Abstract
Tunnels embedded in soft rock masses experience time-dependent behaviour, and designing an appropriate supporting system is a challenging task. This condition can be more problematic when a damaged zone is also developed (due to poor quality blasting). In this paper, a theoretical solution is presented to predict long-term tunnel convergence and long-term induced lining pressure, considering the existence of an altered zone due to excavation. The rheological behaviour of rock mass and the altered zone is simulated by viscoelastic behaviour obeying the Burgers model. It is also assumed that a continuous lining, i.e., a shotcrete layer, is placed (with elastic behaviour) to confine the convergence. A comprehensive parametric study is performed by the presented solution to evaluate the effects of various parameters on the induced lining pressures and the tunnel convergence. Then, to have more practical conditions, the elastic–viscoplastic rheological model (known as CVISC) is assigned to the rock mass to consider its failure. The problem is further studied by only numerical approach using FDM. The results show that the support installation time and the radius of the altered zone have remarkable effects on the output results.
Highlights
-
A new analytical method is proposed to obtain the tunnel displacement over time.
-
The interaction of the tunnel and rheological rock mass is taken into account.
-
The Burgers rheological model is assigned to altered and unaltered zones.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- \({G}_{K}\) :
-
Kelvin shear modulus
- \({G}_{M}\) :
-
Maxwell shear modulus
- \({G}_{c}\) :
-
Shear modulus of lining
- \({P}_{0}\) :
-
In situ hydrostatic stress
- \({R}_{0}\) :
-
Tunnel radius
- \({R}_{L}\) :
-
Influence length of the tunnel face
- \({R}_{\mathrm{alt}}\) :
-
Altered zone radius
- \({R}_{\mathrm{in}}\) :
-
Inner tunnel radius
- \({e}_{ij}\) :
-
Deviatoric tensors of strain
- \({k}_{s}\) :
-
Support stiffness
- \({p}_{\mathrm{in}}\) :
-
Radial stress at \({r}_{\mathrm{in}}\)
- \({p}_{\mathrm{out}}\) :
-
Radial stress at \({r}_{\mathrm{out}}\)
- \({q}_{1}\) :
-
Pressure resulted from the interaction of the lining and the medium
- \({r}_{\mathrm{in}}\) :
-
Inner radius
- \({r}_{\mathrm{out}}\) :
-
Outer radius
- \({s}_{ij}\) :
-
Deviatoric tensors of stress
- \({u}_{r}\) :
-
Radial displacement
- \({v}_{c}\) :
-
Poisson’s ratio of lining
- \({\eta }_{K}\) :
-
Kelvin viscosity
- \({\eta }_{M}\) :
-
Maxwell viscosity
- \({\sigma }_{c\left(\mathrm{conc}\right)}\) :
-
Compressive strength of shotcrete
- \({\sigma }_{r\left({R}_{0}\right)}\) :
-
Radial stress in the tunnel periphery
- \({\sigma }_{r}\) :
-
Radial stress
- \({\sigma }_{\theta }\) :
-
Tangential stress
- \(\Delta {t}_{\mathrm{max}}^{\mathrm{cr}}\) :
-
Maximum creep time step
- \(V\) :
-
Excavation rate
- \(X\) :
-
Tunnel face distance from the studied section
- \(r\) :
-
Radial distance
- \(t\) :
-
Time
- \(\alpha \) :
-
Initial stress release parameter
- \(\delta \) :
-
Delta function
- \(\lambda \) :
-
Stress release coefficient
References
Alonso E, Alejano LR, Varas F, Fdez-Manin G, Carranza-Torres C (2003) Ground response curves for rock masses exhibiting strain-softening behaviour. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 27(13):1153–1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.315
Arora K, Gutierrez M, Hedayat A, Cruz EC (2021) Time-dependent behavior of the tunnels in squeezing ground: an experimental study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54(4):1755–1777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02370-w
Barla G, Debernardi D, Sterpi D (2012) Time-dependent modeling of tunnels in squeezing conditions. Int J Geomech 12(6):697–710. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000163
Bobet A, Einstein H (2011) Tunnel reinforcement with rockbolts. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26(1):100–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2010.06.006
Brown ET, Bray JW, Ladanyi B, Hoek E (1983) Ground response curves for rock tunnels. J Geotech Eng 109(1):15–39. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:1(15)
Chu Z, Wu Z, Liu B, Liu Q (2019) Coupled analytical solutions for deep-buried circular lined tunnels considering tunnel face advancement and soft rock rheology effects. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 94:103111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103111
Chu Z, Wu Z, Liu Q, Liu B (2020) Analytical solutions for deep-buried lined tunnels considering longitudinal discontinuous excavation in rheological rock mass. J Eng Mech 146(6):04020047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001784
Chu Z, Wu Z, Liu Q, Liu B, Sun J (2021) Analytical solution for lined circular tunnels in deep viscoelastic burgers rock considering the longitudinal discontinuous excavation and sequential installation of liners. J Eng Mech 147(4):04021009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001912
Do D-P, Tran N-T, Mai V-T, Hoxha D, Vu M-N (2020) Time-dependent reliability analysis of deep tunnel in the viscoelastic burger rock with sequential installation of liners. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53(3):1259–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01975-6
Fahimifar A, Ranjbarnia M (2009) Analytical approach for the design of active grouted rockbolts in tunnel stability based on convergence-confinement method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24(4):363–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2008.10.005
Fahimifar A, Tehrani FM, Hedayat A, Vakilzadeh A (2010) Analytical solution for the excavation of circular tunnels in a visco-elastic Burger’s material under hydrostatic stress field. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 25(4):297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2010.01.002
Fan Y, Zheng JW, Cui XZ, Leng ZD, Wang F, Lv CC (2021) Damage zones induced by in situ stress unloading during excavation of diversion tunnels for the Jinping II hydropower project. Bull Eng Geol Env 80(6):4689–4715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02172-y
Fang Q, Zhang D, Zhou P, Wong LNY (2013) Ground reaction curves for deep circular tunnels considering the effect of ground reinforcement. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.01.003
Giordanella M, Ranjbarnia M, Oreste P, Zaheri M (2021) Study of the systematic fully grouted rock bolts performance in tunnels considering installation condition of bolt head. Geomech Geoeng. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2021.1928761
Hedayat A, Weems J (2019) The elasto-plastic response of deep tunnels with damaged zone and gravity effects. Rock Mech Rock Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01834-4
Hedayat A (2016) Stability of circular tunnels excavated in rock masses under gravity loading. Paper presented at the 50th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Houston, Texas
Hoek E, Brown ET (2019) The Hoek-Brown failure criterion and GSI – 2018 edition. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 11(3):445–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.001
Hoek E, Guevara R (2009) Overcoming squeezing in the Yacambú-Quibor Tunnel, Venezuela. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42(2):389–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0175-5
Hoek E, Marinos P (2000) Predicting tunnel squeezing problems in weak heterogeneous rock masses. Tunnels Tunnell Int 32(11):45–51
Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. Proc NARMS-Tac 1:267–273
Itasca (2012) Fast lagrangian analysis of continua. Itasca Consulting Group Inc, Minneapolis
Kanji M, He M, Sousa LR (2019) Soft rock mechanics and engineering. Springer Nature, Berlin
Kargar AR (2019) An analytical solution for circular tunnels excavated in rock masses exhibiting viscous elastic-plastic behavior. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 124:104128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.104128
Kargar AR, Haghgouei H (2020) An analytical solution for time-dependent stress field of lined circular tunnels using complex potential functions in a stepwise procedure. Appl Math Model 77:1625–1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.09.025
Mo P-Q, Fang Y, Yu H-S (2020) Benchmark solutions of large-strain cavity contraction for deep tunnel convergence in geomaterials. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 12(3):596–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.07.015
Nomikos P, Rahmannejad R, Sofianos A (2011) Supported axisymmetric tunnels within linear viscoelastic burgers rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44(5):553–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0159-0
Oreste P, Hedayat A, Spagnoli G (2019) Effect of gravity of the plastic zones on the behavior of supports in very deep tunnels excavated in rock masses. Int J Geomech 19(9):04019107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001490
Park K-H, Tontavanich B, Lee J-G (2008) A simple procedure for ground response curve of circular tunnel in elastic-strain softening rock masses. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23(2):151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.03.002
Polyanin AD, Manzhirov AV (2008) Handbook of integral equations, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York
Ranjbarnia M, Fahimifar A, Oreste P (2015) Analysis of non-linear strain-softening behaviour around tunnels. Proc Inst Civ Eng 168(1):16–30. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.13.00144
Ranjbarnia M, Fahimifar A, Oreste P (2016) Practical method for the design of pretensioned fully grouted rockbolts in Tunnels. Int J Geomech 16(1):04015012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000464
Ranjbarnia M, Zaheri M, Dias D (2020a) Three-dimensional finite difference analysis of shallow sprayed concrete tunnels crossing a reverse fault or a normal fault: a parametric study. Front Struct Civ Eng 14(4):998–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0621-8
Ranjbarnia M, Rahimpour N, Oreste P (2020b) A new analytical-numerical solution to analyze a circular tunnel using 3D Hoek-Brown failure criterion. Geomech Eng 22(1):11–23. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.22.1.011
Rocscience I (2007) RocLab Version 1.031—Rock mass strength analysis using the Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Online
Sakurai S (1978) Approximate time-dependent analysis of tunnel support structure considering progress of tunnel face. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 2(2):159–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610020205
Song F, Rodriguez-Dono A, Olivella S, Zhong Z (2020) Analysis and modelling of longitudinal deformation profiles of tunnels excavated in strain-softening time-dependent rock masses. Comput Geotech 125:103643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103643
Sun Q, Li S, Guo H, Zheng M, Yang Z (2021) In situ test of excavation damaged zone of columnar jointed rock masses under different borehole conditions. Bull Eng Geol Env 80(4):2991–3007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-02100-6
Timoshenko SP, Goodier J (1982) Theory of elasticity. Mcgraw Hill Education, New York
Wang X-F, Jiang B-S, Zhang Q, Lu M-M, Chen M (2019) Analytical solution of circular tunnel in elastic-viscoplastic rock mass. Latin Am J Solids Struct. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78255701
Wang X-F, Jiang B-S, Lin F, Liu Y-Q, Bai Y (2021) Elastic-viscoplastic solution of a circular tunnel in Hoek-Brown rock mass. Latin Am J Solids Struct. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78256328
Xu N, Dai F, Li B, Zhu Y, Zhao T, Yang D (2017) Comprehensive evaluation of excavation-damaged zones in the deep underground caverns of the Houziyan hydropower station, Southwest China. Bull Eng Geol Env 76(1):275–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0858-6
Zaheri M, Ranjbarnia M (2020) A New procedure for calculation of ground response curve of a circular tunnel considering the influence of young’s modulus variation and the plastic weight loading. Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01546-5
Zaheri M, Ranjbarnia M (2021) Ground reaction curve of a circular tunnel considering the effects of the altered zone and the self-weight of the plastic zones. Eur J Environ Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2021.1877829
Zaheri M, Ranjbarnia M, Oreste P (2019) Performance of systematic fully grouted rockbolts and shotcreted layer in circular tunnel under the hydrostatic conditions using 3D finite difference approach. Geomech Geoeng. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2019.1648885
Zaheri M, Ranjbarnia M, Dias D (2020a) 3D numerical investigation of segmental tunnels performance crossing a dip-slip fault. Geomech Eng 23(4):351–364. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.23.4.351
Zaheri M, Ranjbarnia M, Dias D, Oreste P (2020b) Performance of segmental and shotcrete linings in shallow tunnels crossing a transverse strike-slip faulting. Transport Geotech 23:100333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100333
Zareifard MR (2019) Ground response curve of deep circular tunnel in rock mass exhibiting Hoek-Brown strain-softening behaviour considering the dead weight loading. Eur J Environ Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2019.1632745
Zareifard MR (2020a) A new semi-numerical method for elastoplastic analysis of a circular tunnel excavated in a Hoek-Brown strain-softening rock mass considering the blast-induced damaged zone. Comput Geotech 122:103476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103476
Zareifard MR (2020b) A simple closed-form solution for analysis of tunnels in mohr-coulomb grounds considering gravity loading. Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01255-z
Zareifard MR, Fahimifar A (2012) A new solution for shallow and deep tunnels by considering the gravitational loads. Acta Geotechnica Slovenica 2:37–49
Zareifard MR, Fahimifar A (2014) Effect of seepage forces on circular openings excavated in Hoek-Brown rock mass based on a generalised effective stress principle. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 18(5):584–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2014.891470
Zareifard MR, Fahimifar A (2015) Elastic–brittle–plastic analysis of circular deep underwater cavities in a Mohr-Coulomb rock mass considering seepage forces. Int J Geomech 15(5):04014077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000400
Zareifard MR, Fahimifar A (2016) Analytical solutions for the stresses and deformations of deep tunnels in an elastic-brittle-plastic rock mass considering the damaged zone. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 58:186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.05.007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MZ: conceptualization, writing, validation, and formal analysis. MR: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing. MG: supervision, writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendices
Appendix A: Detailed Solution of an Unsupported Tunnel Surrounded by the Altered Zone
In the initial rock mass, the radial displacement at radius \({R}_{\mathrm{alt}}\) can be calculated according to Eq. 5 as follows:
Note that \({\sigma }_{r\left({R}_{\mathrm{alt}}\right)}^{\left(1\right)}\) is the radial stress at radius \({R}_{\mathrm{alt}}\) before installation of the lining layer.
On the other hand, in the case of the altered zone, the above displacement is equal to
For the reason of continuity, these displacements must be equal. Thus:
Incorporating Eq. 6, the values of \(\underset{0}{\overset{t}{\int }}{P}_{0}{H}_{\left(\mathrm{ini}\right)}\left(t-\tau \right)d\tau \) and \(\underset{0}{\overset{t}{\int }}{\sigma }_{r\left({R}_{0}\right)}\left(\tau \right){H}_{\left(\mathrm{alt}\right)}\left(t-\tau \right)d\tau \) can be calculated as follows:
In these conditions, Eq. A3 can be written as follows:
where
Equation A6 is similar to Eq. A8:
in which
Also, the right hand side of Eq. A6 is equal to \(f\left(t\right)\), and \(y={\sigma }_{r\left({R}_{\mathrm{alt}}\right)}^{\left(1\right)}\).
The solution of Eq. A8 is (Polyanin and Manzhirov 2008):
The values of \({z}_{1}\), \({z}_{2}\), and \({z}_{3}\) are the roots of Eq. A11. It should be noted that Eq. A10 is valid only when these roots are real numbers and different.
The values of \({B}_{1}\), \({B}_{2}\), and \({B}_{3}\) are obtained by solving the system of Eq. A12:
The value of radial stress in the boundary of the altered and initial rock masses is
where
It should be noted that \({P}_{2\left(i\right)}\), \({P}_{3\left(i\right)}\), and \({P}_{4\left(i\right)}\) depend on the value of \({z}_{i}\) (\(i=1, \mathrm{2,3}\)).
According to Eq. 5, the radial displacement at the tunnel boundary (\({u}_{r}\left({R}_{0},t\right)\)) is:
The solution of the first term of Eq. A15 is
where
Also, the value of \(\underset{0}{\overset{t}{\int }}{\sigma }_{r\left({R}_{0}\right)}\left(\tau \right){H}_{\left(\mathrm{alt}\right)}\left(t-\tau \right)d\tau \) was calculated in Eq. A5.
Appendix B: Solving the Integral Equations Using Numerical Method
Finding a closed-form solution for a system of integral equations may be too difficult. Instead, it is possible to replace integrals by finite sums, and then approximate the solution.
Equation 20 can be written as Eq. B1 which is the linear Volterra integral equation of the second kind (Polyanin and Manzhirov 2008).
If \({t}_{i}\) (\(i=1,\dots ,n\)) are the abscissas of the points of the integration interval \([{t}_{0},{t}^{*}]\), and \({A}_{ii}\) (\(i=1,\dots ,n\)) are numerical coefficient, for the trapezoidal rule, it can be written:
For \(t={t}_{i}\), Eq. B1 can be written as:
or
In which \(y\left({t}_{i}\right)={y}_{i}\), \({K}^{\left(1\right)}\left({t}_{i},{t}_{j}\right)={K}_{ ij}^{\left(1\right)}\), and \(f\left({t}_{i}\right)={f}_{i}\).
Equation B4 can be simplified to
However, as two unknown parameters exist in Eq. 20 (\({\sigma }_{r\left({R}_{\mathrm{alt}}\right)}^{\left(2\right)}\left(t\right)\) and \({q}_{1}\left(t\right)\)), Eq. B5 can be modified slightly according to the above procedure. Thus, it can be written:
in which
Similarly, Eq. 25 can be written as
where
For \(i=2,\dots ,n\), combining Eqs. B6 and B8 lead:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaheri, M., Ranjbarnia, M. & Goudarzy, M. Analytical and Numerical Simulations to Predict the Long-Term Behavior of Lined Tunnels Considering Excavation-Induced Damaged Zone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 55, 5879–5904 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02962-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02962-0