Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Potential of hybrid wavelet-coupled data-driven-based algorithms for daily runoff prediction in complex river basins

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate prediction of daily runoff’s dynamic nature is necessary for better watershed planning and management. This study analyzes the applicability of artificial neural network (ANN), wavelet-coupled artificial neural network (WANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and wavelet-coupled adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (WANFIS) models for daily runoff prediction of Koyna River basin, India. Gamma test (GT) was used to select the best input vector to avoid the time-consuming and tedious trial and error input selection methods. Original daily rainfall and runoff time series data were decomposed into different multifrequency sub-signals using three types (Haar, Daubechies, and Coiflet) of mother wavelets. The decomposed sub-signals were fed to ANN and ANFIS as inputs for developing hybrid WANN and WANFIS models, respectively. The quantitative and qualitative performance evaluation criteria were used for assessing the prediction accuracy of developed models. An uncertainty analysis was employed to study the reliability of the developed models. It was observed that hybrid data-driven models (WANN/WANFIS) outperformed simple data-driven models (ANN/ANFIS). Finally, it was found that the Coiflet wavelet-coupled ANFIS model can be successfully applied for daily runoff prediction of the highly dynamic and complex Koyna River basin. The sensitivity analysis was also carried out to detect the most crucial variable for daily runoff prediction. The sensitivity analysis indicated that the previous 1-day runoff (Qt–1) is the most crucial variable for daily runoff prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Some or all data that support this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The models or codes used to develop this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Adnan RM, Liang Z, Kuriqi A, Kisi O, Malik A, Li B (2020) Streamflow forecasting using heuristic machine learning methods. In: 2020 2nd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCIS), pp 1–6

  • Adnan RM, Petroselli A, Heddam S et al (2021) Short term rainfall-runoff modelling using several machine learning methods and a conceptual event-based model. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 35:597–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01910-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal A et al (2006) Simulation of runoff and sediment yield using artificial neural networks. Biosys Eng 94(4):597–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alizadeh MJ et al (2017) A new approach for simulating and forecasting the rainfall-runoff process within the next two months. J Hydrol 548:588–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anomaa Senaviratne GMMM et al (2014) Use of fuzzy rainfall–runoff predictions for claypan watersheds with conservation buffers in Northeast Missouri. J Hydrol 517:1008–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anusree K, Varghese KO (2016) Streamflow prediction of Karuvannur River basin using ANFIS, ANN and MNLR models. Procedia Technol 24:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azamathulla HM, Haghiabi AH, Parsaie A (2016) Prediction of side weir discharge coefficient by support vector machine technique. Water Supply 16(4):1002–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai P, Liu X, Xie J (2021) Simulating runoff under changing climatic conditions: A comparison of the long short-term memory network with two conceptual hydrologic models. J Hydrol 592:125779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125779

  • Bajirao TS, Kumar P (2021) Geospatial technology for prioritization of Koyna River basin of India based on soil erosion rates using different approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13155-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajirao TS, Kumar P, Kumar M, Elbeltagi A, Kuriqi A (2021) Superiority of hybrid soft computing models in daily suspended sediment estimation in Highly Dynamic Rivers. Sustainability 13:542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budu K (2014) Comparison of wavelet-based ANN and regression models for reservoir inflow forecasting. 19 (7):1385-1400

  • Dumka BB, Kumar P (2021) Modeling rainfall-runoff using Artificial Neural Network (ANNs) and Wavelet based ANNs (WANNs) for Haripura Dam, Uttarakhand. Indian J Ecol 48:271–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebtehaj I, Bonakdari H (2014) Performance evaluation of adaptive neural fuzzy inference system for sediment transport in sewers. Water Resour Manage 28(13):4765–4779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Shafie A et al (2009) Enhancing inflow forecasting model at Aswan high dam utilizing radial basis neural network and upstream monitoring stations measurements. Water Resour Manage 23(11):2289–2315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Shafie A, Taha MR, Noureldin A (2007) A neuro-fuzzy model for inflow forecasting of the Nile river at Aswan high dam. Water Resour Manage 21(3):533–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbeltagi A et al (2020a) The impact of climate changes on the water footprint of wheat and maize production in the Nile Delta Egypt. Sci Total Environ 743:140770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbeltagi A et al (2020b) Spatial and temporal variability analysis of green and blue evapotranspiration of wheat in the Egyptian Nile Delta from 1997 to 2017. J Hydrol https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125662:125662

  • Elbeltagi A et al (2020c) Crop Water footprint estimation and modeling using an artificial neural network approach in the Nile Delta Egypt. Agric Water Manag 235:106080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbeltagi A et al (2020d) Modeling long-term dynamics of crop evapotranspiration using deep learning in a semi-arid environment. Agric Water Manag 241:106334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbeltagi A, Zhang L, Deng J, Juma A, Wang K (2020e) Modeling monthly crop coefficients of maize based on limited meteorological data: A case study in Nile Delta, Egypt. Comput Electron Agric 173:105368

  • Gauch M, Kratzert F, Klotz D et al (2020) Rainfall–runoff prediction at multiple timescales with a single long short-term memory network. arXiv 2045–2062. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-540

  • Gong Y et al (2016) A comparative study of artificial neural networks, support vector machines and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for forecasting groundwater levels near Lake Okeechobee. Florida Water Resour Manag 30(1):375–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güldal V, Tongal H (2010) Comparison of recurrent neural network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and stochastic models in Eğirdir Lake level forecasting. Water Resour Manag 24(1):105–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han H, Morrison RR (2021) Data-driven approaches for runoff prediction using distributed data. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-01993-3

  • Jang JR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(3):665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javan K, Lialestani MRFH, Nejadhossein M (2015) A comparison of ANN and HSPF models for runoff simulation in Gharehsoo River watershed. Iran Model Earth Sys Environ 1(4):41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskin ME, Taylan D, Terzi Ö (2006) Adaptive neural-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approach for modelling hydrological time series. Hydrol Sci J 51(4):588–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kheirfam H, Mokarram-Kashtiban S (2018) A regional suspended load yield estimation model for ungauged watersheds. Water Sci Eng 11(4):328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim M, Gilley JE (2008) Artificial Neural Network estimation of soil erosion and nutrient concentrations in runoff from land application areas. Comput Electron Agric 64(2):268–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O (2015) Streamflow forecasting and estimation using least square support vector regression and adaptive neuro-fuzzy embedded fuzzy c-means clustering. Water Resour Manag 29(14):5109–5127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M et al (2020) Estimation of Daily stage–discharge relationship by using data-driven techniques of a perennial river. India Sustain 12(19):7877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuriqi A, Ali R, Pham QB, Montenegro G, Julio Gupta V, Malik A, Linh NTT, Joshi Y, Anh DT, Nam VT, Dong X (2020a) Seasonality shift and streamflow flow variability trends in central India. Acta Geophysica 68(5):1461–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuriqi A, Pinheiro AN, Sordo-Ward A, Garrote L (2020b) Water-energy-ecosystem nexus: Balancing competing interests at a run-of-river hydropower plant coupling a hydrologic–ecohydraulic approach. Energy Convers Manag 223:113267

  • Lee KT, Hung W-C, Meng C-C (2008) Deterministic insight into ANN model performance for storm runoff simulation. Water Resour Manage 22(1):67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legates DR, McCabe GJ Jr (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35:233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Ling K, Zhou L, Zhu M (2021) Deep learning framework with time series analysis methods for runoff prediction. Water 13:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohani AK, Goel NK, Bhatia KKS (2014) Improving real time flood forecasting using fuzzy inference system. J Hydrol 509:25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohani AK, Kumar R, Singh RD (2012) Hydrological time series modeling: a comparison between adaptive neuro-fuzzy, neural network and autoregressive techniques. J Hydrol 23(35):442–4443

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran R, Khosa R (2012) Comparative study of different wavelets for hydrologic forecasting. Comput Geosci 46:284–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melesse AM et al (2011) Suspended sediment load prediction of river systems: an artificial neural network approach. Agric Water Manag 98(5):855–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirbagheri SA, Nourani V, Rajaee T, Alikhani A (2010) Neuro-fuzzy models employing wavelet analysis for suspended sediment concentration prediction in rivers. Hydrol Sci J 55(7):1175–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak PC et al (2004) A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modeling hydrological time series. J Hydrol 291(1):52–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu WJ, Feng ZK (2021) Evaluating the performances of several artificial intelligence methods in forecasting daily streamflow time series for sustainable water resources management. Sustain Cities Soc 64:102562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102562

  • Nourani V, Komasi M (2013) A geomorphology-based ANFIS model for multi-station modeling of rainfall–runoff process. J Hydrol 490:41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourani V, Komasi M, Mano A (2009) A multivariate ANN-wavelet approach for rainfall-runoff modeling. Water Resour Manag 23:2877–2894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olyaie E et al (2015) A comparison of various artificial intelligence approaches performance for estimating suspended sediment load of river systems: a case study in United States. Environ Monit Assess 187(4):189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouma YO, Cheruyot R, Wachera AN (2021) Rainfall and runoff time-series trend analysis using LSTM recurrent neural network and wavelet neural network with satellite-based meteorological data: case study of Nzoia hydrologic basin. Complex Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00365-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quilty J, Adamowski J (2018) Addressing the incorrect usage of wavelet-based hydrological and water resources forecasting models for real-world applications with best practices and a new forecasting framework. J Hydrol 563:336–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravansalar M, Rajaee T (2015) Evaluation of wavelet performance via an ANN-based electrical conductivity prediction model. Environ Monit Assess 187(6):366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis GB, da Silva DD, Fernandes Filho EI et al (2021) Effect of environmental covariable selection in the hydrological modeling using machine learning models to predict daily streamflow. J Environ Manage 290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112625

  • Rezaie-Balf M, Zahmatkesh Z, Kim S (2017) Soft computing techniques for rainfall-runoff simulation: local non–parametric paradigm vs. model classification methods. Water Resour Manag 31(12):3843–3865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riahi-Madvar H, Dehghani M, Memarzadeh R, Gharabaghi B (2021) Short to long-term forecasting of river flows by heuristic optimization algorithms hybridized with ANFIS. Water Resour Manag 35:1149–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02756-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraiva SV, de OliveiraCarvalho F, Santos CAG et al (2021) Daily streamflow forecasting in Sobradinho Reservoir using machine learning models coupled with wavelet transform and bootstrapping. Appl Soft Comput 102:107081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107081

  • Seo Y et al (2015) Daily water level forecasting using wavelet decomposition and artificial intelligence techniques. J Hydrol 520:224–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharghi E et al (2018) Emotional ANN (EANN) and Wavelet-ANN (WANN) approaches for Markovian and seasonal based modeling of rainfall-runoff process. Water Resour Manage 32(10):3441–3456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirsath PB, Singh AK (2010) A comparative study of daily pan evaporation estimation using ANN, regression and climate based models. Water Resour Manage 24(8):1571–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoaib M, Shamseldin AY, Melville BW (2014) Comparative study of different wavelet based neural network models for rainfall–runoff modeling. J Hydrol 515:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RM (2012) Wavelet-ANN model for Flood Events. Adv Intell Syst Comput 131:165–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwal N et al (2020a) Optimisation of cascade reservoir operation considering environmental flows for different environmental management classes. Renew Energy 158:453–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suwal N et al (2020b) Environmental flows assessment in Nepal: the case of Kaligandaki River. Sustainability 12(21):8766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tezel G, Buyukyildiz M (2016) Monthly evaporation forecasting using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Theoret Appl Climatol 124(1):69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarar A (2014) A hybrid wavelet and neuro-fuzzy model for forecasting the monthly streamflow data. Water Resour Manage 28(2):553–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin D et al (2011) Assessment of sustainable yield of karst water in Huaibei. China Water Resour Manag 25(1):287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan X, Chen C, Yuan Y, Zhang B (2021) Runoff prediction based on hybrid clustering with WOA intervals mapping model. J Hydrol Eng 26:04021019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0002087

  • Zerouali B, Al-ansari N, Chettih M et al (2021) An enhanced innovative triangular trend analysis of rainfall based on a spectral approach. Water 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050727

  • Zhang J, Chen X, Khan A et al (2021) Daily runoff forecasting by deep recursive neural network. J Hydrol 596

  • Zounemat-Kermani M et al (2016) Evaluation of data driven models for river suspended sediment concentration modeling. J Hydrol 535:457–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve this manuscript further.

Funding

Alban Kuriqi was supported by a Ph.D. scholarship granted by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P.P (FCT), Portugal, and the Ph.D. Program FLUVIO–River Restoration and Management, grant number: PD/BD/114558/2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Science and Agriculture Chemistry, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, 144411, India

    Tarate Suryakant Bajirao

  2. Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, 263145, India

    Pravendra Kumar & Manish Kumar

  3. Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt

    Ahmed Elbeltagi

  4. CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1049-001, Portugal

    Alban Kuriqi

Authors
  1. Tarate Suryakant Bajirao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pravendra Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manish Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmed Elbeltagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alban Kuriqi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Tarate Suryakant Bajirao and Pravendra Kumar; methodology: Tarate Suryakant Bajirao, Pravendra Kumar, and Manish Kumar; formal analysis and investigation: Tarate Suryakant Bajirao, Pravendra Kumar, Ahmed Elbeltagi; writing—original draft preparation: Tarate Suryakant Bajirao; writing—review and editing: Tarate Suryakant Bajirao, Pravendra Kumar, Manish Kumar, Ahmed Elbeltagi, and Alban Kuriqi; resources: Pravendra Kumar; supervision: Alban Kuriqi.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alban Kuriqi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Yes.

Consent for publication

Yes.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bajirao, T.S., Kumar, P., Kumar, M. et al. Potential of hybrid wavelet-coupled data-driven-based algorithms for daily runoff prediction in complex river basins. Theor Appl Climatol 145, 1207–1231 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03681-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03681-2

Search

Navigation