Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trends, sensitivity and estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration ET0 using limited climate data: regional focus on Burkina Faso in the West African Sahel

  • Research
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The precise estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is critical for water planning in agriculture. However, with the scarcity of data in developing countries, the use of the reference Penman–Monteith FAO-56 (FAO56-PM) equation to estimate ETo is difficult. Besides the quantification of this water balance component, its trends and sensitivities to climate variables are poorly assessed in such countries. In this study, an examination of ETo is carried out over the period 1988–2017 in Burkina Faso, a landlocked country in the West African Sahel. A gap-filling procedure is first used to estimate missing solar radiation data, in combination with bias-corrected climate data from MERRA-2 reanalysis. The gap-free dataset is therefore used to assess annual, seasonal trends in ETo and its dependant variables, as well as the sensitivities of ETo to its dependant variables. The results show a significant decrease (at Dori, northern region) and increase (Gaoua, southern region) in ETo. Also, solar radiation (rs) and maximum temperature (tx) have the highest effect on ETo, followed by relative humidity (rh) (with negative feedback), wind speed (ws) and minimum temperature (tn). Finally, 49 alternative methods of ETo estimation are calibrated (over 1988–2007), validated (over 2008–2017) using FAO56-PM as a reference and ranked out by performance index (PI). In general, combinatory methods (such as Kimberly–Penman equation) are the most accurate (PI = 0.38–0.61), followed by radiation methods (such as Trajkovic–Stojnic equation) which are satisfactory (PI = 0.21–0.76). Temperature methods (TMP) (such as Penman–Monteith temperature equation) and mass transfer methods (MTF) (such as Rohwer equation) perform worse in comparison (TMP: PI = 0.14–0.69/MTF: PI =  − 0.49–0.40), with large underestimation by MTF methods (PBIAS =  − 15.2–0.0%). Calibrated alternative equations such as Trajkovic–Stojnic, Penman–Monteith temperature and Kimberly–Penman are therefore recommended after FAO-56 PM for daily ETo estimation in Burkina Faso.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The code (under the R programming language) and generated data supporting the results and the figures in this study are available at GitHub (https://github.com/Yonaba/ET0_Analysis_Burkina_Faso). The climate observation data at synoptic stations in Burkina Faso can be obtained through request to the National Meteorology Agency in Burkina Faso (ANAM-BF).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, visualization, validation and writing, original draft: Roland Yonaba; conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, supervision and writing, review and editing: Fowé Tazen; conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis and writing, original draft: Mansourou Cissé; conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis and validation: Lawani Adjadi Mounirou; methodology, visualization and writing, review and editing: Axel Belemtougri; resources, visualization and writing, review and editing: Alligouamé Vincent Ouédraogo; conceptualization, validation, supervision and writing, review and editing: Mahamadou Koïta; conceptualization, validation and supervision: Dial Niang; conceptualization, validation and supervision: Harouna Karambiri; and validation and supervision: Hamma Yacouba.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Yonaba.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

All authors whose names appear on the submission (1) made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data and (2) drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content.

Consent for publication

All authors whose names appear on the submission (1) approved the version to be published and (2) agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 330 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 136 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yonaba, R., Tazen, F., Cissé, M. et al. Trends, sensitivity and estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration ET0 using limited climate data: regional focus on Burkina Faso in the West African Sahel. Theor Appl Climatol 153, 947–974 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04507-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04507-z

Navigation