Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of early tumor shrinkage on conversion surgery and the survival in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposes

Owing to recent advances in induction chemo(radio)therapy, patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (UR-LA PDAC) are sometimes indicated for conversion surgery (CS). However, the predictors for proceeding to CS are unclear. We investigated the predictive factors for CS, especially at the early stage of induction therapy, and evaluated the impact of CS on the survival.

Methods

We analyzed 49 UR-LA PDAC patients retrospectively and investigated the predictive factors for proceeding to CS, including early tumor shrinkage (ETS). ETS in this study was defined as shrinkage of tumors by ≥ 15% at 8–12 weeks after the induction of treatment.

Results

CS was performed in 21 patients (43%). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, ETS was an independent predictive factor for successfully proceeding to CS (P = 0.046). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in the CS group but was 17.2 months in the non-CS group (P < 0.0001). A multivariate analysis by the Cox proportional hazard model identified CS as the only significant independent determinant of the OS (hazard ratio: 0.26, 95% confidence interval: 0.07–0.94, P = 0.004).

Conclusions

ETS by induction therapy is a significant predictor of proceeding to CS among patients with UR-LA PDAC. CS was the only independent prognostic factor for this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;66:394–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heestand GM, Murphy JD, Lowy AM. Approach to patients with pancreatic cancer without detectable metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1770–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mukherjee S, Hurt CN, Bridgewater J, Bridgewater J, Falk S, Cummins S, et al. Gemcitabine-based or capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (SCALOP): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:317–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hammel P, Huguet F, Van Laethem JL, Goldstein D, Glimelius B, Artru P, et al. Effect of chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer controlled after 4 months of gemcitabine with or without erlotinib: the LAP07 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315:1844–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamada S, Fujii T, Takami H, Hayashi M, Iwata N, Kanda M, et al. Evaluation and proposal of novel resectability criteria for pancreatic cancer established by the Japan Pancreatic Society. Surgery. 2017;162:784–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouam Y, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1691–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamada S, Fujii T, Yokoyama Y, Kawashima H, Maeda O, Suzuki K, et al. Phase I study of chemoradiotherapy using gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018;81:815–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Suker M, Berend BR, Sadot E, Marthey L, Faris JE, Mellon EA, et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:801–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rombouts SJ, Walma MS, Vogel JA, van Rijssen LB, Wilmink JW, Mohammad NH, et al. Systematic review of resection and clinical outcomes after FOLFIRINOX-based treatment in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:4352–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Modest DP, Giessen-Jung C, Michl M, Mansmann UR. Early tumour shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:1927–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, Lonardi S, Masi G, Salvatore L, et al. Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: results from phase III TRIBE trial by the Gruppo Oncologico del Nord Ovest. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1188–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Piessevaux H, Buyse M, Schlichting M, Van Cutsem E, Bokemeyer C, Heeger S, et al. Use of early tumor shrinkage to predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3764–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaga Y, Sunakawa Y, Kubota Y, Tagawa T, Yamamoto T, Ikusue T, et al. Early tumor shrinkage as a predictor of favorable outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX. Oncotarget. 2016;7:67314–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. NCCN Guidelines® and Clinical Resources (2017) Updates to the NCCN Guidelines. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/development.aspx. Accessed 1 Sep 2019

  16. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0. https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06. 1 Sep 2019

  18. Yoshitomi H, Takano S, Furukawa K, Takayashiki T, Kuboki S, Ohtsuka M. Conversion surgery for initially unresectable pancreatic cancer: current status and unresolved issues. Surg Today. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01804-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aldakkak M, Christians KK, Krepline AN, George B, Ritch PS, Erickson BA, et al. Pre-treatment carbohydrate antigen 19–9 does not predict the response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17:942–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reni M, Zanon S, Balzano G, Nobile S, Pircher CC, Chiaravalli M, et al. Selecting patients for resection after primary chemotherapy for non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:2786–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Akita H, Takahashi H, Ohigashi H, Tomokuni A, Kobayashi S, Sugimura K, et al. FDG-PET predicts treatment efficacy and surgical outcome of pre-operative chemoradiation therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:1061–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Malinda I, Terence CC, Jennifer A, Anigel BJ, Christopher BN, Rahel LO, et al. Evaluation of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning in the neoadjuvant therapy paradigm in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2020;49:224–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Savio GB, Benjamin L, John AW, Sanjay P. Detecting tumor response and predicting resectability after neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. ANJ J Surg. 2019;89:481–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rivera F, Karthaus M, Hecht JR, Sevilla I, Forget F, Fasola G, et al. Final analysis of the randomized PEAK trial: overall survival and tumor responses during first-line treatment with mFOLFOX6 plus either panitumumab or bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32:1179–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taieb J, Rivera F, Siena S, Karthaus M, Valladares-Ayerbes M, Gallego J, et al. Exploratory analyses assessing the impact of early tumor shrinkage and depth of response on survival outcomes in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving treatment in three randomized panitumumab trials. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144:321–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Osumi H, Takahari D, Shinozaki E, Chin K, Ogura M, Wakatsuki T, et al. Associations between early tumor shrinkage and depth of response and clinical outcomes in patients treated with 1st-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:267–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grünwald V, Dietrich M, Pond GR. Early tumor shrinkage is independently associated with improved overall survival among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a validation study using the COMPARZ cohort. World J Urol. 2018;36:1423–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ueda K, Suekane S, Nishihara K, Suekane H, Ogasawara N, Kurose H, et al. Early primary renal tumor response predicts slinical outcome in patients with primary unresectable renal cell carcinoma with synchronous distant metastasis receiving molecularly targeted therapies. Mol Clin Oncol. 2017;7:205–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kunzmann V, Ramanathan RK, Goldstein D, Liu D, Ferrara S, Lu B, et al. Tumor reduction in primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer lesions with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine: an exploratory analysis from a phase 3 study. Pancreas. 2017;46:203–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cassinotto C, Cortade J, Belleannee G, Lapuyade B, Terrebonne E, Vendrely V, et al. An evaluation of the accuracy of CT when determining resectability of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant treatment. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:589–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferrone CR, Marchegiani G, Hong TS, Ryan DP, Deshpande V, McDonnell EI, Sabbatino F, et al. Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2015;261:12–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Michelakos T, Pergolini I, Castillo CF, Honselmann KC, Cai L, Deshpande V, Wo JY, et al. Predictors of resectability and survival in patients with borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX. Ann Surg. 2019;269:733–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Takano N, Yamada S, Hirakawa A, Yokoyama Y, Kawashima H, Maeda O, Okada T, et al. Phase II study of chemoradiotherapy combined with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (NUPAT 05 trial): study protocol for single arm phase II study. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2019;81:233–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H. Nikki March, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suguru Yamada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takano, N., Yamada, S., Sonohara, F. et al. The impact of early tumor shrinkage on conversion surgery and the survival in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Surg Today 51, 1099–1107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02220-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02220-2

Keywords

Navigation