Abstract
Aims
A better understanding of the current features of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)-related interventional clinical trials is important for improving clinical trial designs and identifying neglected research areas. Therefore, this study aimed to comprehensively assess T1DM-related interventional clinical trials registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database.
Methods
In this cross-sectional study, T1DM-related clinical trials registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database were searched on July 1, 2020. The characteristics of the relevant trials were assessed. PubMed and Google Scholar were used to search for publication statuses of primary completed studies.
Results
Overall, 1,421 T1DM-related interventional clinical trials were identified for analysis. Of those trials, 509 (35.8%) involved children and 912 (64.2%) involved only adults. Overall, 63.2% of trials enrolled < 50 participants and 61.9% were registered after patient recruitment. Most trials were single-centered (66.0%). The proportions of trials with children were higher than those with only adults with respect to the primary purpose of health service or prevention (13.6% vs. 4.8%), intervention of device (30.8% vs. 23.9%), education or lifestyle (28.9% vs. 11.3%), and dietary supplement (5.7% vs. 2.5%) (all P < 0.01). Only 24.0% of trials had available results after primary completion. The 5-year cumulative publication rate after primary trial completion was < 40%.
Conclusions
T1DM-related interventional clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov were dominated by small single-center studies. Most trials lacked the availability of results and their respective publications. Large multicenter interventional clinical trials on T1DM are needed, and more attention should be paid to improve the publication and dissemination of clinical trials results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Diaz-Valencia PA, Bougneres P, Valleron AJ (2015) Global epidemiology of type 1 diabetes in young adults and adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 15:255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1591-y
DIAMOND Project Group (2006) Incidence and trends of childhood Type 1 diabetes worldwide 1990–1999. Diabet Med 23(8):857–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01925.x
Atkinson MA, Eisenbarth GS, Michels AW (2014) Type 1 diabetes. Lancet 383(9911):69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60591-7
Sussman M, Benner J, Haller MJ, Rewers M, Griffiths R (2020) Estimated lifetime economic burden of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 22(2):121–130. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0398
Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM et al (2019) State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016–2018. Diabetes Technol Ther 21(2):66–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2018.0384
American Diabetes Association (2019) Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care 42((Suppl 1)):S61–S70. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S006
Chung WK, Erion K, Florez JC et al (2020) Precision medicine in diabetes: a consensus report from the American diabetes association (ADA) and the European association for the study of diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 43(7):1617–1635. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci20-0022
McGlone P, Watt R, Sheiham A (2001) Evidence-based dentistry: an overview of the challenges in changing professional practice. Br Dent J 190(12):636–639. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801062
De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA et al (2004) Clinical trial registration: a statement from the international committee of medical journal editors. N Engl J Med 351(12):1250–1251. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe048225
Hartung DM, Zarin DA, Guise JM, McDonagh M, Paynter R, Helfand M (2014a) Reporting discrepancies between the ClinicalTrials.gov results database and peer-reviewed publications. Ann Intern Med 160(7):477–83. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-0480
Zwierzyna M, Davies M, Hingorani AD, Hunter J (2018) Clinical trial design and dissemination: comprehensive analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed data since 2005. BMJ 361:k2130. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2130
Anderson ML, Chiswell K, Peterson ED, Tasneem A, Topping J, Califf RM (2015) Compliance with results reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov. N Engl J Med 372(11):1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1409364
Lachin JM, McGee PL, Greenbaum CJ et al (2011) Sample size requirements for studies of treatment effects on beta-cell function in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. PLoS One 6(11):e26471. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026471
Chaturvedi N, Fuller JH (1996) Effect of intensive treatment in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus with microalbuminuria. Sample size was too small. BMJ 312(7025):253–254. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7025.253a
Yusuf S, Collins R, Peto R (1984) Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials? Stat Med 3(4):409–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780030421
Zhai X, Wang Y, Mu Q et al (2015) Methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in 3 leading diabetes journals from 2011 to 2013 following CONSORT statement: a system review. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(27):e1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001083
Moher D, Pham B, Jones A et al (1998) Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352(9128):609–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01085-X
Gohari F, Baradaran HR, Tabatabaee M et al (2015) Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetes in Iran; a systematic review. J Diabetes Metab Disord 15(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40200-016-0258-2
Feys F, Bekkering GE, Singh K, Devroey D (2014) Do randomized clinical trials with inadequate blinding report enhanced placebo effects for intervention groups and nocebo effects for placebo groups? Syst Rev 3:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-14
Leykum LK, Pugh JA, Lanham HJ, Harmon J, McDaniel RJ (2009) Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials. Implement Sci 4:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-69
Ross JS, Tse T, Zarin DA, Xu H, Zhou L, Krumholz HM (2012) Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov cross sectional analysis. BMJ 344:d7292. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7292
Ross JS, Mulvey GK, Hines EM, Nissen SE, Krumholz HM (2009) Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross sectional analysis. PLoS Med. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000144
Hartung DM, Zarin DA, Guise JM, McDonagh M, Paynter R, Helfand M (2014b) Reporting discrepancies between the ClinicalTrials. gov results database and peer-reviewed publications. Ann Intern Med 160(7):477–783. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-0480
Chalmers I, Glasziou P (2009) Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 374(9683):86–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9
Decullier E, Lheritier V, Chapuis F (2005) Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 331(7507):19. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38488.385995.8F
Blumenthal D, Campbell EG, Anderson MS, Causino N, Louis KS (1997) Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. JAMA 277(15):1224–1228
Lowes L (2008) Managing type 1 diabetes in childhood and adolescence. Nurs Stand 22(44):50–56. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2008.07.22.44.50.c6589
Streisand R, Monaghan M (2014) Young children with type 1 diabetes: challenges, research, and future directions. Curr Diab Rep 14(9):520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-014-0520-2
Rankin D, Harden J, Barnard K et al (2018) Barriers and facilitators to taking on diabetes self-management tasks in pre-adolescent children with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study. BMC Endocr Disord 18(1):71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-018-0302-y
Murphy HR, Rayman G, Skinner TC (2006) Psycho-educational interventions for children and young people with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 23(9):935–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01816.x
Turner JR, Close KL, Fleming GA, Wherrett DK, DiMeglio LA (2015) Alternate approaches for pediatric type 1 diabetes drug development and potential regulatory approval: a perspective. Diabetes Care 38(10):1986–1991. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-2707
Funding
This work was financially supported by the Research Fund of Medical Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (Grant Number: A2020132).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YL and FL designed and supervised the study. JL, RL, and FL collected the data, conducted the data analysis, and wrote the draft manuscript. YL performed critical revision on the manuscript. QZ, GY, ZX, and XC participated in the critical revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version before submission.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Human or animal rights
This work does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.
Informed consent
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Additional information
Managed by Antonio Secchi.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liang, R., Long, J., Zheng, Q. et al. Current landscape of type 1 diabetes mellitus-related interventional clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross-sectional study. Acta Diabetol 58, 723–733 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01627-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01627-0