Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The utilization of intraoperative contralateral ankle images for syndesmotic reduction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the variability in ankle syndesmotic morphology on contralateral ankle fluoroscopic images and the reductions obtained utilizing these images.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed at a level one trauma center including 46 adult patients undergoing operative fixation of malleolar ankle fractures that also had anteroposterior (AP) and lateral fluoroscopic images of the uninjured contralateral ankle intraoperatively. Contralateral and post-fixation fluoroscopic images were used to measure the tibiofibular clear space (TFCS) as a proportion of the superior clear space (SCS) on mortise images and the posterior tibiofibular distance (PTFD) as a proportion of the lateral superior clear space (LSCS) on lateral images. Differences between contralateral and post-fixation ankle measurements were compared between those patients with syndesmotic injuries and those without (control group).

Results

The mean TFCS/SCS and PTFD/LSCS ratios measured on contralateral ankle images were 1.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 1.3; range 0.7 to 1.8) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 2; range 0.5 to 3.4). The mean difference between the contralateral and post-fixation TFCS/SCS and PTFD/LSCS in patients with and without syndesmotic fixation was 0.07 vs. 0.13 (F-ratio 0.3, p = 0.5) and −0.2 vs 0.5 (F ratio 5.2,  p= 0.02).

Conclusions

Contralateral syndesmotic measurements varied widely and the utilization of these images allowed for syndesmotic reductions with similar measurements. Intraoperative contralateral ankle images should be considered to assess syndesmotic reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartoníček J (2003) Anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and its clinical relevance. Surg Radiol Anat 25:379–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-003-0156-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hermans JJ, Beumer A, De Jong TAW, Kleinrensink GJ (2010) Anatomy of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in adults: a pictorial essay with a multimodality approach. J Anat 217:633–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01302.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mukhopadhyay S, Metcalfe A, Guha AR et al (2011) Malreduction of syndesmosis—are we considering the anatomical variation? Injury 42:1073–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ostrum RF, de Meo P, Subramanian R (1995) A critical analysis of the anterior-posterior radiographic anatomy of the ankle syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 16:128–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079501600304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nault ML, Marien M, Hébert-Davies J et al (2017) MRI quantification of the impact of ankle position on syndesmosis anatomy. Foot Ankle Int 38:215–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100716674309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu GT, Ryan E, Gustafson E et al (2018) Three-dimensional computed tomographic characterization of normal anatomic morphology and variations of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Foot Ankle Surg 57:1130–1136. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2018.05.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cherney SM, Spraggs-Hughes AG, McAndrew CM et al (2016) Incisura morphology as a risk factor for syndesmotic malreduction. Foot Ankle Int 37:748–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100716637709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tonogai I, Hamada D, Sairyo K (2017) Morphology of the incisura fibularis at the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in the Japanese population. J Foot Ankle Surg 56:1147–1150. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shah AS, Kadakia AR, Tan GJ et al (2012) Radiographic evaluation of the normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 33:870–876. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2012.0870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersen MR, Diep LM, Frihagen F et al (2019) Importance of syndesmotic reduction on clinical outcome after syndesmosis injuries. J Orthop Trauma 33:397–403. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Naqvi GA, Cunningham P, Lynch B et al (2012) Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. Am J Sports Med 40:2828–2835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512461480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Warner SJ, Fabricant PD, Garner MR et al (2014) The measurement and clinical importance of syndesmotic reduction after operative fixation of rotational ankle fractures. J Bone Jt Surg - Am 97:1935–1944. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.O.00016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koenig SJ, Tornetta P, Merlin G et al (2015) Can we tell if the syndesmosis is reduced using fluoroscopy? J Orthop Trauma 29:e326–e330. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dikos GD, Heisler J, Choplin RH, Weber TG (2012) Normal tibiofibular relationships at the syndesmosis on axial CT imaging. J Orthop Trauma 26:433–438. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182535f30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Summers HD, Sinclair MK, Stover MD (2013) A reliable method for intraoperative evaluation of syndesmotic reduction. J Orthop Trauma 27:196–200. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182694766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schreiber JJ, McLawhorn AS, Dy CJ, Goldwyn EM (2013) Intraoperative contralateral view for assessing accurate syndesmosis reduction. Orthopedics 36:360–361. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20130426-03

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Coles CP, Tornetta P, Obremskey WT et al (2019) Ankle fractures: An expert survey of orthopaedic trauma association members and evidence-based treatment recommendations. J Orthop Trauma 33:e318–e324. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS et al (2018) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma 32(Suppl 1):S1–S170. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Davidovitch RI, Weil Y, Karia R et al (2013) Intraoperative syndesmotic reduction: three-dimensional versus standard fluoroscopic imaging. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A 95:1838–1843. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hsu AR, Gross CE, Lee S (2013) Intraoperative o-Arm computed tomography evaluation of syndesmotic reduction: case report. Foot Ankle Int 34:753–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100712468872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pneumaticos SG, Noble PC, Chatziioannou SN, Trevino SG (2002) The effects of rotation on radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 23:107–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070202300205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cha SW, Bae KJ, Chai JW et al (2019) Reliable measurements of physiologic ankle syndesmosis widening using dynamic 3d ultrasonography: a preliminary study. Ultrasonography 38:236–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua A. Parry.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

The institutional review board approved this study. Due to the retrospective nature of this work, informed consent was waived.

Declarations of Interest

None of the authors have financial conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this study.

Source of Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chu, X., Salameh, M., Byun, SE. et al. The utilization of intraoperative contralateral ankle images for syndesmotic reduction. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 32, 347–351 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02984-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02984-4

Keywords

Navigation