Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stress–Energy Mechanism for Rock Failure Evolution Based on Damage Mechanics in Hard Rock

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the quantification of the extent of damage by considering the energy during rock failure, the pattern of energy dissipation and energy conversion, and the stress–energy mechanism for induced rock failure were analysed under cyclic loading/unloading. Based on damage mechanics, rock mechanics, and energy conservation theory, the test data were analysed. The results showed that the characteristics of hard rock compression are small deformation, high energy, and sudden failure; an elastic–plastic damage constitutive model and a stress–energy–rigidity–damage multi-criteria model for rock failure were established for hard rock. We compared the numerical curves and the experimental curves and found that they coincide. Rock failure is a combination of the results of elastic strain accumulation and dissipation by stress propagation. The key to inducing the energy storage capacity of rock before failure is closely related to the rock damage evolution. The pattern of energy release and dissipation through stress during rock failure was revealed from the perspective of energy using the constitutive model and multi-criteria model established for rock failure; these theoretical studies are very helpful in elucidating the mechanism of rock failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(W\) :

The positive work done on the rock samples by the loading system

\(E_{\text{b}}\) :

The absorbed energy

\(E_{\text{e}}\) :

The stored elastic strain energy

\(E_{\text{p}}\) :

The positive work of the plastic deformation

\(E_{\text{d}}\) :

Dissipation energy

\({\text{d}}D\) :

The differential of the damage variable

\({\text{d}}\varepsilon\) :

The differential of the strain

\(\phi (\varepsilon )\) :

The probability distribution function of the strain

\(\sigma\) :

Stress

\(D\) :

Damage variable

\(E\) :

Elastic modulus

\(\varepsilon\) :

Strain

\(\varepsilon_{\text{max} }\) :

Rock strain at the uniaxial compression strength point

\(m,\alpha\) :

Basic parameters of the rock

\(E_{0}\) :

Initial elastic modulus

\(\dot{\sigma }_{1}\) :

Rate of the maximum principal stress

\(\sigma_{2}\) :

Intermediate principal stress

\(k_{1}\) :

Elastic coefficient

\(\eta_{2}\) :

Viscous coefficient

\(\dot{\varepsilon }\) :

Strain rate of model I

\(\mathop {\dot{\varepsilon }}\nolimits_{{_{1} }}\) :

The strain rate in the elastic body of model I

\(\dot{\varepsilon }_{2}\) :

The strain rate in the cohesive body of model I

\(E_{1}\) :

Elastic modulus of part I in Fig. 11

\(t\) :

Time interval

\(E_{j}^{{(\text{s})}}\) :

Static energy

\(E_{j}^{{({\text{d}})}}\) :

Dynamic energy

\(p_{\text{s}}\) :

The vertical component of the static loading

\(P_{\text{d}}\) :

The vertical component of the dynamic loading

\(f(z)\) :

The load of the rock mass

\(k^{\prime }\) :

The rigidity of the roof

\(f^{\prime } (z)\) :

The rigidity of the rock mass

\(\sigma_{{b{\kern 1pt} \text{min} }}\) :

The minimum stress of the rock failure

\(u\) :

The displacement of the rock

\(D_{\text{c}}\) :

The critical value of damage to the rock unit

\(G_{\text{c}}\) :

The critical value of the damage energy dissipation rate of the rock unit

\(G\) :

The energy release rate

\(\sigma_{\text{c}}\) :

The uniaxial compressive strength

References

  • Bańka P, Chmiela A, Fernández MM (2017) Predicting changes in induced seismicity on the basis of estimated rock mass energy states. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 95:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake W, Leighton F, Duvall WI (1974) Microseismic techniques for monitoring the behavior of rock structures. Technical Report Archive & Image Library

  • Brady BHG, Brown ET (2013) Rock mechanics: for underground mining. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady BT, Leighton FW (1977) Seismicity anomaly prior to a moderate rock burst: a case study. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 14(3):127–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Dusseault MB (1993) Deformation and diffusion behaviour in a solid experiencing damage: a continuous damage model and its numerical implementation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 30(7):1323–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook NGW (1965) A note on rockbursts considered as a problem of stability. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 65(8):437–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Dou LM, Lu CP, Mu ZL (2009) Prevention and forecasting of rock burst hazards in coal mines. Int J Min Sci Technol 19(5):585–591

    Google Scholar 

  • He J, Dou LM, Cao AY (2012) Rock burst induced by roof breakage and its prevention. J Cent South Univ 19(4):1086–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang D, Li Y (2014) Conversion of strain energy in triaxial unloading tests on marble. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 66:160–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Q, Feng XT, Xiang TB (2010) Rockburst characteristics and numerical simulation based on a new energy index: a case study of a tunnel at 2500 m depth. Bull Eng Geol Environ 69(3):381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Q, Feng XT, Fan Y (2017) In situ experimental investigation of basalt spalling in a large underground powerhouse cavern. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 68:82–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabiesz J, Makówka J (2009) Selected elements of rock burst state assessment in case studies from the Silesian hard coal mines. Int J Min Sci Technol 19(5):660–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachanov LM (1958) Time of the rupture process under creep conditions. Izvestiia Aka-demii Nauk SSSR Otdelenie Teckhnicheskikh Nauk 8:26–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzhner F, Rosenhouse G (2000) Numerical analysis of tunnel dynamic response to earth motions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 15(3):249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kracinovic D (1985) Continuous damage mechanics revisited: basic concepts and definitions. J Appl Mech 52(4):35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajcinovic D, Mastilovic S (1995) Some fundamental issues of damage mechanics. Mech Mater 21(3):217–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwasniewski M, Szutkowski I, Wang JA (1994) Study of ability of coal from seam 510 for storing elastic energy in the aspect of assessment of hazard in Porabka–Klimontow Colliery. Sci. Rept. Silesian Technical University

  • Leckie FA, Hayhurst DR (1972) Creep rupture of structures. J Mech Phys Solids 20(4):223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL (1975) A non-linear model of creep-fatigue damage cumulation and interaction. Mechanics of Visco-Elastic Media and Bodies, pp 291–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Linkov AM (1996) Rockbursts and the instability of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33(7):727–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marigo JJ (1985) Modelling of brittle and fatigue damage for elastic material by growth of microvoids. Eng Fract Mech 21(4):861–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortlepp WD, Stacey TR (1994) Rockburst mechanisms in tunnels and shafts. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 9(1):59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng RD, Ju Y, Wang JG (2015) Energy dissipation and release during coal failure under conventional triaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:509–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabotnov YN (1969) Creep rupture. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sato K, Isobe T, Mori N et al (1986) Microseismic activity associated with hydraulic mining. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 23(1):85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacy TR (2013) Dynamic rock failure and its containment—a Gordian Knot design problem. In: Rock dynamics and applications. State of the art

  • Stiros SC, Kontogianni VA (2009) Coulomb stress changes: from earthquakes to underground excavation failures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(1):182–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CA, Kaiser PK (1998) Numerical simulation of cumulative damage and seismic energy release during brittle rock failure—part I: fundamentals. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35(2):113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CA, Xu XH (1987) Statistical damage analysis of the rock complete stress–strain process. J Northeast Univ 2:191–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Taymaz I (2006) An experimental study of energy balance in low heat rejection diesel engine. Energy 31(2):364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CL (2017) Evolution, monitoring and predicting models of rockburst. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JA, Park HD (2001) Comprehensive prediction of rockburst based on analysis of strain energy in rocks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16(1):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CL, Wu AX, Lu H (2015) Predicting rockburst tendency based on fuzzy matter–element model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 75:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker BN, Singh RN, Sun G (1992) Rock fracture mechanics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie HQ, He CH (2004) Study of the unloading characteristics of a rock mass using the triaxial test and damage mechanics. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie HP, Peng RD, Ju Y (2004) Energy dissipation of rock deformation and fracture. China J Rock Mech Eng 23(21):3565–3570

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie HP, Ju Y, Li LY (2005) Criteria for strength and structural failure of rocks based on energy dissipation and energy release principles. China J Rock Mech Eng 24(17):3003–3010

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH, Zan YW, Zhao J (2002) A unified strength criterion for rock material. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(8):975–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZX, Kou SQ, Jiang LG (2000) Effects of loading rate on rock fracture: fracture characteristics and energy partitioning. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37(5):745–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W, Yang W, Li X (2014) Study on splitting failure in rock masses by simulation test, site monitoring and energy model. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 41:152–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51574246), the National Key Research and Development Project (No. 2017YFC0804201), the Yue Qi Distinguished Scholar Project, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing (No. 800015Z1138), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2011QZ01). We thank Dr. Zefeng Liao and Dr. Changfeng Li for improving the revised manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunlai Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., He, B., Hou, X. et al. Stress–Energy Mechanism for Rock Failure Evolution Based on Damage Mechanics in Hard Rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53, 1021–1037 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01953-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01953-y

Keywords

Navigation