jensen 1962) for water-insoluble polysaccharides detection, aniline blue black (ABB; Jensen 1962) for proteins identification, and with Sudan black B (SBB; Bronner 1975) for checking for the presence of lipids. Sections were analysed and photographed with a Nikon Eclipse E 800 light microscope equipped with a Nikon DS-5Mc camera using Lucia Image software.
Results
Megasporogenesis and selection of the functional megaspore
The Sedum sediforme female gametophyte develops within the ovule placed in the ovary of the pistil. Ovules of the tested species are bitegmic. Each integument is formed by two layers of cells. The nucellus is successively covered by developing inner and outer integuments during ovule growth (Fig. 1a). In the initial stage of development, the ovule of S. sediforme is relatively small. During megasporogenesis, the one megaspore mother cell (MMC) is visible within the nucellar tissue (Fig. 1a–b). It is located below the nucellar epidermis, from which it is separated by one or two layers of cells (Fig. 1a–b). The MMC, also termed the precursor of the meiotic products, is significantly different from the surrounding cells. Compared to neighbouring cells, it is larger and has a clearly marked nucleus (Fig. 1b). During development, the MMC increases in size and elongates in the micropylar-chalazal direction. The division of the nucleus is seen approximately in the central part of the meiocyte during the first meiotic division (Fig. 1c). Two mononuclear cells are formed after karyokinesis, followed by cytokinesis (dyad) (Fig. 1d). Next, the chalazal cell divides and forms two mononuclear megaspores. The nucleus of the micropylar cell divides; however, a phragmoplast structure is not present in the binucleate micropylar cell and a cell plate is not formed (Fig. 1e). So, the result of the second meiotic division is a linear triad of cells (two megaspores and a binucleate micropylar cell) which are arranged in accordance with the micropylar-chalazal axis (Fig. 1e). The embryo sac mother cell that initiates the megagametogenesis is one of the cells of the triad (Fig. 1f–g). The functional megaspore placed on the chalazal side is always accompanied by two degenerating cells on the micropylar side. The time of their degeneration can be different. The micropylar cell degenerates first (Fig. 1f). The S. sediforme embryo sac develops from a one-nucleate functional megaspore which is localised chalazally—monosporic megasporogenesis (Fig. 1g). A binucleate embryo sac is formed by the first mitotic division of the embryo sac mother cell (Fig. 1h).
Megasporogenesis—cytochemical and ultrastructural analysis
The megaspore mother cell, which initiates the process of megasporogenesis, is clearly distinguished from the remaining ovular cells (Fig. 2a). Cytochemical staining conducted at the stage of the meiocyte revealed the presence of proteins (Fig. 2b), insoluble polysaccharides (Fig. 2c) and lipids (Fig. 2d). A significant sized cell nucleus changed its position depending on the developmental phase (Fig. 2e–f). When the megaspore mother cell was already clearly elongated, its nucleus was located in central part before the first meiotic division. Ultrastructural analysis confirmed the results obtained from cytochemical stainings and allowed observation of the listed substances in the form of small starch granules and lipid droplets (Fig. 2g). In addition, a large nucleus, active dictyosomes, plastids, mitochondria and autophagic vacuoles were found in the cytoplasm of the MMC (Fig. 2g–i). Simple plasmodesmata connected the chalazal part of the megasporocyte with nucellar cells (Fig. 2g–h). Some of the plastids were distinguished by the presence of areas where the content was similar to the surrounding cytoplasm (Fig. 2h). Organelles appeared to be evenly distributed in the cytoplasm at both poles of the meiocyte (Fig. 2f, h–i).
The S. sediforme ovule continued to grow during the development of the female gametophyte (Fig. 3a). The implementation of cytochemical staining confirmed that there were also reserved materials in the form of lipid drops at the stage of dyad, triad and functional megaspore (Fig. 3b–d). The cross cell wall formed after first meiotic division and separating cells was clearly thickened by the electron-translucent material (Fig. 3e–f). The nucleus divided in both cells of the dyad (Fig. 3e), but the micropylar cell remained undivided -lack of cytokinesis (Fig. 3c’). Simple plasmodesmata existed in the chalazal wall which separated the cell from circumjacent nucellus (Fig. 3f, f’). In addition, numerous small vacuoles, mitochondria, plastids, lipid droplets, and dictyosomes were observed in both dyad cells (Fig. 3f–g). Also at the triad stage, transverse walls separating the triad cells were clearly thickened and irregularly formed (Fig. 3h). Within the cytoplasm of the chalazal mononuclear triad cell, there were plastids, active dictyosomes, mitochondria (not shown) and vacuoles (Fig. 3i–j). Both at the dyad and triad stage, plastids were recorded with areas similar to the surrounding cytoplasm (Fig. 3f, j). At the triad stage, the plasmodesmata were characterised by a diversified structure. Plasmodesmata observed in the outer walls of the largest, chalazal megaspore were simple (Fig. 3i), while those seen in the outer walls of the middle megaspore of the triad were branched (Fig. 3k).
The chalazal megaspore provides the origin to the embryo sac mother cell, which is the only megaspore that is not degenerated and undergoes three mitotic divisions (without cytokinesis). It gives a positive reaction after ABB staining and the PAS method, which suggests points on the presence of proteins (Fig. 4a) and insoluble polysaccharides (Fig. 4b). The degenerating cells stain intensively compared to the functional megaspore. The cell walls of the functional megaspore are unevenly thickened (Fig. 4c–d). Moreover, walls are crossed by plasmodesmata (Fig. 4e). At this stage, the nucleus, plastids (also with intraplastidial space or starch grains), dictyosomes, vacuoles, mitochondria and lipid droplets are present in the cytoplasm of the functional megaspore (Fig. 4d–e).
Megagametogenesis—cytochemical and ultrastructural analysis
Three mitotic divisions without wall formation (cytokinesis) in the functional megaspore led to the formation of the coenocytic embryo sac. Lipid droplets stained with Sudan black B were observed at all stages of megagametogenesis: from the functional megaspore through the coenocytic phase (Fig. 5a–b), until to the cellular embryo sac (Fig. 5c). Analysis of ultrathin sections revealed that in the cytoplasm of a two-nucleate embryo sac plastids occur with numerous large starch granules, active dictyosomes, profiles of the endoplasmic reticulum, and mitochondria (Fig. 5d–e). In addition, at the stage of the two-nucleate embryo sac, the presence of thickened cell walls was found, in which simple plasmodesmata were visible with an electron-dense dome adhering to the gametophyte cytoplasm side (Fig. 5f). Similar structural features were also found in the four-nucleate female gametophyte (Fig. 5g). During megagametogenesis, the embryo sac enlarges and destroys the surrounding cells of the nucellus. The cellular female gametophyte develops after the formation of cell walls within the coenocytic embryo sac. After the cellularisation, the female gametophyte consists of seven cells: two synergids, an egg cell, a central cell and three chalazally located antipodes. Simple plasmodesmata with electron-dense material are present in the external cell walls of antipodal cells (Fig. 5h–i). Antipodes are the only cells of the mature embryo sac that are distinguished by their presence. Furthermore, the outer walls of antipodes and adjacent, small fragments of the transverse walls (separating the antipodes from each other and from central cell) form wall ingrowths. Nucleus, plastids, mitochondria, microbodies, vacuoles and profiles of rough endoplasmic reticulum are visible within the cytoplasm of the antipodes. Antipodes are connected with each other and with the central cell by the simple plasmodesmata (Fig. 5h–i) which ensure the symplasmic continuity of these cells.
In the mature embryo sac, the antipodes degenerate so finally the female gametophyte is formed by the egg apparatus and central cell (Fig. 6a). The presence of lipids (Fig. 6b), proteins (Fig. 6c) and insoluble polysaccharides (Fig. 6d) was observed in all cells that form the embryo sac: synergids, an egg cell and a central cell; however, a more significant accumulation was noticed in the central cell. In addition to the numerous lipid droplets in the cytoplasm of the central cell, the plastids, endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and dictyosomes were present (Fig. 6e–f, i). Two polar nuclei of the central cell fuse during embryo sac development (Fig. 6g). The cytoplasm of the egg cell contains two types of endoplasmic reticulum (a concentrically arranged laminae RER structure and a parallel organised one) (Fig. 6h); lipid droplets, plastids (a few of which store starch grains—not shown) (Fig. 6i–j). Some plastids of the egg cell are in close contact with the rough endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. 6i). Mitochondria form larger groups and occur near the cell wall (Fig. 6i–j). The central cell and egg cell are connected to each other by plasmodesmata (Fig. 6i) like the egg cell and synergids (Fig. 6j). Two ultrastructuraly identical synergids occur on the micropylar pole of the embryo sac (Fig. 6j) with formed filiform apparatus (Fig. 6e’). Each of these has one nucleus, active dictyosomes, profiles of ER, mitochondria and plastids which can also form groups (Fig. 6j–k). In addition, the presence of autophagic structures was found in the cytoplasm of synergids (Fig. 6j). Plasmodesmata connect protoplasts of both synergids (Fig. 6k).
The embryo sac elongates during maturation (Fig. 7a). The central cell is clearly vacuolated and has two polar nuclei which fuse and form a secondary nucleus. Insoluble polysaccharides, proteins and lipids are present in the cytoplasm of female gametophyte cells (Fig. 7b–d). Synergids have a well-developed filiform apparatus (not shown), and their cytoplasm is active and contains active dictyosomes, and abundant ER profiles. The cell wall forms an irregular layer, which is discontinuous (Fig. 7e). Also, the wall separating the egg cell from the central cell is interrupted, so that in some places only the cell membrane separates neighbouring cells (Fig. 7f). In the cytoplasm, which is located in close contact with the cell wall of the central cell occur plastids with starch granules, ER profiles, dictyosomes and mitochondria (Fig. 7f). The egg cell is distinguished by the presence of active dictyosomes, mitochondria, plastids (a few of which store starch), vacuoles, lipid droplets and rough ER profiles (Fig. 7f–g).
Discussion
The embryo sac of S. sediforme develops according to the Polygonum type in crassinucellate, bitegmic and anatropous ovules. The nucellus is Sedum type and its hyponucellus (nucellus under developing gametophyte) is very well developed (Herr 1984). As in S. sediforme, the monosporic megasporogenesis and Polygonum type of megagametogenesis is described in most representatives of Crassulaceae and genus Sedum (Mauritzon 1933; Thiede and Eggli 2007). This means that one megaspore mother cell (MMC) undergoes meiotic division, cytokinesis and forms one, usually linear tetrad of megaspores (megasporogenesis). One megaspore localised chalazally becomes an embryo sac mother cell which after mitosis (three rounds) and ultimately cytokinesis gives rise to the formation of a mature female gametophyte (megagametogenesis) (D’Amato 1977; Raghavan 2000; Chevalier et al. 2011). A linear tetrad of megaspores is not formed in all species of the studied family, because tetrads with other than a linear arrangement of cells or even triads have been observed. In the tested species, the step of cell wall formation was omitted in the micropylar dyad cell after karyokinesis. This results in the formation of a triad composed of two chalazally placed megaspores and one binucleate cell. The triad formation has already been observed in other angiosperms (Bouman 1984; Johri et al. 1992); for example, in Trifolium alexandrinum (Krupko 1973), Cytisus striatus and C. multiflorus (Rodríguez-Riaño et al. 2006), Polianthes tuberosa (González-Gutiérrez and Rodríguez-Garay 2016) and also in Crassulaceae. In Crassulaceae, as in other angiosperms, the nucleus of a micropylar dyad cell can undergo meiosis II, as is in Aeonium arboreum and Rosularia sempervivum (Mauritzon 1933). In Echeveria rosei and Umbilicus intermedius belonging to Crassulaceae, the micropylar dyad cell is mononucleate. In Sedum (S. annum, S. caeruleum), the formation of the triad with mononucleate or binucleate micropylar dyad cell has been described as only one of the possibilities for cells formed after megasporogenesis (in addition to normal, linear type tetrads) (Mauritzon 1933). In S. sediforme, the triad is only one noticed result of megasporogenesis. Tetrad formation has not been observed. The situation of the inhibition of non-functional dyad cell division and development which is localised at micropylar pole in S. sediforme can be interpreted as a trend to further reduction (Bouman 1984). The opposite situation is observed when the suppression of the cell wall formation is described in a cell from which the gametophyte originates. Then, it is defined as a trend towards specialisation or bisporic and tetrasporic development (Bouman 1984).
Sedum sediforme belongs to the genus Sedum section Rupestria (Nikulin et al. 2016). So far, the ovules of this species have been studied cytochemically and ultrastructuraly only during the development of the embryo. Previous investigations have described the structure of the suspensor which is formed by a basal cell and maximally 8 chalazal cells. Only in this species from the Crassulaceae has the situation been observed where the nucleus of the basal cell enters the narrowing connecting the basal cell with the micropylar haustorium (Majcher 2017). In addition, ovules of S. rupestre, a species which also belongs to the series Rupestria, have been examined ultrastructurally and cytochemically during embryogenesis. The suspensor of S. rupestre is also filamentous and is built of 5–10 cells (Czaplejewicz and Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno 2013). So far, plasmodesmata with an electron-dense dome have only not been observed in the above mentioned species of Crassulaceae during the development of the embryo. This feature distinguishes Sedum species from section Rupestria from other Crassulaceae. During the research, it was confirmed that the absence of plasmodesmata with an electron-dense dome during embryogenesis does not preclude their presence in the earlier stages of development or during the female gametophyte development. They have been observed during the coenocytic embryo sac stage and in outer walls of antipodes (during megagametogenesis). During megasporogenesis in S. sediforme, simple plasmodesmata occur in the walls of the megaspore mother cell (MMC), the chalazal cell of the dyad and triad and chalazal part of the functional megaspore similarly to Arabidopsis thaliana (Bajon et al. 1999), and Capsella (Schulz and Jansen 1986). This occurrence provides the opportunity for nutritional substance flow towards the cell providing the origin of the embryo sac mother cell and female gametophyte. Such a situation can favour the survival of chalazal placed cell (Schulz and Jansen 1986; Yang 2006). Plasmodesmata are channels that provide opportunities for symplasmic transport of nutrients and signal molecules required for correct development in plants (Benitez-Alfonso 2014 and literature therein). Plasmodesmata with an electron-dense dome were observed only during megagametogenesis in the examined species. Plasmodesmata with adhering electron-dense material distinguish Crassulaceae from other angiosperms, because they were described only during the development of the female gametophyte (Brzezicka and Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno 2018) and embryo (Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno and Bohdanowicz 2010; Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno et al. 2011; Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno and Płachno 2012) in this family. In S. hispanicum, characteristic plasmodesmata have been recorded as early as during megasporogenesis. This might be associated with the different structure, and thickness of the cell walls of megaspores in Sedum. Walls of S. hispanicum megaspores are not thickened as in megaspores of S. sediforme. This hypothesis will be verified during subsequent studies on other Crassulaceae species when more ultrastructural data will be collected.
During the megasporogenesis of S. sediforme, the thickened walls were observed from the dyad to the functional megaspore stage. Initially, they probably separated only the cells of dyad and triad from each other, while at the stage of the functional megaspore and also the coenocytic embryo sac (megagametogenesis) they occur in the form of an irregular or interrupted layer which is crossed with plasmodesmata. Thickening of the walls is a result of the presence of electron-translucent material. Based on the available literature, it can be concluded that cell wall material is callose. This interpretation is based on very similar observations made during megasporogenesis in for example Capsella (Schulz and Jansen 1986), Tillandsia (Papini et al. 2011), Epipactis sp. (Bouman 1984) where the aniline blue fluorescence was observed together with ultrastructural observations. Fluorescence here localised is described as sign of the presence of callose. It is necessary to perform callose staining to precisely describe the location of callose occurrence and its potential function in Sedum.
A common feature for both Sedum species is the occurrence of characteristic plasmodesmata with adhering electron-dense material during megagametogenesis in the outer walls of the coenocytic embryo sac despite of the different thicknesses of the walls. In other angiosperms such as Capsella, the plasmodesmata disappear at the stage of the four-nucleate female gametophyte (Schulz and Jansen 1986). If plasmodesmata remain present at this stage of development they are less frequently (Yang 2006). Temporary regulation of the substance flow is associated with callose depositions as well as the occurrence (lack or presence) of plasmodesmata (Ünal et al. 2013). There is a possibility that plasmodesmata with an electron-dense body are still present in Sedum in the coenocytic embryo sac because they regulate the flow of substances, as has been shown and examined experimentally during S. acre embryogenesis (Wróbel-Marek et al. 2017). Plasmodesmata with adhering electron-dense material might also regulate the flow of substances during female gametophyte development. This may be the reason that they are still present in the coenocytic embryo sac of S. sediforme. This possibility is also supported by the fact of the presence of the thickened wall of the coenocytic embryo sac in S. sediforme, which can also contribute to the regulation of the substances flow. Further ultrastructural observations in combination with experimental research are needed to expand knowledge in this area.
At the stage of the megaspore mother cell, dyad, triad, functional megaspore in S. sediforme, the intraplastidial space whose structure is similar to that of the surrounding cytoplasm occurs in some plastids. So far, it has been assumed that plastids form a protrusion which swirls around the fragments of the cytoplasm (van Doorn and Papini 2013 and literature therein; Parra-Vega et al. 2015). Moreover, some preliminary evidences have been found for possible degradation of the cytoplasmic material inside the organelle (autophagic plastids). Different states of degradation are supposed on the basis of the changing structure of the contents of intraplastidial spaces. Completely digested cytoplasm has been observed on micrographs as uniform electron-translucent areas. Autophagic activity in plastids has also been confirmed by cytochemical staining conducted on petals cells in Dendrobium flowers (van Doorn et al. 2011). In addition, observations of crystalloids made by transmission electron microscopy show some evidence to support the hypothesis that autophagic plastids can degrade other plastids (Papini and van Doorn 2015). Plastids observed during the present study probably engulf portions of the cytoplasm. Our observations on S. sediforme suggest that the autophagy process occurs but ultrastructural changes to the contents of the intraplastidial space were not noticed. Similar structures of plastids can be observed during megasporogenesis in functional megaspore of Tillandsia (Papini et al. 2011), as was indicated in review by van Doorn and Papini (2013). Such function of the plastids (called plastolysomes) has been analysed during studies of suspensor—for example, in Phaseolus species (Nagl 1977; Gärtner and Nagl 1980)—and tapetum cells of Tillandsia albida (Papini et al. 2014). In members of Crassulaceae, the presence of plastolysomes has not been described previously (Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno and Płachno 2013). However, it is important to note that the role of plastids as an autophagosome or autolysosome is not fully documented (Papini and van Doorn 2015). In S. sediforme, together with the plastids which are described above, autophagic vacuoles have been recorded during megasporogenesis (in cytoplasm of MMC, both cells of dyad, functional megaspore and other cells of triad) and megagametogenesis (coenocytic and cellular gametophyte). The portion of the cytoplasm is surrounded and sequestrated, which contributes to autophagic vacuole formation. So far, autophagic vacuoles have been described during the development of the female gametophyte of Capsella where the acid phosphatase activity was recorded (Schulz and Jansen 1981, 1986). Autophagic vacuoles can have some function in organelle selection, cytoplasm regeneration (Yang 2006) and cytoplasmic constituent destruction (Schulz and Jansen 1986; van Doorn and Papini 2016).
Female gametophyte development takes place in ovular, sporophytic tissues. The surrounding, maternal cells are not neutral for the developing gametophyte because the sporophytic cells influence it during both megasporogenesis and megagametogenesis (Yang and Sundaresan 2000; Drews and Koltunow 2011; Figueiredo and Köhler 2016). For example, the covering integuments not only physically protect the female gametophyte, but they also have an active signalling function, which is necessary for correct development of gametophytes (Figueiredo and Köhler 2016). Moreover, the surrounding nucellar cell can be consumed, being degraded by developing embryo sac. The products of the nucellar degradation can be the source of materials and energy for further maturation (Bhojwani et al. 2015; Rodríguez-Riaño et al. 2006). The sporophytic tissues also have a nutritional function. The products of non-functional megaspore degeneration may also be used by developing gametophytes (Raghavan 1997). Programmed cell death (PCD) is an important process involved in nucellar and non-functional megaspore/cell degradation (van Hautegem et al. 2015). During development, the S. sediforme functional megaspore grows and is surrounded by two non-functional, degenerating cells at the micropylar pole. When the embryo sac mother cell conducts first and second mitotic divisions (without cytokinesis), the bordering nucellar cells are also crushed by the enlarging gametophyte. Products appearing after disintegration of neighbouring cells can be a source of nutrients, which are used for the further development of the female gametophyte. This belief is additionally confirmed by the observation of a larger accumulation of reserve substances (lipid droplets, starch granules) within the functional megaspore and the subsequent binucleate embryo sac of S. sediforme.
The ovule of the study species is elongated. The embryo sac of S. sediforme is a small part compared to the whole ovule; however, during maturation it also grows towards the chalaza and becomes elongated. There is a suspicion that in some species of Crassulaceae, the embryo sac becomes haustorial, but so far this has not been confirmed (Johri et al. 1992). Moreover, there has been the suggestion of the possibility of starch accumulation by haustorial embryo sac. In S. sediforme, the extending embryo sac does not show accumulation of larger amounts of materials (proteins, lipids and insoluble polysaccharides), which has been demonstrated the ABB staining, PAS method and ultrastructural observations. The occurrence of the elongation of mature embryo sacs has not been observed in S. hispanicum, the species whose ovules have been analysed cytochemically and ultrastructurally (Brzezicka and Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno 2018). The difference in the embryo sac structure is possibly a result of the systematic position of the species. S. hispanicum belongs to the genus Sedum and clade Leucosedum (Nikulin et al. 2016). The cell wall in the mature S. sediforme embryo sac (separating the synergids from the egg cell and the egg cell from the central cell) has a similar structure to that described in S. hispanicum, but only at the stage of the elongated embryo sac built of the egg apparatus and a central cell. The cell wall disappears locally and the neighbouring cells are separated by a plasma membrane. This shows that the elongated embryo sac of S. sediforme has become fully mature. The thickness and presence of cell walls of egg apparatus change during maturation. In angiosperms, the chalazal part of the egg cell wall thins or disappears locally or in the whole chalazal part (Jensen 1973; Willemse and van Went 1984; Raghavan 1997; Johri et al. 2001). A similar change in cell wall structure is observed in the chalazal end of synergids, where regions with irregular, visibly thin or absent walls also occur. This could be to a facilitate transport of materials (nutrients) and entry of sperm (Willemse and van Went 1984; Raghavan 1997).
The mature female gametophyte of Polygonum type is built of seven cells, but this typically observed structure can be modified by cell proliferation or cell death (Yadegari and Drews 2004). Two synergids, an egg cell, a central cell and three antipodes are noticed in the embryo sac of the study species. The egg cell and central cell are two reproductive cells that participate in fertilisation. Synergids and antipodes are accessory cells, but only the former play an essential role in fertilisation, for example pollen tube guidance and reception (Sánchez-León and Vielle-Calzada 2010). Synergids and antipodes are two lineages of cells, which undergo PCD what is important for reproductive success (van Hautegem et al. 2015). Antipodes are as called an antipodal apparatus. It is a highly variable element of the embryo sac (Willemse and van Went 1984; Johri et al. 1992, 2001). Their function is still not precisely specified, but several possible functions (in nutrition, secretion and storage) of these cells have been proposed based mainly on morphological analysis (Willemse and van Went 1984; Vijayaraghavan et al. 1988; Raghavan 1997; Bhojwani et al. 2015). Moreover, depending on the species, the antipodes can be ephemeral (many of dicotyledons species) or persistent (Willemse and van Went 1984; Tang et al. 2009). In addition, the situation of antipodal proliferation occurs in monocotyledon plants, for example Poaceae (Chettoor and Evans 2015). In S. sediforme, the antipodes are ephemeral, similar to the situation described in S. hispanicum, but their ultrastructure differs. Antipodes in the study species are metabolically active cells which can be interpreted after cytoplasm observations where organelles such as plastids, ribosome, active dictyosomes, and ER profiles occur. Wall ingrowths are visible in outer walls of antipodes, but they are more conspicuous in lateral walls than in the chalazal wall region. Interantipodal cell walls also show the presence of wall ingrowth formation. Moreover, next to wall ingrowths, plasmodesmata are present in outer walls of antipodes, which separate these embryo sac cells from the nucellus. Observations made during this study indicate the nutritional function of antipodes. Due to the presence of the above described structures (plasmodesmata, wall ingrowths), it can be concluded that symplasmic transport and intensive apoplasmic transport takes place. A new feature observed on electronograms in the form of simple plasmodesmata with electron-dense dome suggests that this transport can be precisely regulated. Data collected during our research shows the possibility that this transport is regulated in a similarly manner to transport of substances through the suspensor basal cell walls (Wróbel-Marek et al. 2017). In addition, plasmodesmata occurring between antipodes and antipodal cells-central cell confirm the presence of a pathway for metabolites which can run in two directions: nucellus-antipodes-central cell and vice versa (Willemse and van Went 1984). The presence of wall ingrowths has also been pointed out in other angiosperms species (Vijayaraghavan et al. 1988), for example in Aconitum vulparia (Bohdanowicz and Turała-Szybowska 1985, 1987), Oryza sativa (Maeda and Miyake 1996), and Eleusine tristachya (Lovisolo and Galati 2007). This shows that these cells have transfer character. In S. sediforme, the wall ingrowths are branched and in all antipodal cell walls the plasmodesmata are present. A similar situation has been observed in persistent antipodes of A. vulparia; however, the plasmodesmata did not occur in chalazal wall connecting the antipodal cells with nucellar cells. The lifespan of antipodes is controlled by genes expressed in neighbouring cells of the gametophyte (Tekleyohans et al. 2017).
Conclusions
The mature female gametophyte of Sedum sediforme is elongated and after antipodes degeneration is formed by an egg cell, two synergids and a central cell. Embryo sac development is monosporic Polygonum type. A triad of cells is always formed during megasporogenesis. The embryo sac mother cell is placed chalazally. The functional megaspore forms firstly a coenocytic and later cellular gametophyte after cell wall formation. Plasmodesmata with an electron-dense dome were observed in outer cell walls during both coenocytic and cellular embryo sac stages. The three antipodal cells have a unique structure in study species, which has not been described in other angiosperm plants. During ultrastructural observations of antipodals, plasmodesmata with an electron-dense dome were observed. The presence of these structures in connection with the occurrence of wall ingrowths shows that antipodal cells may perform a role in transport. Plasmodesmata and wall ingrowths provide the opportunity for intense symplasmic and apoplasmic transport. Electron-dense material may perform a role in the regulation of substances transport. On the basis of the available literature, it can be assumed that transport through plasmodesmata with an electron-dense dome takes place in one direction, but this requires further experimental analysis with the use of microinjections of fluorescent tracers. During the present study, new structural features of antipodal cells were described, which could be useful in creating a better understanding of the function of these cells. Moreover, this first ultrastructural comparative analysis of ovules at the stage of gametophyte development in Sedum shows that these species differs in the manner of female gametophyte development and structure.
References
Bajon C, Horlow C, Motamayor JC, Sauvanet A, Robert D (1999) Megasporogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana L.: an ultrastructural study. Sex Plant Reprod 12:99–109
Benitez-Alfonso Y (2014) Symplastic intercellular transport from a developmental perspective. J Exp Biol 65(7):857–1863
Bhojwani SS, Bhatnagar SP, Dantu PK (2015) Female gametophyte in: the embryology of angiosperms, 6th edn. Vikas Publishing House, New, Noida, pp 85–108
Bohdanowicz J, Turała-Szybowska K (1985) Ultrastructure of endopolyploid antipodals in Aconitum vulparia Rchb. I Antipodals in the mature embryo sac. Protoplasma 127:163–170
Bohdanowicz J, Turała-Szybowska K (1987) Ultrastructure of endopolyploid antipodals in Aconitum vulparia Rchb. II Antipodals in the period of free nuclear endosperm. Protoplasma 140:13–21
Bouman F (1984) The ovule. In: Johri BM (ed) Embryology of angiosperms. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 123–157
Bronner R (1975) Simultaneous demonstration of lipid and starch in plant tissues. Stain Technol 50(1):1–4
Brzezicka E, Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M (2018) Ultrastructural and cytochemical aspects of female gametophyte development in Sedum hispanicum L. (Crassulaceae). Protoplasma 225:247–261
Chettoor AM, Evans MMS (2015) Correlation between a loss of auxin signaling and a loss of proliferation in maize antipodal cells. Front Plant Sci 6:187
Chevalier É, Loubert-Hudon A, Zimmerman EL, Matton DP (2011) Cell–cell communication and signalling pathways within the ovule: from its inception to fertilization. New Phytol 192(1):13–28
Christenhusz MJM, Byng JW (2016) The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase. Phytotaxa 261(3):201–217
Czaplejewicz D, Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M (2013) Ultrastructural and cytochemical studies of the embryo suspensor of Sedum reflexum L. (Crassulaceae). Acta Biol Cracov Ser Bot 55(2):76–89
D’Amato F (1977) Nuclear cytology in relation to development. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge
Drews GN, Koltunow AMG (2011) The female gametophyte. ASPB 9:e0155. https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0155
Figueiredo DD, Köhler C (2016) Bridging the generation gap: communication between maternal sporophyte, female gametophyte and fertilization products. Curr Opin Plant Biol 29:16–20
Gallo L, Zika P (2014) A taxonomic study of Sedum series Rupestria (Crassulaceae) naturalized in North America. Phytotaxa 175(1):19–28
Gärtner PJ, Nagl W (1980) Acid phosphatase activity in plastids (plastolysomes) of senescing embryo-suspensor cells. Planta 149:341–349
González-Gutiérrez AG, Rodríguez-Garay B (2016) Embryogenesis in Polianthes tuberosa L var. simple: from megasporogenesis to early embryo development. SpringerPlus 5:1804. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3528-z
González-Gutiérrez AG, Gutiérrez-Mora A, Rodríguez-Garay B (2014) Embryo sac formation and early embryo development in Agave tequilana (Asparagaceae). SpringerPlus 3(1):575
Hart H’t, Bleij B (2003) Sedum. In: Eggli U (ed) Illustrated handbook of succulent plants. Crassulaceae. Springer, Berlin, pp 235–332
Herr JM (1984) Embryology and taxonomy in: Johri BM (ed) Embryology of angiosperms. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 647–696
Jensen WA (1962) Botanical histochemistry. Freeman, San Francisco
Jensen WA (1973) Fertilization in flowering plants. Bioscience 23:21–27
Johri BM, Ambegaokar KB, Srivastava PS (1992) Comparative embryology of angiosperms. Springer Verlag, Berlin
Johri BM, Srivastava PS, Singh N (2001) Reproductive biology of angiosperms. In: Johri BM, Srivastava PS (eds) Reproductive biology of plants. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 237–272
Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M, Bohdanowicz J (2006) Development and cytochemistry of the embryo suspensor in Sedum. Acta Biol Cracov Ser Bot 48:67–72
Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M, Bohdanowicz J (2010) Unusual electron-dense dome associates with compound plasmodesmata in the embryo-suspensor of genus Sedum (Crassulaceae). Protoplasma 247:117–120
Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M, Płachno BJ (2012) Are the symplastic connections between the endosperm and embryo in same angiosperms?-a lesson from the Crassulaceae family. Protoplasma 249:1081–1089
Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M, Płachno BJ (2013) Diversity of plastid morphology and structure along the micropyle–chalaza axis of different Crassulaceae. Flora 208:128–137
Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M, Płachno BJ, Bohdanowicz J (2011) Are unusual plasmodesmata in the embryo-suspensor restricted to species from the genus Sedum among Crassulaceae? Flora 206(7):684–690
Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M, Płachno BJ, Bohdanowicz J (2012) New data about the suspensor of succulent angiosperms: ultrastructure and cytochemical study of the embryo-suspensor of Sempervivum arachnoideum L. and Jovibarba sobolifera (Sims) Opiz. Protoplasma 249:613–624
Krupko S (1973) Megasporogenesis and development of the embryo sac in the Palestine variety of Trifolium alexandrinum L. Acta Soc Bot Pol 42(4):617–625
Lovisolo MR, Galati BG (2007) Ultrastructure and development of the megagametophyte in Eleusine tristachya (lam.) lam. (Poaceae). Flora 202:293–301
Maeda E, Miyake H (1996) Ultrastructure of antipodal cells of rice ( Oryza sativa) after anthesis, as related to nutrient transport in embryo sac. Jpn J Crop Sci 65(2):340–351
Maheshwari P (1937) A critical review of the types of embryo sacs in angiosperms. New Phytol 36(5):359–417
Majcher D (2017) Zróżnicowanie budowy wieszadełka zarodkowego w obrębie rodzaju Sedum (Crassulaceae). Dissertation, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk (in Polish)
Mauritzon J (1933) Studien über die Embryologie der Familien Crassulaceae und Saxifragaceae. Thesis, University of Lund, Lund
Nagl W (1977) ‘Plastolysomes’ – plastids involved in the autolysis of the embryo-suspensor in Phaseolus. Z Pflanzenphysiol 85:45–51
Nikulin VY, Gontcharova SB, Stephenson R, Gontcharov AA (2016) Phylogenetic relationships between Sedum L. and related genera (Crassulaceae) based on ITS rDNA sequence comparisons. Flora 224:218–229
Papini A, van Doorn W (2015) Crystalloids in apparent autophagic plastids: remnants of plastids or peroxisomes? J Plant Physiol 174:36–40
Papini A, Mosti S, Milocani E, Tani G, Di Falco P, Brighigna L (2011) Megasporogenesis and programmed cell death in Tillandsia (Bromeliaceae). Protoplasma 248(4):651–662
Papini A, Mosti S, van Doorn WG (2014) Classical macroautophagy in Lobivia rauschii (Cactaceae) and possible plastidial autophagy in Tillandsia albida (Bromeliaceae) tapetum cells. Protoplasma 251(3):719–725
Parra-Vega V, Corral-Martínez P, Rivas-Sendra A, Seguí-Simarro JM (2015) Formation and excretion of autophagic plastids (plastolysomes) in Brassica napus embryogenic microspores. Front Plant Sci 6:94. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00094
Raghavan V (1997) Megasporogenesis and megagametogenesis. In: Molecular embryology of flowering plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 152–178
Raghavan V (2000) Megasporogenesis and formation of the embryo sac in: developmental biology of flowering plants. Springer, New York
Raghavan V (2006) Double fertilization: embryo and endosperm development in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin
Reiser L, Fischer RL (1993) The ovule and the embryo sac. Plant Cell 5:1291–1301
Rodríguez-Riaño T, Valtueña FJ, Ortega-Olivencia A (2006) Megasporogenesis, megagametogenesis and ontogeny of the aril in Cytisus striatus and C. multiflorus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). Ann Bot 98(4):777–791
Rojek J, Kapusta M, Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M, Majcher D, Górniak M, Sliwinska E, Sharbel TF, Bohdanowicz J (2018) Establishing the cell biology of apomictic reproduction in diploid Boechera stricta (Brassicaceae). Ann Bot 122:513–539. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy114
Sánchez-León N, Vielle-Calzada JP (2010) Development and function of the female gametophyte. In: Plant developmental biology-biotechnological perspectives. Springer, Berlin, pp 209–224
Schmidt A, Schmid MW, Grossniklaus U (2015) Plant germline formation: common concepts and developmental flexibility in sexual and asexual reproduction. Development 142(2):229–241
Schulz P, Jansen WA (1981) Pre-fertilization ovule development in Capsella: ultrastructure and ultracytochemical localization of acid phosphatase in the meiocyte. Protoplasma 107(1–2):27–45
Schulz P, Jansen WA (1986) Prefertilization ovule development in Capsella: the dyad, tetrad, developing megaspore, and two-nucleate gametophyte. Can J Bot 64(4):875–884
Sharp LW (1913) Embryo sac of Crassulaceae. Bot Gaz 55(3):258–259
Souéges R (1927) Développement de l’embryon chez le Sedum acre L. Bull Soc Bot France 74:234–251
Spurr AR (1969) A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 26:31–43
Tang Y, Gao H, Xie JS (2009) An embryological study of Eriolaena candollei Wallich (Malvaceae) and its systematic implications. Flora 204:569–580
Tekleyohans DG, Nakel T, Groß-Hardt R (2017) Patterning the female gametophyte of flowering plants. Plant Physiol 173:122–129
Thiede J, Eggli U (2007) Crassulaceae. In: Kubitzki K (ed) The familie and genera of vascular plants. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 83–118
Ünal M, Vardar F, Aytürk Ö (2013) Callose in plant sexual reproduction in: current progress in biological research. InTech pp 319–343
van Doorn WG, Papini A (2013) Ultrastructure of autophagy in plant cells: a review. Autophagy 9(12):1922–1936
van Doorn WG, Papini A (2016) Plastid degeneration in Tillandsia albida (Bromeliaceae) and Lobivia rauschii (Cactaceae) provides evidence abort the origin and destiny of multilamellar bodies in plants. Phytomorphology 66(3&4):103–112
van Doorn WG, Kirasak K, Sonong A, Srihiran Y, van Lent J, Ketsa S (2011) Do plastids in Dendrobium cv. Lucky Duan petals function similar to autophagosomes and autolysosomes? Autophagy 7(6):58–4597
van Hautegem T, Waters AJ, Goodrich J, Nowack MK (2015) Only in dying, life: programmed cell death during plant development. Trends Plant Sci 20(2):102–113
Vijayaraghavan MR, Seth N, Jain A (1988) Ultrastructure and histochemistry of angiosperm embryo sac - an overview. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 54(1):93–110
Wang D, Tyson MD, Jackson SS, Yadegari R (2006) Partially redundant functions of two SET-domain polycomb-group proteins in controlling initiation of seed development in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(35):13244–13249
Wang Y, Tsukamoto T, Noble JA, Liu X, Mosher R, Palanivelu R (2017) Arabidopsis LORELEI, a maternally-expressed imprinted gene, promotes early seed development. Plant Physiol 175(2):758–773
Willemse MTM, van Went JL (1984) The female gametophyte. In: Johri BM (ed) Embryology of angiosperms. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 159–196
Wojciechowicz MK, Samardakiewicz M (1998) The development of female gametophyte and antipodal embryo formation in Sedum fabaria. Biol Plant 40(2):193–202
Wróbel-Marek J, Kurczyńska E, Płachno BJ, Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M (2017) Identification of symplasmic domains in the embryo and seed of Sedum acre L.(Crassulaceae). Planta 245(3):491–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-016-2619-y
Yadegari R, Drews GN (2004) Female gametophyte development. Plant Cell 16:S133–S141
Yang WC (2006) Female gametophyte development. In: Basra AS (ed) Handbook of seed science and technology. Haworth Press, New York, pp 27–62
Yang WC, Sundaresan V (2000) Genetics of gametophyte biogenesis in Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3(1):53–57
Acknowledgements
We cordially thank the director of the Botanic Garden of the Jagiellonian University Prof. Józef Mitka for permission to use plants from the Garden collections.
Funding
This work was supported financially by University of Gdańsk research grant no. 538-L160-B525-17 in case EB and DS/530-L160-D243-17-18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Peter Nick
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Brzezicka, E., Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno, M. Female gametophyte development in Sedum sediforme (Jacq.) Pau (Crassulaceae): an anatomical, cytochemical and ultrastructural analysis. Protoplasma 256, 537–553 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-018-1319-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-018-1319-9