Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of a vacuum-assisted closure system for the management of enteroatmospheric fistulae

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to analyze the management of enteroatmospheric fistulae (EAF) in an open abdomen using vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy.

Methods

Eighteen patients (ten male/eight female) were treated in our surgical department for the management of EAF. VAC therapy was used to manage both complex and open abdominal wounds and for effluent control in all patients except one until definitive surgery could be performed or spontaneous closure of the EAF occurred.

Results

The median age of the patients was 61.1 years (range 29–84 years). Their average hospital stay was 88.89 days (range 22–129 days). The median number of VAC applications was 22.5, and the median duration of VAC applications was 43.6 days (range 14–114 days). Non-surgical spontaneous closure of the fistulae with negative pressure wound therapy could be achieved in four patients. In the other six patients, after the EAF were controlled with VAC therapy, definitive surgery was performed. Primary fascial repair was performed in two patients, and the component separation technique was synchronously performed in another two patients. Ventral hernia repair using polypropylene mesh was performed in a patient 1 year after discharge from the hospital. One patient was discharged with skin grafting plus ileostomy after the EAF was managed with VAC therapy. Eight patients (44.4 %) died due to intraabdominal infections and sepsis, which could not be controlled despite all precautions. No VAC-related complications were observed in this study.

Conclusion

A VAC system can be successfully used for wound management in the control of fistula effluent in patients with an EAF in an open abdomen until spontaneous fistula closure occurs or definitive fistula surgery can be performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marinis A, Gkiokas G, Argyra E, Fragulidis G, Polymeneas G, Voros D. “Enteroatmospheric fistulae”—gastrointestinal openings in the open abdomen: a review and recent proposal of a surgical technique. Scand J Surg. 2013;102:61–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Verhaalen A, Walkins B, Brasel K. Technique sand cost effectiveness of enteroatmospheric fistula isolation. Wounds. 2010;22:212–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. D’Hondt M, Devriendt D, Van Rooy F, Vansteenkiste F, D’Hoore A, Penninckx F, et al. Treatment of small-bowel fistulae in the open abdomen with topical negative-pressure therapy. Am J Surg. 2011;202:20–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Evenson RA, Fischer JE. Treatment of enteric fistulae in the open abdomen. Chirurg. 2006;77:594–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramsay PT, Mejia VA. Management of enteroatmospheric fistulae in the open abdomen. Am Surg. 2010;76:637–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Layton B, Dubose J, Nichols S, Connaughton J, Jones T, Pratt J. Pacifying the open abdomen with concomitant intestinal fistula: a novel approach. Am J Surg. 2010;199:48–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Becker HP, Willms A, Schwab R. Small bowel fistulas and the open abdomen. Scand J Surg. 2007;96:263–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schecter WP. Management of enterocutaneous fistulas. Surg Clin North Am. 2011;91:481–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marinis A, Gkiokas G, Anastasopoulos G, Fragulidis G, Theodosopoulos T, Kotsis T, et al. Surgical techniques for the management of enteroatmospheric fistulae. Surg Infect. 2009;10:47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cipolla J, Baillie DR, Steinberg SM, Martin ND, Jaik NP, Lukaszczyk JJ, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy: unusual and innovative applications. OPUS 12 Sci. 2008;2:15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kearney R, Payne W, Rosemurgy A. Extra-abdominal closure of enterocutaneous fistula. Am Surg. 1997;63:406–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schrag SP, Sharma R, Jaik NP, Seamon MJ, Lukaszczyk JJ, Martin ND, et al. Complications related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. A comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2007;16:407–18.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Girard S, Sideman M, Spain D. A novel approach to the problem of intestinal fistulization arising in patients managed with open peritoneal cavities. Am J Surg. 2002;184:166–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Subramaniam MH, Liscum KR, Hirshberg A. The floating stoma: a new technique for controlling exposed fistulae in abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 2002;53:386–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goverman J, Yelon JA, Platz JJ, Singson RC, Turcinovic M. The, “Fistula VAC”, a technique for management of enterocutaneous fistulae arising within the open abdomen: report of 5 cases. J Trauma. 2006;60:428–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kubiak BD, Albert SP, Gatto LA, Snyder KP, Maier KG, Vieau CJ, et al. Peritoneal negative pressure therapy prevents multiple organ injury in a chronic porcine sepsis and ischemia/reperfusion model. Shock. 2010;34:525–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobs S, Simhaee DA, Marsano A, Fomovsky GM, Niedt G, Wu JK. Efficacy and mechanisms of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy in promoting wound healing: a rodent model. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:1331–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheatham ML, Demetriades D, Fabian TC, Kaplan MJ, Miles WS, Schreiber MA, et al. Prospective study examining clinical outcomes associated with a negative pressure wound therapy system and Barker’s vacuum packing technique. World J Surg. 2013;37:2018–30.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DiSaverio S, Villani S, Biscardi A, Giorgini E, Tugnoli G. Open abdomen with concomitant enteroatmospheric fistula: validation, refinements, and adjuncts to a novel approach. J Trauma. 2011;71:760–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aguila DJ, Hui-Chou HG, Lifchez SD. The stool shield: a novel approach to the colo-atmospheric fistula. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:17–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pang TC, Morton J, Pincott S. Novel technique for isolating and dressing enteroatmospheric fistulae. ANZ J Surg. 2012;82:747–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. González-Pinto I, González EM. Optimising the treatment of upper gastrointestinal fistulae. Gut. 2001;49:22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pretorius JP, Liebenberg C, Piek D, Smith M. The open abdomen part 3: management of the grade 3 open abdomen with entero-atmospheric fistulae. Wound Heal South Afr. 2011;4:94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Llyod DA, Gabe SM, Windsor AC. Nutrition and management of enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1045–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Demetriades D. Total management of the open abdomen. Int Wound J. 2012;9:17–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erdinc Kamer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tavusbay, C., Genc, H., Cin, N. et al. Use of a vacuum-assisted closure system for the management of enteroatmospheric fistulae. Surg Today 45, 1102–1111 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-1020-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-1020-3

Keywords

Navigation