Abstract
Purpose
The clinical and radiological results of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with a severe lumbar sagittal deformity undergoing multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) + posterior spinal fusion (PSF) were compared to patients undergoing three-column osteotomy (3CO).
Methods
We defined severe lumbar sagittal deformity as fulcrum backward bending (FBB) pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) ≧ 20 degrees. A total of twenty-five patients with an ASD were enrolled between 2013 and 2018. Fifteen patients were in the LLIF + PSF group, and ten patients were in the 3CO group. We evaluated patient demographics, clinical outcomes, and radiographic parameters such as the Cobb angle and spinopelvic parameters from standing X-ray films in each group.
Results
The LLIF + PSF group had a significantly shorter follow-up time than the 3CO group. Postoperatively, the LLIF + PSF group had significantly lower PI-LL and a shorter sagittal vertical axis than the 3CO group. Postoperative PI-LL changes in the LLIF + PSF group were significantly smaller than those in the 3CO group. There were no differences in other patient demographics, radiographic parameters, or clinical outcomes between the groups.
Conclusion
Multilevel LLIF + PSF improved the PI-LL and SVA more than did 3CO for ASD patients with severe lumbar sagittal deformity. This indicated that the multilevel LLIF with open PSF can provide good clinical outcomes even in cases with severe lumbar sagittal deformity such as large FBB PI-LL in which 3CO techniques usually are needed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets acquired and analysed in this study will be disclosed by the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Reference
Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR et al (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 30(18):2024-2029
Pateder DB, Kebaish KM, Cascio BM et al (2007) Posterior only versus combined anterior and posterior approaches to lumbar scoliosis in adults: a radiographic analysis. Spine 32(14):1551–1554
Crandall DG, Revella J (2009) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine 34(20):2126-2133
Matsumura A, Namikawa T, Kato M et al (2017) Posterior corrective surgery with a multilevel transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and a rod rotation maneuver for patients with degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 26(2):150–7
Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Kineberg E et al (2017) Complication rates associated with 3-column osteotomy in 82 adult spinal deformity patients: retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter consecutive series with 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 27(4):444–57
Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L et al (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6(4):435–43
Sembrano JN, Tohmeh AG, Isaacs RE et al (2016) Two-year comparative outcomes of MIS lateral and MIS transforaminal interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis Part1 Clinical findings. Spine 41(8):123–132
Isaacs RE, Sembrano JN, Tohmeh AG et al (2016) Two-year comparative outcomes of MIS lateral and MIS transforaminal interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Part2 Radiographic findings. Spine 41(8):133–144
Strom RG, Bae J, Mizutani J et al (2016) Lateral interbody fusion combined with open posterior surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 25(6):697–705
Park HY, Ha KY, Kim YH et al (2018) Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity: clinical and radiological efficacy with minimum two years follow-up. Spine 43(14): E813–21
Lee KY, Lee JH, Kang KC et al (2019) Minimally invasive multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion with posterior column osteotomy compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy for adult spinal deformity. Spine J. 20(6):925–33
Cho KJ, Sul SI, Park SR et al (2013) Selection of proximal fusion level for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22(2):394–401
Cheung KM, Luk KD (1997) Prediction of correction of scoliosis with use of the fulcrum bending radiograph. J Bone Joint Surg AM 79(8):1144–50
Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E et al (2014) The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification. Neurosurgery 74(1):112–20
Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM, Moazzaz P et al (2014) Anterior column realignment (ACR) for focal kyphotic spinal deformity using a lateral transpsoas approach and ALL release. J Spinal Disord Tech 27(1):29–39
Lafage V, Schwab F, Vira S et al (2011) Does vertebral level of pedicle subtraction osteotomy correlate with degree of spinopelvic parameter correction? J Neurosurg Spine 14(2):184–91
Schwab F, Patel A, Shaffrey C et al (2012) Sagittal realignment failures following pedicle subtraction osteotomy surgery: are we doing enough? J Neurosurg Spine 16(6):539–46
Acknowledgement
IRB Approval: No. 2020007, Institutional review board of Seirei Sakura Citizen Hospital.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Tsuyoshi Sakuma wrote and prepared the manuscript, and all of the authors participated in the study design. All authors have read, reviewed, and approved the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained by all participants in this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sakuma, T., Kotani, T., Akazawa, T. et al. Efficacy of lateral lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior spinal fusion compared with three-column osteotomy for adult spinal deformity with severe lumbar sagittal deformity.. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 32, 973–979 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03068-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03068-z