Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current landscape of type 1 diabetes mellitus-related interventional clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross-sectional study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Diabetologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

A better understanding of the current features of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)-related interventional clinical trials is important for improving clinical trial designs and identifying neglected research areas. Therefore, this study aimed to comprehensively assess T1DM-related interventional clinical trials registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, T1DM-related clinical trials registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database were searched on July 1, 2020. The characteristics of the relevant trials were assessed. PubMed and Google Scholar were used to search for publication statuses of primary completed studies.

Results

Overall, 1,421 T1DM-related interventional clinical trials were identified for analysis. Of those trials, 509 (35.8%) involved children and 912 (64.2%) involved only adults. Overall, 63.2% of trials enrolled < 50 participants and 61.9% were registered after patient recruitment. Most trials were single-centered (66.0%). The proportions of trials with children were higher than those with only adults with respect to the primary purpose of health service or prevention (13.6% vs. 4.8%), intervention of device (30.8% vs. 23.9%), education or lifestyle (28.9% vs. 11.3%), and dietary supplement (5.7% vs. 2.5%) (all P < 0.01). Only 24.0% of trials had available results after primary completion. The 5-year cumulative publication rate after primary trial completion was < 40%.

Conclusions

T1DM-related interventional clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov were dominated by small single-center studies. Most trials lacked the availability of results and their respective publications. Large multicenter interventional clinical trials on T1DM are needed, and more attention should be paid to improve the publication and dissemination of clinical trials results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Diaz-Valencia PA, Bougneres P, Valleron AJ (2015) Global epidemiology of type 1 diabetes in young adults and adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 15:255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1591-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. DIAMOND Project Group (2006) Incidence and trends of childhood Type 1 diabetes worldwide 1990–1999. Diabet Med 23(8):857–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01925.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson MA, Eisenbarth GS, Michels AW (2014) Type 1 diabetes. Lancet 383(9911):69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60591-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sussman M, Benner J, Haller MJ, Rewers M, Griffiths R (2020) Estimated lifetime economic burden of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 22(2):121–130. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM et al (2019) State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016–2018. Diabetes Technol Ther 21(2):66–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2018.0384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. American Diabetes Association (2019) Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care 42((Suppl 1)):S61–S70. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chung WK, Erion K, Florez JC et al (2020) Precision medicine in diabetes: a consensus report from the American diabetes association (ADA) and the European association for the study of diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 43(7):1617–1635. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci20-0022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McGlone P, Watt R, Sheiham A (2001) Evidence-based dentistry: an overview of the challenges in changing professional practice. Br Dent J 190(12):636–639. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA et al (2004) Clinical trial registration: a statement from the international committee of medical journal editors. N Engl J Med 351(12):1250–1251. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe048225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartung DM, Zarin DA, Guise JM, McDonagh M, Paynter R, Helfand M (2014a) Reporting discrepancies between the ClinicalTrials.gov results database and peer-reviewed publications. Ann Intern Med 160(7):477–83. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-0480

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zwierzyna M, Davies M, Hingorani AD, Hunter J (2018) Clinical trial design and dissemination: comprehensive analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed data since 2005. BMJ 361:k2130. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2130

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson ML, Chiswell K, Peterson ED, Tasneem A, Topping J, Califf RM (2015) Compliance with results reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov. N Engl J Med 372(11):1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1409364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lachin JM, McGee PL, Greenbaum CJ et al (2011) Sample size requirements for studies of treatment effects on beta-cell function in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. PLoS One 6(11):e26471. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chaturvedi N, Fuller JH (1996) Effect of intensive treatment in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus with microalbuminuria. Sample size was too small. BMJ 312(7025):253–254. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7025.253a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yusuf S, Collins R, Peto R (1984) Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials? Stat Med 3(4):409–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780030421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhai X, Wang Y, Mu Q et al (2015) Methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in 3 leading diabetes journals from 2011 to 2013 following CONSORT statement: a system review. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(27):e1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A et al (1998) Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352(9128):609–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01085-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gohari F, Baradaran HR, Tabatabaee M et al (2015) Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetes in Iran; a systematic review. J Diabetes Metab Disord 15(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40200-016-0258-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Feys F, Bekkering GE, Singh K, Devroey D (2014) Do randomized clinical trials with inadequate blinding report enhanced placebo effects for intervention groups and nocebo effects for placebo groups? Syst Rev 3:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Leykum LK, Pugh JA, Lanham HJ, Harmon J, McDaniel RJ (2009) Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials. Implement Sci 4:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-69

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ross JS, Tse T, Zarin DA, Xu H, Zhou L, Krumholz HM (2012) Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov cross sectional analysis. BMJ 344:d7292. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7292

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ross JS, Mulvey GK, Hines EM, Nissen SE, Krumholz HM (2009) Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross sectional analysis. PLoS Med. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hartung DM, Zarin DA, Guise JM, McDonagh M, Paynter R, Helfand M (2014b) Reporting discrepancies between the ClinicalTrials. gov results database and peer-reviewed publications. Ann Intern Med 160(7):477–783. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-0480

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chalmers I, Glasziou P (2009) Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 374(9683):86–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Decullier E, Lheritier V, Chapuis F (2005) Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 331(7507):19. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38488.385995.8F

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Blumenthal D, Campbell EG, Anderson MS, Causino N, Louis KS (1997) Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. JAMA 277(15):1224–1228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lowes L (2008) Managing type 1 diabetes in childhood and adolescence. Nurs Stand 22(44):50–56. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2008.07.22.44.50.c6589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Streisand R, Monaghan M (2014) Young children with type 1 diabetes: challenges, research, and future directions. Curr Diab Rep 14(9):520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-014-0520-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rankin D, Harden J, Barnard K et al (2018) Barriers and facilitators to taking on diabetes self-management tasks in pre-adolescent children with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study. BMC Endocr Disord 18(1):71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-018-0302-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Murphy HR, Rayman G, Skinner TC (2006) Psycho-educational interventions for children and young people with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 23(9):935–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01816.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Turner JR, Close KL, Fleming GA, Wherrett DK, DiMeglio LA (2015) Alternate approaches for pediatric type 1 diabetes drug development and potential regulatory approval: a perspective. Diabetes Care 38(10):1986–1991. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-2707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Research Fund of Medical Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (Grant Number: A2020132).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YL and FL designed and supervised the study. JL, RL, and FL collected the data, conducted the data analysis, and wrote the draft manuscript. YL performed critical revision on the manuscript. QZ, GY, ZX, and XC participated in the critical revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version before submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fenghua Lai or Yihao Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Human or animal rights

This work does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Managed by Antonio Secchi.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (TIF 41 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, R., Long, J., Zheng, Q. et al. Current landscape of type 1 diabetes mellitus-related interventional clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross-sectional study. Acta Diabetol 58, 723–733 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01627-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01627-0

Keywords

Navigation