Abstract
Background
The incidence rate of surgical treatment of cervical degenerative diseases (CDD) has increased in the USA and a large geographic variation has been shown. Little is known about such rates in Scandinavia and Europe. The aim of this population-based study was to (1) investigate annual incidence rates of operations performed in Norway, (2) to compare trends and variations in rates for surgical indications with and without myelopathy, and (3) to compare variations in the use of surgery between residential areas.
Methods
Patients operated for CDD and recorded in the Norwegian Patient Registry from 2008 to 2014 were evaluated according to residential areas (resident county and Regional Health Authority (RHA) area), age, gender, treating hospital, and whether myelopathy was present or not. Surgical rates were adjusted for age and gender. Data from private health care were also included.
Results
The annual surgical rates increased by 74.1 % from 2008 to 2014 (12.5/100,000 inhabitants). The largest increase was for surgical treatment of radiculopathy, 86.5 %. Surgical rates for CDD varied in 2014 with a ratio of 1.5 between the highest and lowest RHA and with a ratio of 2.5 between the different residential counties within one RHA. The treatment rates for myelopathy were relatively stable over time, but showed an increase of 2.1/100,000 (44.6 %) from 2013 to 2014.
Conclusions
Our study shows that the rate of surgical treatment for radiculopathy due to CDD has increased substantially from 2008 to 2014 for all RHAs in Norway. The incidence rate for surgical treatment of myelopathy was more stable. An unexplained and moderate geographic variation was found.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS, Wiesel S (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1178–1184
Lehto IJ, Tertti MO, Komu ME, Paajanen HE, Tuominen J, Kormano MJ (1994) Age-related MRI changes at 0.1 T in cervical discs in asymptomatic subjects. Neuroradiology 36:49–53
Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O'Fallon WM, Kurland LT (1994) Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain 117(Pt 2):325–335
Boogaarts HD, Bartels RHMA (2013) Prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 24:139–141
Fouyas IP, Statham PF, Sandercock PA (2002) Cochrane Review on the role of surgery in cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy. Spine 27:736–747
Nikolaidis I, Fouyas IP, Sandercock PA, Statham PF (2010) Surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:Cd001466
Robinson J, Kothari M (2014) Clinical features and diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. Accessed 27.02 2014
Rao RD, Gourab K, David KS (2006) Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1619–1640
Oglesby M, Fineberg SJ, Patel AA, Pelton MA, Singh K (2013) Epidemiological trends in cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases between 2002 and 2009. Spine 38:1226–1232
Wang MC, Kreuter W, Wolfla CE, Maiman DJ, Deyo RA (2009) Trends and variations in cervical spine surgery in the United States: Medicare beneficiaries, 1992 to 2005. Spine 34:955–961, discussion 962–953
Angevine PD, Arons RR, McCormick PC (2003) National and regional rates and variation of cervical discectomy with and without anterior fusion, 1990–1999. Spine 28:931–939, discussion 940
Sciences DMSCftEC, Research MMCCfO, Evaluation (2000) Dartm. Atlas Musculoskelet Health Care. AHS Press
Cowan JA Jr, Dimick JB, Wainess R, Upchurch GR Jr, Chandler WF, La Marca F (2006) Changes in the utilization of spinal fusion in the United States. Neurosurgery 59:15–20, discussion 15–20
Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL (2003) The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med 138:273–287
Gornick M (1982) Trends and regional variations in hospital use under Medicare. Health Care Financ Rev 3:41–73
Knickman JR, Foltz AM (1984) Regional differences in hospital utilization. How much can be traced to population differences? Med Care 22:971–986
Welch WP, Miller ME, Welch HG, Fisher ES, Wennberg JE (1993) Geographic variation in expenditures for physicians' services in the United States. N Engl J Med 328:621–627
Wennberg J, Gittelsohn (1973) Small area variations in health care delivery. Science 182:1102–1108
Walsh K, Cruddas M, Coggon D (1992) Low back pain in eight areas of Britain. J Epidemiol Community Health 46:227–230
Health NIoP (2014) Admitted to hospital, somatic disorders (C) − both genders, all ages, per 1000, standardised . http://www.norgeshelsa.no/norgeshelsa/. Accessed 03.10.14 2014
Marawar S, Girardi FP, Sama AA, Ma Y, Gaber-Baylis LK, Besculides MC, Memtsoudis SG (2010) National trends in anterior cervical fusion procedures. Spine 35:1454–1459
Patil PG, Turner DA, Pietrobon R (2005) National trends in surgical procedures for degenerative cervical spine disease: 1990–2000. Neurosurgery 57:753–758, discussion 753–758
Davis H (1994) Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery in the United States, 1979–1990. Spine 19:1117–1123, discussion 1123–1114
Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Zhao W, Morgan TS, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Weinstein JN (2014) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: eight-year results for the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine 39:3–16
Weber C, Gulati S, Jakola AS, Habiba S, Nygaard OP, Johannesen TB, Solheim O (2014) Incidence rates and surgery of primary intraspinal tumors in the era of modern neuroimaging: a national population-based study. Spine 39:E967–E973
Deyo RA, Mirza SK (2006) Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:139–146
Lied B, Ronning PA, Halvorsen CM, Ekseth K, Helseth E (2013) Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical disk disease: a prospective consecutive series of 96 patients. Acta Neurol Scand 127:31–37
Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Loeser JD, Bush T, Waddell G (1994) An international comparison of back surgery rates. Spine 19:1201–1206
Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, Delamarter RB (2012) Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine 37:67–76
Grasdal AL, Monstad K (2011) Inequity in the use of physician services in Norway before and after introducing patient lists in primary care. Int J Equity Health 10:25
Iversen T, Kopperud GS (2005) Regulation versus practice—the impact of accessibility on the use of specialist health care in Norway. Health Econ 14:1231–1238
Kiil A (2012) Does employment-based private health insurance increase the use of covered health care services? A matching estimator approach. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 12:1–38
Keller RB, Atlas SJ, Soule DN, Singer DE, Deyo RA (1999) Relationship between rates and outcomes of operative treatment for lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:752–762
Grotle M, Solberg T, Storheim K, Laerum E, Zwart JA (2014) Public and private health service in Norway: a comparison of patient characteristics and surgery criteria for patients with nerve root affections due to discus herniation. Eur Spine J 23:1984–1991
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Funding
No funding was received for this research.
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers' bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kristiansen, JA., Balteskard, L., Slettebø, H. et al. The use of surgery for cervical degenerative disease in Norway in the period 2008–2014. Acta Neurochir 158, 969–974 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2760-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2760-1