Skip to main content
Log in

Abdominal aortic calcification volume (AACV) is a predictive factor for postoperative complications associated with biliary tract cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Curative surgical treatment of biliary tract cancer is highly invasive and involves postoperative complications. Abdominal aortic calcification is a parameter that is reportedly linked to systemic arteriosclerosis. We measured the abdominal aortic calcification volume (AACV), assessed the correlation between AACV and postoperative complications, and evaluated the clinical utility of AACV.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 97 patients (ampullary carcinoma, n = 21; distal bile duct cancer, n = 43; hilar bile duct cancer, n = 33). We assessed the calcification volume of the abdominal aorta from the renal artery ramification to the common iliac artery bifurcation. The correlation between AACV, clinical factors, and postoperative complications was evaluated.

Results

The average AACV was 5.02 cm3, and the median AACV was 3.74 (range 0–27.4) cm3. The AACV was significantly related to age (P = 0.009), Brinkman index (P = 0.007), and history of cardiovascular disease (P = 0.015). The AACV was strongly correlated with postoperative complications (P < 0.001) and Clavien–Dindo grade > III postoperative complications (P < 0.001). The AACV was also correlated with pancreatic fistula in pancreatectomy cases (P < 0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that the AACV was an independent predictor of postoperative complications.

Conclusion

The AACV was significantly associated with postoperative complications. The AACV could be used for the preoperative assessment of surgical risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Zamani Z, Fatima S. Biliary tract cancer. Treasure Island: StatPearls; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pellino A, Loupakis F, Cadamuro M, Dadduzio V, Fassan M, Guido M, et al. Precision medicine in cholangiocarcinoma. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:40. https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2018.07.02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasegawa S, Ikai I, Fujii H, Hatano E, Shimahara Y. Surgical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of survival and postoperative complications. World J Surg. 2007;31:1256–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9001-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen HC, Wang WT, Hsi CN, Chou CY, Lin HJ, Huang CC, et al. Abdominal aortic calcification score can predict future coronary artery disease in hemodialysis patients: a 5-year prospective cohort study. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:313. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-1124-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Imaoka Y, Ohira M, Nakano R, Shimizu S, Kuroda S, Tahara H, et al. Impact of abdominal aortic calcification among liver transplantation recipients. Liver Transpl. 2019;25:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Szulc P, Amri EZ, Varennes A, Panaia-Ferrari P, Fontas E, Goudable J, et al. Positive association of high leptin level and abdominal aortic calcification in men- the prospective MINOS study. Circ J. 2018;82:2954–61. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodondi N, Taylor BC, Bauer DC, Lui LY, Vogt MT, Fink HA, et al. Association between aortic calcification and total and cardiovascular mortality in older women. J Intern Med. 2007;261:238–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01769.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Szulc P. Abdominal aortic calcification: a reappraisal of epidemiological and pathophysiological data. Bone. 2016;84:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2015.12.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Szulc P, Blackwell T, Schousboe JT, Bauer DC, Cawthon P, Lane NE, et al. High hip fracture risk in men with severe aortic calcification: MrOS study. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:968–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Szulc P. Vascular calcification and fracture risk. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2015;12:139–41. https://doi.org/10.11138/ccmbm/2015.12.2.139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. de Bie MK, Buiten MS, Rotmans JI, Hogenbirk M, Schalij MJ, Rabelink TJ, et al. Abdominal aortic calcification on a plain X-ray and the relation with significant coronary artery disease in asymptomatic chronic dialysis patients. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18:82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0480-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kakizawa N, Noda H, Watanabe F, Ichida K, Suzuki K, Rikiyama T. A high abdominal aortic calcification score on CT is a risk factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula in elderly patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2018;42:1129–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4240-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shen Z, An Y, Shi Y, Yin M, Xie Q, Gao Z, et al. The Aortic Calcification Index is a risk factor associated with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2019;21:1397–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14795.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyata T, Yamashita YI, Yamao T, Umezaki N, Tsukamoto M, Kitano Y, et al. Prognostic impacts of postoperative complications in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative operations. Int J Clin Oncol. 2017;22:526–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1099-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumamoto Y, Kaizu T, Tajima H, Nishizawa N, Ei S, Igarashi K, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of postoperative morbidity in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma. Mol Clin Oncol. 2018;9:362–8. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2018.1698.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Su CH, Tsay SH, Wu CC, Shyr YM, King KL, Lee CH, et al. Factors influencing postoperative morbidity, mortality, and survival after resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 1996;223:384–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199604000-00007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayashi K, Yokoyama Y, Nakajima H, Nagino M, Inoue T, Nagaya M, et al. Preoperative 6-minute walk distance accurately predicts postoperative complications after operations for hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer. Surgery. 2017;161:525–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukushi K, Hatakeyama S, Yamamoto H, Tobisawa Y, Yoneyama T, Soma O, et al. Aortic calcification burden predicts deterioration of renal function after radical nephrectomy. BMC Urol. 2017;17:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0202-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Harbaugh CM, Terjimanian MN, Lee JS, Alawieh AZ, Kowalsky DB, Tishberg LM, et al. Abdominal aortic calcification and surgical outcomes in patients with no known cardiovascular risk factors. Ann Surg. 2013;257:774–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826ddd5f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eveno C, Latrasse V, Gayat É, Lo Dico R, Dohan A, Pocard M. Colorectal anastomotic leakage can be predicted by abdominal aortic calcification on preoperative CT scans: a pilot study. J Visc Surg. 2016;153:253–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.03.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Borggreve AS, Goense L, van Rossum PSN, van Hillegersberg R, de Jong PA, Ruurda JP. Generalized cardiovascular disease on a preoperative CT scan is predictive for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:587–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hickler RB. Aortic and large artery stiffness: Current methodology and clinical correlations. Clin Cardiol. 1990;13:317–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960130504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr. Junya Fukuda for his excellent assistance.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norifumi Harimoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study.

Approval of research protocol

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Gunma University (Approval No. HS 2021-119).

Informed consent

The requirement to obtain informed consent was satisfied through an opt-out method.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (TIF 1003 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watanabe, A., Harimoto, N., Araki, K. et al. Abdominal aortic calcification volume (AACV) is a predictive factor for postoperative complications associated with biliary tract cancer. Surg Today 53, 207–213 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-022-02621-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-022-02621-5

Keywords

Navigation