Abstract
Purpose
In this retrospective, non-randomized study, we compared the quality of life (QOL) of patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair (LVIHR) with fascial defect closure or non-defect closure and examined the factors associated with the QOL after LVIHR.
Methods
Between February 2013 and 2016, we conducted a single-center, follow-up study of 33 consecutive midline hernia patients who underwent LVIHR. Overall, 14 cases underwent intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM), and 19 underwent IPOM with fascial defect closure (IPOM-plus). Patients were interviewed using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) to assess their pre- and postoperative QOL (at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery). The QOL, as assessed by the SF-36, was compared before and at 1 year after surgery, and the risk factors associated with the QOL were examined.
Results
Overall, scores for 5 of the 8 domains and 1 of the 3 components of SF-36 had improved by 1 year after surgery compared with before surgery. The scores for the SF-36 domains and components at 1 year post-surgery were comparable in patients undergoing IPOM or IPOM-plus. Obesity, operative time, hernia size, and mesh size were factors correlated with the QOL.
Conclusions
LVIHR improved the QOL, regardless of defect closure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
LeBlanc KA, Booth WV. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3:39–41.
Suwa K, Okamoto T, Yanaga K. Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature. Surg Today. 2016;46:764–73.
Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1037–44.
Fukuhara S, Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Wada S, Gandek B. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1045–53.
Franklin ME Jr, Gonzalez JJ Jr, Glass JL, Manjarrez A. Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair: an 11-year experience. Hernia. 2004;8:23–7.
Banerjee A, Beck C, Narula VK, Linn J, Noria S, Zagol B, et al. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: does primary repair in addition to placement of mesh decrease recurrence? Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1264–8.
Rogmark P, Petersson U, Bringman S, Eklund A, Ezra E, Sevonius D, et al. Short-term outcomes for open and laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair: a randomized multicenter controlled trial: the ProLOVE (prospective randomized trial on open versus laparoscopic operation of ventral eventrations) trial. Ann Surg. 2013;258:37–45.
Chelala E, Thoma M, Tatete B, Lemye AC, Dessily M, Alle JL. The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernia repair: mid-term analysis of 400 cases. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:391–5.
Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, Fabian M, Ferzli GS, Fortelny RH, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS])—part 2. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:353–79.
Earle D, Roth JS, Saber A, Haggerty S, Bradley JF, Fanelli R, et al. SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:3163–83.
Clapp ML, Hicks SC, Awad SS, Liang MK. Trans-cutaneous closure of central defects (TCCD) in laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs (LVHR). World J Surg. 2013;37:42–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saijo, F., Tokumura, H., Narushima, Y. et al. The quality of life after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with closure and non-closure of fascial defect. Surg Today 49, 942–947 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01834-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01834-5