Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the health-related quality of life for patients following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the standard procedure, and contributes to a shorter hospital stay. However, there have been no reports regarding when the patients can be discharged in terms of their health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Methods

The HRQOL was evaluated by using the SF-8 health survey (SF-8) 24-hour version in 127 consecutive patients treated from May 2007 to December 2008. The HRQOL and a visual analogue scale (VAS) score were assessed on the day before surgery and on postoperative day (POD) 1, POD2 and POD7.

Results

All scores of the eight domains on POD1 were significantly decreased compared to the preoperative score (P < 0.05), and seven scores were still decreased on POD2, with the mental health (MH) domain showing an improvement. On POD7, the general health score improved to the preoperative level. The physical component summary 8 (PCS-8) was suppressed for all 7 days after LC. The mental health component summary 8 (MCS-8) was improved to the preoperative level on POD2, despite the significant suppression observed on POD1 (P < 0.05). The VAS score was higher in the low PCS-8 (PCS-8 < 42.4) and low MCS-8 (MCS-8 < 40.6) patients than in the high PCS-8 and high MCS-8 patients.

Conclusion

The HRQOL score demonstrated the improvement of the MCS-8 on POD2, which might suggest that a discharge of LC patients is appropriate on POD2 in terms of the patients’ point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Uchiyama K, Kawai M, Onishi H, Tani M, Kinoshita H, Ueno M, et al. Preoperative antimicrobial administration for prevention of postoperative infection in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48:1955–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M, Kinoshita H, Ueno M, Yamaue H. Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with cholecystolithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:346–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Uchiyama K, Tani M, Kawai M, Ueno M, Hama T, Yamaue H. Preoperative evaluation of the extrahepatic bile duct structure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1119–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Uchiyama K, Tani M, Kawai M, Terasawa H, Hama T, Yamaue H. Clinical significance of drainage tube insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14:551–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Baxter JN, Ross S, Anderson JR, Morran CG, et al. Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1994;343:135–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barkun JS, Barkun AN, Sampalis JS, Fried G, Taylor B, Wexler MJ, et al. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Lancet. 1992;340:1116–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wills VL, Hunt DR. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2000;87:273–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Uchiyama K, Takifuji K, Tani M, Onishi H, Yamaue H. Effectiveness of the clinical pathway to decrease length of stay and cost for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1594–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Psaila J, Agrawal S, Fountain U, Whitfield T, Murgatroyd B, Dunsire MF, et al. Day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy: factors influencing same-day discharge. World J Surg. 2008;32:76–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harju J, Kokki H, Paakkonen M, Karjalainen K, Eskelinen M. Feasibility of minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for day surgery: a prospective randomised study. Scand J Surg. 2010;99:132–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marinis A, Stamatakis E, Tsaroucha A, Dafnios N, Anastasopoulos G, Polymeneas G, et al. Safety and effectiveness of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a teaching hospital: a prospective study of 110 consecutive patients. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:207.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fukuhara S, Suzukamo Y. Manual of the SF-8 Japanese version. Kyoto; 2004.

  13. Turner-Bowker DM, Bayliss MS, Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M. Usefulness of the SF-8 Health Survey for comparing the impact of migraine and other conditions. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:1003–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Suzukamo Y, Oshika T, Yuzawa M, Tokuda Y, Tomidokoro A, Oki K, et al. Psychometric properties of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), Japanese version. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:65.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H, Nordgren CE, Thorell A, Wallin G, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Ann Surg. 2001;234:741–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Petersen MA, Larsen H, Pedersen L, Sonne N, Groenvold M. Assessing health-related quality of life in palliative care: comparing patient and physician assessments. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:1159–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimozuma K, Ohashi Y, Takeuchi A, Aranishi T, Morita S, Kuroi K, et al. Taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy and health-related quality of life in postoperative breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy: N-SAS BC 02, a randomized clinical trial. Support Care Cancer. 2009;20:3355–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu SS, Wu CL. The effect of analgesic technique on postoperative patient-reported outcomes including analgesia: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:789–808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abd Ellatif ME, Askar WA, Abbas AE, Noaman N, Negm A, El-Morsy G, et al. Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1896–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

No financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki Yamaue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tani, M., Kawai, M., Okada, Ki. et al. Evaluation of the health-related quality of life for patients following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Today 45, 564–568 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0938-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0938-9

Keywords

Navigation