Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ultrasound-guided brain surgery: echographic visibility of different pathologies and surgical applications in neurosurgical routine

  • Original Article - Neurosurgery general
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The use of intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) has increased in the last 15 years becoming a standard tool in many neurosurgical centers. Our aim was to assess the utility of routine use of iUS during various types of intracranial surgery. We reviewed our series to assess ultrasound visibility of different pathologies and iUS applications during the course of surgery.

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective review of 162 patients who underwent intracranial surgery with assistance of the iUS guidance system (SonoWand). Pathologic categories were neoplastic (135), vascular (20), infectious (2), and CSF related (5). Ultrasound visibility was assessed using the Mair classification, a four-tiered grading system that considers the echogenicity of the lesion and its border visibility (from 0 to 3; grade 0, pathology not visible; grade 3, visible with clear border with normal tissue). iUS applications included lesion localization, approach planning to deep-seated lesions, and lesion removal.

Results

All pathologies were visible on iUS except one aneurysm. On average, extra-axial tumors were identified more easily and had clearer limits compared to intra-axial tumors (extra-axial 17% grade 2, 83% grade 3; intra-axial 5.5% grade 1, 46.5% grade 2, 48% grade 3). iUS provided precise and safe transcortical trajectories to deep-seated lesions (71 patients; tumors, hemangiomas, ICHs); iUS was judged to be less useful to approach skull base tumors and aneurysms. iUS was used to judge extent of resection in 152 cases; surgical artifacts reduced sonographic visibility in 25 cases: extent of resection was correctly checked in 127 patients (53 gliomas, 15 metastases, 39 meningiomas, 4 schwannomas, 4 sellar region tumors, 6 hemangiomas, 3 AVMs, 2 abscesses).

Conclusions

iUS was highly sensitive in detecting all types of pathology, was safe and precise in planning trajectories to intraparenchymal lesions (including minimally mini-invasive approaches), and was accurate in checking extent of resection in more than 80% of cases. iUS is a versatile and feasible tool; it could improve safety and its use may be considered in routine intracranial surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HGG:

High-grade glioma

LGG:

Low-grade glioma

ICH:

Intracerebral hematoma

AVM:

Artero-venous malformation

US:

Ultrasound

iUS:

Intraoperative US

CECT:

Contrast-enhanced CT scan

References

  1. Chacko AG, Kumar NK, Chacko G, Athyal R, Rajshekhar V (2003) Intraoperative ultrasound in determining the extent of resection of parenchymal brain tumours—a comparative study with computed tomography and histopathology. Acta Neurochir 145(9):743–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coburger J, König RW (2016). Intraoperative findings in brain tumor surgery. In: Prada F, Solbiati L, Martegani A, Di Meco F, editors. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in neurosurgery. From standard-B-mode to elastosonography. Switzerland Springer, pp 41–59

  3. Gerganov VM, Samii A, Akbarian A, Stieglitz L, Samii M, Fahlbusch R (2009) Reliability of intraoperative high-resolution 2D ultrasound as an alternative to high-field strength MR imaging for tumor resection control: a prospective comparative study. J Neurosurg 2009 111(3):512–519

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gerganov VM, Samii A, Giordano M, Samii M, Fahlbusch R (2011) Two-dimensional high-end ultrasound imaging compared to intraoperative MRI during resection of low-grade gliomas. J Clin Neurosci 18(5):669–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goren O, Monteith SJ, Hadani M, Bakon M, Harnof S (2013) Modern intraoperative imaging modalities for the vascular neurosurgeon treating intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurosurg Focus 34(5):E2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gronningsaeter A, Kleven A, Ommedal S, Aarseth TE, Lie T, Lindseth F, Langø T, Unsgård G (2000) SonoWand, an ultrasound-based neuronavigation system. Neurosurgery 47(6):1373–1379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jakola AS, Reinertsen I, Selbekk T, Solheim O, Lindseth F, Gulati S, Unsgård G (2014) Three-dimensional ultrasound-guided placement of ventricular catheters. World Neurosurg 82(3–4):536.e5–536.e9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mair R, Heald J, Poeata I, Ivanov M (2013) A practical grading system of ultrasonographic visibility for intracerebral lesions. Acta Neurochir 155(12):2293–2298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller D, Benes L, Sure U (2011) Stand-alone 3D-ultrasound navigation after failure of conventional image guidance for deep-seated lesions. Neurosurg Rev 34(3):381–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller D, Heinze S, Tirakotai W, Bozinov O, Sürücü O, Benes L, Bertalanffy H, Sure U (2007) Is the image guidance of ultrasonography beneficial for neurosurgical routine? Surg Neurol 67(6):579–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moiyadi AV, Shetty PM, Mahajan A, Udare A, Sridhar E (2013) Usefulness of three-dimensional navigable intraoperative ultrasound in resection of brain tumors with a special emphasis on malignant gliomas. Acta Neurochir 155(12):2217–2225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rygh OM, Selbekk T, Torp SH, Lydersen S, Hernes TA, Unsgaard G (2008) Comparison of navigated 3D ultrasound findings with histopathology in subsequent phases of glioblastoma resection. Acta Neurochir 150(10):1033–1041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sæther CA, Torsteinsen M, Torp SH, Sundstrøm S, Unsgård G, Solheim O (2012) Did survival improve after the implementation of intraoperative neuronavigation and3D ultrasound in glioblastoma surgery? A retrospective analysis of 192 primary operations. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 73(2):73–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shinoura N, Takahashi M, Yamada R (2006) Delineation of brain tumor margins using intraoperative sononavigation: implications for tumor resection. J Clin Ultrasound 34(4):177–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Solheim O, Selbekk T, Lindseth F, Unsgård G (2009) Navigated resection of giant intracranial meningiomas based on intraoperative 3D ultrasound. Acta Neurochir 151(9):1143–1151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Solheim O, Selbekk T, Jakola AS, Unsgård G (2010) Ultrasound-guided operations in unselected high-grade gliomas—overall results, impact of image quality and patient selection. Acta Neurochir 152(11):1873–1886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sosna J, Barth MM, Kruskal JB, Kane RA (2005) Intraoperative sonography for neurosurgery. J Ultrasound Med 24(12):1671–1682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tronnier VM, Bonsanto MM, Staubert A, Knauth M, Kunze S, Wirtz CR (2001) Comparison of intraoperative MR imaging and 3D-navigated ultrasonography in the detection and resection control of lesions. Neurosurg Focus 10(2):E3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Unsgaard G, Gronningsaeter A, Ommedal S, Nagelhus Hernes TA (2002) Brain operations guided by real-time two-dimensional ultrasound: new possibilities as a result of improved image quality. Neurosurgery 51(2):402–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Unsgaard G, Ommedal S, Muller T, Gronningsaeter A, Nagelhus Hernes TA (2002) Neuronavigation by intraoperative three-dimensional ultrasound: initial experience during brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 50(4):804–812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Unsgaard G, Rygh OM, Selbekk T, Müller TB, Kolstad F, Lindseth F, Hernes TA (2006) Intra-operative 3D ultrasound in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir 148(3):235–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Unsgaard G, Selbekk T, Brostrup Müller T, Ommedal S, Torp SH, Myhr G, Bang J, Nagelhus Hernes TA (2005) Ability of navigated 3D ultrasound to delineate gliomas and metastases—comparison of image interpretations with histopathology. Acta Neurochir 147(12):1259–1269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang J, Liu X, Hou WH, Dong G, Wei Z, Zhou H, Duan YY (2008) The relationship between intra-operative ultrasonography and pathological grade in cerebral glioma. J Int Med Res 36(6):1426–1434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Woydt M, Krone A, Becker G, Schmidt K, Roggendorf W, Roosen K (1996) Correlation of intra-operative ultrasound with histopathologic findings after tumour resection in supratentorial gliomas. A method to improve gross total tumour resection. Acta Neurochir 138(12):1391–1398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Woydt M, Krone A, Soerensen N, Roosen K (2001) Ultrasound-guided neuronavigation of deep-seated cavernous haemangiomas: clinical results and navigation techniques. Br J Neurosurg 15(6):485–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Justin Mascitelli (Neurosurgeon at Barrow Neurological Institute) for the English revision and for his precious intellectual support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Domenico Policicchio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Policicchio, D., Doda, A., Sgaramella, E. et al. Ultrasound-guided brain surgery: echographic visibility of different pathologies and surgical applications in neurosurgical routine. Acta Neurochir 160, 1175–1185 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3532-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3532-x

Keywords

Navigation